IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v263y2020ics030626192030146x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New reduced-order model optimized for online dynamic simulation of a Shell coal gasifier

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Mukyeong
  • Ye, Insoo
  • Jo, Hyunbin
  • Ryu, Changkook
  • Kim, Bongkeun
  • Lee, Jeongsoo

Abstract

A reduced-order model (ROM) for an entrained flow coal gasifier provides a real-time dynamic prediction of key performance parameters under various operating conditions. However, existing 1D ROMs cannot consider coal burners located on the sidewalls in Shell coal gasifiers frequently applied in commercial plants. In this study, a pseudo-2D ROM was developed to consider the characteristic flow pattern of the gasifier and coupled with a discretized slag-layer model for the wall. Some input parameters specific to the gasifier were determined from a detailed computational fluid dynamics study. Further, the measured differences between input coal ash and bottom slag composition were incorporated in the slag viscosity. The ROM was validated in two ways using the design and operation data of a 300-MW IGCC plant. First, the steady-state prediction showed good agreement with the design data at various loads in terms of syngas composition, heat duty, and exit gas temperature. This also implied that the predicted slag thickness on the wall was reasonable. Second, the ROM was applied to actual operation data over 7 h with two events. For a gradual increase in the target O2/coal ratio and sudden changes in the coal throughput, the dynamic response of the measured heat duty was successfully reproduced by the ROM. The predicted exit gas temperature reflected the instantaneous fluctuations of O2/coal ratio and appeared more reasonable than the correlation-based value used by the operators. The ROM clearly showed differences in the response rate between the exit gas temperature, heat duty, cold gas efficiency, and slag thickness for changes in the operation variables. It can be used as a real-time online simulator for advanced gasifier operation.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Mukyeong & Ye, Insoo & Jo, Hyunbin & Ryu, Changkook & Kim, Bongkeun & Lee, Jeongsoo, 2020. "New reduced-order model optimized for online dynamic simulation of a Shell coal gasifier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:263:y:2020:i:c:s030626192030146x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030626192030146X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114634?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sang Shin Park & Hyo Jae Jeong & Jungho Hwang, 2015. "3-D CFD Modeling for Parametric Study in a 300-MWe One-Stage Oxygen-Blown Entrained-Bed Coal Gasifier," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Martelli, Emanuele & Kreutz, Thomas & Carbo, Michiel & Consonni, Stefano & Jansen, Daniel, 2011. "Shell coal IGCCS with carbon capture: Conventional gas quench vs. innovative configurations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3978-3989.
    3. Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan & Yao, Qiang, 2018. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquids process with different entrained flow coal gasifiers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 413-432.
    4. Ishii, Hiromi & Hayashi, Tomoya & Tada, Hiroaki & Yokohama, Katsuhiko & Takashima, Ryuhei & Hayashi, Jun-ichiro, 2019. "Critical assessment of oxy-fuel integrated coal gasification combined cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 156-169.
    5. Wang, Dandan & Li, Sheng & He, Song & Gao, Lin, 2019. "Coal to substitute natural gas based on combined coal-steam gasification and one-step methanation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 851-859.
    6. Zhou, Hua & Xie, Taili & You, Fengqi, 2018. "On-line simulation and optimization of a commercial-scale shell entrained-flow gasifier using a novel dynamic reduced order model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 516-534.
    7. Cao, Zhikai & Li, Tao & Zhang, Quancong & Zhou, Hua & Song, Can & You, Fengqi, 2018. "Systems modeling, simulation and analysis for robust operations and improved design of entrained-flow pulverized coal gasifiers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 941-964.
