IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/c/pml13.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Rudolf Müller
(Rudolf Mueller)

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Juan Carlos Carbajal & Rudolf Müller, 2015. "Implementability under Monotonic Transformations in Differences," Working Papers 37, Peruvian Economic Association.

    Cited by:

    1. André Berger & Rudolf Müller & Seyed Hossein Naeemi, 2017. "Characterizing implementable allocation rules in multi-dimensional environments," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(2), pages 367-383, February.
    2. Paul H. Edelman & John A Weymark, 2017. "Dominant Strategy Implementability, Zero Length Cycles, and Affine Maximizers," Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers 17-00002, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics.
    3. Kunimoto, Takashi & Zhang, Cuiling, 2018. "On Incentive Compatible, Individually Rational Public Good Provision Mechanisms," Economics and Statistics Working Papers 21-2018, Singapore Management University, School of Economics.
    4. Kazumura, Tomoya & Mishra, Debasis & Serizawa, Shigehiro, 2020. "Mechanism design without quasilinearity," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(2), May.
    5. Alexey Kushnir & Vinod Krishnamoorthy, 2022. "A Simple Characterization of Supply Correspondences," Papers 2205.10472, arXiv.org.
    6. Liu, Yi & Wu, Fan, 2024. "Implementing randomized allocation rules with outcome-contingent transfers," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    7. Paul H. Edelman & John A. Weymark, 2021. "Dominant strategy implementability and zero length cycles," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(4), pages 1091-1120, November.
    8. Carbajal, Juan Carlos & Müller, Rudolf, 2017. "Monotonicity and revenue equivalence domains by monotonic transformations in differences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 29-35.
    9. Mishra, Debasis & Pramanik, Anup & Roy, Souvik, 2016. "Local incentive compatibility with transfers," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 149-165.
    10. Kumar, Ujjwal & Roy, Souvik, 2021. "Local incentive compatibility in ordinal type-spaces," MPRA Paper 110994, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Abdul Quadir, 2019. "Single Object Auctions with Externalities: A Tractable Model," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 70(4), pages 479-496, December.
    12. Carbajal, Juan Carlos & Mu'alem, Ahuva, 2020. "Selling mechanisms for a financially constrained buyer," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 386-405.

  2. Berger, A. & Müller, R.J. & Naeemi, S.H., 2014. "Characterizing implementable allocation rules in multi-dimensional environments," Research Memorandum 021, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).

    Cited by:

    1. Rochet, Jean-Charles, 2024. "Multidimensional screening after 37 years," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    2. Paul H. Edelman & John A. Weymark, 2021. "Dominant strategy implementability and zero length cycles," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(4), pages 1091-1120, November.

  3. Prokic-Breuer, T. & Dronkers, J., 2012. "The high performance of Dutch and Flemish 15-year-old native pupils: explaining country differences in math scores between highly stratified educational systems," Research Memorandum 038, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Stijn Baert & Frank W. Heiland & Sanders Korenman, 2016. "Native-Immigrant Gaps in Educational and School-to-Work Transitions in the 2nd Generation: The Role of Gender and Ethnicity," De Economist, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 159-186, June.
    2. Dronkers, J., 2014. "Parental background, early scholastic ability, the allocation into secondary school tracks and language skills at the age of 15 years in a highly differentiated system: a test of the contradictions be," ROA Technical Report 001, Maastricht University, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA).
    3. Verhagen, Mark D., 2021. "To predict and explain. How prediction improves our understanding of models: an application to the study of teacher bias," SocArXiv y6mnb_v1, Center for Open Science.
    4. Ã lvaro Choi & John Jerrim, 2015. "The use (and misuse) of PISA in guiding policy reform: the case of Spain?," DoQSS Working Papers 15-04, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
    5. Álvaro Choi & John Jerrim, 2015. "The use (and misuse) of Pisa in guiding policy reform: the case of Spain," Working Papers 2015/6, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    6. Gert-Jan Martijn Veerman & Jaap Dronkers, 2016. "Ethnic Composition and School Performance in the Secondary Education of Turkish Migrant Students in Seven Countries and 19 European Educational Systems," International Migration Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 537-567, September.
    7. Gert-Jan Veerman & Jaap Dronkers, 2013. "Ethnic composition of schools and school performances in secondary education of Turkish migrant students in 7 countries and 19 European educational systems," RF Berlin - CReAM Discussion Paper Series 1314, Rockwool Foundation Berlin (RF Berlin) - Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration (CReAM).
    8. Verhagen, Mark D., 2021. "Prediction in Educational Research: An Application to the Study of Teacher Bias," SocArXiv y6mnb, Center for Open Science.
    9. Baert, Stijn & Heiland, Frank & Korenman, Sanders, 2014. "Native-Immigrant Gaps in Educational and School-to-Work Transitions in the Second Generation: The Role of Gender and Ethnicity," IZA Discussion Papers 8752, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

