IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v35y2010i2p996-1007.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exergetic evaluation of 5 biowastes-to-biofuels routes via gasification

Author

Listed:
  • Sues, Anna
  • Juraščík, Martin
  • Ptasinski, Krzysztof

Abstract

This paper presents the exergy analysis results for the production of several biofuels, i.e., SNG (synthetic natural gas), methanol, Fischer–Tropsch fuels, hydrogen, as well as heat and electricity, from several biowastes generated in the Dutch province of Friesland, selected as one of the typical European regions. Biowastes have been classified in 5 virtual streams according to their ultimate and proximate analysis. All production chains have been modeled in Aspen Plus in order to analyze their technical performance. The common steps for all the production chains are: pre-treatment, gasification, gas cleaning, water–gas-shift reactions, catalytic reactors, final gas separation and upgrading. Optionally a gas turbine and steam turbines are used to produce heat and electricity from unconverted gas and heat removal, respectively. The results show that, in terms of mass conversion, methanol production seems to be the most efficient process for all the biowastes. SNG synthesis is preferred when exergetic efficiency is the objective parameter, but hydrogen process is more efficient when the performance is analyzed by means of the 1st Law of Thermodynamics. The main exergy losses account for the gasification section, except in the electricity and heat production chain, where the combined cycle is less efficient.

