IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v35y2010i12p4731-4739.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exergy analysis of two cryogenic air separation processes

Author

Listed:
  • van der Ham, L.V.
  • Kjelstrup, S.

Abstract

Two process designs of a cryogenic ASU (air separation unit) have been evaluated using exergy analysis. The ASU is part of an IGCC (integrated gasification combined cycle); it is supplying oxygen and nitrogen to the gasifier and nitrogen to the gas turbine. The two process designs separate the same feed into products with the same specifications. They differ in the number of distillation columns that are used; either two or three. Addition of the third column reduced the exergy destruction in the distillation section with 31%. Overall, the three-column design destroyed 12% less exergy than the two-column design. The rational exergy efficiency is defined as the desired exergy change divided by the total exergy change; it is 38% for the three-column design and 35% for the two-column design. Almost half of the exergy destruction is located in compressor after-coolers. Using this heat of compression elsewhere in the IGCC can be an important way to increase the IGCC efficiency. It is proposed to use it for the pre-heating of ASU products or for the production of steam, which can be used as part of the steam turbine cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • van der Ham, L.V. & Kjelstrup, S., 2010. "Exergy analysis of two cryogenic air separation processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4731-4739.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:35:y:2010:i:12:p:4731-4739
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544210004986
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bhattacharya, Atmadeep & Das, Anirban & Datta, Amitava, 2014. "Exergy based performance analysis of hydrogen production from rice straw using oxygen blown gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 525-533.
    2. Querol, E. & Gonzalez-Regueral, B. & Ramos, A. & Perez-Benedito, J.L., 2011. "Novel application for exergy and thermoeconomic analysis of processes simulated with Aspen Plus®," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 964-974.
    3. Matsuda, Kazuo & Kawazuishi, Kenichi & Kansha, Yasuki & Fushimi, Chihiro & Nagao, Masaki & Kunikiyo, Hiroshi & Masuda, Fusao & Tsutsumi, Atsushi, 2011. "Advanced energy saving in distillation process with self-heat recuperation technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 4640-4645.
    4. Ebrahimi, Armin & Ziabasharhagh, Masoud, 2017. "Optimal design and integration of a cryogenic Air Separation Unit (ASU) with Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) as heat sink, thermodynamic and economic analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 868-885.
    5. Khoa, T.D. & Shuhaimi, M. & Nam, H.M., 2012. "Application of three dimensional exergy analysis curves for absorption columns," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 273-280.
    6. Puig-Arnavat, Maria & Søgaard, Martin & Hjuler, Klaus & Ahrenfeldt, Jesper & Henriksen, Ulrik Birk & Hendriksen, Peter Vang, 2015. "Integration of oxygen membranes for oxygen production in cement plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 852-865.
    7. Qin, Shiyue & Zhang, Xuzhi & Wang, Ming & Cui, Hongyou & Li, Zhihe & Yi, Weiming, 2021. "Comparison of BGL and Lurgi gasification for coal to liquid fuels (CTL): Process modeling, simulation and thermodynamic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    8. Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan & Yao, Qiang, 2018. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquids process with different entrained flow coal gasifiers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 413-432.
    9. Ebrahimi, Armin & Meratizaman, Mousa & Akbarpour Reyhani, Hamed & Pourali, Omid & Amidpour, Majid, 2015. "Energetic, exergetic and economic assessment of oxygen production from two columns cryogenic air separation unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1298-1316.
    10. Zonouz, Masood Jalali & Mehrpooya, Mehdi, 2017. "Parametric study of a hybrid one column air separation unit (ASU) and CO2 power cycle based on advanced exergy cost analysis results," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 261-275.
    11. Piadehrouhi, Forough & Ghorbani, Bahram & Miansari, Mehdi & Mehrpooya, Mehdi, 2019. "Development of a new integrated structure for simultaneous generation of power and liquid carbon dioxide using solar dish collectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 938-959.
    12. Singla, Rohit & Chowdhury, Kanchan, 2020. "Saving power by modifying a double column air separation plant to produce high and low purity pressurized gaseous oxygen simultaneously," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    13. Fu, Qian & Kansha, Yasuki & Song, Chunfeng & Liu, Yuping & Ishizuka, Masanori & Tsutsumi, Atsushi, 2016. "A cryogenic air separation process based on self-heat recuperation for oxy-combustion plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1114-1121.
    14. Akbari, Maryam & Oyedun, Adetoyese Olajire & Kumar, Amit, 2018. "Ammonia production from black liquor gasification and co-gasification with pulp and waste sludges: A techno-economic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 133-143.
    15. Andrey Rogalev & Nikolay Rogalev & Vladimir Kindra & Olga Zlyvko & Andrey Vegera, 2021. "A Study of Low-Potential Heat Utilization Methods for Oxy-Fuel Combustion Power Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, June.
    16. Muhammad Haris Hamayun & Naveed Ramzan & Murid Hussain & Muhammad Faheem, 2020. "Evaluation of Two-Column Air Separation Processes Based on Exergy Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, December.
    17. Paweł Ziółkowski & Stanisław Głuch & Piotr Józef Ziółkowski & Janusz Badur, 2022. "Compact High Efficiency and Zero-Emission Gas-Fired Power Plant with Oxy-Combustion and Carbon Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-39, April.
    18. Wang, Maojian & Liu, Guilian & Hui, Chi Wai, 2016. "Simultaneous optimization and integration of gas turbine and air separation unit in IGCC plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P2), pages 1294-1301.
    19. Thomas, Rijo Jacob & Ghosh, Parthasarathi & Chowdhury, Kanchan, 2012. "Application of exergy analysis in designing helium liquefiers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 207-219.
    20. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Moftakhari Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi & Rosen, Marc A., 2015. "Optimum design and exergy analysis of a novel cryogenic air separation process with LNG (liquefied natural gas) cold energy utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 2047-2069.
    21. Fu, Chao & Gundersen, Truls, 2012. "Using exergy analysis to reduce power consumption in air separation units for oxy-combustion processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 60-68.
    22. Dan Fernandes & Song Wang & Qiang Xu & Russel Buss & Daniel Chen, 2019. "Process and Carbon Footprint Analyses of the Allam Cycle Power Plant Integrated with an Air Separation Unit," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-16, October.
    23. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C. & Pinto, P.C.R., 2020. "Gasification-based biorefinery integration in the pulp and paper industry: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:35:y:2010:i:12:p:4731-4739. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.