IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v229y2021ics0360544221009452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of BGL and Lurgi gasification for coal to liquid fuels (CTL): Process modeling, simulation and thermodynamic analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Qin, Shiyue
  • Zhang, Xuzhi
  • Wang, Ming
  • Cui, Hongyou
  • Li, Zhihe
  • Yi, Weiming

Abstract

Fixed bed gasifiers are widely used for the production of clean alternative fuels, chemicals and electricity. Of the commercialized fixed bed gasifiers, BGL and Lurgi gasifiers are the most typical. In this paper, modeling, simulation and comparison of the coal to liquid fuels (CTL) process with BGL/Lurgi gasifier are conducted. For a typical CTL process with feeding rate of 852.74 t coal (dry)/h, Case BGL can produce Fischer-Tropsch (FT) liquids of 212.61 t/h, while Case Lurgi can produce 168.48 t/h. Case BGL demonstrates higher energy efficiency (44.91%) than Case Lurgi (41.21%) due to the higher syngas yield of BGL gasifier. The corresponding exergy efficiencies are 44.65% for Case BGL and 40.27% for Case Lurgi, respectively. The exergy losses of the subsystems are quantitatively analyzed and the measures to reduce exergy losses are proposed. The techno-economic and CO2 emission analysis are investigated. Finally, the performances of fixed bed and entrained flow gasifiers for CTL process are compared. It is found that gasification has an important influence on the thermodynamic efficiency, economics, and CO2 emission, and this research is useful for gasifier selection in the CTL process.

