IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v45y2012i1p142-150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy and exergy analysis of hydrogen-oriented coal gasification with CO2 capture

Author

Listed:
  • Liszka, Marcin
  • Malik, Tomasz
  • Manfrida, Giampaolo

Abstract

Coal gasification is seen as an attractive way for hydrogen production. The main advantage of this approach is the low fuel price compared to reforming of natural gas. On the other hand, considering the EU climate policy, the emission of CO2 has to be reduced. The CO2 capture from the raw syngas should be thus considered. The main purpose of this work is to propose implementation of a fully “zero-emission” plant by introduction of biomass into the gasifier. The structure of the plant has been proposed and modeled. It is composed basically of gasifier, water gas shift reactors, acid gas removal units, pressure-swing adsorption process for hydrogen separation, combined cycle for power production and essential auxiliary components. The analyzed installation has been evaluated from the energy and exergy points of view by calculation of energy utilization factor and relative exergy losses occurring in main components of the system. Such an approach enables determination of the contribution of each component to the total system irreversibility. The results indicate that the highest exergy loss takes place in the gasifier. The overall exergy efficiency of the coal-to-hydrogen system is equal to ca. 57%, while the energy utilization factor is close to 65%.

Suggested Citation

  • Liszka, Marcin & Malik, Tomasz & Manfrida, Giampaolo, 2012. "Energy and exergy analysis of hydrogen-oriented coal gasification with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 142-150.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:45:y:2012:i:1:p:142-150
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.03.054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544212002575
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2012.03.054?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tock, Laurence & Maréchal, François, 2012. "Co-production of hydrogen and electricity from lignocellulosic biomass: Process design and thermo-economic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 339-349.
    2. Erlach, B. & Schmidt, M. & Tsatsaronis, G., 2011. "Comparison of carbon capture IGCC with pre-combustion decarbonisation and with chemical-looping combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3804-3815.
    3. Martelli, Emanuele & Kreutz, Thomas & Carbo, Michiel & Consonni, Stefano & Jansen, Daniel, 2011. "Shell coal IGCCS with carbon capture: Conventional gas quench vs. innovative configurations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3978-3989.
    4. Johansson, Daniella & Franck, Per-Åke & Berntsson, Thore, 2012. "Hydrogen production from biomass gasification in the oil refining industry – A system analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 212-227.
    5. Domenichini, R. & Gallio, M. & Lazzaretto, A., 2010. "Combined production of hydrogen and power from heavy oil gasification: Pinch analysis, thermodynamic and economic evaluations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2184-2193.
    6. Kunze, Christian & Riedl, Karsten & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2011. "Structured exergy analysis of an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) plant with carbon capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 1480-1487.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chutichai, Bhawasut & Authayanun, Suthida & Assabumrungrat, Suttichai & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2013. "Performance analysis of an integrated biomass gasification and PEMFC (proton exchange membrane fuel cell) system: Hydrogen and power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 98-106.
    2. Nicholas S. Siefert & Sarah Narburgh & Yang Chen, 2016. "Comprehensive Exergy Analysis of Three IGCC Power Plant Configurations with CO 2 Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Khan, Zakir & Yusup, Suzana & Kamble, Prashant & Naqvi, Muhammad & Watson, Ian, 2018. "Assessment of energy flows and energy efficiencies in integrated catalytic adsorption steam gasification for hydrogen production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 346-355.
    4. Fan, Jing-Li & Yu, Pengwei & Li, Kai & Xu, Mao & Zhang, Xian, 2022. "A levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) comparison of coal-to-hydrogen with CCS and water electrolysis powered by renewable energy in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    5. Qin, Shiyue & Zhang, Xuzhi & Wang, Ming & Cui, Hongyou & Li, Zhihe & Yi, Weiming, 2021. "Comparison of BGL and Lurgi gasification for coal to liquid fuels (CTL): Process modeling, simulation and thermodynamic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    6. Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan & Yao, Qiang, 2018. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquids process with different entrained flow coal gasifiers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 413-432.
    7. Lee, Jae Chul & Lee, Hyeon Hui & Joo, Yong Jin & Lee, Chang Ha & Oh, Min, 2014. "Process simulation and thermodynamic analysis of an IGCC (integrated gasification combined cycle) plant with an entrained coal gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 58-68.
    8. Liszka, Marcin & Malik, Tomasz & Budnik, Michał & Ziębik, Andrzej, 2013. "Comparison of IGCC (integrated gasification combined cycle) and CFB (circulating fluidized bed) cogeneration plants equipped with CO2 removal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 86-96.
    9. Atsonios, K. & Panopoulos, K.D. & Doukelis, A. & Koumanakos, A. & Kakaras, E., 2013. "Cryogenic method for H2 and CH4 recovery from a rich CO2 stream in pre-combustion carbon capture and storage schemes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 106-113.
