IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/c/pdi169.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Franz Dietrich

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Dietrich, Franz & Spiekermann, Kai, 2024. "Deliberation and the wisdom of crowds," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 123889, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Cited by:

    1. Chaim Fershtman & Uzi Segal, 2024. "Social influence in committee deliberation," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 96(2), pages 185-207, March.

  2. Franz Dietrich, 2022. "Categorical versus graded beliefs," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-03500542, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Minkyung Wang, 2024. "Aggregating individual credences into collective binary beliefs: an impossibility result," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 97(1), pages 39-66, August.

  3. Franz Dietrich & Antonios Staras & Robert Sugden, 2021. "Savage’s response to Allais as Broomean reasoning," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-03261452, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Baccelli, Jean & Hartmann, Lorenz, 2023. "The Sure-Thing Principle," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Steven J. Humphrey & Nadia-Yasmine Kruse, 2024. "Who accepts Savage’s axiom now?," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 1-17, February.

  4. Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann, 2021. "Social Epistemology," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-02431971, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Huihui Ding & Marcus Pivato, 2021. "Deliberation and epistemic democracy," Post-Print hal-03637874, HAL.

  5. Franz Dietrich, 2021. "Fully Bayesian Aggregation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-03194928, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Brandl, Florian, 2021. "Belief-averaging and relative utilitarianism," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    2. Lorenzo Bastianello & José Heleno Faro & Ana Santos, 2022. "Dynamically consistent objective and subjective rationality," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 74(2), pages 477-504, September.
    3. Bach Dong-Xuan, 2024. "Aggregation of misspecified experts," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 78(3), pages 923-943, November.
    4. Marcus Pivato, 2022. "Bayesian social aggregation with accumulating evidence," Post-Print hal-03637877, HAL.

  6. Franz Dietrich, 2019. "A theory of Bayesian groups," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01744083, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Huihui Ding & Marcus Pivato, 2021. "Deliberation and epistemic democracy," Post-Print hal-03637874, HAL.
    2. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2017. "Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part two: The premise-based approach," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-01485767, HAL.
    3. Franz Dietrich, 2021. "Fully Bayesian Aggregation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-03194928, HAL.
    4. Christian J. Feldbacher-Escamilla & Gerhard Schurz, 2023. "Meta-Inductive Probability Aggregation," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 95(4), pages 663-689, November.
    5. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2021. "Dynamically rational judgment aggregation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-03140090, HAL.

  7. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2019. "The relation between degrees of belief and binary beliefs: A general impossibility theorem [La relation entre les degrés de croyance et les croyances binaires : un théorème d'impossibilité général]," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01999527, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Franz Dietrich, 2022. "Categorical versus graded beliefs," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-03615028, HAL.

  8. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2018. "From degrees of belief to binary beliefs: Lessons from judgment-aggregation theory," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01744085, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Franz Dietrich, 2022. "Categorical versus graded beliefs," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-03615028, HAL.
    2. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2021. "The Relation between Degrees of Belief and Binary Beliefs: A General Impossibility Theorem," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-03344183, HAL.
    3. Minkyung Wang, 2024. "Aggregating individual credences into collective binary beliefs: an impossibility result," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 97(1), pages 39-66, August.

  9. Franz Dietrich & Brian Jabarian, 2018. "Decision Under Normative Uncertainty," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01877769, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Zou, Wenbo & Gao, Wenzheng, 2023. "Measuring the welfare and spillover effects of rank information," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 187-220.
    2. Cecchini, Mathilde, 2024. "Into the Unknown - Conceptualizing Citizens' Experiences of Uncertainty in Citizen-state Interactions," OSF Preprints 96pjt, Center for Open Science.

  10. Franz Dietrich, 2018. "Savage's Theorem Under Changing Awareness," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01743898, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Franz Dietrich, 2021. "Fully Bayesian Aggregation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-03194928, HAL.
    2. Simon Grant & Ani Guerdjikova & John Quiggin, 2020. "Ambiguity and awareness: a coherent multiple priors model. ," Working Papers hal-02550347, HAL.
    3. Proto, Eugenio & Becker, Christoph & Melkonyan, Tigran & Sofianos, Andis & Trautmann, Stefan, 2020. "Reverse Bayesianism: Revising Beliefs in Light of Unforeseen Events," CEPR Discussion Papers 15477, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Adam Dominiak & Ani Guerdjikova, 2021. "Pessimism and optimism towards new discoveries," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 90(3), pages 321-370, May.
    5. Marie-Louise Vierø, 2017. "An Intertemporal Model Of Growing Awareness," Working Paper 1388, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    6. Boissonnet, Niels & Ghersengorin, Alexis & Gleyze, Simon, 2020. "Revealed Deliberate Preference Changes," MPRA Paper 101756, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Dominiak, Adam & Tserenjigmid, Gerelt, 2022. "Ambiguity under growing awareness," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    8. Burkhard C. Schipper, 2024. "Predicting the Unpredictable under Subjective Expected Utility," Working Papers 362, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
    9. Marcus Pivato, 2020. "Subjective expected utility with a spectral state space," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 69(2), pages 249-313, March.
    10. Abdellaoui, Mohammed & Wakker, Peter P., 2020. "Savage for dummies and experts," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).

  11. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2017. "Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: general agendas," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 73508, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Cited by:

    1. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2017. "Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part two: The premise-based approach," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-01485767, HAL.
    2. Marta O. Soares & Mark J. Sculpher & Karl Claxton, 2020. "Health Opportunity Costs: Assessing the Implications of Uncertainty Using Elicitation Methods with Experts," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 40(4), pages 448-459, May.
    3. Luigi Marengo & Simona Settepanella & Yan X. Zhang, 2021. "Towards a unified aggregation framework for preferences and judgments," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 21-44, April.
    4. Richard Bradley, 2018. "Learning from others: conditioning versus averaging," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 85(1), pages 5-20, July.
    5. Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann, 2021. "Social Epistemology," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02431971, HAL.
    6. Baharad, Eyal & Neeman, Zvika & Rubinchik, Anna, 2020. "The rarity of consistent aggregators," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 146-149.
    7. Minkyung Wang, 2024. "Aggregating individual credences into collective binary beliefs: an impossibility result," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 97(1), pages 39-66, August.

  12. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2017. "What matters and how it matters: a choice-theoretic representation of moral theories," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01744079, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Hein Duijf & Frederik Putte, 2022. "The problem of no hands: responsibility voids in collective decisions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 58(4), pages 753-790, May.
    2. Brian Ball & Alexandros Koliousis & Amil Mohanan & Mike Peacey, 2024. "Computational philosophy: reflections on the PolyGraphs project," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.

  13. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2017. "Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part two: the premise-based approach," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 73519, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Cited by:

    1. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2017. "Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: General agendas," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01485792, HAL.
    2. Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann, 2021. "Social Epistemology," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02431971, HAL.
    3. Baharad, Eyal & Neeman, Zvika & Rubinchik, Anna, 2020. "The rarity of consistent aggregators," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 146-149.
    4. Minkyung Wang, 2024. "Aggregating individual credences into collective binary beliefs: an impossibility result," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 97(1), pages 39-66, August.

  14. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2016. "Mentalism versus behaviourism in economics: a philosophy-of-science perspective," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 62444, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Cited by:

    1. Francesco GUALA, 2017. "Preferences: Neither Behavioural nor Mental," Departmental Working Papers 2017-05, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    2. Martin Kolmar & Andreas Wagener, 2019. "Group Identities in Conflicts," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 165-192, December.
    3. Miles S. Kimball, 2015. "Cognitive Economics," NBER Working Papers 20834, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2016. "Reason-based choice and context-dependence: An explanatory framework," Post-Print halshs-01249514, HAL.
    5. Fumagalli, Roberto, 2021. "Rationality, preference satisfaction and anomalous intentions: why rational choice theory is not self-defeating," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112446, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Dietrich, Franz, 2018. "Savage's theorem under changing awareness," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 1-54.
    7. Lauren Larrouy & Guilhem Lecouteux, 2018. "Choosing in a Large World: The Role of Focal Points as a Mindshaping Device," GREDEG Working Papers 2018-29, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    8. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2014. "Reason-Based Rationalization," STICERD - Theoretical Economics Paper Series 565, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    9. David Lipka, 2014. "Do economists need virtues?," ICER Working Papers 06-2014, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.
    10. Moscati, Ivan, 2021. "On the recent philosophy of decision theory," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115039, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Ivan Moscati, 2022. "Behavioral and heuristic models are as-if models too — and that’s ok," BAFFI CAREFIN Working Papers 22177, BAFFI CAREFIN, Centre for Applied Research on International Markets Banking Finance and Regulation, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    12. Shintaro Tamate, 2015. "External Norms and Systematically Observed Norms," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 66(2), pages 247-259, June.
    13. Roberto Fumagalli, 2021. "Rationality, preference satisfaction and anomalous intentions: why rational choice theory is not self-defeating," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 91(3), pages 337-356, October.
    14. Truls Pedersen & Sjur Dyrkolbotn & Thomas Ågotnes, 2015. "Reasoning about reasons behind preferences using modal logic," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 713-724, August.
    15. Vaios Koliofotis, 2021. "Applying evolutionary methods in economics: progress or pitfall?," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 203-223, July.

  15. Franz Dietrich, 2016. "Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01252817, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2017. "Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: General agendas," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01485792, HAL.
    2. Stefano Vannucci, 2022. "Agenda manipulation-proofness, stalemates, and redundant elicitation in preference aggregation. Exposing the bright side of Arrow's theorem," Papers 2210.03200, arXiv.org.
    3. Masaki Miyashita, 2021. "Premise-based vs conclusion-based collective choice," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 57(2), pages 361-385, August.
    4. Irem Bozbay, 2015. "Truth-Tracking Judgment Aggregation Over Interconnected Issues," School of Economics Discussion Papers 0916, School of Economics, University of Surrey.
    5. Irem Bozbay, 2019. "Truth-tracking judgment aggregation over interconnected issues," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 53(2), pages 337-370, August.
    6. Zoi Terzopoulou & Ulle Endriss, 2019. "Strategyproof judgment aggregation under partial information," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 53(3), pages 415-442, October.
    7. Nehring, Klaus & Pivato, Marcus, 2019. "Majority rule in the absence of a majority," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 213-257.
    8. Beg, Ismat & Syed, Ayesha, 2016. "An interactive fuzzy judgment aggregation model for consensus with partially undecided judges," MPRA Paper 96096, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 14 Apr 2017.

