IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/c/psa379.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Toyotaka Sakai

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Takehito Masuda & Ryo Mikami & Toyotaka Sakai & Shigehiro Serizawa & Takuma Wakayama, 2020. "The net effect of advice on strategy-proof mechanisms: An experiment for the Vickrey auction," ISER Discussion Paper 1109rr, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University, revised Oct 2021.

    Cited by:

    1. Shigehiro Serizawa & Natsumi Shimada & Tiffany Tsz Kwan Tse, 2024. "Toward an Understanding of Dominated Bidding in a Vickrey Auction Experiment," ISER Discussion Paper 1229r, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University, revised Apr 2024.
    2. Yannai A. Gonczarowski & Ori Heffetz & Guy Ishai & Clayton Thomas, 2024. "Describing Deferred Acceptance and Strategyproofness to Participants: Experimental Analysis," Papers 2409.18166, arXiv.org.
    3. Yannai A. Gonczarowski & Ori Heffetz & Clayton Thomas, 2022. "Strategyproofness-Exposing Mechanism Descriptions," Papers 2209.13148, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.

  2. Toyotaka Sakai & Takuma Wakayama, 2008. "Uniform, Equal Division, and Other Envy-free Rules between the Two," ISER Discussion Paper 0723, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.

    Cited by:

    1. Bochet, Olivier & Tumennasan, Norovsambuu, 2020. "Dominance of truthtelling and the lattice structure of Nash equilibria," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    2. Toyotaka Sakai & Takuma Wakayama, 2012. "Strategy-proofness, tops-only, and the uniform rule," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 287-301, March.
    3. William Thomson, 2014. "Non-bossiness," RCER Working Papers 586, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).

  3. Sakai, Toyotaka & 坂井, 豊貴 & サカイ, トヨタカ, 2008. "Intergenerational equity and an explicit construction of welfare criteria," PIE/CIS Discussion Paper 395, Center for Intergenerational Studies, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.

    Cited by:

    1. Asheim, Geir B. & d'Aspremont, Claude & Banerjee, Kuntal, 2010. "Generalized time-invariant overtaking," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 519-533, July.
    2. Pivato, Marcus & Fleurbaey, Marc, 2024. "Intergenerational equity and infinite-population ethics: A survey," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    3. Geir B. Asheim & Kuntal Banerjee, 2009. "Fixed-step anonymous overtaking and catching-up," Working Papers 09001, Department of Economics, College of Business, Florida Atlantic University.
    4. Marcus Pivato, 2014. "Additive representation of separable preferences over infinite products," Post-Print hal-02979672, HAL.
    5. Susumu Cato, 2019. "The possibility of Paretian anonymous decision-making with an infinite population," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 53(4), pages 587-601, December.
    6. Geir B. Asheim & Stéphane Zuber, 2013. "A complete and strongly anonymous leximin relation on infinite streams," Post-Print hal-00979780, HAL.
    7. Michele Lombardi & Kaname Miyagishima & Roberto Veneziani, 2016. "Liberal Egalitarianism and the Harm Principle," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 126(597), pages 2173-2196, November.
    8. Adachi, Tsuyoshi & Cato, Susumu & Kamaga, Kohei, 2014. "Extended anonymity and Paretian relations on infinite utility streams," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 24-32.
    9. Sakai, Toyotaka, 2010. "A characterization and an impossibility of finite length anonymity for infinite generations," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 877-883, September.
    10. José Carlos R. Alcantud & María D. García-Sanz, 2013. "Evaluations of Infinite Utility Streams: Pareto Efficient and Egalitarian Axiomatics," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 432-447, July.
    11. Jonsson, Adam & Voorneveld, Mark, 2014. "The limit of discounted utilitarianism," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 748, Stockholm School of Economics, revised 01 Feb 2017.
    12. Asier Estevan & Roberto Maura & Óscar Valero, 2023. "Quasi-Metrics for Possibility Results: Intergenerational Preferences and Continuity," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Kamaga, Kohei & 釜賀, 浩平 & カマガ, コウヘイ & Kojima, Takashi & コジマ, タカシ, 2008. "On the leximin and utilitarian overtaking criteria with extended anonymity," PIE/CIS Discussion Paper 392, Center for Intergenerational Studies, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    14. Cato, Susumu, 2017. "Unanimity, anonymity, and infinite population," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 28-35.

  4. Biung-Ghi Ju & Eiichi Miyagawa & Toyotaka Sakai, 2003. "Non-Manipulable Division Rules in Claim Problems and Generalizations," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 200307, University of Kansas, Department of Economics, revised Aug 2005.

    Cited by:

