IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v229y2018icp413-432.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquids process with different entrained flow coal gasifiers

Author

Listed:
  • Qin, Shiyue
  • Chang, Shiyan
  • Yao, Qiang

Abstract

For the coal-to-liquids (CTL) plant, the most important unit is gasification, which determines the composition of the crude syngas, and affects CO2 emissions and investment of the CTL process. This paper conducts a detailed plant-wide modeling of CTL process with different entrained flow gasifiers. The model is compared with the literature data. Three cases of CTL process with different entrained flow gasifiers (GSP, Shell and Texaco) are researched through thermodynamic, techno-economic and CO2 emissions analysis. Case GSP represents the CTL process with GSP gasifier, Case Shell represents that with Shell gasifier, and Case Texaco represents that with Texaco gasifier. For a typical CTL process, Case GSP can produce FT liquids of 277.49 t/h, Case Shell can produce 246.25 t/h, and Case Texaco can provide 232.93 t/h. The energy efficiencies of Case GSP, Shell and Texaco are 50.85%, 48.18% and 41.09%, respectively. The exergy efficiencies are 49.89%, 47.20% and 40.44%, respectively. The exergy inefficiencies of the subsystem are quantified. The economic performance and CO2 emissions of the three cases are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan & Yao, Qiang, 2018. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquids process with different entrained flow coal gasifiers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 413-432.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:229:y:2018:i:c:p:413-432
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261918310572
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ptasinski, Krzysztof J. & Prins, Mark J. & Pierik, Anke, 2007. "Exergetic evaluation of biomass gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 568-574.
    2. Mansouri Majoumerd, Mohammad & Raas, Han & De, Sudipta & Assadi, Mohsen, 2014. "Estimation of performance variation of future generation IGCC with coal quality and gasification process – Simulation results of EU H2-IGCC project," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 452-462.
    3. Liszka, Marcin & Malik, Tomasz & Manfrida, Giampaolo, 2012. "Energy and exergy analysis of hydrogen-oriented coal gasification with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 142-150.
    4. Pan, Yu & Liu, Liuchen & Zhu, Tong & Zhang, Tao & Zhang, Junying, 2017. "Feasibility analysis on distributed energy system of Chongming County based on RETScreen software," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 298-306.
    5. Sudiro, Maria & Bertucco, Alberto, 2009. "Production of synthetic gasoline and diesel fuel by alternative processes using natural gas and coal: Process simulation and optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2206-2214.
    6. Yueshi Wu & Weihong Yang & Wlodzimierz Blasiak, 2014. "Energy and Exergy Analysis of High Temperature Agent Gasification of Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Karamarkovic, Rade & Karamarkovic, Vladan, 2010. "Energy and exergy analysis of biomass gasification at different temperatures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 537-549.
    8. Hamelinck, Carlo N. & Faaij, André P.C. & den Uil, Herman & Boerrigter, Harold, 2004. "Production of FT transportation fuels from biomass; technical options, process analysis and optimisation, and development potential," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(11), pages 1743-1771.
    9. Ail, Snehesh Shivananda & Dasappa, S., 2016. "Biomass to liquid transportation fuel via Fischer Tropsch synthesis – Technology review and current scenario," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 267-286.
    10. Morris, David R. & Szargut, Jan, 1986. "Standard chemical exergy of some elements and compounds on the planet earth," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 11(8), pages 733-755.
    11. van der Ham, L.V. & Kjelstrup, S., 2010. "Exergy analysis of two cryogenic air separation processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4731-4739.
    12. Karellas, S. & Leontaritis, A.-D. & Panousis, G. & Bellos, E. & Kakaras, E., 2013. "Energetic and exergetic analysis of waste heat recovery systems in the cement industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 147-156.
    13. Mantripragada, Hari Chandan & Rubin, Edward S., 2011. "Techno-economic evaluation of coal-to-liquids (CTL) plants with carbon capture and sequestration," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2808-2816, May.
    14. Parvez, A.M. & Mujtaba, I.M. & Wu, T., 2016. "Energy, exergy and environmental analyses of conventional, steam and CO2-enhanced rice straw gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 579-588.
    15. Ou, Xunmin & Yan, Xiaoyu & Zhang, Xiliang & Liu, Zhen, 2012. "Life-cycle analysis on energy consumption and GHG emission intensities of alternative vehicle fuels in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 218-224.
    16. Chen, Qin & Rao, Ashok & Samuelsen, Scott, 2015. "Coproduction of transportation fuels in advanced IGCCs via coal and biomass mixtures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 851-860.
    17. Becker, W.L. & Braun, R.J. & Penev, M. & Melaina, M., 2012. "Production of Fischer–Tropsch liquid fuels from high temperature solid oxide co-electrolysis units," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 99-115.
    18. Martelli, Emanuele & Kreutz, Thomas & Carbo, Michiel & Consonni, Stefano & Jansen, Daniel, 2011. "Shell coal IGCCS with carbon capture: Conventional gas quench vs. innovative configurations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3978-3989.