  16. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2016. "Reason-based choice and context-dependence: an explanatory framework," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64219, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Cited by:

    1. Franz Dietrich & Antonios Staras & Robert Sugden, 2021. "Savage’s response to Allais as Broomean reasoning," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) hal-03261452, HAL.
    2. Guilhem Lecouteux & Ivan Mitrouchev, 2022. "The View from `Manywhere’: Normative Economics with Context-Dependent Preferences," Working Papers hal-02915807, HAL.
    3. Gold, Natalie, 2020. "How should we reconcile self-regarding and pro-social motivations? A renaissance of “Das Adam Smith Problem”," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 109218, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Natalie Gold, 2019. "The limits of commodification arguments: Framing, motivation crowding, and shared valuations," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 18(2), pages 165-192, May.
    5. Dino Borie & Dorian Jullien, 2019. "Description-dependent Choices," Working Papers halshs-01651086, HAL.
    6. Kadziński, Miłosz & Ghaderi, Mohammad & Dąbrowski, Maciej, 2020. "Contingent preference disaggregation model for multiple criteria sorting problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(2), pages 369-387.
    7. Borie, Dino & Jullien, Dorian, 2020. "Description-dependent preferences," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    8. Dietrich, Franz, 2018. "Savage's theorem under changing awareness," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 1-54.
    9. Gold, Natalie, 2019. "The limits of commodification arguments: framing, motivation crowding, and shared valuations," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 109238, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Olivier Cailloux & Yves Meinard, 2020. "A formal framework for deliberated judgment," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 88(2), pages 269-295, March.
    11. Boissonnet, Niels & Ghersengorin, Alexis & Gleyze, Simon, 2020. "Revealed Deliberate Preference Changes," MPRA Paper 101756, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Boissonnet, Niels & Ghersengorin, Alexis & Gleyze, Simon, 2023. "Revealed deliberate preference change," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 357-367.
    13. Niels Boissonnet & Alexis Ghersengorin & Simon Gleyze, 2022. "Revealed Deliberate Preference Change," Working Papers hal-03672734, HAL.
    14. Jiapeng Liu & Miłosz Kadziński & Xiuwu Liao, 2023. "Modeling Contingent Decision Behavior: A Bayesian Nonparametric Preference-Learning Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 764-785, July.
    15. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2012. "Mentalism versus behaviourism in economics: a philosophy-of-science perspective," MPRA Paper 37813, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Guilhem Lecouteux & Ivan Mitrouchev, 2022. "Preference Purification in Behavioural Welfare Economics: an Impossibility Result," GREDEG Working Papers 2022-31, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    17. Dorian Jullien, 2016. "All Frames Created Equal are Not Identical: On the Structure of Kahneman and Tversky's Framing Effects," GREDEG Working Papers 2016-17, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    18. Mattauch, Linus & Hepburn, Cameron, 2016. "Climate policy when preferences are endogenous – and sometimes they are," INET Oxford Working Papers 2016-04, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.

  17. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2016. "Probabilistic opinion pooling," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00978032, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. McCarthy, David & Mikkola, Kalle & Thomas, Teruji, 2016. "Utilitarianism with and without expected utility," MPRA Paper 72578, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Huihui Ding & Marcus Pivato, 2021. "Deliberation and epistemic democracy," Post-Print hal-03637874, HAL.
    3. Werner, Christoph & Bedford, Tim & Cooke, Roger M. & Hanea, Anca M. & Morales-Nápoles, Oswaldo, 2017. "Expert judgement for dependence in probabilistic modelling: A systematic literature review and future research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(3), pages 801-819.
    4. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2017. "Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: General agendas," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01485792, HAL.
    5. Federica Ceron & Vassili Vergopoulos, 2017. "Aggregation of Bayesian preferences: Unanimity vs Monotonicity," Post-Print halshs-01539444, HAL.
    6. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2017. "Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part two: The premise-based approach," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-01485767, HAL.
    7. Franz Dietrich, 2019. "A theory of Bayesian groups," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01744083, HAL.
    8. Marta O. Soares & Mark J. Sculpher & Karl Claxton, 2020. "Health Opportunity Costs: Assessing the Implications of Uncertainty Using Elicitation Methods with Experts," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 40(4), pages 448-459, May.
    9. Franz Dietrich, 2021. "Fully Bayesian Aggregation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-03194928, HAL.
    10. Jared A. Beekman & Ronald F. A. Woodaman & Dennis M. Buede, 2020. "A Review of Probabilistic Opinion Pooling Algorithms with Application to Insider Threat Detection," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 39-55, March.
    11. Federica Ceron & Vassili Vergopoulos, 2019. "Aggregation of Bayesian preferences: unanimity vs monotonicity," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 52(3), pages 419-451, March.
    12. Elena M. Parilina & Georges Zaccour, 2022. "Sustainable Cooperation in Dynamic Games on Event Trees with Players’ Asymmetric Beliefs," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 194(1), pages 92-120, July.
    13. David McCarthy & Kalle Mikkola & Teruji Thomas, 2019. "Aggregation for potentially infinite populations without continuity or completeness," Papers 1911.00872, arXiv.org.
    14. Federica Ceron & Vassili Vergopoulos, 2017. "Aggregation of Bayesian preferences: Unanimity vs Monotonicity," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 17028, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    15. Federica Ceron & Vassili Vergopoulos, 2017. "Aggregation of Bayesian preferences: Unanimity vs Monotonicity," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01539444, HAL.
    16. Marcus Pivato, 2022. "Bayesian social aggregation with accumulating evidence," Post-Print hal-03637877, HAL.

  18. Franz Dietrich & Christian List & Richard Bradley, 2016. "Belief revision generalized: A joint characterization of Bayes' and Je¤rey's rules," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01249635, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Franz Dietrich & Wlodek Rabinowicz, 2018. "Introduction to the special issue "Beliefs in Groups" of Theory and Decision," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01970967, HAL.
    2. Hill, Brian, 2022. "Updating confidence in beliefs," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Denis Bonnay & Mikaël Cozic, 2018. "Weighted averaging, Jeffrey conditioning and invariance," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 85(1), pages 21-39, July.

  19. Franz Dietrich, 2015. "Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01249513, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Justin Kruger & M. Remzi Sanver, 2021. "An Arrovian impossibility in combining ranking and evaluation," Post-Print hal-03347632, HAL.
    2. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2004. "A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation," Public Economics 0405003, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. List, Christian & Polak, Ben, 2010. "Introduction to judgment aggregation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27900, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Franz Dietrich, 2016. "Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01252817, HAL.
    5. Bezalel Peleg & Shmuel Zamir, 2017. "Sequential aggregation of judgments," Discussion Paper Series dp708, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    6. Edurne Falcó & Madhuparna Karmokar & Souvik Roy & Ton Storcken, 2020. "On update monotone, continuous, and consistent collective evaluation rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 55(4), pages 759-776, December.
    7. Schoch, Daniel, 2015. "Game Form Representation for Judgement and Arrovian Aggregation," MPRA Paper 64311, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann, 2021. "Social Epistemology," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02431971, HAL.
    9. Cailloux, Olivier & Hervouin, Matthieu & Ozkes, Ali I. & Sanver, M. Remzi, 2024. "Classification aggregation without unanimity," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 6-9.
    10. Nehring, Klaus & Pivato, Marcus, 2018. "The median rule in judgement aggregation," MPRA Paper 84258, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Zoi Terzopoulou & Ulle Endriss, 2020. "Neutrality and relative acceptability in judgment aggregation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 55(1), pages 25-49, June.
    12. List, Christian, 2010. "The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27596, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Bezalel Peleg & Shmuel Zamir, 2018. "Judgements aggregation by a sequential majority procedure," Discussion Paper Series dp719, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    14. Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2008. "The aggregation of propositional attitudes: towards a general theory," Research Memorandum 047, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

  20. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian & Bradley, Richard, 2015. "Belief revision generalized: a joint characterization of Bayes's and Jeffrey's rules," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64836, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Cited by:

    1. Franz Dietrich & Wlodek Rabinowicz, 2018. "Introduction to the special issue "Beliefs in Groups" of Theory and Decision," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01970967, HAL.
    2. Hill, Brian, 2022. "Updating confidence in beliefs," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Denis Bonnay & Mikaël Cozic, 2018. "Weighted averaging, Jeffrey conditioning and invariance," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 85(1), pages 21-39, July.

  21. Franz Dietrich, 2014. "Scoring rules for judgment aggregation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00978027, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Dietrich, Franz, 2015. "Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 463-493.
    2. Franz Dietrich, 2016. "Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01252817, HAL.
    3. Bezalel Peleg & Shmuel Zamir, 2017. "Sequential aggregation of judgments," Discussion Paper Series dp708, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    4. Aureli Alabert & Mercè Farré, 2022. "The doctrinal paradox: comparison of decision rules in a probabilistic framework," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 58(4), pages 863-895, May.
    5. Duddy, Conal & Piggins, Ashley & Zwicker, William, 2014. "Aggregation of binary evaluations: a Borda-like approach," MPRA Paper 62071, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Terzopoulou, Zoi & Endriss, Ulle, 2021. "The Borda class," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 31-40.
    7. Nehring, Klaus & Pivato, Marcus, 2018. "The median rule in judgement aggregation," MPRA Paper 84258, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. García-Bermejo, Juan Carlos, 2013. "A Non-Proposition-Wise Variant of Majority Voting for Aggregating Judgments," Working Papers in Economic Theory 2013/02, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain), Department of Economic Analysis (Economic Theory and Economic History).
    9. Bezalel Peleg & Shmuel Zamir, 2018. "Judgements aggregation by a sequential majority procedure," Discussion Paper Series dp719, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    10. Jérôme Lang & Gabriella Pigozzi & Marija Slavkovik & Leendert Torre & Srdjan Vesic, 2017. "A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules and their properties," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(2), pages 327-356, February.
    11. Christian Basteck, 2022. "Characterising scoring rules by their solution in iteratively undominated strategies," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 74(1), pages 161-208, July.
    12. Florian Brandl & Dominik Peters, 2019. "An axiomatic characterization of the Borda mean rule," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 52(4), pages 685-707, April.

  22. Irem Bozbay & Franz Dietrich & Hans Peters, 2014. "Judgment aggregation in search for the truth," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00978030, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Eliaz, Kfir & de Clippel, Geoffroy, 2012. "Premise-Based versus Outcome-Based Information Aggregation," CEPR Discussion Papers 8733, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Masaki Miyashita, 2021. "Premise-based vs conclusion-based collective choice," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 57(2), pages 361-385, August.
    3. John A Weymark, 2014. "Cognitive Diversity, Binary Decisions, and Epistemic Democracy," Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers 14-00008, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics.
    4. Franz Dietrich, 2016. "Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01252817, HAL.
    5. Franz Dietrich, 2014. "Scoring rules for judgment aggregation," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-00978027, HAL.
    6. Shu-Heng Chen & Ragupathy Venkatachalam, 2017. "Information aggregation and computational intelligence," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 231-252, June.
    7. Irem Bozbay, 2015. "Truth-Tracking Judgment Aggregation Over Interconnected Issues," School of Economics Discussion Papers 0916, School of Economics, University of Surrey.
    8. Ben-Yashar, Ruth & Danziger, Leif, 2014. "On the Optimal Composition of Committees," IZA Discussion Papers 7963, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Ahn, David S. & Oliveros, Santiago, 2014. "The Condorcet Jur(ies) Theorem," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 841-851.
    10. Irem Bozbay, 2019. "Truth-tracking judgment aggregation over interconnected issues," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 53(2), pages 337-370, August.
    11. Zoi Terzopoulou & Ulle Endriss, 2019. "Strategyproof judgment aggregation under partial information," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 53(3), pages 415-442, October.
    12. Ben-Yashar, Ruth & Danziger, Leif, 2016. "The Unanimity Rule and Extremely Asymmetric Committees," IZA Discussion Papers 9875, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Bozbay, Irem & Peters, Hans, 2017. "Information aggregation with continuum of types," Research Memorandum 032, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    14. Mitri Kitti, 2016. "Axioms for centrality scoring with principal eigenvectors," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 46(3), pages 639-653, March.
    15. Masaki Miyashita, 2017. "Binary Collective Choice with Multiple Premises," Discussion Paper Series DP2017-27, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    16. Aureli Alabert & Mercè Farré & Rubén Montes, 2023. "Optimal Decision Rules for the Discursive Dilemma," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 889-923, August.
    17. Alex Albright & Peter Pedroni & Stephen Sheppard, 2018. "Uncorking Expert Reviews with Social Media: A Case Study Served with Wine," Department of Economics Working Papers 2018-03, Department of Economics, Williams College.

  23. Franz Dietrich, 2014. "Anti-terrorism policies and the risk of provoking," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00978025, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2010. "Where do preferences come from?," Levine's Working Paper Archive 661465000000001137, David K. Levine.
    2. Cavatorta, Elisa & Groom, Ben, 2020. "Does deterrence change preferences? Evidence from a natural experiment," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).