    1. A. M. Mármol & M. A. Hinojosa, 2020. "A Two-Step Proportional Rule for Division with Multiple References," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 127-141, February.
    2. Yuzhi Yang & Erik Ansink & Jens Gudmundsson, 2023. "How to Pollute a River If You Must," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 23-036/VIII, Tinbergen Institute, revised 01 Jun 2024.
    3. Karagozoglu, E., 2010. "A noncooperative approach to bankruptcy problems with an endogenous estate," Research Memorandum 027, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    4. Biung-Ghi Ju, 2004. "Coalitional Manipulation on Networks," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 200410, University of Kansas, Department of Economics, revised Aug 2004.
    5. Pablo Amorós, 2009. "Picking the Winners," Working Papers 2009-2, Universidad de Málaga, Department of Economic Theory, Málaga Economic Theory Research Center.
    6. Rick K. Acosta-Vega & Encarnaci'on Algaba & Joaqu'in S'anchez-Soriano, 2022. "On proportionality in multi-issue problems with crossed claims," Papers 2202.09877, arXiv.org.
    7. Carmen Herrero & Juan Moreno-Ternero & Giovanni Ponti, 2010. "On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental study," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 34(1), pages 145-179, January.
    8. William Thomson & Chun-Hsien Yeh, 2006. "Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims," RCER Working Papers 531, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
    9. HOUGAARD, Jens Leth & MORENO-TERNERO, Juan D. & OSTERDAL, Lars Peter, 2012. "A unifying framework for the problem of adjudicating conflicting claims," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2399, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    10. Peter Holch Knudsen & Lars Peter Østerdal, 2005. "Merging and Splitting in Cooperative Games: Some (Im-)Possibility Results," Discussion Papers 05-19, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    11. Hougaard, J. & Moreno-Ternero, J. & Tvede, M. & Osterdal, L., 2015. "Sharing the proceeds from a hierarchical venture," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2015031, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    12. Alcalde-Unzu, Jorge & Moreno-Ternero, Juan D. & Weber, Shlomo, 2022. "The measurement of the value of a language," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    13. Juarez, Ruben & Ko, Chiu Yu & Xue, Jingyi, 2016. "Sharing Sequential Values in a Network," Economics and Statistics Working Papers 3-2017, Singapore Management University, School of Economics.
    14. Biung-Ghi Ju & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, 2016. "Entitlement theory of justice and end-state fairness in the allocation of goods," UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers 2016-14, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics.
    15. HOUGAARD, Jens Leth & MORENO-TERNERO, Juan D. & OSTERDAL, Lars Peter, 2013. "Rationing with baselines: the composition extension operator," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2541, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    16. Kasajima, Yoichi & Velez, Rodrigo A., 2010. "Non-proportional inequality preservation in gains and losses," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 1079-1092, November.
    17. Biung-Ghi Ju & Juan D. Moreno Ternero, 2017. "Fair allocation of disputed properties," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2913, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    18. Jens Gudmundsson & Jens Leth Hougaard & Chiu Yu Ko, 2022. "Sharing sequentially triggered losses: Automatic conflict resolution through smart contracts," IFRO Working Paper 2020/05, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    19. Kıbrıs, Özgür & Kıbrıs, Arzu, 2013. "On the investment implications of bankruptcy laws," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 85-99.
    20. Victor Ginsburgh & Juan D. Moreno‐Ternero, 2018. "Compensation schemes for learning a Lingua Franca in the European Union," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(7), pages 1775-1789, July.
    21. Csóka, Péter & Herings, P.J.J., 2023. "An Axiomatization of the Pairwise Netting Proportional Rule in Financial Networks," Discussion Paper 2023-002, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    22. Ricardo Martínez, 2020. "On how to divide a budget according to population and wealth," ThE Papers 20/10, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
    23. Stovall, John E., 2013. "Asymmetric Parametric Division Rules," Economic Research Papers 270537, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    24. Biung-Ghi Ju & Juan Moreno-Ternero, 2011. "Progressive and merging-proof taxation," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 40(1), pages 43-62, February.
    25. Jens L. Hougaard & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero & Lars P. Osterdal, 2012. "Rationing in the presence of baselines," Working Papers 12.04, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
    26. Gustavo Bergantiños & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, 2023. "Broadcasting revenue sharing after cancelling sports competitions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(2), pages 1213-1238, September.
    27. Sinan Ertemel & Rajnish Kumar, 2018. "Proportional rules for state contingent claims," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 47(1), pages 229-246, March.
    28. Christopher P. Chambers & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, 2015. "Taxation and Poverty," Working Papers 15.05, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
    29. Hinojosa Ramos, Miguel Ángel & López Sánchez, Ana Dolores, 2011. "Regla de reparto proporcional con referencias múltiples: aplicación al caso de agregación y actualización de probabilidades || A Proportional Rule for the Division Problems with Multiple References: A," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 12(1), pages 65-80, December.
    30. Bas Dietzenbacher & Yuki Tamura & William Thomson, 2024. "Partial-implementation invariance and claims problems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 63(1), pages 203-229, August.
    31. Panova, Elena, 2023. "Sharing cost of network among users with differentiated willingness to pay," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 666-689.
    32. William Thomson, 2012. "New variable-population paradoxes for resource allocation," RCER Working Papers 575, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
    33. Biung-Ghi Ju & Min Kim & Suyi Kim & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, 2021. "Fair international protocols for the abatement of GHG emissions," Working Papers 21.01, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
    34. M. Hinojosa & A. Mármol & F. Sánchez, 2012. "A consistent talmudic rule for division problems with multiple references," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 20(3), pages 661-678, October.
    35. Ricardo Martínez & Juan D. Moreno‐Ternero, 2024. "Redistribution with needs," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 26(1), February.
    36. MORENO-TERNERO, Juan D., 2006. "The proportional rule for multi-issue bankruptcy problems," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2006076, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    37. Gustavo Berganti~nos & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, 2023. "Revenue sharing at music streaming platforms," Papers 2310.11861, arXiv.org.
    38. Juan Carlos Gonc{c}alves-Dosantos & Ricardo Mart'inez & Joaqu'in S'anchez-Soriano, 2024. "Measures of relevance to the success of streaming platforms," Papers 2403.08421, arXiv.org.
    39. Alfredo Valencia-Toledo & Juan Vidal-Puga, 2020. "Reassignment-proof rules for land rental problems," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 49(1), pages 173-193, March.
    40. Cappelen, Alexander W. & Luttens, Roland I. & Sørensen, Erik Ø. & Tungodden, Bertil, 2015. "Fairness in bankruptcy situations: an experimental study," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 17/2015, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics.
    41. Valencia-Toledo, Alfredo & Vidal-Puga, Juan, 2015. "Non-manipulable rules for land rental problems," MPRA Paper 67334, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    42. SPRUMONT, Yves & MOULIN, Hervé, 2005. "Fair Allocation of Production Externalities: Recent Results," Cahiers de recherche 2005-22, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.
    43. Péter Csóka & P. Jean-Jacques Herings, 2021. "An Axiomatization of the Proportional Rule in Financial Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 2799-2812, May.
    44. Elena Panova, 2023. "Sharing cost of network among users with differentiated willingness to pay," Post-Print hal-04556220, HAL.
    45. Bergantiños, Gustavo & Chamorro, José María & Lorenzo, Leticia & Lorenzo-Freire, Silvia, 2019. "Mixed rules in multi-issue allocation situations," MPRA Paper 94314, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    46. Victor Ginsburgh & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, 2018. "On Poverty and the International Allocation of Development Aid," Working Papers 18.15, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
    47. Duygu Yengin, 2009. "Appointment Games in Fixed-Route Traveling Salesman Problems and the Shapley Value," School of Economics and Public Policy Working Papers 2009-28, University of Adelaide, School of Economics and Public Policy.
    48. Alexander W. Cappelen & Roland Iwan Luttens & Erik Ø. Sørensen & Bertil Tungodden, 2019. "Fairness in Bankruptcies: An Experimental Study," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2832-2841, June.
    49. Ephraim Zehavi & Amir Leshem, 2018. "On the Allocation of Multiple Divisible Assets to Players with Different Utilities," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 52(1), pages 253-274, June.
    50. MORENO-TERNERO, Juan D., 2011. "A coalitional procedure leading to a family of bankruptcy rules," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2279, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    51. Casajus, André, 2015. "Monotonic redistribution of non-negative allocations: A case for proportional taxation revisited," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 95-98.
    52. Gaertner, Wulf & Xu, Yongsheng, 2020. "Loss sharing: characterizing a new class of rules," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115467, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    53. Teresa Estañ & Natividad Llorca & Ricardo Martínez & Joaquín Sánchez-Soriano, 2020. "On the difficulty of budget allocation in claims problems with indivisible items of different prices," ThE Papers 20/09, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
    54. Csóka, Péter, 2017. "Az arányos csődszabály karakterizációja körbetartozások esetén [The characterization of the proportional rule in the case of circular liabilities]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 930-942.
    55. Teresa Estañ & Natividad Llorca & Ricardo Martínez & Joaquín Sánchez-Soriano, 2021. "On the Difficulty of Budget Allocation in Claims Problems with Indivisible Items and Prices," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1133-1159, October.
    56. Alex Krumer & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, 2023. "The allocation of additional slots for the FIFA World Cup," Working Papers 23.05, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
    57. HOUGAARD, Jens L. & moreno-ternero, JUAN D. & OSTERDAL, Lars P., 2013. "Assigning agents to a line," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2013015, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    58. Jens L. Hougaard & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero & Lars P. Østerdal, 2011. "Baseline Rationing," Working Papers 2011-04, Universidad de Málaga, Department of Economic Theory, Málaga Economic Theory Research Center.
    59. Takayuki Oishi, 2018. "Legal and Political Agreements for Sharing International Rivers with Water Shortage," Discussion Papers 39, Meisei University, School of Economics.
    60. Gustavo Bergantiños & Leticia Lorenzo & Silvia Lorenzo-Freire, 2011. "New characterizations of the constrained equal awards rule in multi-issue allocation situations," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 74(3), pages 311-325, December.
    61. Algaba, E. & Márquez, G. & Martínez-Lozano, J. & Sánchez-Soriano, J., 2023. "A novel methodology for public management of annual greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    62. Christopher P. Chambers & Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, 2021. "Bilateral Redistribution," Working Papers 21.07, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
    63. Thomson, William, 2015. "Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: An update," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 41-59.
    64. Acosta-Vega, Rick K. & Algaba, Encarnación & Sánchez-Soriano, Joaquín, 2023. "Design of water quality policies based on proportionality in multi-issue problems with crossed claims," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 777-788.
    65. Patrick Harless, 2017. "Endowment additivity and the weighted proportional rules for adjudicating conflicting claims," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 63(3), pages 755-781, March.
    66. JU, Biung-Ghi & MORENO-TERNERO, Juan D., 2006. "Progressivity, inequality reduction and merging-proofness in taxation," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2006075, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    67. Sang-Chul Suh & Yuntong Wang, 2023. "The equal share proportional solution in a permit sharing problem," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 60(3), pages 477-501, April.
    68. Flores-Szwagrzak, Karol & Østerdal, Lars Peter, 2024. "Rationalizing Sharing Rules," Working Papers 17-2024, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Economics.
    69. Andreas Darmann & Christian Klamler, 2014. "Knapsack cost sharing," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 18(3), pages 219-241, September.
    70. Gómez-Rúa, María & Vidal-Puga, Juan, 2015. "A monotonic and merge-proof rule in minimum cost spanning tree situations," MPRA Paper 62923, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    71. Marieke Quant & Peter Borm, 2011. "Random conjugates of bankruptcy rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 36(2), pages 249-266, February.
    72. Karol Flores-Szwagrzak & Jaume García-Segarra & Miguel Ginés-Vilar, 2020. "Priority and proportionality in bankruptcy," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 54(4), pages 559-579, April.
    73. Moulin, Hervé, 2008. "Proportional scheduling, split-proofness, and merge-proofness," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 567-587, July.
    74. Yoichi Kasajima & Rodrigo Velez, 2011. "Reflecting inequality of claims in gains and losses," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 46(2), pages 283-295, February.
    75. Stefan Wintein & Conrad Heilmann, 2022. "Liberal political equality does not imply proportional representation," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 59(1), pages 63-91, July.
    76. Martínez, Ricardo & Moreno-Ternero, Juan D., 2022. "Laissez-faire or full redistribution?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    77. Altuntaş, Açelya & Phan, William & Tamura, Yuki, 2023. "Some characterizations of Generalized Top Trading Cycles," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 156-181.
    78. M. Hinojosa & A. Mármol & F. Sánchez, 2013. "Extended proportionality in division problems with multiple references," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 206(1), pages 183-195, July.
    79. Chambers, Christoper P., 2005. "An axiomatic theory of political representation," Working Papers 1218, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
    80. Teresa Estañ & Natividad Llorca & Ricardo Martínez & Joaquín Sánchez-Soriano, 2020. "Manipulability in the cost allocation of transport systems," ThE Papers 20/08, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
    81. Biung-Ghi Ju, 2004. "Coalitional Manipulation on Communication Network," Econometric Society 2004 Far Eastern Meetings 563, Econometric Society.
    82. Casajus, André, 2016. "Differentially monotonic redistribution of income," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 112-115.
    83. Toyotaka Sakai, 2012. "Fair waste pricing: an axiomatic analysis to the NIMBY problem," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 50(2), pages 499-521, June.
    84. Zou, Zhengxing & Tan, Zhibin, 2023. "Axiomatizations of convex compromise rules for redistribution of non-negative income," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    85. Christian Basteck & Frank Huettner, 2023. "Coalitional Manipulations and Immunity of the Shapley Value," Papers 2310.20415, arXiv.org.
    86. J. Sánchez-Pérez, 2023. "New results for multi-issue allocation problems and their solutions," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 27(2), pages 313-336, June.
    87. Emilio Calvo, 2021. "Redistribution of tax resources: a cooperative game theory approach," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 12(4), pages 633-686, December.