  4. Csapó, G. & Müller, R.J., 2012. "Optimal mechanism design for the private supply of a public good," Research Memorandum 037, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Ward, Shannon & Williams, J. & van Ours, Jan, 2015. "Bad Behavior : Delinquency, Arrest and Early School Leaving," Discussion Paper 2015-040, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    2. Ignacio Munyo, 2015. "The Juvenile Crime Dilemma," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 18(2), pages 201-211, April.
    3. Povilas Lastauskas & Eirini Tatsi, 2017. "Spatial Nexus in Crime and Unemployement in Times of Crisis," Bank of Lithuania Working Paper Series 39, Bank of Lithuania.
    4. James, Jonathan, 2015. "Health and education expansion," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 193-215.
    5. Brugård, Kaja Høiseth & Falch, Torberg, 2013. "Post-compulsory education and imprisonment," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 97-106.
    6. Aoki, Yu, 2014. "More Schooling, Less Youth Crime? Learning from an Earthquake in Japan," IZA Discussion Papers 8619, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. James, Jonathan & Vujić, Sunčica, 2019. "From high school to the high chair: Education and fertility timing," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 1-24.
    8. Rud, I & Van Klaveren, C. & Groot, W. and Maassen van den Brink, H., 2013. "Education and Youth Crime: a Review of the Empirical Literature," Working Papers 48, Top Institute for Evidence Based Education Research.
    9. van der Steeg, Marc & van Elk, Roel & Webbink, Dinand, 2015. "Does intensive coaching reduce school dropout? Evidence from a randomized experiment," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 184-197.
    10. Nguyen, Hieu T.M., 2019. "Do more educated neighbourhoods experience less property crime? Evidence from Indonesia," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 27-37.
    11. Propper, Carol & Janke, Katharina & Johnston, David & Shields, Michael A, 2019. "The causal effect of education on chronic health conditions in the UK," CEPR Discussion Papers 14084, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    12. Janke, Katharina & Johnston, David W. & Propper, Carol & Shields, Michael A., 2018. "The Causal Effect of Education on Chronic Health Conditions," IZA Discussion Papers 11353, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    13. Marc van der Steeg & Roel van Elk & Dinand Webbink, 2012. "Does intensive coaching reduce school dropout?," CPB Discussion Paper 224, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    14. Nordin , Martin, 2014. "Does Eligibility for Tertiary Education Affect Crime Rates? Quasi-Experimental Evidence," Working Papers 2014:14, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    15. Jin Xi & Haitian Xie, 2021. "Strength in Numbers: Robust Mechanisms for Public Goods with Many Agents," Papers 2101.02423, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    16. Lindgren, Karl-Oskar & Oskarsson, Sven & Persson, Mikael, 2016. "How does access to education influence political candidacy? Lessons from school openings in Sweden," Working Paper Series 2016:7, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.

  5. Berger, A. & Müller, R.J. & Naeemi, S.H., 2010. "Path-monotonicity and incentive compatibility," Research Memorandum 035, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Mishra, Debasis & Sen, Arunava, 2012. "Robertsʼ Theorem with neutrality: A social welfare ordering approach," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 283-298.
    2. , & ,, 2013. "Implementation in multidimensional dichotomous domains," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 8(2), May.
    3. Mishra, Debasis & Pramanik, Anup & Roy, Souvik, 2014. "Multidimensional mechanism design in single peaked type spaces," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 103-116.

  6. Grigorieva, E. & Herings, P.J.J. & Müller, R.J. & Vermeulen, A.J., 2009. "Fraction auctions: the tradeoff between efficiency and running time," Research Memorandum 045, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Grigorieva, Elena & Herings, P. Jean-Jacques & Müller, Rudolf & Vermeulen, Dries, 2011. "Inefficiency of equilibria in digital mechanisms with continuous valuations," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(4-5), pages 541-544.

  7. Heydenreich, B. & Mishra, D. & Müller, R.J. & Uetz, M.J., 2008. "Optimal mechanisms for single machine scheduling," Research Memorandum 033, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Dominik Kress & Sebastian Meiswinkel & Erwin Pesch, 2018. "Mechanism design for machine scheduling problems: classification and literature overview," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 40(3), pages 583-611, July.
    2. Ruben Hoeksma & Marc Uetz, 2016. "Optimal Mechanism Design for a Sequencing Problem with Two-Dimensional Types," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 1438-1450, December.

  8. Müller, R.J. & Perea ý Monsuwé, A. & Wolf, S., 2007. "Combinatorial scoring auctions," Research Memorandum 020, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Pierangelo Mori, 2008. "Design of Multidimensional Franchise Auctions by an Ignorant Principal," Working Papers - Economics wp2008_13.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.

  9. First:Birgit Heydenreich & Rudolf Muller & Marc Uetz & Rakesh Vohra, 2007. "Characterization of Revenue Equivalence," Discussion Papers 1448, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.

    Cited by:

    1. Julián Enrique Chitiva Bocanegra, 2019. "Implementable Mechanisms for discrete utility functions, a solution using Tropical Geometry," Documentos CEDE 17485, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    2. Nenad Kos & Matthias Messner, 2010. "Extremal Incentive Compatible Transfers," Working Papers 359, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    3. André Berger & Rudolf Müller & Seyed Hossein Naeemi, 2017. "Characterizing implementable allocation rules in multi-dimensional environments," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(2), pages 367-383, February.
    4. Paul H. Edelman & John A Weymark, 2017. "Dominant Strategy Implementability, Zero Length Cycles, and Affine Maximizers," Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers 17-00002, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics.
    5. Nath, Swaprava & Sandholm, Tuomas, 2019. "Efficiency and budget balance in general quasi-linear domains," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 673-693.
    6. Rachmilevitch, Shiran, 2014. "First-best collusion without communication," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 224-230.
    7. , & ,, 2013. "Implementation in multidimensional dichotomous domains," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 8(2), May.
    8. Quadir, Abdul, 2017. "Spanning tree auctions: A complete characterization," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-8.
    9. Carbajal, Juan Carlos & Ely, Jeffrey C., 2013. "Mechanism design without revenue equivalence," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(1), pages 104-133.
    10. Heydenreich, B. & Mishra, D. & Müller, R.J. & Uetz, M.J., 2008. "Optimal mechanisms for single machine scheduling," Research Memorandum 033, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    11. Kunimoto, Takashi & Zhang, Cuiling, 2018. "On Incentive Compatible, Individually Rational Public Good Provision Mechanisms," Economics and Statistics Working Papers 21-2018, Singapore Management University, School of Economics.
    12. Jiwoong Lee & Rudolf Müller & Dries Vermeulen, 2019. "Separating equilibrium in quasi-linear signaling games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 48(4), pages 1033-1054, December.
    13. M. Yenmez, 2015. "Incentive compatible market design with applications," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 44(3), pages 543-569, August.
    14. Takehiro Kawasaki & Nathanael Barrot & Seiji Takanashi & Taiki Todo & Makoto Yokoo, 2019. "Strategy-Proof and Non-Wasteful Multi-Unit Auction via Social Network," Papers 1911.08809, arXiv.org.
    15. Kazumura, Tomoya & Mishra, Debasis & Serizawa, Shigehiro, 2020. "Mechanism design without quasilinearity," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(2), May.
    16. Tomoya Kazumura & Debasis Mishra & Shigehiro Serizawa, 2017. "Strategy-proof multi-object allocation: Ex-post revenue maximization with no wastage," Working Papers e116, Tokyo Center for Economic Research.
    17. Rahman, David M., 2024. "Detecting profitable deviations," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    18. Yoon, Kiho, 2020. "Implementability with contingent contracts," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    19. Mishra, Debasis & Pramanik, Anup & Roy, Souvik, 2014. "Multidimensional mechanism design in single peaked type spaces," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 103-116.
    20. Debasis Mishra & Anup Pramanik & Souvik Roy, 2013. "Implementation in multidimensional domains with ordinal restrictions," Discussion Papers 13-07, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi.
    21. Rochet, Jean-Charles, 2024. "Multidimensional screening after 37 years," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    22. Yuta Nakamura, 2020. "The uniqueness of the pivotal mechanisms without strategy-proofness," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 24(3), pages 171-186, December.
    23. Dworczak, Piotr & Zhang, Anthony Lee, 2017. "Implementability, Walrasian equilibria, and efficient matchings," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 57-60.
    24. Xu Lang & Zaifu Yang, 2023. "Reduced-Form Allocations for Multiple Indivisible Objects under Constraints," Discussion Papers 23/02, Department of Economics, University of York.
    25. Carbajal, Juan Carlos, 2010. "On the uniqueness of Groves mechanisms and the payoff equivalence principle," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 763-772, March.
    26. Paul H. Edelman & John A. Weymark, 2021. "Dominant strategy implementability and zero length cycles," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(4), pages 1091-1120, November.
    27. Carbajal, Juan Carlos & Müller, Rudolf, 2017. "Monotonicity and revenue equivalence domains by monotonic transformations in differences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 29-35.
    28. Berger, A. & Müller, R.J. & Naeemi, S.H., 2010. "Path-monotonicity and incentive compatibility," Research Memorandum 035, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    29. Frongillo, Rafael M. & Kash, Ian A., 2021. "General truthfulness characterizations via convex analysis," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 636-662.
    30. Mishra, Debasis & Pramanik, Anup & Roy, Souvik, 2016. "Local incentive compatibility with transfers," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 149-165.
    31. Daske, Thomas, 2019. "Efficient Incentives in Social Networks: "Gamification" and the Coase Theorem," EconStor Preprints 193148, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    32. Tomoya Kazumura & Debasis Mishra & Shigehiro Serizawa, 2017. "Strategy-proof multi-object auction design: Ex-post revenue maximization with no wastage," Discussion Papers 17-03, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi.
    33. Muto, Nozomu & Shirata, Yasuhiro, 2017. "Manipulation via endowments in auctions with multiple goods," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 75-84.
    34. Chen, Yi-Chun & Li, Jiangtao, 2018. "Revisiting the foundations of dominant-strategy mechanisms," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 294-317.
    35. Katherine Cuff & Sunghoon Hong & Jesse Schwartz & Quan Wen & John Weymark, 2012. "Dominant strategy implementation with a convex product space of valuations," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 39(2), pages 567-597, July.
    36. Thierry Marchant & Debasis Mishra, 2015. "Mechanism design with two alternatives in quasi-linear environments," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 44(2), pages 433-455, February.
    37. Lavi, Ron & Oren, Sigal, 2012. "Side-communication yields efficiency of ascending auctions: The two-items case," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 439-456.
    38. Jacob K. Goeree & Alexey Kushnir, 2011. "On the equivalence of Bayesian and dominant strategy implementation in a general class of social choice problems," ECON - Working Papers 021, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    39. Juan Carlos Carbajal & Rudolf Müller, 2015. "Implementability under Monotonic Transformations in Differences," Working Papers 37, Peruvian Economic Association.
    40. Paul H. Edelman & John A Weymark, 2018. "Unrestricted Domain Extensions of Dominant Strategy Implementable Allocation Functions," Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers 18-00003, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics.
    41. Nakamura, Yuta, 2019. "Strategy-proof characterizations of the pivotal mechanisms on restricted domains," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 77-87.
    42. Carbajal, Juan Carlos & Mu'alem, Ahuva, 2020. "Selling mechanisms for a financially constrained buyer," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 386-405.
    43. Makowski, Louis & Ostroy, Joseph M., 2013. "From revealed preference to preference revelation," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 71-81.
    44. Diego Aycinena & Lucas Rentschler, 2018. "Auctions with endogenous participation and an uncertain number of bidders: experimental evidence," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 21(4), pages 924-949, December.

  10. Vermeulen, A.J. & Grigorieva, E. & Müller, R.J. & Herings, P.J.J., 2006. "The family of c-bisections auctions: efficiency and running time," Research Memorandum 019, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Flesch, J. & Perea ý Monsuwé, A., 2009. "Strategic disclosure of random variables," Research Memorandum 023, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

  11. Heydenreich, B. & Müller, R.J. & Uetz, M.J., 2006. "Decentralization and mechanism design for online machine scheduling," Research Memorandum 007, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Heydenreich, B. & Müller, R.J. & Uetz, M.J., 2006. "Games and mechanism design in machine scheduling - an introduction," Research Memorandum 022, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    2. Herbert Hamers & Marco Slikker & Flip Klijn, 2015. "Price of Anarchy in Sequencing Situations and the Impossibility to Coordinate," Working Papers 709, Barcelona School of Economics.
    3. Stößer, Jochen & Neumann, Dirk & Weinhardt, Christof, 2010. "Market-based pricing in grids: On strategic manipulation and computational cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 464-475, June.

  12. Heydenreich, B. & Müller, R.J. & Uetz, M.J., 2006. "Games and mechanism design in machine scheduling - an introduction," Research Memorandum 022, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Herbert Hamers & Marco Slikker & Flip Klijn, 2015. "Price of Anarchy in Sequencing Situations and the Impossibility to Coordinate," Working Papers 709, Barcelona School of Economics.
    2. Wang, Xiuli & Geng, Sujie & Cheng, T.C.E., 2018. "Negotiation mechanisms for an order subcontracting and scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 154-167.
    3. Lee, Kangbok & Leung, Joseph Y.-T. & Pinedo, Michael L., 2012. "Coordination mechanisms for parallel machine scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 305-313.