  24. Richard Bradley & Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2014. "Aggregating causal judgments," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00978020, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Werner, Christoph & Bedford, Tim & Cooke, Roger M. & Hanea, Anca M. & Morales-Nápoles, Oswaldo, 2017. "Expert judgement for dependence in probabilistic modelling: A systematic literature review and future research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(3), pages 801-819.
    2. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2017. "Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: General agendas," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01485792, HAL.

  25. Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann, 2013. "Independent opinions? On the causal foundations of belief formation and jury theorems," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00978016, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2016. "Probabilistic opinion pooling," Post-Print halshs-00978032, HAL.
    2. Hyoungsik Noh, 2023. "Conservativeness in jury decision-making," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 95(1), pages 151-172, July.
    3. Aureli Alabert & Mercè Farré, 2022. "The doctrinal paradox: comparison of decision rules in a probabilistic framework," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 58(4), pages 863-895, May.
    4. Nehring, Klaus & Pivato, Marcus, 2019. "Majority rule in the absence of a majority," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 213-257.
    5. Pivato, Marcus, 2017. "Epistemic democracy with correlated voters," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 51-69.
    6. Aureli Alabert & Mercè Farré & Rubén Montes, 2023. "Optimal Decision Rules for the Discursive Dilemma," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 889-923, August.

  26. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2013. "Reasons for (prior) belief in Bayesian epistemology," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00978005, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Barokas, Guy, 2024. "Positively correlated choice," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 62-71.
    2. Jennifer A. Loughmiller-Cardinal & James Scott Cardinal, 2023. "The Behavior of Information: A Reconsideration of Social Norms," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, April.

  27. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2013. "Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 43283, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Cited by:

    1. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2017. "Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: General agendas," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01485792, HAL.
    2. Dietrich, Franz, 2015. "Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 463-493.
    3. Ben-Yashar, Ruth & Nitzan, Shmuel, 2019. "Skill, value and remuneration in committees," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 93-95.
    4. Franz Dietrich, 2016. "Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01252817, HAL.
    5. Luigi Marengo & Simona Settepanella & Yan X. Zhang, 2021. "Towards a unified aggregation framework for preferences and judgments," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 21-44, April.
    6. Ben-Yashar, Ruth & Danziger, Leif, 2014. "On the Optimal Composition of Committees," IZA Discussion Papers 7963, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Ruth Ben-Yashar & Miriam Krausz & Shmuel Nitzan, 2018. "The effect of democratic decision-making on investment in reputation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 177(1), pages 155-164, October.
    8. BAHARAD, Eyal & BEN-YASHAR, Ruth & NITZAN, Shmuel, 2018. "Variable Competence and Collective Performance: Unanimity vs. Simple Majority Rule," Discussion paper series HIAS-E-80, Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University.
    9. Ruth Ben-Yashar & Shmuel Nitzan, 2017. "Is diversity in capabilities desirable when adding decision makers?," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 82(3), pages 395-402, March.
    10. Eyal Baharad & Ruth Ben-Yashar, 2021. "Judgment Aggregation by a Boundedly Rational Decision-Maker," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 903-914, August.
    11. Ben-Yashar, Ruth & Danziger, Leif, 2016. "The Unanimity Rule and Extremely Asymmetric Committees," IZA Discussion Papers 9875, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Ruth Ben-Yashar & Shmuel Nitzan & Tomoya Tajika, 2021. "Skill, power and marginal contribution in committees," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 33(2), pages 225-235, April.
    13. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2014. "From degrees of belief to beliefs: Lessons from judgment-aggregation theory," MPRA Paper 58257, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Eyal Baharad & Ruth Ben-Yashar & Shmuel Nitzan, 2020. "Variable Competence and Collective Performance: Unanimity Versus Simple Majority Rule," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 157-167, February.
    15. Ruth Ben-Yashar & Shmuel Nitzan, 2017. "Are two better than one? A note," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 323-329, June.
    16. Ruth Ben‐Yashar & Miriam Krausz & Shmuel Nitzan, 2018. "Government loan guarantees and the credit decision‐making structure," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(2), pages 607-625, May.
    17. Shmuel Nitzan & Tomoya Tajika, 2022. "Inequality of decision-makers’ power and marginal contribution," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 92(2), pages 275-292, March.
    18. Ruth Ben-Yashar, 2023. "An application of simple majority rule to a group with an even number of voters," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 83-95, January.

  28. Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann, 2013. "Epistemic democracy with defensible premises," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00978008, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann, 2013. "Independent opinions? On the causal foundations of belief formation and jury theorems," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00978016, HAL.
    2. Addison Pan, 2019. "A Note on Pivotality," Games, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-8, June.
    3. Joseph McMurray, 2017. "Ideology as Opinion: A Spatial Model of Common-Value Elections," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 9(4), pages 108-140, November.
    4. George Masterton & Erik J. Olsson & Staffan Angere, 2016. "Linking as voting: how the Condorcet jury theorem in political science is relevant to webometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(3), pages 945-966, March.
    5. Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann, 2022. "Deliberation and the Wisdom of Crowds," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 22011r, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne, revised Dec 2023.
    6. Hyoungsik Noh, 2023. "Conservativeness in jury decision-making," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 95(1), pages 151-172, July.
    7. Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann, 2021. "Social Epistemology," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02431971, HAL.
    8. William J Berger & Adam Sales, 2020. "Testing epistemic democracy’s claims for majority rule," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 19(1), pages 22-35, February.
    9. Aureli Alabert & Mercè Farré, 2022. "The doctrinal paradox: comparison of decision rules in a probabilistic framework," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 58(4), pages 863-895, May.
    10. Nehring, Klaus & Pivato, Marcus, 2019. "Majority rule in the absence of a majority," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 213-257.
    11. Han, Lu & Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias, 2015. "Aid Fragmentation or Aid Pluralism? The Effect of Multiple Donors on Child Survival in Developing Countries, 1990–2010," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 344-358.
    12. Pivato, Marcus, 2017. "Epistemic democracy with correlated voters," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 51-69.
    13. Peterson, Mark & Feldman, David, 2018. "Citizen preferences for possible energy policies at the national and state levels," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 80-91.
    14. Roy Baharad & Shmuel Nitzan & Erel Segal-Halevi, 2022. "One person, one weight: when is weighted voting democratic?," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 59(2), pages 467-493, August.
    15. Christian List & Adrian Vermeule, 2014. "Independence and interdependence: Lessons from the hive," Rationality and Society, , vol. 26(2), pages 170-207, May.
    16. Aureli Alabert & Mercè Farré & Rubén Montes, 2023. "Optimal Decision Rules for the Discursive Dilemma," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 889-923, August.

  29. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2013. "Where do preferences come from? A summary," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00978022, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Marek Hudik, 2020. "Equilibrium as compatibility of plans," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 89(3), pages 349-368, October.
    2. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2016. "Reason-based choice and context-dependence: An explanatory framework," Post-Print halshs-01249514, HAL.
    3. Amitai Etzioni, 2014. "Crossing the Rubicon," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(2), pages 65-79.
    4. Kadziński, Miłosz & Ghaderi, Mohammad & Dąbrowski, Maciej, 2020. "Contingent preference disaggregation model for multiple criteria sorting problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(2), pages 369-387.
    5. Acharya, Avidit & Blackwell, Matthew & Sen, Maya, 2015. "Explaining Attitudes from Behavior: A Cognitive Dissonance Approach," Working Paper Series rwp15-026, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    6. Lauren Larrouy & Guilhem Lecouteux, 2018. "Choosing in a Large World: The Role of Focal Points as a Mindshaping Device," GREDEG Working Papers 2018-29, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    7. Boissonnet, Niels & Ghersengorin, Alexis & Gleyze, Simon, 2020. "Revealed Deliberate Preference Changes," MPRA Paper 101756, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2012. "Mentalism versus behaviourism in economics: a philosophy-of-science perspective," MPRA Paper 37813, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Tomasz Gajderowicz & Maciej Jakubowski & Sylwia Wrona & Ghadah Alkhadim, 2023. "Is students’ teamwork a dreamwork? A new DCE-based multidimensional approach to preferences towards group work," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Mattauch, Linus & Hepburn, Cameron, 2016. "Climate policy when preferences are endogenous – and sometimes they are," INET Oxford Working Papers 2016-04, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    11. Jacobs Martin, 2016. "Accounting for Changing Tastes: Approaches to Explaining Unstable Individual Preferences," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 67(2), pages 121-183, August.
    12. Mingli Zheng, 2018. "Subjective value judgments of distributive justice and legal decision-making," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 177-194, April.

  30. Franz Dietrich, 2012. "Modelling change in individual characteristics: an axiomatic framework," Post-Print halshs-00977998, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Franz Dietrich, 2014. "Anti-terrorism policies and the risk of provoking," Post-Print halshs-00978025, HAL.
    2. Franz Dietrich & Christian List & Richard Bradley, 2016. "Belief revision generalized: A joint characterization of Bayes' and Je¤rey's rules," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01249635, HAL.
    3. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2011. "A model of non-informational preference change," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01971020, HAL.
    4. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2014. "Reason-Based Rationalization," STICERD - Theoretical Economics Paper Series 565, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    5. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2012. "Mentalism versus behaviourism in economics: a philosophy-of-science perspective," MPRA Paper 37813, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian & Bradley, Richard, 2015. "Belief revision generalized: a joint characterization of Bayes's and Jeffrey's rules," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64836, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

  31. Irem Bozbay & Franz Dietrich & Hans Peters, 2012. "Bargaining with endogenous disagreement: the extended Kalai-Smorodinsky solution," Post-Print halshs-00977992, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. William Thomson, 2022. "On the axiomatic theory of bargaining: a survey of recent results," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(4), pages 491-542, December.
    2. Rudy Henkel, 2021. "Multiself Bargaining," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 9(1), pages 28-65, June.
    3. Khan, Abhimanyu, 2022. "Expected utility versus cumulative prospect theory in an evolutionary model of bargaining," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    4. Llorente-Saguer, Aniol & Zultan, Ro’i, 2017. "Collusion and information revelation in auctions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 84-102.
    5. Emin Karagözoğlu & Kerim Keskin, 2018. "Endogenous reference points in bargaining," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 88(2), pages 283-295, October.

  32. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2010. "A reason-based theory of rational choice," Levine's Working Paper Archive 661465000000000046, David K. Levine.

    Cited by:

    1. Marek Hudik, 2020. "Equilibrium as compatibility of plans," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 89(3), pages 349-368, October.
    2. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2010. "Where do preferences come from?," Levine's Working Paper Archive 661465000000001137, David K. Levine.
    3. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2016. "Reason-based choice and context-dependence: An explanatory framework," Post-Print halshs-01249514, HAL.
    4. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2017. "What matters and how it matters: a choice-theoretic representation of moral theories," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-01744079, HAL.
    5. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2011. "A model of non-informational preference change," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01971020, HAL.
    6. Nestor Lovera Nieto, 2021. "The Role of Values of Economists and Economic Agents in Economics: A Necessary Distinction," Working Papers hal-02735869, HAL.
    7. Fumagalli, Roberto, 2021. "Rationality, preference satisfaction and anomalous intentions: why rational choice theory is not self-defeating," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112446, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Borie, Dino & Jullien, Dorian, 2020. "Description-dependent preferences," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    9. Olivier Cailloux & Yves Meinard, 2020. "A formal framework for deliberated judgment," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 88(2), pages 269-295, March.
    10. Boissonnet, Niels & Ghersengorin, Alexis & Gleyze, Simon, 2020. "Revealed Deliberate Preference Changes," MPRA Paper 101756, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Boissonnet, Niels & Ghersengorin, Alexis & Gleyze, Simon, 2023. "Revealed deliberate preference change," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 357-367.
    12. Niels Boissonnet & Alexis Ghersengorin & Simon Gleyze, 2022. "Revealed Deliberate Preference Change," Working Papers hal-03672734, HAL.
    13. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2012. "Mentalism versus behaviourism in economics: a philosophy-of-science perspective," MPRA Paper 37813, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Dorian Jullien, 2016. "All Frames Created Equal are Not Identical: On the Structure of Kahneman and Tversky's Framing Effects," GREDEG Working Papers 2016-17, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    15. Guido Baldi, 2014. "Endogenous preference formation on macroeconomic issues: the role of individuality and social conformity," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 13(1), pages 49-58, June.
    16. Mihaela DIACONU & Amalia DUTU, 2020. "Crisis, Uncertainty, Risk And Consumer Behavior: A Psycho-Economic Approach," Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences, University of Pitesti, vol. 19(2), pages 3-8.
    17. Roberto Fumagalli, 2021. "Rationality, preference satisfaction and anomalous intentions: why rational choice theory is not self-defeating," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 91(3), pages 337-356, October.
    18. Cherepanov, Vadim & Feddersen, Timothy & ,, 2013. "Rationalization," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 8(3), September.
    19. Truls Pedersen & Sjur Dyrkolbotn & Thomas Ågotnes, 2015. "Reasoning about reasons behind preferences using modal logic," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 713-724, August.