Articles

  1. Takehito Masuda & Ryo Mikami & Toyotaka Sakai & Shigehiro Serizawa & Takuma Wakayama, 2022. "The net effect of advice on strategy-proof mechanisms: an experiment for the Vickrey auction," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(3), pages 902-941, June.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Noriaki Okamoto & Toyotaka Sakai, 2019. "The Borda rule and the pairwise-majority-loser revisited," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 23(1), pages 75-89, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Mihoko Shimamoto, 2023. "Normative Corporate Income Tax with Rent for SDGs’ Funding: Case of the U.S," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Doi, Ryoga & Okamoto, Noriaki, 2024. "Condorcet-loser dominance between the plurality rule and other scoring rules," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).

  3. Toyotaka Sakai, 2016. "Limit representations of intergenerational equity," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 47(2), pages 481-500, August.

    Cited by:

    1. Dubey, Ram Sewak & Laguzzi, Giorgio & Ruscitti, Francesco, 2021. "On social welfare orders satisfying anonymity and asymptotic density-one Pareto," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 26-33.
    2. Geir B. Asheim & Kuntal Banerjee & Tapan Mitra, 2021. "How stationarity contradicts intergenerational equity," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(2), pages 423-444, September.
    3. Pivato, Marcus & Fleurbaey, Marc, 2024. "Intergenerational equity and infinite-population ethics: A survey," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    4. Susumu Cato, 2019. "The possibility of Paretian anonymous decision-making with an infinite population," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 53(4), pages 587-601, December.
    5. Asheim, Geir B. & Kamaga, Kohei & Zuber, Stéphane, 2022. "Maximal sensitivity under Strong Anonymity," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    6. Marcus Pivato, 2021. "Intertemporal Choice with Continuity Constraints," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 1203-1229, August.
    7. Asier Estevan & Roberto Maura & Óscar Valero, 2023. "Quasi-Metrics for Possibility Results: Intergenerational Preferences and Continuity," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Ram S. Dubey & Giorgio Laguzzi, 2020. "Equitable preference relations on infinite utility streams," Papers 2012.06481, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.

  4. Toyotaka Sakai, 2015. "A Search for the General Will in a Spatial Model," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 66(2), pages 260-270, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Masao Ogaki, 2022. "Economics of the community mechanism," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 433-457, July.

  5. Toyotaka Sakai, 2013. "An equity characterization of second price auctions when preferences may not be quasilinear," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 17(1), pages 17-26, March.

    Cited by:

    1. Hiroki Shinozaki, 2022. "Characterizing pairwise strategy-proof rules in object allocation problems with money," ISER Discussion Paper 1187, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    2. Andersson, Tommy & Svensson, Lars-Gunnar, 2024. "Strategy-proof allocation of objects: A characterization result," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 1-5.
    3. Shuhei Morimoto & Shigehiro Serizawa, 2012. "Strategy-proofness and Efficiency with Nonquasi-linear Preferences: A Characterization of Minimum Price Walrasian Rule," ISER Discussion Paper 0852, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    4. Tsuyoshi Adachi & Takumi Kongo, 2013. "First-price auctions on general preference domains: axiomatic characterizations," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 1(1), pages 93-103, May.
    5. Fujinaka, Yuji & Wakayama, Takuma, 2015. "Maximal manipulation of envy-free solutions in economies with indivisible goods and money," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 158(PA), pages 165-185.
    6. Malik, Komal & Mishra, Debasis, 2021. "Pareto efficient combinatorial auctions: Dichotomous preferences without quasilinearity," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    7. Toyotaka Sakai, 2013. "Axiomatizations of second price auctions with a reserve price," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 9(3), pages 255-265, September.
    8. William Thomson, 2014. "Non-bossiness," RCER Working Papers 586, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
    9. Shichijo, Tatsuhiro & Fukuda, Emiko, 2021. "Cost-sharing mechanism for excludable goods with generalized non-rivalry," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    10. Tsuyoshi Adachi, 2014. "Equity and the Vickrey allocation rule on general preference domains," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(4), pages 813-830, April.
    11. Saeed Alaei & Kamal Jain & Azarakhsh Malekian, 2016. "Competitive Equilibria in Two-Sided Matching Markets with General Utility Functions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 638-645, June.
    12. Mukherjee, Conan, 2015. "On Axioms Underlying Use of Reserve Price," Working Papers 2015:7, Lund University, Department of Economics, revised 14 Apr 2015.
    13. Kazuhiko Hashimoto, 2015. "Strategy-Proof Rule in Probabilistic Allocation Problem of an Indivisible Good and Money," ISER Discussion Paper 0931, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    14. Takumi Kongo, 2020. "Similarities in axiomatizations: equal surplus division value and first-price auctions," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 24(3), pages 199-213, December.
    15. Kazumura, Tomoya & Mishra, Debasis & Serizawa, Shigehiro, 2020. "Strategy-proof multi-object mechanism design: Ex-post revenue maximization with non-quasilinear preferences," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    16. Conan Mukherjee, 2014. "Fair and group strategy-proof good allocation with money," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(2), pages 289-311, February.
    17. Zhou, Yu & Serizawa, Shigehiro, 2018. "Strategy-proofness and efficiency for non-quasi-linear and common-tiered-object preferences: Characterization of minimum price rule," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 327-363.