    10. Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Hosseinpour, Soleiman & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Younesi, Habibollah & Najafpour, Ghasem, 2016. "On the exergetic optimization of continuous photobiological hydrogen production using hybrid ANFIS–NSGA-II (adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system–non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 507-520.
    11. Liszka, Marcin & Tuka, Jakub, 2012. "Parametric study of GT and ASU integration in case of IGCC with CO2 removal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 151-159.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ren, Siyue & Feng, Xiao & Wang, Yufei, 2021. "Emergy evaluation of the integrated gasification combined cycle power generation systems with a carbon capture system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    2. Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan & Yao, Qiang, 2018. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquids process with different entrained flow coal gasifiers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 413-432.
    3. Lee, Woo-Sung & Oh, Hyun-Taek & Lee, Jae-Cheol & Oh, Min & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2019. "Performance analysis and carbon reduction assessment of an integrated syngas purification process for the co-production of hydrogen and power in an integrated gasification combined cycle plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 910-927.
    4. Nicholas S. Siefert & Sarah Narburgh & Yang Chen, 2016. "Comprehensive Exergy Analysis of Three IGCC Power Plant Configurations with CO 2 Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Liszka, Marcin & Malik, Tomasz & Budnik, Michał & Ziębik, Andrzej, 2013. "Comparison of IGCC (integrated gasification combined cycle) and CFB (circulating fluidized bed) cogeneration plants equipped with CO2 removal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 86-96.
    6. Oh, Hyun-Taek & Lee, Woo-Sung & Ju, Youngsan & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2019. "Performance evaluation and carbon assessment of IGCC power plant with coal quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    7. Xu, Shisen & Ren, Yongqiang & Wang, Baomin & Xu, Yue & Chen, Liang & Wang, Xiaolong & Xiao, Tiancun, 2014. "Development of a novel 2-stage entrained flow coal dry powder gasifier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 318-323.
    8. Chen, Shiyi & Lior, Noam & Xiang, Wenguo, 2015. "Coal gasification integration with solid oxide fuel cell and chemical looping combustion for high-efficiency power generation with inherent CO2 capture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 298-312.
    9. Lane, Blake & Kinnon, Michael Mac & Shaffer, Brendan & Samuelsen, Scott, 2022. "Deployment planning tool for environmentally sensitive heavy-duty vehicles and fueling infrastructure," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    10. Igor Donskoy, 2023. "Techno-Economic Efficiency Estimation of Promising Integrated Oxyfuel Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, February.
    11. Samuel C. Bayham & Andrew Tong & Mandar Kathe & Liang-Shih Fan, 2016. "Chemical looping technology for energy and chemical production," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 216-241, March.
    12. Håkonsen, Silje Fosse & Grande, Carlos A. & Blom, Richard, 2014. "Rotating bed reactor for CLC: Bed characteristics dependencies on internal gas mixing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1952-1957.
    13. Xue, Xiaodong & Liu, Changchun & Han, Wei & Wang, Zefeng & Zhang, Na & Jin, Hongguang & Wang, Xiaodong, 2023. "Proposal and investigation of a high-efficiency coal-fired power generation system enabled by chemical recuperative supercritical water coal gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    14. Cloete, Schalk & Zaabout, Abdelghafour & Romano, Matteo C. & Chiesa, Paolo & Lozza, Giovanni & Gallucci, Fausto & van Sint Annaland, Martin & Amini, Shahriar, 2017. "Optimization of a Gas Switching Combustion process through advanced heat management strategies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P2), pages 1459-1470.
    15. Li, Sheng & Jin, Hongguang & Gao, Lin, 2013. "Cogeneration of substitute natural gas and power from coal by moderate recycle of the chemical unconverted gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 658-667.
    16. Kim, Mukyeong & Ye, Insoo & Jo, Hyunbin & Ryu, Changkook & Kim, Bongkeun & Lee, Jeongsoo, 2020. "New reduced-order model optimized for online dynamic simulation of a Shell coal gasifier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    17. Chou, Chang-Chen & Hsieh, Ching-Hsuan & Chen, Bing-Hung, 2015. "Hydrogen generation from catalytic hydrolysis of sodium borohydride using bimetallic Ni–Co nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide as catalysts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1973-1982.
    18. Brenda Raho & Gianpiero Colangelo & Marco Milanese & Arturo de Risi, 2022. "A Critical Analysis of the Oxy-Combustion Process: From Mathematical Models to Combustion Product Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-25, September.
    19. Duan, Liqiang & Xia, Kun & Feng, Tao & Jia, Shilun & Bian, Jing, 2016. "Study on coal-fired power plant with CO2 capture by integrating molten carbonate fuel cell system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(P2), pages 578-589.
    20. Pedro Tavares Borges & Electo Eduardo Silva Lora & Osvaldo José Venturini & Marcelo Risso Errera & Diego Mauricio Yepes Maya & Yusuf Makarfi Isa & Alexander Kozlov & Shu Zhang, 2024. "A Comprehensive Technical, Environmental, Economic, and Bibliometric Assessment of Hydrogen Production Through Biomass Gasification, Including Global and Brazilian Potentials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-20, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Gasification; Hydrogen; Exergy; IGCC; CO2;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:45:y:2012:i:1:p:142-150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.