  33. Dietrich, Franz, 2010. "The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27899, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Cited by:

    1. Bozbay, Irem, 2012. "Truth-Seeking Judgment Aggregation over Interconnected Issues," Working Papers 2012:31, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    2. Philippe Mongin & Franz Dietrich, 2010. "The Premiss-Based Approach to Judgment Aggregation," Post-Print hal-00528387, HAL.
    3. Bozbay, İrem & Dietrich, Franz & Peters, Hans, 2014. "Judgment aggregation in search for the truth," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 571-590.
    4. List, Christian & Polak, Ben, 2010. "Introduction to judgment aggregation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27900, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Franz Dietrich, 2014. "Scoring rules for judgment aggregation," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-00978027, HAL.
    6. Ruth Ben-Yashar & Leif Danziger, 2014. "When is Voting Optimal?," CESifo Working Paper Series 5116, CESifo.
    7. Nehring, Klaus & Puppe, Clemens, 2010. "Justifiable group choice," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 583-602, March.
    8. Crès, Hervé & Gilboa, Itzhak & Vieille, Nicolas, 2024. "Bureaucracy in quest of feasibility," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    9. Philippe Mongin & Franz Dietrich, 2011. "An Interpretive Account of Logical Aggregation Theory," Working Papers hal-00579343, HAL.
    10. Philippe Mongin, 2012. "The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 315-355, September.
    11. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2010. "Majority voting on restricted domains," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27902, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2010. "The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 281-299, March.

  34. Mongin, Philippe & Dietrich, Franz, 2010. "Un bilan interprétatif de la théorie de l’agrégation logique," HEC Research Papers Series 936, HEC Paris.

    Cited by:

    1. Mongin, Philippe & Maniquet, Francois, 2015. "A Theorem on Aggregating Classifications," HEC Research Papers Series 1116, HEC Paris.
    2. Philippe Mongin, 2012. "The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 315-355, September.
    3. Philippe Mongin, 2011. "Judgment Aggregation," Working Papers hal-00625434, HAL.
    4. Philippe Mongin, 2012. "Une source méconnue de la théorie de l'agrégation des jugements," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 63(4), pages 645-657.

  35. Dietrich, Franz & Mongin, Philippe, 2010. "The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27896, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Cited by:

    1. Conal Duddy & Ashley Piggins, 2012. "A measure of distance between judgment sets," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 39(4), pages 855-867, October.
    2. Daniel Eckert & Bernard Monjardet, 2009. "Guilbaud's Theorem: an early contribution to judgment aggregation," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 09047, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    3. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2017. "Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: General agendas," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01485792, HAL.
    4. Dietrich, Franz, 2015. "Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 463-493.
    5. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2017. "Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part two: The premise-based approach," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-01485767, HAL.
    6. Masaki Miyashita, 2021. "Premise-based vs conclusion-based collective choice," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 57(2), pages 361-385, August.
    7. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2013. "Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case," Post-Print halshs-00978004, HAL.
    8. Bozbay, İrem & Dietrich, Franz & Peters, Hans, 2014. "Judgment aggregation in search for the truth," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 571-590.
    9. List, Christian & Polak, Ben, 2010. "Introduction to judgment aggregation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27900, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Franz Dietrich, 2016. "Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01252817, HAL.
    11. Luigi Marengo & Simona Settepanella & Yan X. Zhang, 2021. "Towards a unified aggregation framework for preferences and judgments," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 21-44, April.
    12. Franz Dietrich, 2014. "Scoring rules for judgment aggregation," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-00978027, HAL.
    13. Nehring, Klaus & Puppe, Clemens, 2010. "Justifiable group choice," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 583-602, March.
    14. Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann, 2021. "Social Epistemology," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02431971, HAL.
    15. Crès, Hervé & Gilboa, Itzhak & Vieille, Nicolas, 2024. "Bureaucracy in quest of feasibility," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    16. Philippe Mongin & Franz Dietrich, 2011. "An Interpretive Account of Logical Aggregation Theory," Working Papers hal-00579343, HAL.
    17. Zoi Terzopoulou & Ulle Endriss, 2019. "Strategyproof judgment aggregation under partial information," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 53(3), pages 415-442, October.
    18. Philippe Mongin, 2012. "The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 315-355, September.
    19. Jordi Ganzer-Ripoll & Natalia Criado & Maite Lopez-Sanchez & Simon Parsons & Juan A. Rodriguez-Aguilar, 2019. "Combining Social Choice Theory and Argumentation: Enabling Collective Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 127-173, February.
    20. Nehring, Klaus & Puppe, Clemens, 2010. "Abstract Arrowian aggregation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 467-494, March.
    21. Nehring, Klaus & Pivato, Marcus, 2018. "The median rule in judgement aggregation," MPRA Paper 84258, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    22. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2014. "From degrees of belief to beliefs: Lessons from judgment-aggregation theory," MPRA Paper 58257, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    23. Jérôme Lang & Gabriella Pigozzi & Marija Slavkovik & Leendert Torre & Srdjan Vesic, 2017. "A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules and their properties," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(2), pages 327-356, February.
    24. Herzberg, Frederik, 2010. "Judgment aggregators and Boolean algebra homomorphisms," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 414, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    25. Baharad, Eyal & Neeman, Zvika & Rubinchik, Anna, 2020. "The rarity of consistent aggregators," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 146-149.
    26. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2021. "Dynamically rational judgment aggregation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-03140090, HAL.
    27. Jean Baccelli & Marcus Pivato, 2021. "Philippe Mongin (1950–2020)," Post-Print hal-03797424, HAL.
    28. Philippe Mongin, 2011. "Judgment Aggregation," Working Papers hal-00625434, HAL.
    29. Masaki Miyashita, 2017. "Binary Collective Choice with Multiple Premises," Discussion Paper Series DP2017-27, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    30. Marc Fleurbaey, 2020. "Philippe Mongin 1950–2020," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 55(3), pages 399-403, October.

  36. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2010. "Majority voting on restricted domains," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27902, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Cited by:

    1. Mei, Tianhua & Liu, Jie & Guo, Jianming & Siano, Pierluigi & Jin, Xuanxuan, 2022. "Allocation of emission allowances considering strategic voting," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    2. List, Christian & Polak, Ben, 2010. "Introduction to judgment aggregation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27900, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Franz Dietrich, 2016. "Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01252817, HAL.
    4. Franz Dietrich, 2014. "Scoring rules for judgment aggregation," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-00978027, HAL.
    5. García-Bermejo, Juan Carlos, 2012. "A Pooling Approach to Judgment Aggregation," Working Papers in Economic Theory 2012/01, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain), Department of Economic Analysis (Economic Theory and Economic History).
    6. Ruth Ben-Yashar & Leif Danziger, 2014. "When is Voting Optimal?," CESifo Working Paper Series 5116, CESifo.
    7. Nehring, Klaus & Pivato, Marcus & Puppe, Clemens, 2013. "The Condorcet set: Majority voting over interconnected propositions," Working Paper Series in Economics 51, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Management.
    8. Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann, 2021. "Social Epistemology," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02431971, HAL.
    9. Crès, Hervé & Gilboa, Itzhak & Vieille, Nicolas, 2024. "Bureaucracy in quest of feasibility," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    10. Philippe Mongin & Franz Dietrich, 2011. "An Interpretive Account of Logical Aggregation Theory," Working Papers hal-00579343, HAL.
    11. Nehring, Klaus & Pivato, Marcus, 2019. "Majority rule in the absence of a majority," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 213-257.
    12. Philippe Mongin, 2012. "The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 315-355, September.
    13. Frederik S. Herzberg, 2013. "The (im)possibility of collective risk measurement: Arrovian aggregation of variational preferences," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 1(1), pages 69-92, May.
    14. García-Bermejo, Juan Carlos, 2013. "A Non-Proposition-Wise Variant of Majority Voting for Aggregating Judgments," Working Papers in Economic Theory 2013/02, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain), Department of Economic Analysis (Economic Theory and Economic History).
    15. Nehring, Klaus & Pivato, Marcus & Puppe, Clemens, 2011. "Condorcet admissibility: Indeterminacy and path-dependence under majority voting on interconnected decisions," MPRA Paper 32434, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Herzberg, Frederik S., 2008. "Judgement aggregation functions and ultraproducts," MPRA Paper 10546, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Sep 2008.
    17. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2021. "Dynamically rational judgment aggregation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-03140090, HAL.
    18. Terzopoulou, Zoi, 2020. "Quota rules for incomplete judgments," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 23-36.
    19. Yang, Yongjie & Dimitrov, Dinko, 2023. "Group control for consent rules with consecutive qualifications," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 1-7.
    20. Marcus Pivato, 2009. "Geometric models of consistent judgement aggregation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 33(4), pages 559-574, November.
    21. Fujun Hou, 2024. "A new social welfare function with a number of desirable properties," Papers 2403.16373, arXiv.org.

  37. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2010. "Where do preferences come from?," Levine's Working Paper Archive 661465000000001137, David K. Levine.

    Cited by:

    1. Marek Hudik, 2020. "Equilibrium as compatibility of plans," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 89(3), pages 349-368, October.
    2. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2016. "Reason-based choice and context-dependence: An explanatory framework," Post-Print halshs-01249514, HAL.
    3. Nicolas Sirven & Thomas Barnay, 2016. "Expectations, Loss Aversion, And Retirement Decisions In The Context Of The 2009 Crisis In Europe," TEPP Working Paper 2016-04, TEPP.
    4. Amitai Etzioni, 2014. "Crossing the Rubicon," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(2), pages 65-79.
    5. Anaïs Carlin, 2014. "Consumer Choice Theory and Social Learning," GREDEG Working Papers 2014-13, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    6. Kadziński, Miłosz & Ghaderi, Mohammad & Dąbrowski, Maciej, 2020. "Contingent preference disaggregation model for multiple criteria sorting problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(2), pages 369-387.
    7. Acharya, Avidit & Blackwell, Matthew & Sen, Maya, 2015. "Explaining Attitudes from Behavior: A Cognitive Dissonance Approach," Working Paper Series rwp15-026, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    8. Lauren Larrouy & Guilhem Lecouteux, 2018. "Choosing in a Large World: The Role of Focal Points as a Mindshaping Device," GREDEG Working Papers 2018-29, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    9. Boissonnet, Niels & Ghersengorin, Alexis & Gleyze, Simon, 2020. "Revealed Deliberate Preference Changes," MPRA Paper 101756, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Boissonnet, Niels & Ghersengorin, Alexis & Gleyze, Simon, 2023. "Revealed deliberate preference change," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 357-367.
    11. Krecik, Markus, 2024. "A needs-based framework for approximating decisions and well-being," Discussion Papers 2024/2, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    12. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2012. "Mentalism versus behaviourism in economics: a philosophy-of-science perspective," MPRA Paper 37813, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Tomasz Gajderowicz & Maciej Jakubowski & Sylwia Wrona & Ghadah Alkhadim, 2023. "Is students’ teamwork a dreamwork? A new DCE-based multidimensional approach to preferences towards group work," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Bernat Mallén Alberdi, 2023. "How Have Video-on-Demand Platforms Shaped Our Preferences?Endogenous Preferences in a Cultural Market," IREA Working Papers 202316, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Nov 2023.
    15. Bernat Mallén, 2023. "“How Have Video-on-Demand Platforms Shaped Our Preferences? Endogenous Preferences in a Cultural Market”," AQR Working Papers 202308, University of Barcelona, Regional Quantitative Analysis Group, revised Nov 2023.
    16. Sebastian Silva-Leander, 2011. "On the Possibility of Measuring Freedom: A Kantian Perspective," OPHI Working Papers 49, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    17. Robin Cubitt & Daniel Navarro-Martinez & Chris Starmer, 2015. "On preference imprecision," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 1-34, February.
    18. Mattauch, Linus & Hepburn, Cameron, 2016. "Climate policy when preferences are endogenous – and sometimes they are," INET Oxford Working Papers 2016-04, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    19. Jacobs Martin, 2016. "Accounting for Changing Tastes: Approaches to Explaining Unstable Individual Preferences," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 67(2), pages 121-183, August.
    20. Mingli Zheng, 2018. "Subjective value judgments of distributive justice and legal decision-making," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 177-194, April.