  6. Toyotaka Sakai, 2013. "Axiomatizations of second price auctions with a reserve price," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 9(3), pages 255-265, September.

    Cited by:

    1. Yuya Wakabayashi & Ryosuke Sakai & Shigehiro Serizawa, 2022. "A Characterization of the Minimum Price Walrasian Rule with Reserve Prices for an Arbitrary Number of Agents and Objects," ISER Discussion Paper 1161, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    2. Hagen, Martin, 2019. "Collusion-proof and fair auctions," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    3. Toyotaka Sakai, 2013. "An equity characterization of second price auctions when preferences may not be quasilinear," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 17(1), pages 17-26, March.
    4. Yuya Wakabayashi & Ryosuke Sakai & Hiroki Shinozaki, 2024. "Strategy-proof allocation problem with hard budget constraints and income effects: weak efficiency and fairness," OSIPP Discussion Paper 24E003, Osaka School of International Public Policy, Osaka University.
    5. Bettina Klaus & Alexandru Nichifor, 2019. "Serial Dictatorship Mechanisms with Reservation Prices," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 19.04, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
    6. Bettina Klaus & Alexandru Nichifor, 2021. "Serial dictatorship mechanisms with reservation prices: heterogeneous objects," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 57(1), pages 145-162, July.
    7. Mukherjee, Conan, 2015. "On Axioms Underlying Use of Reserve Price," Working Papers 2015:7, Lund University, Department of Economics, revised 14 Apr 2015.
    8. Kazumura, Tomoya & Mishra, Debasis & Serizawa, Shigehiro, 2020. "Strategy-proof multi-object mechanism design: Ex-post revenue maximization with non-quasilinear preferences," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

  7. Toyotaka Sakai, 2012. "Fair waste pricing: an axiomatic analysis to the NIMBY problem," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 50(2), pages 499-521, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Ferraz, Eduardo & Mantilla, Cesar, 2020. "Lindahl vs. Lindahl: Optimal siting and sizing of a noxious facility," SocArXiv 6nja8, Center for Open Science.
    2. Stefan Ambec & Yann Kervinio, 2016. "Cooperative decision-making for the provision of a locally undesirable facility," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 46(1), pages 119-155, January.
    3. Ricardo Martínez & Bernardo Moreno, 2013. "Strategy-proofness on restricted separable domains," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 17(4), pages 323-333, December.
    4. Peters, Hans & Roy, Souvik & Sadhukhan, Soumyarup & Storcken, Ton, 2017. "An extreme point characterization of strategy-proof and unanimous probabilistic rules over binary restricted domains," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 84-90.
    5. Duygu Yengin, 2011. "Identical Preferences Lower Bound for Allocation of Heterogeneous Tasks and NIMBY Problems," School of Economics and Public Policy Working Papers 2011-27, University of Adelaide, School of Economics and Public Policy.
    6. Lahiri, Abhinaba & Peters, Hans & Storcken, Ton, 2017. "Strategy-proof location of public bads in a two-country model," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 150-159.
    7. Satoshi Nakada, 2018. "Envy-free allocation of indivisible goods with money and externalities," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 38(1), pages 52-59.
    8. Ghidoni, Riccardo, 2017. "Mistrust and Opposition to Large-Scale Projects : An Experiment on the Role of Uncertainty," Other publications TiSEM f5596ad2-947a-49b9-abda-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Thomson, William, 2024. "Cost allocation and airport problems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 17-31.
    10. Laurent-Lucchetti, Jérémy & Leroux, Justin, 2009. "Axiomatic foundation for Lindahl pricing in the NIMBY context," MPRA Paper 14930, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Murat Öztürk & Hans Peters & Ton Storcken, 2014. "On the location of public bads: strategy-proofness under two-dimensional single-dipped preferences," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 56(1), pages 83-108, May.
    12. Oto-Peralías, Daniel & Cuberes, David, 2023. "Land Concentration and Mega Photovoltaic Plants," OSF Preprints hakt5, Center for Open Science.
    13. Abhinaba Lahiri & Ton Storcken, 2019. "Strategy-proof location of public bads in an interval," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 53(1), pages 49-62, June.
    14. Doudou Gong & Bas Dietzenbacher & Hans Peters, 2024. "Mechanisms and axiomatics for division problems with single-dipped preferences," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 78(3), pages 789-813, November.
    15. Yamashita, Takuro, 2018. "Revenue guarantees in auctions with a (correlated) common prior and additional information," TSE Working Papers 18-937, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    16. Yuji Fujinaka & Toyotaka Sakai, 2009. "The positive consequence of strategic manipulation in indivisible good allocation," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 38(3), pages 325-348, November.
    17. Ferraz, Eduardo & Mantilla, César, 2023. "A mechanism for the efficient provision of Potential Pareto public goods," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    18. Kazuhiko Hashimoto & Yu Nakayama, 2016. "Strategy-Proofness on Bankruptcy Problems with an Indivisible Object," ISER Discussion Paper 0961, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    19. Kevin Techer, 2023. "Hazardous waste transportation: a cost allocation analysis," Working Papers hal-04099139, HAL.
    20. Yuichi Ishimura & Kenji Takeuchi, 2018. "Where Did Our NIMBY Go? The Spatial Concentration of Waste Landfill Sites in Japan," Discussion Papers 1818, Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University.

  8. Toyotaka Sakai & Takuma Wakayama, 2012. "Strategy-proofness, tops-only, and the uniform rule," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 287-301, March.

    Cited by:

    1. Takuma Wakayama, 2017. "Bribe-proofness for single-peaked preferences: characterizations and maximality-of-domains results," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 49(2), pages 357-385, August.
    2. Zhen Zhao & Shinji Ohseto, 2022. "Strategy-proof and fair reallocation with single-peaked preferences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 58(4), pages 791-800, May.
    3. Kazuhiko Hashimoto & Takuma Wakayama, 2021. "Fair reallocation in economies with single-peaked preferences," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 50(3), pages 773-785, September.
    4. Olivier Bochet & Sidartha Gordon & René Saran, 2013. "Weighted Majoritarian Rules for the Location of Multiple Public Facilities," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03460749, HAL.
    5. Bochet, Olivier & Gordon, Sidartha & Saran, Rene, 2013. "Weighted majoritarian rules for the location of multiple public facilities," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(6), pages 454-459.
    6. Olivier Bochet & Sidartha Gordon & René Saran, 2013. "Weighted Majoritarian Rules for the Location of Multiple Public Facilities," Working Papers hal-03460749, HAL.