  13. Grigorieva, E. & Herings, P.J.J. & Müller, R.J. & Vermeulen, A.J., 2006. "Inefficiency of equilibria in query auctions with continuous valuations," Research Memorandum 017, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Grigorieva, E. & Herings, P.J.J. & Müller, R.J. & Vermeulen, A.J., 2009. "Fraction auctions: the tradeoff between efficiency and running time," Research Memorandum 045, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

  14. Bochet, O.L.A., 2005. "Implementation of the Walrasian correspondence: the boundary problem," Research Memorandum 039, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Michele Lombardi & Naoki Yoshihara, 2017. "Natural implementation with semi-responsible agents in pure exchange economies," UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers 2017-05, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics.
    2. BOCHET, Olivier & MANIQUET, François, 2006. "Virtual Nash implementation with admissible support," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2006084, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    3. Müller, R.J. & Perea ý Monsuwé, A. & Wolf, S., 2005. "Weak monotonicity and Bayes-Nash incentive compatibility," Research Memorandum 040, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    4. Bochet, O.L.A., 2006. "Equal-budget choice equivalent solutions in exchange economies," Research Memorandum 025, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    5. Lombardi, Michele & Yoshihara, Naoki & 吉原, 直毅, 2016. "Natural Implementation with Semi-responsible-sincere Agents in Pure Exchange Economies," Discussion Paper Series 649, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.

  15. Candelon, B. & Cubadda, G., 2005. "Testing for parameter stability in dynamic models across frequencies," Research Memorandum 021, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Yanfeng Wei, 2015. "The informational role of commodity prices in formulating monetary policy: a reexamination under the frequency domain," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 537-549, September.
    2. Wei, Yanfeng & Guo, Xiaoying, 2017. "Oil price shocks and China's stock market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 185-197.
    3. Atella, Vincenzo & Centoni, Marco & Cubadda, Gianluca, 2008. "Technology shocks, structural breaks and the effects on the business cycle," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 100(3), pages 392-395, September.

  16. Müller, R.J. & Perea ý Monsuwé, A. & Wolf, S., 2005. "Weak monotonicity and Bayes-Nash incentive compatibility," Research Memorandum 040, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. André Berger & Rudolf Müller & Seyed Hossein Naeemi, 2017. "Characterizing implementable allocation rules in multi-dimensional environments," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(2), pages 367-383, February.
    2. Alex Gershkov & Jacob K. Goeree & Alexey Kushnir & Benny Moldovanu & Xianwen Shi, 2013. "On the Equivalence of Bayesian and Dominant Strategy Implementation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 81(1), pages 197-220, January.
    3. , & ,, 2013. "Implementation in multidimensional dichotomous domains," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 8(2), May.
    4. Heydenreich, B. & Mishra, D. & Müller, R.J. & Uetz, M.J., 2008. "Optimal mechanisms for single machine scheduling," Research Memorandum 033, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    5. Kazumura, Tomoya & Mishra, Debasis & Serizawa, Shigehiro, 2020. "Mechanism design without quasilinearity," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(2), May.
    6. Yoon, Kiho, 2020. "Implementability with contingent contracts," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    7. Heydenreich, B. & Müller, R.J. & Uetz, M.J. & Vohra, R., 2007. "Characterization of revenue equivalence," Research Memorandum 017, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    8. Mishra, Debasis & Pramanik, Anup & Roy, Souvik, 2014. "Multidimensional mechanism design in single peaked type spaces," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 103-116.
    9. Debasis Mishra & Anup Pramanik & Souvik Roy, 2013. "Implementation in multidimensional domains with ordinal restrictions," Discussion Papers 13-07, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi.
    10. Berger, A. & Müller, R.J. & Naeemi, S.H., 2010. "Path-monotonicity and incentive compatibility," Research Memorandum 035, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    11. Frongillo, Rafael M. & Kash, Ian A., 2021. "General truthfulness characterizations via convex analysis," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 636-662.
    12. Chen, Yi-Chun & Li, Jiangtao, 2018. "Revisiting the foundations of dominant-strategy mechanisms," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 294-317.

  17. Grigorieva, E. & Herings, P.J.J. & Müller, R.J. & Vermeulen, A.J., 2004. "The communication complexity of private value single item auctions," Research Memorandum 050, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Grigorieva, E. & Herings, P.J.J. & Müller, R.J. & Vermeulen, A.J., 2007. "On the fastest vickrey algorithm," Research Memorandum 013, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    2. Grigorieva, E. & Herings, P.J.J. & Müller, R.J. & Vermeulen, A.J., 2009. "Fraction auctions: the tradeoff between efficiency and running time," Research Memorandum 045, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    3. Katerina Sherstyuk, 2011. "Complexity and bidder behavior in iterative auctions," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 31(4), pages 2769-2776.
    4. Pastine, Tuvana & Pastine, Ivan, 2006. "Politician Preferences and Caps on Political Lobbying," CEPR Discussion Papers 5913, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

  18. Hongwei Gui & Rudolf M¨uller & Rakesh V. Vohra, 2004. "Dominant Strategy Mechanisms with Multidimensional Types," Discussion Papers 1392, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.

    Cited by:

    1. André Berger & Rudolf Müller & Seyed Hossein Naeemi, 2017. "Characterizing implementable allocation rules in multi-dimensional environments," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(2), pages 367-383, February.
    2. Mishra, Debasis & Sen, Arunava, 2012. "Robertsʼ Theorem with neutrality: A social welfare ordering approach," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 283-298.
    3. Bochet, O.L.A., 2005. "Implementation of the Walrasian correspondence: the boundary problem," Research Memorandum 039, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    4. , & ,, 2013. "Implementation in multidimensional dichotomous domains," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 8(2), May.
    5. Müller, R.J. & Perea ý Monsuwé, A. & Wolf, S., 2005. "Weak monotonicity and Bayes-Nash incentive compatibility," Research Memorandum 040, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    6. Heydenreich, B. & Müller, R.J. & Uetz, M.J. & Vohra, R., 2007. "Characterization of revenue equivalence," Research Memorandum 017, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    7. Liu, Yi & Wu, Fan, 2024. "Implementing randomized allocation rules with outcome-contingent transfers," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    8. Debasis Mishra & Anup Pramanik & Souvik Roy, 2013. "Implementation in multidimensional domains with ordinal restrictions," Discussion Papers 13-07, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi.
    9. Tang, Rui & Zhang, Mu, 2021. "Maxmin implementation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    10. Heydenreich, B. & Müller, R.J. & Uetz, M.J., 2006. "Games and mechanism design in machine scheduling - an introduction," Research Memorandum 022, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    11. Archer, Aaron & Kleinberg, Robert, 2014. "Truthful germs are contagious: A local-to-global characterization of truthfulness," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 340-366.
    12. Berger, A. & Müller, R.J. & Naeemi, S.H., 2010. "Path-monotonicity and incentive compatibility," Research Memorandum 035, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    13. Chen, Yi-Chun & Li, Jiangtao, 2018. "Revisiting the foundations of dominant-strategy mechanisms," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 294-317.
    14. Paul H. Edelman & John A Weymark, 2018. "Unrestricted Domain Extensions of Dominant Strategy Implementable Allocation Functions," Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers 18-00003, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics.