    19. Mansouri Majoumerd, Mohammad & De, Sudipta & Assadi, Mohsen & Breuhaus, Peter, 2012. "An EU initiative for future generation of IGCC power plants using hydrogen-rich syngas: Simulation results for the baseline configuration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 280-290.
    20. Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan, 2017. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coke production process with waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 435-450.
    21. Sues, Anna & Juraščík, Martin & Ptasinski, Krzysztof, 2010. "Exergetic evaluation of 5 biowastes-to-biofuels routes via gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 996-1007.
    22. Song, Guohui & Xiao, Jun & Zhao, Hao & Shen, Laihong, 2012. "A unified correlation for estimating specific chemical exergy of solid and liquid fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 164-173.
    23. Haarlemmer, Geert & Boissonnet, Guillaume & Peduzzi, Emanuela & Setier, Pierre-Alexandre, 2014. "Investment and production costs of synthetic fuels – A literature survey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 667-676.
    24. Lee, Hyeon-Hui & Lee, Jae-Chul & Joo, Yong-Jin & Oh, Min & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2014. "Dynamic modeling of Shell entrained flow gasifier in an integrated gasification combined cycle process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 425-440.
    25. Kunze, Christian & Riedl, Karsten & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2011. "Structured exergy analysis of an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) plant with carbon capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1480-1487.
    26. Yang, Sheng & Qian, Yu & Ma, Donghui & Wang, Yifan & Yang, Siyu, 2017. "BGL gasifier for coal-to-SNG: A comparative techno-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 158-170.
    27. Zhou, Huairong & Yang, Siyu & Xiao, Honghua & Yang, Qingchun & Qian, Yu & Gao, Li, 2016. "Modeling and techno-economic analysis of shale-to-liquid and coal-to-liquid fuels processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 201-210.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qin, Shiyue & Zhang, Xuzhi & Wang, Ming & Cui, Hongyou & Li, Zhihe & Yi, Weiming, 2021. "Comparison of BGL and Lurgi gasification for coal to liquid fuels (CTL): Process modeling, simulation and thermodynamic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    2. Sunel Kumar & Zhihua Wang & Yong He & Yanqun Zhu & Kefa Cen, 2022. "Numerical Analysis for Coal Gasification Performance in a Lab-Scale Gasifier: Effects of the Wall Temperature and Oxygen/Coal Ratio," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Xiao, Juan & Wang, Simin & Ye, Shupei & Dong, Jiayu & Wen, Jian & Zhang, Zaoxiao, 2020. "Thermo-economic optimization of gasification process with coal water slurry preheating technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    4. Dongliang, Wang & Wenliang, Meng & Huairong, Zhou & Guixian, Li & Yong, Yang & Hongwei, Li, 2021. "Green hydrogen coupling with CO2 utilization of coal-to-methanol for high methanol productivity and low CO2 emission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    5. Huo, Hailong & Liu, Xunliang & Wen, Zhi & Lou, Guofeng & Dou, Ruifeng & Su, Fuyong & Zhou, Wenning & Jiang, Zeyi, 2021. "Case study of a novel low rank coal to calcium carbide process based on techno-economic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    6. Chen, Jianjun & Lam, Hon Loong & Qian, Yu & Yang, Siyu, 2021. "Combined energy consumption and CO2 capture management: Improved acid gas removal process integrated with CO2 liquefaction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PA).
    7. Larson, Eric D. & Kreutz, Thomas G. & Greig, Chris & Williams, Robert H. & Rooney, Tim & Gray, Edward & Elsido, Cristina & Martelli, Emanuele & Meerman, Johannes C., 2020. "Design and analysis of a low-carbon lignite/biomass-to-jet fuel demonstration project," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    8. Qin, Shiyue & Wang, Ming & Cui, Hongyou & Li, Zhihe & Yi, Weiming, 2022. "Opportunities for renewable electricity utilization in coal to liquid fuels process: Thermodynamic and techo-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    9. Farias Neto, G.W. & Leite, M.B.M. & Marcelino, T.O.A.C. & Carneiro, L.O. & Brito, K.D. & Brito, R.P., 2021. "Optimizing the coke oven process by adjusting the temperature of the combustion chambers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    10. Xu, Haoran & Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes & Ni, Meng & Cao, Jun & Xuan, Jin, 2019. "Low carbon fuel production from combined solid oxide CO2 co-electrolysis and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis system: A modelling study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 911-918.
    11. Ammr M. Khurmy & Ahmad Al Harbi & Abdul Gani Abdul Jameel & Nabeel Ahmad & Usama Ahmed, 2023. "Conversion of Vacuum Residue from Refinery Waste to Cleaner Fuel: Technical and Economic Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-28, October.