  9. Toyotaka Sakai, 2011. "A note on strategy-proofness from the doctor side in matching with contracts," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 15(4), pages 337-342, December.

    Cited by:

    1. David Pérez-Castrillo & Marilda Sotomayor, 2017. "On the manipulability of competitive equilibrium rules in many-to-many buyer–seller markets," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(4), pages 1137-1161, November.
    2. Adriana Amieva & Agust'in Bonifacio & Pablo Neme, 2024. "Mechanisms for a dynamic many-to-many school choice problem," Papers 2411.07851, arXiv.org.
    3. HIRATA, Daisuke & 平田, 大祐 & KASUYA, Yusuke & 糟谷, 祐介, 2016. "On Stable and Strategy-Proof Rules in Matching Markets with Contracts," Discussion Papers 2016-13, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.
    4. Yusuke Iwase, 2022. "Equivalence theorem in matching with contracts," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(1), pages 117-125, March.
    5. Camilo J. Sirguiado & Juan Pablo Torres-Martinez, 2024. "Strategic Behavior Without Outside Options," Working Papers wp553, University of Chile, Department of Economics.

  10. Sakai, Toyotaka, 2010. "A characterization and an impossibility of finite length anonymity for infinite generations," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 877-883, September.

    Cited by:

    1. Pivato, Marcus & Fleurbaey, Marc, 2024. "Intergenerational equity and infinite-population ethics: A survey," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    2. Marcus Pivato, 2014. "Additive representation of separable preferences over infinite products," Post-Print hal-02979672, HAL.
    3. Sakai, Toyotaka & 坂井, 豊貴 & サカイ, トヨタカ, 2008. "Intergenerational equity and an explicit construction of welfare criteria," PIE/CIS Discussion Paper 395, Center for Intergenerational Studies, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    4. Asheim, Geir B. & Kamaga, Kohei & Zuber, Stéphane, 2022. "Maximal sensitivity under Strong Anonymity," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    5. Adachi, Tsuyoshi & Cato, Susumu & Kamaga, Kohei, 2014. "Extended anonymity and Paretian relations on infinite utility streams," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 24-32.
    6. Alcantud, José Carlos R., 2013. "Fuzzy sets from the ethics of social preferences," MPRA Paper 53549, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Ram S. Dubey & Giorgio Laguzzi, 2020. "Equitable preference relations on infinite utility streams," Papers 2012.06481, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.

  11. Toyotaka Sakai, 2010. "Intergenerational equity and an explicit construction of welfare criteria," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 35(3), pages 393-414, September.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  12. Bochet, Olivier & Sakai, Toyotaka, 2010. "Secure implementation in allotment economies," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 35-49, January.

    Cited by:

    1. Yuji Fujinaka & Takuma Wakayama, 2007. "Secure Implementation in Economies with Indivisible Objects and Money," ISER Discussion Paper 0699, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    2. Nishizaki, Katsuhiko, 2018. "Secure implementability under Pareto-efficient rules in linear production economies with classical preferences," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(3), pages 379-383.
    3. Yuji Fujinaka & Takuma Wakayama, 2008. "Secure Implementation in Shapley-Scarf Housing Markets," ISER Discussion Paper 0727, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University, revised Feb 2009.
    4. Bochet, Olivier & Tumennasan, Norovsambuu, 2020. "Dominance of truthtelling and the lattice structure of Nash equilibria," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    5. Rodrigo A. Velez & Alexander L. Brown, 2019. "Empirical strategy-proofness," Papers 1907.12408, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2020.
    6. William Thomson, 2010. "Implementation of solutions to the problem of fair division when preferences are single-peaked," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Adachi, Tsuyoshi, 2010. "The uniform rule with several commodities: A generalization of Sprumont's characterization," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 952-964, November.
    8. Adachi, Tsuyoshi, 2014. "Robust and secure implementation: equivalence theorems," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 96-101.
    9. Rajnish Kumar, 2011. "Secure Implementation in Production Economies," Departmental Working Papers 2011-02, Department of Economics, Louisiana State University.
    10. Katsuhiko Nishizaki, 2013. "An impossibility theorem for secure implementation in discrete public good economies," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 33(1), pages 300-308.
    11. Bochet, Olivier & Sakai, Toyotaka & Thomson, William, 2024. "Preference manipulations lead to the uniform rule," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    12. Katsuhiko Nishizaki, 2014. "An equivalence of secure implementability and full implementability in truthful strategies in pure exchange economies with Leontief utility functions," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 18(1), pages 73-82, March.
    13. Hirofumi Yamamura & Ryo Kawasaki, 2013. "Generalized average rules as stable Nash mechanisms to implement generalized median rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 40(3), pages 815-832, March.
    14. Toyotaka Sakai & Takuma Wakayama, 2008. "Uniform, Equal Division, and Other Envy-free Rules between the Two," ISER Discussion Paper 0723, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.

  13. Yuji Fujinaka & Toyotaka Sakai, 2009. "The positive consequence of strategic manipulation in indivisible good allocation," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 38(3), pages 325-348, November.

    Cited by:

    1. Fujinaka, Yuji & Wakayama, Takuma, 2015. "Maximal manipulation of envy-free solutions in economies with indivisible goods and money," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 158(PA), pages 165-185.
    2. Satoshi Nakada, 2018. "Envy-free allocation of indivisible goods with money and externalities," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 38(1), pages 52-59.
    3. Bochet, Olivier & Sakai, Toyotaka & Thomson, William, 2024. "Preference manipulations lead to the uniform rule," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    4. C. Gizem Korpeoglu, 2018. "Allocation of an indivisible object on the full preference domain: axiomatic characterizations," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 6(1), pages 41-53, April.
    5. Yuji Fujinaka & Toyotaka Sakai, 2007. "The Manipulability of Fair Solutions in Assignment of an Indivisible Object with Monetary Transfers," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 9(6), pages 993-1011, December.
    6. Conan Mukherjee, 2014. "Fair and group strategy-proof good allocation with money," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(2), pages 289-311, February.
    7. Toyotaka Sakai, 2012. "Fair waste pricing: an axiomatic analysis to the NIMBY problem," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 50(2), pages 499-521, June.
    8. Yamamura, Hirofumi, 2016. "Coalitional stability in the location problem with single-dipped preferences: An application of the minimax theorem," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 48-57.

  14. Sakai, Toyotaka, 2009. "Walrasian social orderings in exchange economies," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1-2), pages 16-22, January.

    Cited by:

    1. Cato, Susumu, 2010. "Local strict envy-freeness in large economies," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 319-322, May.

  15. Takashi Hayashi & Toyotaka Sakai, 2009. "Nash implementation of competitive equilibria in the job-matching market," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 38(4), pages 453-467, November.

    Cited by:

    1. Makoto Hagiwara & Shunsuke Hanato, 2021. "A strategic justification of the constrained equal awards rule through a procedurally fair multilateral bargaining game," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 90(2), pages 233-243, March.
    2. David Pérez-Castrillo & Marilda Sotomayor, 2017. "The outcome of competitive equilibrium rules in buyer–seller markets when the agents play strategically," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 64(1), pages 99-119, June.
    3. Hideo Konishi & Margarita Sapozhnikov, 2006. "Decentralized Matching Markets with Endogenous Salaries," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 654, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 03 Jan 2008.
    4. Hideo Konishi & Chiu Yu Ko, 2009. "Profit-Maximizing Matchmaker," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 721, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 23 Apr 2012.
    5. Hayashi, Takashi & Lombardi, Michele, 2019. "Constrained implementation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 546-567.

  16. Toyotaka Sakai, 2008. "Second price auctions on general preference domains: two characterizations," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 37(2), pages 347-356, November.