  38. Dietrich, Franz, 2009. "Bayesian group belief," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27002, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Cited by:

    1. Huihui Ding & Marcus Pivato, 2021. "Deliberation and epistemic democracy," Post-Print hal-03637874, HAL.
    2. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2017. "Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: General agendas," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01485792, HAL.
    3. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2017. "Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part two: The premise-based approach," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-01485767, HAL.
    4. Franz Dietrich, 2019. "A theory of Bayesian groups," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01744083, HAL.
    5. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2016. "Probabilistic opinion pooling," Post-Print halshs-00978032, HAL.
    6. Ruth Ben-Yashar & Leif Danziger, 2014. "When is Voting Optimal?," CESifo Working Paper Series 5116, CESifo.
    7. Elena M. Parilina & Georges Zaccour, 2022. "Sustainable Cooperation in Dynamic Games on Event Trees with Players’ Asymmetric Beliefs," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 194(1), pages 92-120, July.
    8. Satopää, Ville A. & Salikhov, Marat & Tetlock, Philip E. & Mellers, Barbara, 2023. "Decomposing the effects of crowd-wisdom aggregators: The bias–information–noise (BIN) model," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 470-485.
    9. Aurélien Baillon & Laure Cabantous & Peter Wakker, 2012. "Aggregating imprecise or conflicting beliefs: An experimental investigation using modern ambiguity theories," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 115-147, April.
    10. List, Christian, 2010. "The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27596, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2021. "Dynamically rational judgment aggregation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-03140090, HAL.
    12. Francesco Billari & Rebecca Graziani & Eugenio Melilli, 2014. "Stochastic Population Forecasting Based on Combinations of Expert Evaluations Within the Bayesian Paradigm," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 51(5), pages 1933-1954, October.
    13. Philip E. Tetlock & Christopher Karvetski & Ville A. Satopää & Kevin Chen, 2024. "Long‐range subjective‐probability forecasts of slow‐motion variables in world politics: Exploring limits on expert judgment," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(1), March.
    14. Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2008. "The aggregation of propositional attitudes: towards a general theory," Research Memorandum 047, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    15. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian & Bradley, Richard, 2012. "A Joint Characterization of Belief Revision Rules," MPRA Paper 41240, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  39. Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2009. "Propositionwise judgment aggregation," Research Memorandum 020, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Conal Duddy & Ashley Piggins, 2012. "A measure of distance between judgment sets," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 39(4), pages 855-867, October.
    2. List, Christian & Polak, Ben, 2010. "Introduction to judgment aggregation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27900, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Herzberg, Frederik & Eckert, Daniel, 2012. "The model-theoretic approach to aggregation: Impossibility results for finite and infinite electorates," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 41-47.

  40. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2009. "A Model of Non-Informational Preference Change," Levine's Working Paper Archive 814577000000000297, David K. Levine.

    Cited by:

    1. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2010. "Where do preferences come from?," Levine's Working Paper Archive 661465000000001137, David K. Levine.
    2. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2016. "Reason-based choice and context-dependence: An explanatory framework," Post-Print halshs-01249514, HAL.
    3. Elliott Ash & Sharun Mukand & Dani Rodrik, 2021. "Economic Interests, Worldviews, and Identities: Theory and Evidence on Ideational Politics," NBER Working Papers 29474, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Rodrik, Dani & Mukand, Sharun, 2018. "The Political Economy of Ideas: On Ideas versus Interests in Policymaking," CEPR Discussion Papers 12820, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. Acharya, Avidit & Blackwell, Matthew & Sen, Maya, 2015. "Explaining Attitudes from Behavior: A Cognitive Dissonance Approach," Working Paper Series rwp15-026, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    6. Boissonnet, Niels & Ghersengorin, Alexis & Gleyze, Simon, 2023. "Revealed deliberate preference change," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 357-367.
    7. Niels Boissonnet & Alexis Ghersengorin & Simon Gleyze, 2022. "Revealed Deliberate Preference Change," Working Papers hal-03672734, HAL.
    8. Mukand, Sharun W. & Rodrik, Dani, 2018. "The Political Economy of Ideas," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1163, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    9. Mingli Zheng, 2014. "Lobbying for wealth redistribution by changing the social planner’s preferences," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 26(1), pages 79-92, January.
    10. Mukand, Sharun W. & Rodrik, Dani, 2018. "The Political Economy of Ideas," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 370, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).

  41. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2008. "Opinion pooling on general agendas," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 20127, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Cited by:

    1. List, Christian & Polak, Ben, 2010. "Introduction to judgment aggregation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27900, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Dietrich, Franz, 2010. "Bayesian group belief," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 29573, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. List, Christian, 2010. "The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27596, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Herzberg, Frederik, 2014. "Aggregating infinitely many probability measures," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 499, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    5. Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2008. "The aggregation of propositional attitudes: towards a general theory," Research Memorandum 047, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

  42. Dietrich, F.K., 2008. "The premises of condorcet's jury theorem are not simultaneously justified," Research Memorandum 012, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann, 2013. "Independent opinions? On the causal foundations of belief formation and jury theorems," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00978016, HAL.
    2. Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann, 2013. "Epistemic democracy with defensible premises," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00978008, HAL.
    3. Gustaf Arrhenius & Klas Markstrom, 2024. "More, better or different? Trade-offs between group size and competence development in jury theorems," Papers 2404.09523, arXiv.org.
    4. George Masterton & Erik J. Olsson & Staffan Angere, 2016. "Linking as voting: how the Condorcet jury theorem in political science is relevant to webometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(3), pages 945-966, March.
    5. Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann, 2021. "Social Epistemology," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02431971, HAL.
    6. Bezalel Peleg & Shmuel Zamir, 2009. "On Bayesian-Nash Equilibria Satisfying the Condorcet Jury Theorem: The Dependent Case," Discussion Paper Series dp527, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    7. Christian List & Adrian Vermeule, 2014. "Independence and interdependence: Lessons from the hive," Rationality and Society, , vol. 26(2), pages 170-207, May.
    8. Alexander Lundberg, 2020. "The importance of expertise in group decisions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 55(3), pages 495-521, October.
    9. Bezalel Peleg & Shmuel Zamir, 2012. "Extending the Condorcet Jury Theorem to a general dependent jury," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 39(1), pages 91-125, June.

  43. Dietrich, F.K., 2007. "Aggregation and the relevance of some issues for others," Research Memorandum 002, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2004. "A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation," Public Economics 0405003, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. List, Christian & Polak, Ben, 2010. "Introduction to judgment aggregation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27900, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. List, Christian, 2010. "The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27596, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2008. "The aggregation of propositional attitudes: towards a general theory," Research Memorandum 047, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

  44. MONGIN, Philippe & DIETRICH, Franz, 2007. "The premiss-based approach to logical aggregation," HEC Research Papers Series 886, HEC Paris.

    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Eckert & Bernard Monjardet, 2009. "Guilbaud's Theorem: an early contribution to judgment aggregation," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 09047, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    2. Philippe Mongin & Franz Dietrich, 2011. "An Interpretive Account of Logical Aggregation Theory," Working Papers hal-00579343, HAL.
    3. Philippe Mongin, 2012. "The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 315-355, September.
    4. Frederik S. Herzberg, 2013. "The (im)possibility of collective risk measurement: Arrovian aggregation of variational preferences," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 1(1), pages 69-92, May.

  45. Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2007. "Judgment aggregation with consistency alone," Research Memorandum 021, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. List, Christian, 2010. "The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27596, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

  46. Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2006. "Judgment aggregation on restricted domains," Research Memorandum 033, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Eckert & Bernard Monjardet, 2009. "Guilbaud's Theorem: an early contribution to judgment aggregation," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 09047, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    2. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2010. "The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 281-299, March.
    3. Dietrich, Franz, 2010. "The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27899, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

  47. Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2006. "Judgment aggregation without full rationality," Research Memorandum 032, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Dietrich, Franz, 2015. "Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 463-493.
    2. Dokow, Elad & Holzman, Ron, 2010. "Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 544-561, March.
    3. Bozbay, Irem, 2012. "Truth-Seeking Judgment Aggregation over Interconnected Issues," Working Papers 2012:31, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    4. Philippe Mongin & Franz Dietrich, 2010. "The Premiss-Based Approach to Judgment Aggregation," Post-Print hal-00528387, HAL.
    5. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2013. "Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case," Post-Print halshs-00978004, HAL.
    6. Bozbay, İrem & Dietrich, Franz & Peters, Hans, 2014. "Judgment aggregation in search for the truth," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 571-590.
    7. List, Christian & Polak, Ben, 2010. "Introduction to judgment aggregation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27900, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Jean-François Bonnefon, 2010. "Behavioral evidence for framing effects in the resolution of the doctrinal paradox," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 34(4), pages 631-641, April.
    9. García-Bermejo, Juan Carlos, 2012. "A Pooling Approach to Judgment Aggregation," Working Papers in Economic Theory 2012/01, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain), Department of Economic Analysis (Economic Theory and Economic History).
    10. Bezalel Peleg & Shmuel Zamir, 2017. "Sequential aggregation of judgments," Discussion Paper Series dp708, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    11. Schoch, Daniel, 2015. "Game Form Representation for Judgement and Arrovian Aggregation," MPRA Paper 64311, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Ben-Yashar, Ruth & Danziger, Leif, 2014. "On the Optimal Composition of Committees," IZA Discussion Papers 7963, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Philippe Mongin & Franz Dietrich, 2011. "An Interpretive Account of Logical Aggregation Theory," Working Papers hal-00579343, HAL.
    14. Zoi Terzopoulou & Ulle Endriss, 2019. "Strategyproof judgment aggregation under partial information," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 53(3), pages 415-442, October.
    15. Philippe Mongin, 2012. "The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 315-355, September.
    16. Frederik S. Herzberg, 2013. "The (im)possibility of collective risk measurement: Arrovian aggregation of variational preferences," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 1(1), pages 69-92, May.
    17. List, Christian, 2007. "Group deliberation and the transformation of judgments: an impossibility result," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 19273, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Klaus Nehring & Clemens Puppe, 2008. "Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 31(1), pages 41-57, June.
    19. Ben-Yashar, Ruth & Danziger, Leif, 2016. "The Unanimity Rule and Extremely Asymmetric Committees," IZA Discussion Papers 9875, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    20. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2010. "Majority voting on restricted domains," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27902, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    21. Zoi Terzopoulou & Ulle Endriss, 2020. "Neutrality and relative acceptability in judgment aggregation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 55(1), pages 25-49, June.
    22. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2010. "The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 281-299, March.
    23. Duddy, Conal & Piggins, Ashley, 2013. "Many-valued judgment aggregation: Characterizing the possibility/impossibility boundary," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(2), pages 793-805.
    24. Vivarelli, Marco, 2018. "Globalization, Structural Change and Innovation in Emerging Economies : The Impact on Employment and Skills," GLO Discussion Paper Series 254, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    25. List, Christian, 2010. "The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27596, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    26. García-Bermejo, Juan Carlos, 2013. "A Non-Proposition-Wise Variant of Majority Voting for Aggregating Judgments," Working Papers in Economic Theory 2013/02, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain), Department of Economic Analysis (Economic Theory and Economic History).
    27. Bezalel Peleg & Shmuel Zamir, 2018. "Judgements aggregation by a sequential majority procedure," Discussion Paper Series dp719, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    28. Herzberg, Frederik, 2010. "Judgment aggregators and Boolean algebra homomorphisms," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 414, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    29. C. Binder, 2014. "Plural identities and preference formation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(4), pages 959-976, April.
    30. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2021. "Dynamically rational judgment aggregation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-03140090, HAL.
    31. Terzopoulou, Zoi, 2020. "Quota rules for incomplete judgments," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 23-36.
    32. Philippe Mongin, 2011. "Judgment Aggregation," Working Papers hal-00625434, HAL.
    33. Michael Miller & Daniel Osherson, 2009. "Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 32(4), pages 575-601, May.
    34. Minkyung Wang, 2024. "Aggregating individual credences into collective binary beliefs: an impossibility result," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 97(1), pages 39-66, August.
    35. Aureli Alabert & Mercè Farré & Rubén Montes, 2023. "Optimal Decision Rules for the Discursive Dilemma," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 889-923, August.