Suggested Citation

  • Sues, Anna & Juraščík, Martin & Ptasinski, Krzysztof, 2010. "Exergetic evaluation of 5 biowastes-to-biofuels routes via gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 996-1007.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:35:y:2010:i:2:p:996-1007
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2009.06.027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544209002424
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2009.06.027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ptasinski, Krzysztof J. & Prins, Mark J. & Pierik, Anke, 2007. "Exergetic evaluation of biomass gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 568-574.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rupesh S & Muraleedharan C & Arun P, 2022. "Influence of Residence Time on Syngas Composition in CaO Enhanced Air–Steam Gasification of Biomass," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8363-8377, June.
    2. Atsonios, Konstantinos & Kougioumtzis, Michael-Alexander & D. Panopoulos, Kyriakos & Kakaras, Emmanuel, 2015. "Alternative thermochemical routes for aviation biofuels via alcohols synthesis: Process modeling, techno-economic assessment and comparison," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 346-366.
    3. Piazzi, Stefano & Patuzzi, Francesco & Baratieri, Marco, 2022. "Energy and exergy analysis of different biomass gasification coupled to Fischer-Tropsch synthesis configurations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    4. Zhang, Bo & Chen, Jixiang & Kandasamy, Sabariswaran & He, Zhixia, 2020. "Hydrothermal liquefaction of fresh lemon-peel and Spirulina platensis blending -operation parameter and biocrude chemistry investigation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    5. Clausen, Lasse R. & Houbak, Niels & Elmegaard, Brian, 2010. "Technoeconomic analysis of a methanol plant based on gasification of biomass and electrolysis of water," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2338-2347.
    6. Wang, Chaoyang & Liu, Ming & Zhao, Yongliang & Wang, Zhu & Yan, Junjie, 2018. "Thermodynamics analysis on a heat exchanger unit during the transient processes based on the second law," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 622-633.
    7. Kolb, Sebastian & Plankenbühler, Thomas & Hofmann, Katharina & Bergerson, Joule & Karl, Jürgen, 2021. "Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of renewable gas technologies: A comparative review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    8. Karami, Kavosh & Karimi, Keikhosro & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Kumar, Rajeev, 2022. "Mesophilic aerobic digestion: An efficient and inexpensive biological pretreatment to improve biogas production from highly-recalcitrant pinewood," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    9. Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan & Yao, Qiang, 2018. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquids process with different entrained flow coal gasifiers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 413-432.
    10. Saidur, R. & BoroumandJazi, G. & Mekhilef, S. & Mohammed, H.A., 2012. "A review on exergy analysis of biomass based fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 1217-1222.
    11. Velásquez-Arredondo, H.I. & De Oliveira Junior, S. & Benjumea, P., 2012. "Exergy efficiency analysis of chemical and biochemical stages involved in liquid biofuels production processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 138-145.
    12. van der Heijden, Harro & Ptasinski, Krzysztof J., 2012. "Exergy analysis of thermochemical ethanol production via biomass gasification and catalytic synthesis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 200-210.
    13. Lümmen, Norbert & Røstbø, Erlend Velken, 2020. "Biowaste to hydrogen or Fischer-Tropsch fuels by gasification – A Gibbs energy minimisation study for finding carbon capture potential and fossil carbon displacement on the road," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    14. Tanmay Chaturvedi & Ana I. Torres & George Stephanopoulos & Mette Hedegaard Thomsen & Jens Ejbye Schmidt, 2020. "Developing Process Designs for Biorefineries—Definitions, Categories, and Unit Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.
    15. Peters, Jens F. & Petrakopoulou, Fontina & Dufour, Javier, 2015. "Exergy analysis of synthetic biofuel production via fast pyrolysis and hydroupgrading," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 325-336.
    16. Schmidt, Johannes & Leduc, Sylvain & Dotzauer, Erik & Schmid, Erwin, 2011. "Cost-effective policy instruments for greenhouse gas emission reduction and fossil fuel substitution through bioenergy production in Austria," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3261-3280, June.
    17. Clausen, Lasse R. & Elmegaard, Brian & Ahrenfeldt, Jesper & Henriksen, Ulrik, 2011. "Thermodynamic analysis of small-scale dimethyl ether (DME) and methanol plants based on the efficient two-stage gasifier," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 5805-5814.
    18. Rovas, Dimitrios & Zabaniotou, Anastasia, 2015. "Exergy analysis of a small gasification-ICE integrated system for CHP production fueled with Mediterranean agro-food processing wastes: The SMARt-CHP," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 510-517.
    19. Costa, M. & La Villetta, M. & Massarotti, N. & Piazzullo, D. & Rocco, V., 2017. "Numerical analysis of a compression ignition engine powered in the dual-fuel mode with syngas and biodiesel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 969-979.
    20. Mendiburu, Andrés Z. & Carvalho, João A. & Coronado, Christian J.R., 2014. "Thermochemical equilibrium modeling of biomass downdraft gasifier: Stoichiometric models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 189-201.
    21. Vitasari, Caecilia R. & Jurascik, Martin & Ptasinski, Krzysztof J., 2011. "Exergy analysis of biomass-to-synthetic natural gas (SNG) process via indirect gasification of various biomass feedstock," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3825-3837.
    22. Stergios Vakalis & Konstantinos Moustakas, 2019. "Applications of the 3T Method and the R1 Formula as Efficiency Assessment Tools for Comparing Waste-to-Energy and Landfilling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-11, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gassner, Martin & Maréchal, François, 2009. "Thermodynamic comparison of the FICFB and Viking gasification concepts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1744-1753.
    2. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Luís Calado & Valter Silva & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "Experimental and Modeling Analysis of Brewers´ Spent Grains Gasification in a Downdraft Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Gawlik, Bernd Manfred & Sobiecka, Elzbieta & Vaccaro, Stefano & Ciceri, Giovanni, 2007. "Quality management organisation, validation of standards, developments and inquiries for solid-recovered fuels--An overview on the QUOVADIS-Project," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 6293-6298, December.
    4. Wang, Jiang-Jiang & Yang, Kun & Xu, Zi-Long & Fu, Chao, 2015. "Energy and exergy analyses of an integrated CCHP system with biomass air gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 317-327.
    5. Jiao, Liguo & Li, Jian & Yan, Beibei & Chen, Guanyi & Ahmed, Sarwaich, 2022. "Microwave torrefaction integrated with gasification: Energy and exergy analyses based on Aspen Plus modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
    6. Wang, Changbo & Zhang, Lixiao & Chang, Yuan & Pang, Mingyue, 2021. "Energy return on investment (EROI) of biomass conversion systems in China: Meta-analysis focused on system boundary unification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    7. Baghel, Paramjeet & Sakhiya, Anil Kumar & Kaushal, Priyanka, 2022. "Influence of temperature on slow pyrolysis of Prosopis Juliflora: An experimental and thermodynamic approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 538-551.
    8. Parvez, A.M. & Mujtaba, I.M. & Wu, T., 2016. "Energy, exergy and environmental analyses of conventional, steam and CO2-enhanced rice straw gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 579-588.
    9. Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan & Yao, Qiang, 2018. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquids process with different entrained flow coal gasifiers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 413-432.
    10. He, Chang & Feng, Xiao & Chu, Khim Hoong, 2013. "Process modeling and thermodynamic analysis of Lurgi fixed-bed coal gasifier in an SNG plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 742-757.
    11. Kong, Mengdi & Ye, Xuemin & Liu, Di & Li, Chunxi, 2024. "Comprehensive evaluation of medical waste gasification low-carbon multi-generation system based on AHP–EWM–GFCE method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    12. Mendiburu, Andrés Z. & Carvalho, João A. & Coronado, Christian J.R., 2014. "Thermochemical equilibrium modeling of biomass downdraft gasifier: Stoichiometric models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 189-201.
    13. La Villetta, M. & Costa, M. & Massarotti, N., 2017. "Modelling approaches to biomass gasification: A review with emphasis on the stoichiometric method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 71-88.
    14. Boyaghchi, Fateme Ahmadi & Chavoshi, Mansoure & Sabeti, Vajiheh, 2018. "Multi-generation system incorporated with PEM electrolyzer and dual ORC based on biomass gasification waste heat recovery: Exergetic, economic and environmental impact optimizations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 38-51.
    15. Karamarkovic, Rade & Karamarkovic, Vladan, 2010. "Energy and exergy analysis of biomass gasification at different temperatures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 537-549.
    16. Bollas, Konstantinos & Banihabib, Reyhaneh & Assadi, Mohsen & Kalfas, Anestis, 2024. "Optimal operating scenario and performance comparison of biomass-fueled externally-fired microturbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    17. Rovas, Dimitrios & Zabaniotou, Anastasia, 2015. "Exergy analysis of a small gasification-ICE integrated system for CHP production fueled with Mediterranean agro-food processing wastes: The SMARt-CHP," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 510-517.
    18. Chang, C.T. & Costa, M. & La Villetta, M. & Macaluso, A. & Piazzullo, D. & Vanoli, L., 2019. "Thermo-economic analyses of a Taiwanese combined CHP system fuelled with syngas from rice husk gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 766-780.
    19. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C. & Pinto, P.C.R., 2020. "Gasification-based biorefinery integration in the pulp and paper industry: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    20. Safder, Usman & Loy-Benitez, Jorge & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2024. "Techno-economic assessment of a novel integrated multigeneration system to synthesize e-methanol and green hydrogen in a carbon-neutral context," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:35:y:2010:i:2:p:996-1007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.