    12. Zhang, Dongqiang & Duan, Runhao & Li, Hongwei & Yang, Qingchun & Zhou, Huairong, 2020. "Optimal design, thermodynamic, cost and CO2 emission analyses of coal-to-methanol process integrated with chemical looping air separation and hydrogen technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    13. Kim, Mukyeong & Ye, Insoo & Jo, Hyunbin & Ryu, Changkook & Kim, Bongkeun & Lee, Jeongsoo, 2020. "New reduced-order model optimized for online dynamic simulation of a Shell coal gasifier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    14. Wang, Dandan & Li, Sheng & He, Song & Gao, Lin, 2019. "Coal to substitute natural gas based on combined coal-steam gasification and one-step methanation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 851-859.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qin, Shiyue & Zhang, Xuzhi & Wang, Ming & Cui, Hongyou & Li, Zhihe & Yi, Weiming, 2021. "Comparison of BGL and Lurgi gasification for coal to liquid fuels (CTL): Process modeling, simulation and thermodynamic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    2. Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan, 2017. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coke production process with waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 435-450.
    3. Lee, Woo-Sung & Oh, Hyun-Taek & Lee, Jae-Cheol & Oh, Min & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2019. "Performance analysis and carbon reduction assessment of an integrated syngas purification process for the co-production of hydrogen and power in an integrated gasification combined cycle plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 910-927.
    4. Silva, Isabelly P. & Lima, Rafael M.A. & Silva, Gabriel F. & Ruzene, Denise S. & Silva, Daniel P., 2019. "Thermodynamic equilibrium model based on stoichiometric method for biomass gasification: A review of model modifications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Qin, Shiyue & Wang, Ming & Cui, Hongyou & Li, Zhihe & Yi, Weiming, 2022. "Opportunities for renewable electricity utilization in coal to liquid fuels process: Thermodynamic and techo-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    6. Oh, Hyun-Taek & Lee, Woo-Sung & Ju, Youngsan & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2019. "Performance evaluation and carbon assessment of IGCC power plant with coal quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    7. König, Daniel H. & Baucks, Nadine & Dietrich, Ralph-Uwe & Wörner, Antje, 2015. "Simulation and evaluation of a process concept for the generation of synthetic fuel from CO2 and H2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 833-841.
    8. Martínez González, Aldemar & Lesme Jaén, René & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo, 2020. "Thermodynamic assessment of the integrated gasification-power plant operating in the sawmill industry: An energy and exergy analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1151-1163.
    9. Moioli, Stefania & Giuffrida, Antonio & Romano, Matteo C. & Pellegrini, Laura A. & Lozza, Giovanni, 2016. "Assessment of MDEA absorption process for sequential H2S removal and CO2 capture in air-blown IGCC plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1452-1470.
    10. Ren, Siyue & Feng, Xiao & Wang, Yufei, 2021. "Emergy evaluation of the integrated gasification combined cycle power generation systems with a carbon capture system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    11. Moon, Dong-Kyu & Lee, Dong-Geun & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2016. "H2 pressure swing adsorption for high pressure syngas from an integrated gasification combined cycle with a carbon capture process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 760-774.
    12. Wang, Changbo & Zhang, Lixiao & Chang, Yuan & Pang, Mingyue, 2021. "Energy return on investment (EROI) of biomass conversion systems in China: Meta-analysis focused on system boundary unification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    13. Mendiburu, Andrés Z. & Carvalho, João A. & Coronado, Christian J.R., 2014. "Thermochemical equilibrium modeling of biomass downdraft gasifier: Stoichiometric models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 189-201.
    14. Kreutz, Thomas G. & Larson, Eric D. & Elsido, Cristina & Martelli, Emanuele & Greig, Chris & Williams, Robert H., 2020. "Techno-economic prospects for producing Fischer-Tropsch jet fuel and electricity from lignite and woody biomass with CO2 capture for EOR," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    15. Rovas, Dimitrios & Zabaniotou, Anastasia, 2015. "Exergy analysis of a small gasification-ICE integrated system for CHP production fueled with Mediterranean agro-food processing wastes: The SMARt-CHP," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 510-517.
    16. Martínez González, Aldemar & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo & Escobar Palacio, José Carlos, 2019. "Syngas production from oil sludge gasification and its potential use in power generation systems: An energy and exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1175-1190.
    17. Saidur, R. & BoroumandJazi, G. & Mekhilef, S. & Mohammed, H.A., 2012. "A review on exergy analysis of biomass based fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 1217-1222.
    18. Piazzi, Stefano & Patuzzi, Francesco & Baratieri, Marco, 2022. "Energy and exergy analysis of different biomass gasification coupled to Fischer-Tropsch synthesis configurations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    19. Andreas Meurer & Jürgen Kern, 2021. "Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis as the Key for Decentralized Sustainable Kerosene Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Wang, Linwei & Izaharuddin, Ainul N. & Karimi, Nader & Paul, Manosh C., 2021. "A numerical investigation of CO2 gasification of biomass particles- analysis of energy, exergy and entropy generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:229:y:2018:i:c:p:413-432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.