  48. Franz Dietrich, 2005. "Judgment aggregation in general logics," Public Economics 0505007, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Conal Duddy & Ashley Piggins, 2012. "A measure of distance between judgment sets," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 39(4), pages 855-867, October.
    2. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2017. "Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: General agendas," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01485792, HAL.
    3. Dietrich, Franz, 2015. "Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 463-493.
    4. Dokow, Elad & Holzman, Ron, 2010. "Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 544-561, March.
    5. Bozbay, Irem, 2012. "Truth-Seeking Judgment Aggregation over Interconnected Issues," Working Papers 2012:31, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    6. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2005. "Arrow’s theorem in judgment aggregation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 19295, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Franz Dietrich, 2013. "Judgment aggregation and the discursive dilemma," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00978021, HAL.
    8. Philippe Mongin & Franz Dietrich, 2010. "The Premiss-Based Approach to Judgment Aggregation," Post-Print hal-00528387, HAL.
    9. Stefano Vannucci, 2017. "Symmetric Consequence Relations and Strategy-Proof Judgment Aggregation," Department of Economics University of Siena 754, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    10. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2016. "Probabilistic opinion pooling," Post-Print halshs-00978032, HAL.
    11. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2013. "Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case," Post-Print halshs-00978004, HAL.
    12. Kretz, Claudio, 2021. "Consistent rights on property spaces," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    13. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2004. "A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation," Public Economics 0405003, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Bozbay, İrem & Dietrich, Franz & Peters, Hans, 2014. "Judgment aggregation in search for the truth," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 571-590.
    15. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2005. "Strategy-proof judgment aggregation," STICERD - Political Economy and Public Policy Paper Series 09, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    16. List, Christian & Polak, Ben, 2010. "Introduction to judgment aggregation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27900, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Franz Dietrich, 2016. "Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01252817, HAL.
    18. Franz Dietrich, 2014. "Scoring rules for judgment aggregation," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-00978027, HAL.
    19. Pivato, Marcus, 2008. "The Discursive Dilemma and Probabilistic Judgement Aggregation," MPRA Paper 8412, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2007. "Judgment Aggregation By Quota Rules," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 19(4), pages 391-424, October.
    21. Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann, 2021. "Social Epistemology," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02431971, HAL.
    22. Zoi Terzopoulou & Ulle Endriss, 2019. "Strategyproof judgment aggregation under partial information," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 53(3), pages 415-442, October.
    23. Aureli Alabert & Mercè Farré, 2022. "The doctrinal paradox: comparison of decision rules in a probabilistic framework," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 58(4), pages 863-895, May.
    24. Andrew Knops, 2011. "Representing collective reasons for group decisions: The judgment aggregation problem revisited," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 23(4), pages 448-462, October.
    25. Philippe Mongin, 2012. "The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 315-355, September.
    26. Jordi Ganzer-Ripoll & Natalia Criado & Maite Lopez-Sanchez & Simon Parsons & Juan A. Rodriguez-Aguilar, 2019. "Combining Social Choice Theory and Argumentation: Enabling Collective Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 127-173, February.
    27. List, Christian, 2007. "Group deliberation and the transformation of judgments: an impossibility result," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 19273, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    28. Klaus Nehring & Clemens Puppe, 2008. "Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 31(1), pages 41-57, June.
    29. Carl Andreas Claussen & Øistein Røisland., 2007. "A quantitative discursive dilemma," Working Paper 2007/07, Norges Bank, revised 24 Nov 2008.
    30. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2010. "Majority voting on restricted domains," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27902, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    31. Zoi Terzopoulou & Ulle Endriss, 2020. "Neutrality and relative acceptability in judgment aggregation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 55(1), pages 25-49, June.
    32. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2010. "The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 281-299, March.
    33. Duddy, Conal & Piggins, Ashley, 2013. "Many-valued judgment aggregation: Characterizing the possibility/impossibility boundary," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(2), pages 793-805.
    34. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2014. "From degrees of belief to beliefs: Lessons from judgment-aggregation theory," MPRA Paper 58257, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    35. List, Christian, 2010. "The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27596, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    36. García-Bermejo, Juan Carlos, 2013. "A Non-Proposition-Wise Variant of Majority Voting for Aggregating Judgments," Working Papers in Economic Theory 2013/02, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain), Department of Economic Analysis (Economic Theory and Economic History).
    37. Baharad, Eyal & Neeman, Zvika & Rubinchik, Anna, 2020. "The rarity of consistent aggregators," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 146-149.
    38. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2021. "Dynamically rational judgment aggregation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-03140090, HAL.
    39. Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2006. "Judgment aggregation without full rationality," Research Memorandum 032, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    40. Dietrich, Franz, 2010. "The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27899, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    41. Philippe Mongin, 2011. "Judgment Aggregation," Working Papers hal-00625434, HAL.
    42. Michael Miller & Daniel Osherson, 2009. "Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 32(4), pages 575-601, May.
    43. Valeria Ottonelli, 2010. "What Does the Discursive Paradox Really Mean for Democracy?," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(4), pages 666-687, October.
    44. Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2008. "The aggregation of propositional attitudes: towards a general theory," Research Memorandum 047, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    45. Klaus Nehring, 2005. "The (Im)Possibility of a Paretian Rational," Economics Working Papers 0068, Institute for Advanced Study, School of Social Science.
    46. Christian Klamler & Daniel Eckert, 2009. "A simple ultrafilter proof for an impossibility theorem in judgment aggregation," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 29(1), pages 319-327.
    47. Elad Dokow & Ron Holzman, 2009. "Aggregation of binary evaluations for truth-functional agendas," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 32(2), pages 221-241, February.
    48. Dokow, Elad & Holzman, Ron, 2010. "Aggregation of binary evaluations," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 495-511, March.

  49. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2005. "Strategy-proof judgment aggregation," STICERD - Political Economy and Public Policy Paper Series 09, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.

    Cited by:

    1. Eliaz, Kfir & de Clippel, Geoffroy, 2012. "Premise-Based versus Outcome-Based Information Aggregation," CEPR Discussion Papers 8733, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Bozbay, Irem, 2012. "Truth-Seeking Judgment Aggregation over Interconnected Issues," Working Papers 2012:31, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    3. Takuya Sekiguchi & Hisashi Ohtsuki, 2023. "Aggregation of Correlated Judgments on Multiple Interconnected Issues," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 233-256, February.
    4. Philippe Mongin & Franz Dietrich, 2010. "The Premiss-Based Approach to Judgment Aggregation," Post-Print hal-00528387, HAL.
    5. Stefano Vannucci, 2017. "Symmetric Consequence Relations and Strategy-Proof Judgment Aggregation," Department of Economics University of Siena 754, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    6. Aditya Aradhye & Hans Peters, 2024. "Group strategy-proof rules in multidimensional binary domains," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 63(1), pages 103-124, August.
    7. Bozbay, İrem & Dietrich, Franz & Peters, Hans, 2014. "Judgment aggregation in search for the truth," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 571-590.
    8. List, Christian & Polak, Ben, 2010. "Introduction to judgment aggregation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27900, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Franz Dietrich, 2016. "Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01252817, HAL.
    10. García-Bermejo, Juan Carlos, 2012. "A Pooling Approach to Judgment Aggregation," Working Papers in Economic Theory 2012/01, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain), Department of Economic Analysis (Economic Theory and Economic History).
    11. Schoch, Daniel, 2015. "Game Form Representation for Judgement and Arrovian Aggregation," MPRA Paper 64311, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Philippe Mongin, 2005. "Factoring Out the Impossibility of Logical Aggregation," Working Papers hal-00243010, HAL.
    13. Takuya Sekiguchi, 2019. "Preferences over procedures and outcomes in judgment aggregation: an experimental study," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 86(2), pages 239-258, March.
    14. Aureli Alabert & Mercè Farré, 2022. "The doctrinal paradox: comparison of decision rules in a probabilistic framework," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 58(4), pages 863-895, May.
    15. Jordi Ganzer-Ripoll & Natalia Criado & Maite Lopez-Sanchez & Simon Parsons & Juan A. Rodriguez-Aguilar, 2019. "Combining Social Choice Theory and Argumentation: Enabling Collective Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 127-173, February.
    16. Baumeister, Dorothea & Erdélyi, Gábor & Erdélyi, Olivia J. & Rothe, Jörg, 2015. "Complexity of manipulation and bribery in judgment aggregation for uniform premise-based quota rules," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 19-30.
    17. Osherson, Daniel & Vardi, Moshe Y., 2006. "Aggregating disparate estimates of chance," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 148-173, July.
    18. List, Christian, 2007. "Group deliberation and the transformation of judgments: an impossibility result," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 19273, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Klaus Nehring & Clemens Puppe, 2008. "Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 31(1), pages 41-57, June.
    20. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2010. "Majority voting on restricted domains," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27902, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    21. Nehring, Klaus & Puppe, Clemens, 2007. "Efficient and strategy-proof voting rules: A characterization," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 132-153, April.
    22. Franz Dietrich, 2005. "Judgment aggregation in general logics," Public Economics 0505007, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    23. Zoi Terzopoulou & Ulle Endriss, 2022. "Strategic manipulation in judgment aggregation under higher-level reasoning," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 92(2), pages 363-385, March.
    24. List, Christian, 2010. "The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27596, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    25. García-Bermejo, Juan Carlos, 2013. "A Non-Proposition-Wise Variant of Majority Voting for Aggregating Judgments," Working Papers in Economic Theory 2013/02, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain), Department of Economic Analysis (Economic Theory and Economic History).
    26. Lars J. K. Moen, 2024. "Collective agency and positive political theory," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 36(1), pages 83-98, January.
    27. Franz Dietrich, 2005. "The possibility of judgment aggregation for network agendas," Public Economics 0504002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    28. Terzopoulou, Zoi, 2020. "Quota rules for incomplete judgments," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 23-36.
    29. Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2006. "Judgment aggregation without full rationality," Research Memorandum 032, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    30. Dietrich, Franz, 2010. "The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27899, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    31. Michael Miller & Daniel Osherson, 2009. "Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 32(4), pages 575-601, May.
    32. Sasaki, Yasuo, 2023. "Strategic manipulation in group decisions with pairwise comparisons: A game theoretical perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(3), pages 1133-1139.
    33. Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2008. "The aggregation of propositional attitudes: towards a general theory," Research Memorandum 047, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    34. Samuel Dooley & John P. Dickerson, 2020. "The Affiliate Matching Problem: On Labor Markets where Firms are Also Interested in the Placement of Previous Workers," Papers 2009.11867, arXiv.org.