Suggested Citation

  • Qin, Shiyue & Zhang, Xuzhi & Wang, Ming & Cui, Hongyou & Li, Zhihe & Yi, Weiming, 2021. "Comparison of BGL and Lurgi gasification for coal to liquid fuels (CTL): Process modeling, simulation and thermodynamic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:229:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221009452
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120697
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221009452
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120697?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liszka, Marcin & Malik, Tomasz & Manfrida, Giampaolo, 2012. "Energy and exergy analysis of hydrogen-oriented coal gasification with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 142-150.
    2. Sudiro, Maria & Bertucco, Alberto, 2009. "Production of synthetic gasoline and diesel fuel by alternative processes using natural gas and coal: Process simulation and optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2206-2214.
    3. Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan & Yao, Qiang, 2018. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquids process with different entrained flow coal gasifiers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 413-432.
    4. Hamelinck, Carlo N. & Faaij, André P.C. & den Uil, Herman & Boerrigter, Harold, 2004. "Production of FT transportation fuels from biomass; technical options, process analysis and optimisation, and development potential," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(11), pages 1743-1771.
    5. He, Chang & Feng, Xiao & Chu, Khim Hoong, 2013. "Process modeling and thermodynamic analysis of Lurgi fixed-bed coal gasifier in an SNG plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 742-757.
    6. van der Ham, L.V. & Kjelstrup, S., 2010. "Exergy analysis of two cryogenic air separation processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 4731-4739.
    7. Mantripragada, Hari Chandan & Rubin, Edward S., 2011. "Techno-economic evaluation of coal-to-liquids (CTL) plants with carbon capture and sequestration," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2808-2816, May.
    8. Becker, W.L. & Braun, R.J. & Penev, M. & Melaina, M., 2012. "Production of Fischer–Tropsch liquid fuels from high temperature solid oxide co-electrolysis units," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 99-115.
    9. Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan, 2017. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coke production process with waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 435-450.
    10. Haarlemmer, Geert & Boissonnet, Guillaume & Peduzzi, Emanuela & Setier, Pierre-Alexandre, 2014. "Investment and production costs of synthetic fuels – A literature survey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 667-676.
    11. Udaeta, Miguel Edgar Morales & Burani, Geraldo Francisco & Arzabe Maure, Jose Omar & Oliva, Cidar Ramon, 2007. "Economics of secondary energy from GTL regarding natural gas reserves of Bolivia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 4095-4106, August.
    12. Yang, Sheng & Qian, Yu & Ma, Donghui & Wang, Yifan & Yang, Siyu, 2017. "BGL gasifier for coal-to-SNG: A comparative techno-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 158-170.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guo, Shenghui & Meng, Fanrui & Peng, Pai & Xu, Jialing & Jin, Hui & Chen, Yunan & Guo, Liejin, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis of the superiority of the direct mass transfer design in the supercritical water gasification system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    2. Chen, Jian & Lu, Yi & Tang, Guoxin & Yang, Yuxuan & Shao, Shuzhen & Ding, Yangwei, 2023. "Research and prevention of upper remaining coal spontaneous combustion induced by air leakage in multi-inclination regenerated roof: A case study in the Luwa coal mine, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    3. Guo, Shenghui & Wang, Yu & Shang, Fei & Yi, Lei & Chen, Yunan & Chen, Bin & Guo, Liejin, 2023. "Thermodynamic analysis of the series system for the supercritical water gasification of coal-water slurry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan & Yao, Qiang, 2018. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquids process with different entrained flow coal gasifiers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 413-432.
    2. König, Daniel H. & Baucks, Nadine & Dietrich, Ralph-Uwe & Wörner, Antje, 2015. "Simulation and evaluation of a process concept for the generation of synthetic fuel from CO2 and H2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 833-841.
    3. Haarlemmer, Geert & Boissonnet, Guillaume & Peduzzi, Emanuela & Setier, Pierre-Alexandre, 2014. "Investment and production costs of synthetic fuels – A literature survey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 667-676.
    4. Qin, Shiyue & Wang, Ming & Cui, Hongyou & Li, Zhihe & Yi, Weiming, 2022. "Opportunities for renewable electricity utilization in coal to liquid fuels process: Thermodynamic and techo-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    5. Damartzis, T. & Zabaniotou, A., 2011. "Thermochemical conversion of biomass to second generation biofuels through integrated process design--A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 366-378, January.
    6. Chen, Jianjun & Lam, Hon Loong & Qian, Yu & Yang, Siyu, 2021. "Combined energy consumption and CO2 capture management: Improved acid gas removal process integrated with CO2 liquefaction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PA).
    7. Cinti, Giovanni & Baldinelli, Arianna & Di Michele, Alessandro & Desideri, Umberto, 2016. "Integration of Solid Oxide Electrolyzer and Fischer-Tropsch: A sustainable pathway for synthetic fuel," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 308-320.
    8. Mohajerani, Sara & Kumar, Amit & Oni, Abayomi Olufemi, 2018. "A techno-economic assessment of gas-to-liquid and coal-to-liquid plants through the development of scale factors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 681-693.
    9. Kou, Nannan & Zhao, Fu, 2011. "Techno-economical analysis of a thermo-chemical biofuel plant with feedstock and product flexibility under external disturbances," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 6745-6752.
    10. Decker, Maximilian & Schorn, Felix & Samsun, Remzi Can & Peters, Ralf & Stolten, Detlef, 2019. "Off-grid power-to-fuel systems for a market launch scenario – A techno-economic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1099-1109.
    11. Xu, Haoran & Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes & Ni, Meng & Cao, Jun & Xuan, Jin, 2019. "Low carbon fuel production from combined solid oxide CO2 co-electrolysis and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis system: A modelling study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 911-918.
    12. Wang, Dandan & Li, Sheng & He, Song & Gao, Lin, 2019. "Coal to substitute natural gas based on combined coal-steam gasification and one-step methanation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 851-859.
    13. Zhang, Hanfei & Desideri, Umberto, 2020. "Techno-economic optimization of power-to-methanol with co-electrolysis of CO2 and H2O in solid-oxide electrolyzers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    14. Andreas Meurer & Jürgen Kern, 2021. "Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis as the Key for Decentralized Sustainable Kerosene Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    15. Wang, Wei-Cheng & Tao, Ling, 2016. "Bio-jet fuel conversion technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 801-822.
    16. Meerman, J.C. & Ramírez, A. & Turkenburg, W.C. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2012. "Performance of simulated flexible integrated gasification polygeneration facilities, Part B: Economic evaluation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 6083-6102.
    17. Stempien, Jan Pawel & Ni, Meng & Sun, Qiang & Chan, Siew Hwa, 2015. "Thermodynamic analysis of combined Solid Oxide Electrolyzer and Fischer–Tropsch processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 682-690.
    18. Wafiq, A. & Hanafy, M., 2015. "Feasibility assessment of diesel fuel production in Egypt using coal and biomass: Integrated novel methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 522-533.
    19. Huo, Hailong & Liu, Xunliang & Wen, Zhi & Lou, Guofeng & Dou, Ruifeng & Su, Fuyong & Zhou, Wenning & Jiang, Zeyi, 2021. "Case study of a novel low rank coal to calcium carbide process based on techno-economic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    20. Farias Neto, G.W. & Leite, M.B.M. & Marcelino, T.O.A.C. & Carneiro, L.O. & Brito, K.D. & Brito, R.P., 2021. "Optimizing the coke oven process by adjusting the temperature of the combustion chambers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:229:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221009452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.