  19. Feess, E. & Schieble, M. & Walzl, M., 2004. "When should principals acquire verifiable information?," Research Memorandum 047, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Mishra, Debasis & Sen, Arunava, 2012. "Robertsʼ Theorem with neutrality: A social welfare ordering approach," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 283-298.
    2. Bochet, O.L.A., 2005. "Implementation of the Walrasian correspondence: the boundary problem," Research Memorandum 039, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    3. , & ,, 2013. "Implementation in multidimensional dichotomous domains," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 8(2), May.
    4. Jehiel, Philippe & Meyer-ter-Vehn, Moritz & Moldovanu, Benny, 2007. "Mixed bundling auctions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 494-512, May.
    5. Ron Lavi & Ahuva Mu’alem & Noam Nisan, 2009. "Two simplified proofs for Roberts’ theorem," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 32(3), pages 407-423, March.
    6. Jehiel, Philippe & moldovanu, benny, 2006. "Allocative and Informational Externalities in Auctions and Related Mechanisms," CEPR Discussion Papers 5558, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Müller, R.J. & Perea ý Monsuwé, A. & Wolf, S., 2005. "Weak monotonicity and Bayes-Nash incentive compatibility," Research Memorandum 040, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    8. Heydenreich, B. & Müller, R.J. & Uetz, M.J. & Vohra, R., 2007. "Characterization of revenue equivalence," Research Memorandum 017, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    9. Philippe Jehiel & Moritz Meyer-Ter-Vehn & Benny Moldovanu, 2008. "Ex-post implementation and preference aggregation via potentials," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-00754256, HAL.
    10. Heydenreich, B. & Müller, R.J. & Uetz, M.J., 2006. "Games and mechanism design in machine scheduling - an introduction," Research Memorandum 022, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    11. Archer, Aaron & Kleinberg, Robert, 2014. "Truthful germs are contagious: A local-to-global characterization of truthfulness," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 340-366.
    12. Berger, A. & Müller, R.J. & Naeemi, S.H., 2010. "Path-monotonicity and incentive compatibility," Research Memorandum 035, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    13. Chen, Yi-Chun & Li, Jiangtao, 2018. "Revisiting the foundations of dominant-strategy mechanisms," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 294-317.
    14. Paul H. Edelman & John A Weymark, 2018. "Unrestricted Domain Extensions of Dominant Strategy Implementable Allocation Functions," Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers 18-00003, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics.
    15. Lavi, Ron & Swamy, Chaitanya, 2009. "Truthful mechanism design for multidimensional scheduling via cycle monotonicity," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 99-124, September.

  20. Muysken, J. & Rutten, T., 2002. "Disability in the Netherlands: another dutch disease?," Research Memorandum 051, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Grigorieva, E. & Herings, P.J.J. & Müller, R.J. & Vermeulen, A.J., 2009. "Inefficiency of equilibria in query auctions with continuous valuations," Research Memorandum 024, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    2. Pierre Fleckinger, 2008. "Bayesian Improvement of the Phantom Voters Rule: An example of Dichotomic Communication," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) hal-00641865, HAL.
    3. Dirk Bergemann & Achim Wambach, 2013. "Sequential Information Disclosure in Auctions," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1900R, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Oct 2014.
    4. Andersson, Tommy & Erlanson, Albin, 2013. "Multi-item Vickrey–English–Dutch auctions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 116-129.
    5. Erlanson, Albin, 2011. "The Multi-item Bisection Auction," Working Papers 2011:31, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    6. Grigorieva, E. & Strobel, M., 2006. "Bidding behavior in the bisection auction : an experimental investigation," Research Memorandum 026, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

  21. Grigorieva, E. & Herings, P.J.J. & Vermeulen, A.J. & Müller, R.J., 2002. "The private value single item bisection auction," Research Memorandum 035, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

    Cited by:

    1. Grigorieva, E. & Herings, P.J.J. & Müller, R.J. & Vermeulen, A.J., 2009. "Inefficiency of equilibria in query auctions with continuous valuations," Research Memorandum 024, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    2. Grigorieva, E. & Herings, P.J.J. & Müller, R.J. & Vermeulen, A.J., 2007. "On the fastest vickrey algorithm," Research Memorandum 013, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    3. Pierre Fleckinger, 2008. "Bayesian Improvement of the Phantom Voters Rule: An example of Dichotomic Communication," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) hal-00641865, HAL.
    4. Ryuji Sano, 2016. "Iterative Revelation Mechanisms," KIER Working Papers 937, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.
    5. Yu Zhou & Shigehiro Serizawa, 2019. "Minimum price equilibrium in the assignment market," ISER Discussion Paper 1047, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    6. Ingebretsen Carlson, Jim, 2016. "An Auction with Approximated Bidder Preferences - When an Auction has to be Quick," Working Papers 2016:12, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    7. Dirk Bergemann & Achim Wambach, 2013. "Sequential Information Disclosure in Auctions," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1900R, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Oct 2014.
    8. Flesch, J. & Perea ý Monsuwé, A., 2009. "Strategic disclosure of random variables," Research Memorandum 023, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    9. Grigorieva, E. & Herings, P.J.J. & Müller, R.J. & Vermeulen, A.J., 2009. "Fraction auctions: the tradeoff between efficiency and running time," Research Memorandum 045, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    10. Ryuji Sano, 2021. "Dynamic communication mechanism design," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 57(1), pages 163-180, July.
    11. Fadel, Ronald & Segal, Ilya, 2009. "The communication cost of selfishness," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 144(5), pages 1895-1920, September.
    12. Andersson, Tommy & Erlanson, Albin, 2013. "Multi-item Vickrey–English–Dutch auctions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 116-129.
    13. Grigorieva, E. & Strobel, M., 2006. "Bidding behavior in the bisection auction : an experimental investigation," Research Memorandum 026, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    14. Jim Ingebretsen Carlson, 2020. "A speedy auction using approximated bidders’ preferences," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 288(1), pages 65-93, May.
    15. Albin Erlanson, 2014. "The Duo-Item Bisection Auction," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 43(1), pages 15-31, January.
    16. Sushil Bikhchandani & Sven de Vries & James Schummer & Rakesh V. Vohra, 2005. "An Ascending Vickrey Auction for Selling Bases of a Matroid," Levine's Bibliography 784828000000000133, UCLA Department of Economics.
    17. Kos, Nenad, 2014. "Asking questions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 642-650.