    Cited by:

    1. Yuya Wakabayashi & Ryosuke Sakai & Shigehiro Serizawa, 2022. "A Characterization of the Minimum Price Walrasian Rule with Reserve Prices for an Arbitrary Number of Agents and Objects," ISER Discussion Paper 1161, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    2. Ryosuke Sakai & Shigehiro Serizawa, 2023. "Strategy-proof mechanism design with non-quasi-linear preferences: ex-post revenue maximization for an arbitrary number of objects," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 60(1), pages 103-120, January.
    3. Masahiro KAWASAKI & Ryosuke SAKAI & Tomoya KAZUMURA, 2023. "Sequential dictatorship rules in multi-unit objectassignment problems with money," Discussion papers e-23-007, Graduate School of Economics , Kyoto University.
    4. Hiroki Shinozaki, 2022. "Characterizing pairwise strategy-proof rules in object allocation problems with money," ISER Discussion Paper 1187, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    5. Tomoya Kazumura & Shigehiro Serizawa, 2016. "Efficiency and strategy-proofness in object assignment problems with multi-demand preferences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 47(3), pages 633-663, October.
    6. Yuji Fujinaka & Takuma Wakayama, 2008. "Secure Implementation in Shapley-Scarf Housing Markets," ISER Discussion Paper 0727, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University, revised Feb 2009.
    7. Andersson, Tommy & Svensson, Lars-Gunnar, 2024. "Strategy-proof allocation of objects: A characterization result," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 1-5.
    8. Tsuyoshi Adachi & Takumi Kongo, 2013. "First-price auctions on general preference domains: axiomatic characterizations," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 1(1), pages 93-103, May.
    9. Toyotaka Sakai, 2017. "Considering Collective Choice: The Route 328 Problem in Kodaira City," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 323-332, September.
    10. SHINOZAKI, Hiroki, 2023. "Non-obvious manipulability and efficiency in package assignment problems with money for agents with income effects and hard budget constraints," Discussion paper series HIAS-E-136, Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University.
    11. Yu Zhou & Shigehiro Serizawa, 2019. "Minimum price equilibrium in the assignment market," ISER Discussion Paper 1047, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    12. Bando, Keisuke & Kawasaki, Ryo, 2021. "Stability properties of the core in a generalized assignment problem," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 211-223.
    13. Tomoya KAZUMURA, 2020. "When can we design efficient and strategy-proof rules in package assignment problems?," Discussion papers e-21-008, Graduate School of Economics , Kyoto University.
    14. Sano, Ryuji, 2023. "Post-auction investment by financially constrained bidders," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    15. Toyotaka Sakai, 2013. "An equity characterization of second price auctions when preferences may not be quasilinear," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 17(1), pages 17-26, March.
    16. Komal Malik & Debasis Mishra, 2020. "Pareto efficient combinatorial auctions: dichotomous preferences without quasilinearity," Papers 2009.12114, arXiv.org.
    17. Kazumura, Tomoya & Mishra, Debasis & Serizawa, Shigehiro, 2020. "Mechanism design without quasilinearity," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(2), May.
    18. Tomoya Kazumura & Debasis Mishra & Shigehiro Serizawa, 2017. "Strategy-proof multi-object auction design: Ex-post revenue maximization with no wastage," Discussion Papers 17-03, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi.
    19. Tomoya Kazumura & Debasis Mishra & Shigehiro Serizawa, 2017. "Strategy-proof multi-object allocation: Ex-post revenue maximization with no wastage," Working Papers e116, Tokyo Center for Economic Research.
    20. Hiroki Shinozaki, 2022. "Egalitarian-Equivalence and Strategy-Proofness in the Object Allocation Problem with Non-Quasi-Linear Preferences," Games, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, November.
    21. Malik, Komal & Mishra, Debasis, 2021. "Pareto efficient combinatorial auctions: Dichotomous preferences without quasilinearity," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    22. Masahiro KAWASAKI & Ryosuke SAKAI & Tomoya KAZUMURA, 2024. "Sequential dictatorship rules in multi-unit object assignment problems with money," Discussion papers e-23-007-v2, Graduate School of Economics , Kyoto University.
    23. Toyotaka Sakai, 2013. "Axiomatizations of second price auctions with a reserve price," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 9(3), pages 255-265, September.
    24. William Thomson, 2014. "Non-bossiness," RCER Working Papers 586, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
    25. Yu Zhou & Shigehiro Serizawa, 2016. "Strategy-Proofness and Efficiency for Non-quasi-linear Common-Tiered-Object Preferences: Characterization of Minimum Price Rule," ISER Discussion Paper 0971, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    26. Baisa, Brian, 2016. "Overbidding and inefficiencies in multi-unit Vickrey auctions for normal goods," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 23-35.
    27. Mackenzie, Andrew & Trudeau, Christian, 2018. "Club good mechanisms: from free-riders to citizen-shareholders, from impossibility to characterization," Research Memorandum 012, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    28. Yuya Wakabayashi & Ryosuke Sakai & Hiroki Shinozaki, 2024. "Strategy-proof allocation problem with hard budget constraints and income effects: weak efficiency and fairness," OSIPP Discussion Paper 24E003, Osaka School of International Public Policy, Osaka University.
    29. Itai Ashlagi & Shigehiro Serizawa, 2012. "Characterizing Vickrey allocation rule by anonymity," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 38(3), pages 531-542, March.
    30. Yu Zhou & Youngsub Chun & Shigehiro Serizawa, 2022. "A characterization of the Vickrey rule in slot allocation problems," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 18(1), pages 38-49, March.
    31. Bettina Klaus & Alexandru Nichifor, 2019. "Serial Dictatorship Mechanisms with Reservation Prices," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 19.04, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
    32. SHINOZAKI, Hiroki, 2024. "Shill-proof rules in object allocation problems with money," Discussion paper series HIAS-E-137, Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University.
    33. Tsuyoshi Adachi, 2014. "Equity and the Vickrey allocation rule on general preference domains," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(4), pages 813-830, April.
    34. Jianxin Yi, 2024. "A note on the impossibility of multi-unit auctions with budget-constrained bidders," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 28(2), pages 331-345, June.
    35. Andrew Mackenzie & Christian Trudeau, 2021. "On Groves Mechanisms for Costly Inclusion," Working Papers 1901, University of Windsor, Department of Economics.
    36. Mukherjee, Conan, 2015. "On Axioms Underlying Use of Reserve Price," Working Papers 2015:7, Lund University, Department of Economics, revised 14 Apr 2015.
    37. Takumi Kongo, 2020. "Similarities in axiomatizations: equal surplus division value and first-price auctions," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 24(3), pages 199-213, December.
    38. Shinozaki, Hiroki, 2023. "Efficiency and strategy-proofness in multi-unit object allocation problems with non-quasi-linear preferences: A positive result," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    39. Kazumura, Tomoya & Mishra, Debasis & Serizawa, Shigehiro, 2020. "Strategy-proof multi-object mechanism design: Ex-post revenue maximization with non-quasilinear preferences," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    40. Lars-Gunnar Svensson, 2009. "Coalitional strategy-proofness and fairness," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 40(2), pages 227-245, August.
    41. Nanyang Bu, 2016. "Joint misrepresentation with bribes," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 61(1), pages 115-125, January.
    42. Shinji Ohseto, 2021. "Strategy-proof and Pareto efficient allocation of indivisible goods: general impossibility domains," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 50(2), pages 419-432, June.
    43. Toyotaka Sakai, 2012. "Fair waste pricing: an axiomatic analysis to the NIMBY problem," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 50(2), pages 499-521, June.
    44. SHINOZAKI, Hiroki, 2023. "Efficiency and strategy-proofness in object allocation problems with payments: Externalities with income effects," Discussion paper series HIAS-E-135, Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University.
    45. Miki Kato & Shinji Ohseto & Shohei Tamura, 2015. "Strategy-proofness versus symmetry in economies with an indivisible good and money," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 44(1), pages 195-207, February.
    46. Zhou, Yu & Serizawa, Shigehiro, 2018. "Strategy-proofness and efficiency for non-quasi-linear and common-tiered-object preferences: Characterization of minimum price rule," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 327-363.