  50. Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2005. "The impossibility of unbiased judgement aggregation," Research Memorandum 049, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Iida, Hiroshi, 2008. "Partition のある風景," ビジネス創造センターディスカッション・ペーパー (Discussion papers of the Center for Business Creation) 10252/918, Otaru University of Commerce.
    2. Maarten Vendrik & Christiane Schwieren, 2010. "Identification, screening and stereotyping in labour market discrimination," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 99(2), pages 141-171, March.
    3. García-Bermejo, Juan Carlos, 2012. "A Pooling Approach to Judgment Aggregation," Working Papers in Economic Theory 2012/01, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain), Department of Economic Analysis (Economic Theory and Economic History).
    4. Philippe Mongin, 2012. "The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 315-355, September.
    5. Zoi Terzopoulou & Ulle Endriss, 2020. "Neutrality and relative acceptability in judgment aggregation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 55(1), pages 25-49, June.

  51. Franz Dietrich, 2005. "The possibility of judgment aggregation for network agendas," Public Economics 0504002, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2005. "Strategy-proof judgment aggregation," STICERD - Political Economy and Public Policy Paper Series 09, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    2. List, Christian & Polak, Ben, 2010. "Introduction to judgment aggregation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27900, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Franz Dietrich, 2005. "Judgment aggregation in general logics," Public Economics 0505007, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  52. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2005. "Judgment aggregation by quota rules," Public Economics 0501005, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Dietrich, Franz, 2015. "Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 463-493.
    2. Dokow, Elad & Holzman, Ron, 2010. "Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 544-561, March.
    3. Bozbay, Irem, 2012. "Truth-Seeking Judgment Aggregation over Interconnected Issues," Working Papers 2012:31, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    4. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2005. "Strategy-proof judgment aggregation," STICERD - Political Economy and Public Policy Paper Series 09, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    5. List, Christian & Polak, Ben, 2010. "Introduction to judgment aggregation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27900, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Franz Dietrich, 2016. "Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01252817, HAL.
    7. Franz Dietrich, 2014. "Scoring rules for judgment aggregation," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-00978027, HAL.
    8. García-Bermejo, Juan Carlos, 2012. "A Pooling Approach to Judgment Aggregation," Working Papers in Economic Theory 2012/01, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain), Department of Economic Analysis (Economic Theory and Economic History).
    9. Schoch, Daniel, 2015. "Game Form Representation for Judgement and Arrovian Aggregation," MPRA Paper 64311, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Philippe Mongin, 2012. "The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 315-355, September.
    11. Baumeister, Dorothea & Erdélyi, Gábor & Erdélyi, Olivia J. & Rothe, Jörg, 2015. "Complexity of manipulation and bribery in judgment aggregation for uniform premise-based quota rules," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 19-30.
    12. List, Christian, 2007. "Group deliberation and the transformation of judgments: an impossibility result," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 19273, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2010. "Majority voting on restricted domains," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27902, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Constanze Binder, 2014. "Preferences and Similarity between Alternatives," Rationality, Markets and Morals, Frankfurt School Verlag, Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, vol. 5(88), November.
    15. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2010. "The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 281-299, March.
    16. Franz Dietrich, 2005. "Judgment aggregation in general logics," Public Economics 0505007, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. García-Bermejo, Juan Carlos, 2013. "A Non-Proposition-Wise Variant of Majority Voting for Aggregating Judgments," Working Papers in Economic Theory 2013/02, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain), Department of Economic Analysis (Economic Theory and Economic History).
    18. Bezalel Peleg & Shmuel Zamir, 2018. "Judgements aggregation by a sequential majority procedure," Discussion Paper Series dp719, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    19. Terzopoulou, Zoi, 2020. "Quota rules for incomplete judgments," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 23-36.
    20. Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2006. "Judgment aggregation without full rationality," Research Memorandum 032, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    21. Dietrich, Franz, 2010. "The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27899, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    22. Aureli Alabert & Mercè Farré & Rubén Montes, 2023. "Optimal Decision Rules for the Discursive Dilemma," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 889-923, August.

  53. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2005. "Arrow’s theorem in judgment aggregation," STICERD - Political Economy and Public Policy Paper Series 13, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.

    Cited by:

    1. Conal Duddy & Ashley Piggins, 2012. "A measure of distance between judgment sets," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 39(4), pages 855-867, October.
    2. Dietrich, Franz, 2015. "Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 463-493.
    3. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2017. "Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part two: The premise-based approach," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-01485767, HAL.
    4. Bezalel Peleg & Shmuel Zamir, 2016. "Sequential aggregation judgments: Logical derivation of relevance relation," Discussion Paper Series dp703, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    5. Franz Dietrich, 2013. "Judgment aggregation and the discursive dilemma," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00978021, HAL.
    6. Philippe Mongin & Franz Dietrich, 2010. "The Premiss-Based Approach to Judgment Aggregation," Post-Print hal-00528387, HAL.
    7. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2016. "Probabilistic opinion pooling," Post-Print halshs-00978032, HAL.
    8. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2004. "A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation," Public Economics 0405003, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Bozbay, İrem & Dietrich, Franz & Peters, Hans, 2014. "Judgment aggregation in search for the truth," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 571-590.
    10. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2005. "Strategy-proof judgment aggregation," STICERD - Political Economy and Public Policy Paper Series 09, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    11. List, Christian & Polak, Ben, 2010. "Introduction to judgment aggregation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27900, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Franz Dietrich, 2016. "Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01252817, HAL.
    13. Bezalel Peleg & Shmuel Zamir, 2017. "Sequential aggregation of judgments," Discussion Paper Series dp708, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    14. Pivato, Marcus, 2008. "The Discursive Dilemma and Probabilistic Judgement Aggregation," MPRA Paper 8412, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2021. "The Relation between Degrees of Belief and Binary Beliefs: A General Impossibility Theorem," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-03344183, HAL.
    16. Takuya Sekiguchi, 2019. "Preferences over procedures and outcomes in judgment aggregation: an experimental study," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 86(2), pages 239-258, March.
    17. Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann, 2021. "Social Epistemology," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02431971, HAL.
    18. Philippe Mongin, 2012. "The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 315-355, September.
    19. Duddy, Conal & Piggins, Ashley & Zwicker, William, 2014. "Aggregation of binary evaluations: a Borda-like approach," MPRA Paper 62071, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Frederik S. Herzberg, 2013. "The (im)possibility of collective risk measurement: Arrovian aggregation of variational preferences," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 1(1), pages 69-92, May.
    21. List, Christian, 2007. "Group deliberation and the transformation of judgments: an impossibility result," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 19273, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    22. Klaus Nehring & Clemens Puppe, 2008. "Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 31(1), pages 41-57, June.
    23. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2010. "Majority voting on restricted domains," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27902, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    24. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2010. "The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 281-299, March.
    25. Duddy, Conal & Piggins, Ashley, 2013. "Many-valued judgment aggregation: Characterizing the possibility/impossibility boundary," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(2), pages 793-805.
    26. Vivarelli, Marco, 2018. "Globalization, Structural Change and Innovation in Emerging Economies : The Impact on Employment and Skills," GLO Discussion Paper Series 254, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    27. List, Christian, 2010. "The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27596, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    28. Mongin , Philippe & Maniquet , Francois, 2014. "Judgment Aggregation Theory Can Entail New Social Choice Results," HEC Research Papers Series 1063, HEC Paris.
    29. Bezalel Peleg & Shmuel Zamir, 2018. "Judgements aggregation by a sequential majority procedure," Discussion Paper Series dp719, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    30. Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2006. "Judgment aggregation without full rationality," Research Memorandum 032, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    31. Michael Miller & Daniel Osherson, 2009. "Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 32(4), pages 575-601, May.
    32. Herzberg, Frederik & Eckert, Daniel, 2012. "The model-theoretic approach to aggregation: Impossibility results for finite and infinite electorates," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 41-47.
    33. Marcus Pivato, 2009. "Geometric models of consistent judgement aggregation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 33(4), pages 559-574, November.
    34. Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2008. "The aggregation of propositional attitudes: towards a general theory," Research Memorandum 047, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    35. Elad Dokow & Ron Holzman, 2009. "Aggregation of binary evaluations for truth-functional agendas," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 32(2), pages 221-241, February.
    36. Dokow, Elad & Holzman, Ron, 2010. "Aggregation of binary evaluations," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 495-511, March.

  54. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2004. "A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation," Public Economics 0405003, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Kretz, Claudio, 2021. "Consistent rights on property spaces," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    2. List, Christian & Polak, Ben, 2010. "Introduction to judgment aggregation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27900, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Herzberg, Frederik, 2016. "Respect for experts or respect for unanimity? The liberal paradox in probabilistic opinion pooling," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 513, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    4. Piggins, Ashley & Salerno, Gillian, 2016. "Sen cycles and externalities," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 25-27.
    5. Philippe Mongin, 2012. "The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 315-355, September.
    6. Franz Dietrich, 2005. "Judgment aggregation in general logics," Public Economics 0505007, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. List, Christian, 2010. "The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27596, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Jérôme Lang & Gabriella Pigozzi & Marija Slavkovik & Leendert Torre & Srdjan Vesic, 2017. "A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules and their properties," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(2), pages 327-356, February.
    9. Baharad, Eyal & Neeman, Zvika & Rubinchik, Anna, 2020. "The rarity of consistent aggregators," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 146-149.
    10. Richard Bradley, 2007. "Reaching a consensus," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 29(4), pages 609-632, December.
    11. Itai Sher, 2020. "How perspective-based aggregation undermines the Pareto principle," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 19(2), pages 182-205, May.
    12. Valeria Ottonelli, 2010. "What Does the Discursive Paradox Really Mean for Democracy?," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(4), pages 666-687, October.
    13. Masaki Miyashita, 2017. "Binary Collective Choice with Multiple Premises," Discussion Paper Series DP2017-27, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    14. Nan Li, 2018. "A paradox of expert rights in abstract argumentation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 51(4), pages 737-752, December.
    15. Klaus Nehring, 2005. "The (Im)Possibility of a Paretian Rational," Economics Working Papers 0068, Institute for Advanced Study, School of Social Science.

  55. Franz Dietrich, 2004. "Opinion Pooling under Asymmetric Information," Public Economics 0407002, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Dietrich, Franz, 2010. "Bayesian group belief," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 29573, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

  56. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2002. "A Model of Jury Decisions Where All Jurors Have the Same Evidence," Economics Papers 2002-W23, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.

    Cited by:

    1. Christian List, 2002. "On the Significance of the Absolute Margin," Public Economics 0211004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann, 2013. "Independent opinions? On the causal foundations of belief formation and jury theorems," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00978016, HAL.
    3. Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann, 2013. "Epistemic democracy with defensible premises," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00978008, HAL.
    4. Franz Dietrich, 2006. "General Representation of Epistemically Optimal Procedures," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 26(2), pages 263-283, April.
    5. Bezalel Peleg & Shmuel Zamir, 2009. "On Bayesian-Nash Equilibria Satisfying the Condorcet Jury Theorem: The Dependent Case," Discussion Paper Series dp527, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    6. Daniel Berend & Luba Sapir, 2007. "Monotonicity in Condorcet’s Jury Theorem with dependent voters," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 28(3), pages 507-528, April.
    7. Wojciech Charemza & Daniel Ladley, 2012. "MPC Voting, Forecasting and Inflation," Discussion Papers in Economics 12/23, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester, revised Jan 2013.