  22. Müller, Rudolf, 2001. "Auctions - the Big Winner Among Trading Mechanisms for the Internet Economy," Research Memorandum 015, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).

    Cited by:

    1. Gruner, Sven & Hirschauer, Norbert & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2014. "Potenzial Verschiedener Experimenteller Designs Fur Die Politikfolgenabschatzung," 54th Annual Conference, Goettingen, Germany, September 17-19, 2014 187435, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    2. Glaser, Markus & Weber, Martin, 2003. "Overconfidence and Trading Volume," Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications 03-07, Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Universität Mannheim;Sonderforschungsbereich 504, University of Mannheim.
    3. Bruce Lyons & Gordon Menzies & Daniel Zizzo, 2012. "Conflicting evidence and decisions by agency professionals: an experimental test in the context of merger regulation," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 465-499, September.
    4. Mathias Drehmann & Joerg Oechssler & Andreas Roider, 2002. "Herding and Contrarian Behavior in Financial Markets - An Internet Experiment," Finance 0210005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Hans-Theo Normann & Till Requate & Israel Waichman, 2014. "Do short-term laboratory experiments provide valid descriptions of long-term economic interactions? A study of Cournot markets," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 17(3), pages 371-390, September.
    6. Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet, 2015. "Social preferences in the online laboratory: a randomized experiment," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-00984211, HAL.
    7. Charness, Gary & Haruvy, Ernan & Sonsino, Doron, 2007. "Social distance and reciprocity: An Internet experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 88-103, May.
    8. Holm, Håkan & Nystedt, Paul, 2005. "Trust in surveys and games - a matter of money and location?," Working Papers 2005:26, Lund University, Department of Economics, revised 15 Aug 2005.
    9. Werner Guth & Carsten Schmidt & Matthias Sutter, 2003. "Fairness in the mail and opportunism in the internet - a newspaper experiment on ultimatum bargaining," Artefactual Field Experiments 00051, The Field Experiments Website.
    10. Drehmann, Mathias & Oechssler, Jörg & Roider, Andreas, 2004. "Herding with and without Payoff Externalities - An Internet Experiment," Bonn Econ Discussion Papers 15/2004, University of Bonn, Bonn Graduate School of Economics (BGSE).
    11. Chesney, Thomas & Chuah, Swee-Hoon & Hoffmann, Robert, 2009. "Virtual world experimentation: An exploratory study," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 618-635, October.
    12. Katrin Schmelz & Anthony Ziegelmeyer, 2015. "Social Distance and Control Aversion: Evidence from the Internet and the Laboratory," TWI Research Paper Series 100, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
    13. Catherine Eckel & Rick Wilson, 2006. "Internet cautions: Experimental games with internet partners," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 9(1), pages 53-66, April.
    14. Pikulina, E.S. & Renneboog, L.D.R. & Tobler, P.N., 2014. "Overconfidence, Effort, and Investment (Revised version of CentER DP 2013-035)," Discussion Paper 2014-039, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    15. Holm, Håkan & Nystedt, Paul, 2002. "Intra-Generational Trust - a Semi-Experimental Study of Trust Among Different Generations," Working Papers 2002:16, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    16. Duersch, Peter & Oechssler, Jörg & Schipper, Burkhard C., 2009. "Incentives for subjects in internet experiments," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 120-122, October.
    17. Fiedler, Marina & Haruvy, Ernan, 2009. "The lab versus the virtual lab and virtual field--An experimental investigation of trust games with communication," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 716-724, November.
    18. Emmanuel PETIT & Anna TCHERKASSOF & Xavier GASSMANN, 2011. "Anticipated regret and self-esteem in the Allais paradox," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2011-25, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    19. Holm, Håkan & Nystedt, Paul, 2008. "Trust in surveys and games - A methodological contribution on the influence of money and location," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 522-542, August.
    20. Emmanuel PETIT & Anna TCHERKASSOF & Xavier GASSMANN, 2012. "Sincere Giving and Shame in a Dictator Game," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2012-25, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).

  23. Anderhub, V. & Müller, R. & Schmidt, C., 1998. "Design and Evaluation of an Economic Experiment via the Internet," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 1998,69, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.