  17. Yuji Fujinaka & Toyotaka Sakai, 2007. "The Manipulability of Fair Solutions in Assignment of an Indivisible Object with Monetary Transfers," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 9(6), pages 993-1011, December.

    Cited by:

    1. Carmen Beviá, 2010. "Manipulation games in economies with indivisible goods," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 39(1), pages 209-222, March.
    2. Kazuhiko Hashimoto, 2018. "Strategy-proofness and identical preferences lower bound in allocation problem of indivisible objects," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 65(4), pages 1045-1078, June.
    3. Fujinaka, Yuji & Wakayama, Takuma, 2015. "Maximal manipulation of envy-free solutions in economies with indivisible goods and money," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 158(PA), pages 165-185.
    4. Yuji Fujinaka, 2008. "A Bayesian Incentive Compatible Mechanism for Fair Division," ISER Discussion Paper 0721, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    5. Toyotaka Sakai, 2013. "An equity characterization of second price auctions when preferences may not be quasilinear," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 17(1), pages 17-26, March.
    6. Toyotaka Sakai, 2008. "Second price auctions on general preference domains: two characterizations," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 37(2), pages 347-356, November.
    7. Di Feng & Jacob Coreno, 2024. "Justified Fairness in House Allocation Problems: two Characterizations of Strategy-proof Mechanisms," Papers 2407.14101, arXiv.org.
    8. Hirofumi Yamamura & Ryo Kawasaki, 2013. "Generalized average rules as stable Nash mechanisms to implement generalized median rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 40(3), pages 815-832, March.
    9. Conan Mukherjee, 2014. "Fair and group strategy-proof good allocation with money," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(2), pages 289-311, February.
    10. Toyotaka Sakai, 2012. "Fair waste pricing: an axiomatic analysis to the NIMBY problem," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 50(2), pages 499-521, June.
    11. Yamamura, Hirofumi, 2016. "Coalitional stability in the location problem with single-dipped preferences: An application of the minimax theorem," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 48-57.

  18. Sakai, Toyotaka, 2007. "Fairness and implementability in allocation of indivisible objects with monetary compensations," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 549-563, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Toyotaka Sakai, 2017. "Considering Collective Choice: The Route 328 Problem in Kodaira City," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 323-332, September.
    2. Fujinaka, Yuji & Wakayama, Takuma, 2015. "Maximal manipulation of envy-free solutions in economies with indivisible goods and money," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 158(PA), pages 165-185.
    3. Yuji Fujinaka, 2008. "A Bayesian Incentive Compatible Mechanism for Fair Division," ISER Discussion Paper 0721, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    4. Ando, Kazutoshi & Kato, Miki & Ohseto, Shinji, 2008. "Strategy-proof and symmetric allocation of an indivisible good," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 14-23, January.
    5. Toyotaka Sakai, 2013. "Axiomatizations of second price auctions with a reserve price," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 9(3), pages 255-265, September.
    6. Korpela, Ville, 2018. "Procedurally fair implementation under complete information," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 25-31.
    7. Tsuyoshi Adachi, 2014. "Equity and the Vickrey allocation rule on general preference domains," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 42(4), pages 813-830, April.
    8. Korpela Ville, 2016. "Procedurally Fair Implementation: The Cost of Insisting on Symmetry," Discussion Papers 108, Aboa Centre for Economics.
    9. Toyotaka Sakai, 2012. "Fair waste pricing: an axiomatic analysis to the NIMBY problem," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 50(2), pages 499-521, June.
    10. Kaname Miyagishima, 2015. "Implementability and equity in production economies with unequal skills," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 19(3), pages 247-257, September.

  19. Ju, Biung-Ghi & Miyagawa, Eiichi & Sakai, Toyotaka, 2007. "Non-manipulable division rules in claim problems and generalizations," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 1-26, January.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  20. Bochet, Olivier & Sakai, Toyotaka, 2007. "Strategic manipulations of multi-valued solutions in economies with indivisibilities," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 53-68, January.

    Cited by:

    1. Yuji Fujinaka, 2008. "A Bayesian Incentive Compatible Mechanism for Fair Division," ISER Discussion Paper 0721, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    2. Ando, Kazutoshi & Kato, Miki & Ohseto, Shinji, 2008. "Strategy-proof and symmetric allocation of an indivisible good," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 14-23, January.
    3. Sakai, Toyotaka, 2007. "Fairness and implementability in allocation of indivisible objects with monetary compensations," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 549-563, June.
    4. Yuji Fujinaka & Toyotaka Sakai, 2009. "The positive consequence of strategic manipulation in indivisible good allocation," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 38(3), pages 325-348, November.

  21. Fujinaka, Yuji & Sakai, Toyotaka, 2007. "Maskin monotonicity in economies with indivisible goods and money," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 253-258, February.

    Cited by:

    1. Yuji Fujinaka & Takuma Wakayama, 2007. "Secure Implementation in Economies with Indivisible Objects and Money," ISER Discussion Paper 0699, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    2. Hagen, Martin, 2019. "Collusion-proof and fair auctions," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    3. Yuji Fujinaka, 2008. "A Bayesian Incentive Compatible Mechanism for Fair Division," ISER Discussion Paper 0721, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    4. Ando, Kazutoshi & Kato, Miki & Ohseto, Shinji, 2008. "Strategy-proof and symmetric allocation of an indivisible good," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 14-23, January.
    5. Yuji Fujinaka & Toyotaka Sakai, 2009. "The positive consequence of strategic manipulation in indivisible good allocation," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 38(3), pages 325-348, November.
    6. Toyotaka Sakai, 2012. "Fair waste pricing: an axiomatic analysis to the NIMBY problem," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 50(2), pages 499-521, June.
    7. Miki Kato & Shinji Ohseto & Shohei Tamura, 2015. "Strategy-proofness versus symmetry in economies with an indivisible good and money," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 44(1), pages 195-207, February.

  22. Toyotaka Sakai & Masaki Shimoji, 2006. "Dichotomous preferences and the possibility of Arrovian social choice," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 26(3), pages 435-445, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Erdamar, Bora & Sanver, M. Remzi & Sato, Shin, 2017. "Evaluationwise strategy-proofness," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 227-238.
    2. Susumu Cato, 2014. "Common preference, non-consequential features, and collective decision making," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 18(4), pages 265-287, December.
    3. Yukinori Iwata, 2009. "Consequences, opportunities, and Arrovian impossibility theorems with consequentialist domains," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 32(3), pages 513-531, March.
    4. James Nguyen, 2019. "The limitations of the Arrovian consistency of domains with a fixed preference," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 87(2), pages 183-199, September.
    5. Shin Sato, 2012. "On strategy-proof social choice under categorization," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 38(3), pages 455-471, March.
    6. Yukinori Iwata, 2016. "The possibility of Arrovian social choice with the process of nomination," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 81(4), pages 535-552, November.
    7. Ju, Biung-Ghi, 2011. "Collectively rational voting rules for simple preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 143-149, March.