    8. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fang, Neng & Li, Zhengqi & Xie, Cheng & Liu, Shuxuan & Lu, Yue & Zeng, Lingyan & Chen, Zhichao, 2021. "Influence of the multi-burner bias angle on the air/particle flow characteristics in an improved fly ash entrained-flow gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    2. Fang, Neng & Li, Zhengqi & Liu, Shuxuan & Xie, Cheng & Zeng, Lingyan & Chen, Zhichao, 2021. "Experimental air/particle flow characteristics of an 80,000 Nm3/h fly ash entrained-flow gasifier with different multi-burner arrangements," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PB).
    3. Ismail, Tamer M. & Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & El-Salam, M. Abd & Rouboa, Abel, 2020. "Parametric studies in the gasification agent and fluidization velocity during oxygen-enriched gasification of biomass in a pilot-scale fluidized bed: Experimental and numerical assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 2429-2439.
    4. Fang, Neng & Li, Zhengqi & Wang, Jiaquan & Zhang, Bin & Zeng, Lingyan & Chen, Zhichao & Wang, Haopeng & Liu, Xiaoying & Zhang, Xiaoyan, 2018. "Experimental investigations on air/particle flow characteristics in a 2000 t/d GSP pulverized coal gasifier with an improved burner," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 432-441.
    5. Shevyrev, S.A. & Mazheiko, N.E. & Yakutin, S.K. & Strizhak, P.A., 2022. "Investigation of characteristics of gas and coke residue for the regime of quasi- and non-stationary steam gasification of coal in a fluidized bed: Part 1," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    6. Cao, Zhikai & Wu, Qi & Zhou, Hua & Chen, Pingping & You, Fengqi, 2020. "Dynamic modeling, systematic analysis, and operation optimization for shell entrained-flow heavy residue gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    7. Xu, Shisen & Ren, Yongqiang & Wang, Baomin & Xu, Yue & Chen, Liang & Wang, Xiaolong & Xiao, Tiancun, 2014. "Development of a novel 2-stage entrained flow coal dry powder gasifier," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 318-323.
    8. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    9. Igor Donskoy, 2023. "Techno-Economic Efficiency Estimation of Promising Integrated Oxyfuel Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Ren, Siyue & Feng, Xiao & Wang, Yufei, 2021. "Emergy evaluation of the integrated gasification combined cycle power generation systems with a carbon capture system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    11. Salem, Ahmed M. & Abd Elbar, Ayman Refat, 2023. "The feasibility and performance of using producer gas as a gasifying medium," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    12. Sahu, Nitesh Kumar & Kumar, Mayank & Dewan, Anupam, 2022. "Sophisticated interplay of operating conditions governs flow field transition and optimal conversion inside tangentially fired gasifiers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    13. Brenda Raho & Gianpiero Colangelo & Marco Milanese & Arturo de Risi, 2022. "A Critical Analysis of the Oxy-Combustion Process: From Mathematical Models to Combustion Product Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-25, September.
    14. Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan & Yao, Qiang, 2018. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquids process with different entrained flow coal gasifiers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 413-432.
    15. Scaccabarozzi, Roberto & Gatti, Manuele & Martelli, Emanuele, 2016. "Thermodynamic analysis and numerical optimization of the NET Power oxy-combustion cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 505-526.
    16. Lee, Adrian J. & Diwekar, Urmila M., 2012. "Optimal sensor placement in integrated gasification combined cycle power systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 255-264.
    17. Li, Jichao & Han, Wei & Song, Xinyang & Li, Peijing & Wang, Zefeng & Jin, Hongguang, 2024. "Near-zero carbon emission power generation system enabled by staged coal gasification and chemical recuperation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    18. Pettinau, Alberto & Ferrara, Francesca & Tola, Vittorio & Cau, Giorgio, 2017. "Techno-economic comparison between different technologies for CO2-free power generation from coal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 426-439.
    19. Viebahn, Peter & Vallentin, Daniel & Höller, Samuel, 2014. "Prospects of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in India’s power sector – An integrated assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 62-75.
    20. Liu, Yang & Fu, Peifang & Yu, Bo & Yan, Weijie & Chen, Yumin & Zhou, Huaichun, 2023. "Intrinsic combustion kinetics of rapid-pyrolysis Zhundong coal char," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:263:y:2020:i:c:s030626192030146x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.