    Cited by:

    1. Gruner, Sven & Hirschauer, Norbert & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2014. "Potenzial Verschiedener Experimenteller Designs Fur Die Politikfolgenabschatzung," 54th Annual Conference, Goettingen, Germany, September 17-19, 2014 187435, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    2. Heinicke, Franziska & Rosenkranz, Stephanie & Weitzel, Utz, 2019. "The effect of pledges on the distribution of lying behavior: An online experiment," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 136-151.
    3. Amador, Luis & Brañas-Garza, Pablo & Espín, Antonio M. & Garcia, Teresa & Hernández, Ana, 2019. "Consistent and inconsistent choices under uncertainty: The role of cognitive abilities," MPRA Paper 95178, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Glaser, Markus & Weber, Martin, 2003. "Overconfidence and Trading Volume," Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications 03-07, Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Universität Mannheim;Sonderforschungsbereich 504, University of Mannheim.
    5. Mathias Drehmann & Joerg Oechssler & Andreas Roider, 2002. "Herding and Contrarian Behavior in Financial Markets - An Internet Experiment," Finance 0210005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Douadia Bougherara & Lana Friesen & Céline Nauges, 2021. "Risk Taking and Skewness Seeking Behavior in a Demographically Diverse Population," Discussion Papers Series 650, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    7. Hans-Theo Normann & Till Requate & Israel Waichman, 2014. "Do short-term laboratory experiments provide valid descriptions of long-term economic interactions? A study of Cournot markets," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 17(3), pages 371-390, September.
    8. Jérôme Hergueux & Nicolas Jacquemet, 2015. "Social preferences in the online laboratory: a randomized experiment," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-00984211, HAL.
    9. Charness, Gary & Haruvy, Ernan & Sonsino, Doron, 2007. "Social distance and reciprocity: An Internet experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 88-103, May.
    10. Holm, Håkan & Nystedt, Paul, 2005. "Trust in surveys and games - a matter of money and location?," Working Papers 2005:26, Lund University, Department of Economics, revised 15 Aug 2005.
    11. Antonio A. Arechar & Simon Gaechter & Lucas Molleman, 2017. "Conducting interactive experiments online," Discussion Papers 2017-02, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    12. Wang, Xidong & Liu, Jing, 2024. "The influence mechanism of internet finance on residents’ online consumption," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    13. Grewenig, Elisabeth & Lergetporer, Philipp & Simon, Lisa & Werner, Katharina & Woessmann, Ludger, 2018. "Can Online Surveys Represent the Entire Population?," IZA Discussion Papers 11799, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Vital Anderhub & Werner Güth & Wieland Müller & Martin Strobel, 2000. "An Experimental Analysis of Intertemporal Allocation Behavior," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 3(2), pages 137-152, October.
    15. Werner Guth & Carsten Schmidt & Matthias Sutter, 2003. "Fairness in the mail and opportunism in the internet - a newspaper experiment on ultimatum bargaining," Artefactual Field Experiments 00051, The Field Experiments Website.
    16. John Duffy, 2011. "Trust in Second Life," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 78(1), pages 53-62, July.
    17. Alessandro Innocenti, 2015. "Virtual reality experiments in economics," Labsi Experimental Economics Laboratory University of Siena 049, University of Siena.
    18. Charness, Gary & haruvy, Ernan & Sonsino, Doron, 2001. "Social Distance and Reciprocity: The Internet vs. the Laboratory," University of California at Santa Barbara, Economics Working Paper Series qt3dt073wb, Department of Economics, UC Santa Barbara.
    19. Drehmann, Mathias & Oechssler, Jörg & Roider, Andreas, 2004. "Herding with and without Payoff Externalities - An Internet Experiment," Bonn Econ Discussion Papers 15/2004, University of Bonn, Bonn Graduate School of Economics (BGSE).
    20. Chesney, Thomas & Chuah, Swee-Hoon & Hoffmann, Robert, 2009. "Virtual world experimentation: An exploratory study," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 618-635, October.
    21. Katrin Schmelz & Anthony Ziegelmeyer, 2015. "Social Distance and Control Aversion: Evidence from the Internet and the Laboratory," TWI Research Paper Series 100, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
    22. Pikulina, E.S. & Renneboog, Luc & Tobler, P.N., 2017. "Overconfidence and investment : An experimental approach," Other publications TiSEM 940a1d28-f38f-4953-9790-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    23. Catherine Eckel & Rick Wilson, 2006. "Internet cautions: Experimental games with internet partners," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 9(1), pages 53-66, April.
    24. Pikulina, E.S. & Renneboog, L.D.R. & Tobler, P.N., 2014. "Overconfidence, Effort, and Investment (Revised version of CentER DP 2013-035)," Discussion Paper 2014-039, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    25. Shavit, Tal & Sonsino, Doron & Benzion, Uri, 2001. "A comparative study of lotteries-evaluation in class and on the Web," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 483-491, August.
    26. Roggenkamp, Hauke C., 2024. "Revisiting ‘Growth and Inequality in Public Good Provision’—Reproducing and Generalizing Through Inconvenient Online Experimentation," OSF Preprints 6rn97_v1, Center for Open Science.
    27. Guo, Yiting & Shachat, Jason & Walker, Matthew J. & Wei, Lijia, 2023. "On the generalizability of using mobile devices to conduct economic experiments," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    28. Holm, Håkan & Nystedt, Paul, 2002. "Intra-Generational Trust - a Semi-Experimental Study of Trust Among Different Generations," Working Papers 2002:16, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    29. Duersch, Peter & Oechssler, Jörg & Schipper, Burkhard C., 2009. "Incentives for subjects in internet experiments," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 120-122, October.
    30. Fiedler, Marina & Haruvy, Ernan, 2009. "The lab versus the virtual lab and virtual field--An experimental investigation of trust games with communication," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 716-724, November.
    31. Katrin Schmelz & Anthony Ziegelmeyer, 2020. "Reactions to (the absence of) control and workplace arrangements: experimental evidence from the internet and the laboratory," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 23(4), pages 933-960, December.
    32. Roggenkamp, Hauke C., 2024. "Revisiting ‘Growth and Inequality in Public Good Provision’—Reproducing and Generalizing Through Inconvenient Online Experimentation," OSF Preprints 6rn97, Center for Open Science.
    33. Emmanuel PETIT & Anna TCHERKASSOF & Xavier GASSMANN, 2011. "Anticipated regret and self-esteem in the Allais paradox," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2011-25, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    34. Massimo Finocchiaro Castro & Calogero Guccio & Domenica Romeo, 2024. "Looking inside the lab: a systematic literature review of economic experiments in health service provision," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(7), pages 1177-1204, September.
    35. Pin, Paolo & Rotesi, Tiziano, 2023. "App-based experiments," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    36. Holm, Håkan & Nystedt, Paul, 2008. "Trust in surveys and games - A methodological contribution on the influence of money and location," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 522-542, August.
    37. Emmanuel PETIT & Anna TCHERKASSOF & Xavier GASSMANN, 2012. "Sincere Giving and Shame in a Dictator Game," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2012-25, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    38. Grewenig, Elisabeth & Lergetporer, Philipp & Simon, Lisa & Werner, Katharina & Woessmann, Ludger, 2023. "Can internet surveys represent the entire population? A practitioners’ analysis," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).