  23. Toyotaka Sakai, 2006. "Equitable Intergenerational Preferences on Restricted Domains," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 27(1), pages 41-54, August.

    Cited by:

    1. José Carlos R. Alcantud, 2013. "The impossibility of social evaluations of infinite streams with strict inequality aversion," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 1(2), pages 123-130, November.
    2. Alcantud, José Carlos R., 2012. "Inequality averse criteria for evaluating infinite utility streams: The impossibility of Weak Pareto," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 353-363.
    3. Pivato, Marcus & Fleurbaey, Marc, 2024. "Intergenerational equity and infinite-population ethics: A survey," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    4. Alcantud, José Carlos R., 2010. "The compromise efficiency vs. egalitarianism among generations with an infinite horizon," MPRA Paper 22284, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Susumu Cato, 2019. "The possibility of Paretian anonymous decision-making with an infinite population," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 53(4), pages 587-601, December.
    6. Chiaki Hara & Tomoichi Shinotsuka & Kotaro Suzumura & Yongsheng Xu, 2008. "Continuity and egalitarianism in the evaluation of infinite utility streams," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 31(2), pages 179-191, August.
    7. Asier Estevan & Roberto Maura & Oscar Valero, 2024. "Intergenerational Preferences and Continuity: Reconciling Order and Topology," Papers 2402.01699, arXiv.org.
    8. Toyotaka Sakai, 2003. "Intergenerational preferences and sensitivity to the present," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(26), pages 1-5.
    9. Sakai, Toyotaka, 2010. "A characterization and an impossibility of finite length anonymity for infinite generations," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 877-883, September.
    10. José Carlos R. Alcantud & María D. García-Sanz, 2013. "Evaluations of Infinite Utility Streams: Pareto Efficient and Egalitarian Axiomatics," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 432-447, July.
    11. Vincent Martinet, 2009. "Defining sustainability objectives," EconomiX Working Papers 2009-7, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    12. Christopher Chambers, 2009. "Intergenerational equity: sup, inf, lim sup, and lim inf," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 32(2), pages 243-252, February.
    13. Ram Sewak Dubey & Giorgio Laguzzi, 2020. "Extended Gini Index," Papers 2012.04141, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    14. Asier Estevan & Roberto Maura & Óscar Valero, 2023. "Quasi-Metrics for Possibility Results: Intergenerational Preferences and Continuity," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    15. Dubey, Ram Sewak & Mitra, Tapan, 2010. "On Equitable Social Welfare Functions Satisfying the Weak Pareto Axiom: A Complete Characterimplete Characterization," Working Papers 10-02, Cornell University, Center for Analytic Economics.
    16. Susumu Cato, 2009. "Characterizing the Nash social welfare relation for infinite utility streams: a note," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 29(3), pages 2372-2379.
    17. Banerjee, Kuntal & Mitra, Tapan, 2004. "On the Continuity of Ethical Social Welfare Orders," Working Papers 04-16, Cornell University, Center for Analytic Economics.
    18. Susumu Cato, 2020. "Quasi-stationary social welfare functions," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 89(1), pages 85-106, July.
    19. Toyotaka Sakai, 2016. "Limit representations of intergenerational equity," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 47(2), pages 481-500, August.
    20. Ram S. Dubey & Giorgio Laguzzi, 2020. "Equitable preference relations on infinite utility streams," Papers 2012.06481, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    21. Sakamoto, Norihito & 坂本, 徳仁, 2011. "Impossibilities of Paretian Social Welfare Functions for Infinite Utility Streams with Distributive Equity," Discussion Papers 2011-09, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.

  24. Toyotaka Sakai, 2003. "Intergenerational preferences and sensitivity to the present," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(26), pages 1-5.

    Cited by:

    1. Pivato, Marcus & Fleurbaey, Marc, 2024. "Intergenerational equity and infinite-population ethics: A survey," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    2. Asier Estevan & Roberto Maura & Oscar Valero, 2024. "Intergenerational Preferences and Continuity: Reconciling Order and Topology," Papers 2402.01699, arXiv.org.
    3. José Carlos R. Alcantud & María D. García-Sanz, 2013. "Evaluations of Infinite Utility Streams: Pareto Efficient and Egalitarian Axiomatics," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 432-447, July.
    4. Alcantud, José Carlos R., 2011. "Liberal approaches to ranking infinite utility streams: When can we avoid interferences?," MPRA Paper 32198, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Asier Estevan & Roberto Maura & Óscar Valero, 2023. "Quasi-Metrics for Possibility Results: Intergenerational Preferences and Continuity," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Susumu Cato, 2009. "Characterizing the Nash social welfare relation for infinite utility streams: a note," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 29(3), pages 2372-2379.
    7. Mabrouk, Mohamed, 2006. "Allais-anonymity as an alternative to the discounted-sum criterion in the calculus of optimal growth I: Consensual optimality," MPRA Paper 10512, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Asheim, Geir B. & Tungodden, Bertil, 2005. "A new equity condition for infinite utility streams and the possibility of being Paretian," Memorandum 08/2005, Oslo University, Department of Economics.

  25. Toyotaka Sakai, 2003. "An axiomatic approach to intergenerational equity," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 20(1), pages 167-176.

    Cited by:

    1. Pivato, Marcus & Fleurbaey, Marc, 2024. "Intergenerational equity and infinite-population ethics: A survey," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    2. Sakai, Toyotaka & 坂井, 豊貴 & サカイ, トヨタカ, 2008. "Intergenerational equity and an explicit construction of welfare criteria," PIE/CIS Discussion Paper 395, Center for Intergenerational Studies, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    3. Asier Estevan & Roberto Maura & Oscar Valero, 2024. "Intergenerational Preferences and Continuity: Reconciling Order and Topology," Papers 2402.01699, arXiv.org.
    4. Toyotaka Sakai, 2003. "Intergenerational preferences and sensitivity to the present," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(26), pages 1-5.
    5. Sakai, Toyotaka, 2010. "A characterization and an impossibility of finite length anonymity for infinite generations," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 877-883, September.
    6. Kaname Miyagishima, 2015. "A Characterization Of The Rawlsian Social Ordering Over Infinite Utility Streams," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(3), pages 303-308, July.
    7. Kohei Kamaga & Takashi Kojima, 2009. "$${\mathcal{Q}}$$ -anonymous social welfare relations on infinite utility streams," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 33(3), pages 405-413, September.
    8. Alcantud, José Carlos R., 2011. "Liberal approaches to ranking infinite utility streams: When can we avoid interferences?," MPRA Paper 32198, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Christopher Chambers, 2009. "Intergenerational equity: sup, inf, lim sup, and lim inf," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 32(2), pages 243-252, February.
    10. Asier Estevan & Roberto Maura & Óscar Valero, 2023. "Quasi-Metrics for Possibility Results: Intergenerational Preferences and Continuity," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    11. Markus Knell, 2005. "On the Design of Sustainable and Fair PAYG Pension Systems When Cohort Sizes Change," Working Papers 95, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank).
    12. Susumu Cato, 2009. "Characterizing the Nash social welfare relation for infinite utility streams: a note," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 29(3), pages 2372-2379.
    13. Banerjee, Kuntal & Mitra, Tapan, 2004. "On the Continuity of Ethical Social Welfare Orders," Working Papers 04-16, Cornell University, Center for Analytic Economics.
    14. Ram S. Dubey & Giorgio Laguzzi, 2020. "Equitable preference relations on infinite utility streams," Papers 2012.06481, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    15. Sakamoto, Norihito & 坂本, 徳仁, 2011. "Impossibilities of Paretian Social Welfare Functions for Infinite Utility Streams with Distributive Equity," Discussion Papers 2011-09, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.