Articles

  1. Dietrich, Franz & Jabarian, Brian, 2022. "Decision under normative uncertainty," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(3), pages 372-394, November.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Franz Dietrich & Antonios Staras & Robert Sugden, 2021. "Savage’s response to Allais as Broomean reasoning," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 143-164, April.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  3. Dietrich, Franz, 2021. "Fully Bayesian aggregation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    See citations under working paper version above.
  4. Dietrich, Franz, 2018. "Savage's theorem under changing awareness," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 1-54.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  5. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2017. "Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part two: the premise-based approach," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(4), pages 787-814, April.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  6. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2017. "Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: general agendas," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(4), pages 747-786, April.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  7. Dietrich, Franz, 2016. "Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 113-136.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  8. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2016. "Reason-Based Choice And Context-Dependence: An Explanatory Framework," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 175-229, July.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  9. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2016. "Mentalism Versus Behaviourism In Economics: A Philosophy-Of-Science Perspective," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 249-281, July.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  10. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian & Bradley, Richard, 2016. "Belief revision generalized: A joint characterization of Bayes' and Jeffrey's rules," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 352-371.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  11. Dietrich, Franz, 2015. "Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 463-493.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  12. Franz Dietrich, 2014. "Anti-terrorism policies and the risk of provoking," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 26(3), pages 405-441, July.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  13. Franz Dietrich, 2014. "Scoring rules for judgment aggregation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(4), pages 873-911, April.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  14. Bozbay, İrem & Dietrich, Franz & Peters, Hans, 2014. "Judgment aggregation in search for the truth," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 571-590.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  15. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2013. "Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 40(4), pages 1067-1095, April.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  16. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2013. "Where do preferences come from?," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 42(3), pages 613-637, August.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  17. Dietrich, Franz & Spiekermann, Kai, 2013. "Epistemic Democracy With Defensible Premises1," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(1), pages 87-120, March.

    Cited by:

    1. Addison Pan, 2019. "A Note on Pivotality," Games, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-8, June.
    2. Joseph McMurray, 2017. "Ideology as Opinion: A Spatial Model of Common-Value Elections," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 9(4), pages 108-140, November.
    3. George Masterton & Erik J. Olsson & Staffan Angere, 2016. "Linking as voting: how the Condorcet jury theorem in political science is relevant to webometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(3), pages 945-966, March.
    4. Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann, 2022. "Deliberation and the Wisdom of Crowds," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 22011r, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne, revised Dec 2023.
    5. Hyoungsik Noh, 2023. "Conservativeness in jury decision-making," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 95(1), pages 151-172, July.
    6. William J Berger & Adam Sales, 2020. "Testing epistemic democracy’s claims for majority rule," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 19(1), pages 22-35, February.
    7. Aureli Alabert & Mercè Farré, 2022. "The doctrinal paradox: comparison of decision rules in a probabilistic framework," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 58(4), pages 863-895, May.
    8. Obregon, Carlos, 2023. "Social Choice and Institutionalism," MPRA Paper 122458, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Han, Lu & Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias, 2015. "Aid Fragmentation or Aid Pluralism? The Effect of Multiple Donors on Child Survival in Developing Countries, 1990–2010," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 344-358.
    10. Pivato, Marcus, 2017. "Epistemic democracy with correlated voters," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 51-69.
    11. Peterson, Mark & Feldman, David, 2018. "Citizen preferences for possible energy policies at the national and state levels," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 80-91.
    12. Roy Baharad & Shmuel Nitzan & Erel Segal-Halevi, 2022. "One person, one weight: when is weighted voting democratic?," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 59(2), pages 467-493, August.
    13. Christian List & Adrian Vermeule, 2014. "Independence and interdependence: Lessons from the hive," Rationality and Society, , vol. 26(2), pages 170-207, May.
    14. Aureli Alabert & Mercè Farré & Rubén Montes, 2023. "Optimal Decision Rules for the Discursive Dilemma," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 889-923, August.

  18. Bozbay, Irem & Dietrich, Franz & Peters, Hans, 2012. "Bargaining with endogenous disagreement: The extended Kalai–Smorodinsky solution," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 407-417.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  19. Dietrich, Franz, 2012. "Modelling change in individual characteristics: An axiomatic framework," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 471-494.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  20. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2011. "A model of non-informational preference change," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 23(2), pages 145-164, April.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  21. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2010. "Majority voting on restricted domains," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 512-543, March.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  22. Franz Dietrich, 2010. "Bayesian group belief," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 35(4), pages 595-626, October.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  23. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2010. "The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 281-299, March.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  24. Dietrich, Franz, 2010. "The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 603-638, March.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  25. Dietrich, Franz & Mongin, Philippe, 2010. "The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 562-582, March.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  26. Philippe Mongin & Franz Dietrich, 2010. "Un bilan interprétatif de la théorie de l'agrégation logique," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 120(6), pages 929-972.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  27. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2008. "Judgment aggregation without full rationality," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 31(1), pages 15-39, June.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  28. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2008. "A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 31(1), pages 59-78, June.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  29. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2007. "Arrow’s theorem in judgment aggregation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 29(1), pages 19-33, July.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  30. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2007. "Judgment Aggregation By Quota Rules," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 19(4), pages 391-424, October.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  31. Franz Dietrich, 2007. "A generalised model of judgment aggregation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 28(4), pages 529-565, June.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  32. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2007. "Strategy-Proof Judgment Aggregation," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 269-300, November.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  33. Dietrich, Franz, 2006. "Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 126(1), pages 286-298, January.

    Cited by:

    1. Conal Duddy & Ashley Piggins, 2012. "A measure of distance between judgment sets," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 39(4), pages 855-867, October.
    2. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2017. "Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: General agendas," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01485792, HAL.
    3. Dietrich, Franz, 2015. "Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 463-493.
    4. Dokow, Elad & Holzman, Ron, 2010. "Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 544-561, March.
    5. Bozbay, Irem, 2012. "Truth-Seeking Judgment Aggregation over Interconnected Issues," Working Papers 2012:31, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    6. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2017. "Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part two: The premise-based approach," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-01485767, HAL.
    7. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2005. "Arrow’s theorem in judgment aggregation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 19295, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Masaki Miyashita, 2021. "Premise-based vs conclusion-based collective choice," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 57(2), pages 361-385, August.
    9. Philippe Mongin & Franz Dietrich, 2010. "The Premiss-Based Approach to Judgment Aggregation," Post-Print hal-00528387, HAL.
    10. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2004. "A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation," Public Economics 0405003, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Bozbay, İrem & Dietrich, Franz & Peters, Hans, 2014. "Judgment aggregation in search for the truth," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 571-590.
    12. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2005. "Strategy-proof judgment aggregation," STICERD - Political Economy and Public Policy Paper Series 09, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    13. List, Christian & Polak, Ben, 2010. "Introduction to judgment aggregation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27900, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Franz Dietrich, 2016. "Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01252817, HAL.
    15. Luigi Marengo & Simona Settepanella & Yan X. Zhang, 2021. "Towards a unified aggregation framework for preferences and judgments," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 21-44, April.
    16. Franz Dietrich, 2014. "Scoring rules for judgment aggregation," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-00978027, HAL.
    17. Jean-François Bonnefon, 2010. "Behavioral evidence for framing effects in the resolution of the doctrinal paradox," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 34(4), pages 631-641, April.
    18. Shu-Heng Chen & Ragupathy Venkatachalam, 2017. "Information aggregation and computational intelligence," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 231-252, June.
    19. Philippe Mongin, 2005. "Factoring Out the Impossibility of Logical Aggregation," Working Papers hal-00243010, HAL.
    20. Nehring, Klaus & Puppe, Clemens, 2010. "Justifiable group choice," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 583-602, March.
    21. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2007. "Judgment Aggregation By Quota Rules," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 19(4), pages 391-424, October.
    22. Philippe Mongin & Franz Dietrich, 2011. "An Interpretive Account of Logical Aggregation Theory," Working Papers hal-00579343, HAL.
    23. Philippe Mongin, 2012. "The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 315-355, September.
    24. Baumeister, Dorothea & Erdélyi, Gábor & Erdélyi, Olivia J. & Rothe, Jörg, 2015. "Complexity of manipulation and bribery in judgment aggregation for uniform premise-based quota rules," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 19-30.
    25. List, Christian, 2007. "Group deliberation and the transformation of judgments: an impossibility result," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 19273, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    26. Klaus Nehring & Clemens Puppe, 2008. "Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 31(1), pages 41-57, June.
    27. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2010. "Majority voting on restricted domains," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27902, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    28. Zoi Terzopoulou & Ulle Endriss, 2020. "Neutrality and relative acceptability in judgment aggregation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 55(1), pages 25-49, June.
    29. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2010. "The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 281-299, March.
    30. Birendra K. Rai1 & Chiu Ki So & Aaron Nicholas, 2011. "Mathematical Economics: A Reader," Monash Economics Working Papers 02-11, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    31. Dietrich, Franz & List, Christian, 2014. "From degrees of belief to beliefs: Lessons from judgment-aggregation theory," MPRA Paper 58257, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    32. Franz Dietrich, 2005. "Judgment aggregation in general logics," Public Economics 0505007, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    33. Martin Hees, 2007. "The limits of epistemic democracy," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 28(4), pages 649-666, June.
    34. Gilbert Laffond & Jean Lainé, 2014. "Triple-consistent social choice and the majority rule," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(2), pages 784-799, July.
    35. Baharad, Eyal & Neeman, Zvika & Rubinchik, Anna, 2020. "The rarity of consistent aggregators," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 146-149.
    36. Franz Dietrich & Christian List, 2021. "Dynamically rational judgment aggregation," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-03140090, HAL.
    37. Dietrich, F.K. & List, C., 2006. "Judgment aggregation without full rationality," Research Memorandum 032, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    38. Dietrich, Franz, 2010. "The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27899, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    39. Philippe Mongin, 2011. "Judgment Aggregation," Working Papers hal-00625434, HAL.
    40. Michael Miller & Daniel Osherson, 2009. "Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 32(4), pages 575-601, May.
    41. Masaki Miyashita, 2017. "Binary Collective Choice with Multiple Premises," Discussion Paper Series DP2017-27, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    42. Aureli Alabert & Mercè Farré & Rubén Montes, 2023. "Optimal Decision Rules for the Discursive Dilemma," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 889-923, August.
    43. Klaus Nehring, 2005. "The (Im)Possibility of a Paretian Rational," Economics Working Papers 0068, Institute for Advanced Study, School of Social Science.
    44. Dokow, Elad & Holzman, Ron, 2010. "Aggregation of binary evaluations," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 495-511, March.

  34. Franz Dietrich, 2006. "General Representation of Epistemically Optimal Procedures," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 26(2), pages 263-283, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Marcus Pivato, 2013. "Voting rules as statistical estimators," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 40(2), pages 581-630, February.
    2. Franz Dietrich, 2014. "Scoring rules for judgment aggregation," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-00978027, HAL.
    3. Franz Dietrich & Kai Spiekermann, 2021. "Social Epistemology," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02431971, HAL.
    4. Roy Baharad & Shmuel Nitzan & Erel Segal-Halevi, 2022. "One person, one weight: when is weighted voting democratic?," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 59(2), pages 467-493, August.

  35. Franz Dietrich, 2005. "How to reach legitimate decisions when the procedure is controversial," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 24(2), pages 363-393, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Takahiro Suzuki & Masahide Horita, 2023. "A Society Can Always Decide How to Decide: A Proof," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 987-1023, October.

  36. Franz K. Dietrich, 2001. "The limiting distribution of the t-ratio for the unit root test in an AR(1)," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 4(2), pages 1-5.

    Cited by:

    1. Bent Nielsen & J. James Reade, 2004. "Simulating properties of the likelihood ratio test for a unit root in an explosive second order autoregression," Economics Papers 2004-W24, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.