  24. Schmidt, Carsten & Müller, Rudolf, 1998. "A framework for micropayment evaluation," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 1998,66, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.

    Cited by:

    1. Mashreghi , Behrooz & Keramati , Abbas, 2012. "An Analysis of the Factors Influencing Success of Bank-issued Micropayment Systems in Iran," Journal of Money and Economy, Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 6(3), pages 245-286, April.
    2. Ben Greiner & H.-Arno Jacobsen & Carsten Schmidt, 2002. "The Virtual Laboratory Infrstructure for Online Economic Experiments," Papers on Strategic Interaction 2002-35, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group.

  25. Günther, O. & Müller, R. & Schmidt, P. & Bhargava, H. & Krishnan, R., 1996. "MMM: A WWW-Based Model Management System for Using Software Modules Remotely," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 1996,32, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.

    Cited by:

    1. Yong Xie & Hongwei Wang, 2014. "A Group Cooperative Decision Support System Based on Extended Contract Net," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 1191-1217, September.
    2. Abel, David J. & Gaede, Volker & Taylor, Kerry L. & Zhou, Xiaofang, 1997. "SMART: Towards spatial internet marketplaces," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 1997,51, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.

  26. Bhargava, H. K. & Krishnan, R. & Müller, R., 1996. "Electronic Commerce in Decision Technologies: A Business Cycle Analysis," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 1996,83, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.

    Cited by:

    1. Abel, David J. & Gaede, Volker & Taylor, Kerry L. & Zhou, Xiaofang, 1997. "SMART: Towards spatial internet marketplaces," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 1997,51, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.

  27. Bhargava, H. & Krishnan, R. & Müller, R., 1996. "Decision Support on Demand: on Emerging Electronic Markets for Decision Technologies," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 1996,31, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.

    Cited by:

    1. Amit V. Deokar & Omar F. El-Gayar, 2011. "Decision-enabled dynamic process management for networked enterprises," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 13(5), pages 655-668, November.
    2. Gu, Jifa & Tang, Xijin, 2005. "Meta-synthesis approach to complex system modeling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 166(3), pages 597-614, November.
    3. Yong Xie & Hongwei Wang, 2014. "A Group Cooperative Decision Support System Based on Extended Contract Net," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 1191-1217, September.
    4. Guangquan Zhang & Jie Lu, 2003. "An Integrated Group Decision-Making Method Dealing with Fuzzy Preferences for Alternatives and Individual Judgments for Selection Criteria," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 12(6), pages 501-515, November.
    5. Makowski, Marek, 2005. "A structured modeling technology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 166(3), pages 615-648, November.
    6. Abel, David J. & Gaede, Volker & Taylor, Kerry L. & Zhou, Xiaofang, 1997. "SMART: Towards spatial internet marketplaces," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 1997,51, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.
    7. Therani Madhusudan, 2007. "A web services framework for distributed model management," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 9-27, March.

Articles

  1. Hemant K. Bhargava & Gergely Csapó & Rudolf Müller, 2020. "On Optimal Auctions for Mixing Exclusive and Shared Matching in Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(6), pages 2653-2676, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Sameer Mehta & Milind Dawande & Ganesh Janakiraman & Vijay Mookerjee, 2021. "How to Sell a Data Set? Pricing Policies for Data Monetization," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1281-1297, December.
    2. Sameer Mehta & Milind Dawande & Ganesh Janakiraman & Vijay Mookerjee, 2022. "An Approximation Scheme for Data Monetization," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2412-2428, June.

  2. Hyndman, Kyle & Müller, Rudolf, 2020. "The role of incentives in dynamic favour exchange: An experimental investigation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 83-96.

    Cited by:

    1. Arianna Degan & Yushen Li & Huan Xie, 2024. "Favor Exchange with Private Costs: An Experiment," CIRANO Working Papers 2024s-08, CIRANO.
    2. James, Steffan & Liu, Zheng & White, Gareth R.T. & Samuel, Anthony, 2023. "Introducing ethical theory to the triple helix model: Supererogatory acts in crisis innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).

  3. Carbajal, Juan Carlos & Müller, Rudolf, 2017. "Monotonicity and revenue equivalence domains by monotonic transformations in differences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 29-35.

    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Yi & Wu, Fan, 2024. "Implementing randomized allocation rules with outcome-contingent transfers," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).

  4. André Berger & Rudolf Müller & Seyed Hossein Naeemi, 2017. "Characterizing implementable allocation rules in multi-dimensional environments," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(2), pages 367-383, February.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  5. Carbajal, Juan Carlos & Müller, Rudolf, 2015. "Implementability under monotonic transformations in differences," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 114-131.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  6. Csapó, Gergely & Müller, Rudolf, 2013. "Optimal mechanism design for the private supply of a public good," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 229-242.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  7. Grigorieva, Elena & Jean-Jacques Herings, P. & Müller, Rudolf & Vermeulen, Dries, 2012. "Fraction auctions: The tradeoff between efficiency and running time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 577-587.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  8. Grigorieva, Elena & Herings, P. Jean-Jacques & Müller, Rudolf & Vermeulen, Dries, 2011. "Inefficiency of equilibria in digital mechanisms with continuous valuations," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(4-5), pages 541-544.

    Cited by:

    1. Grigorieva, E. & Herings, P.J.J. & Müller, R.J. & Vermeulen, A.J., 2009. "Fraction auctions: the tradeoff between efficiency and running time," Research Memorandum 045, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).

  9. Birgit Heydenreich & Rudolf Müller & Marc Uetz, 2010. "Mechanism Design for Decentralized Online Machine Scheduling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 445-457, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Briskorn, Dirk & Waldherr, Stefan, 2022. "Anarchy in the UJ: Coordination mechanisms for minimizing the number of late jobs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 815-827.
    2. Jie Yang & Fang He & Xi Lin & Max Zuo‐Jun Shen, 2021. "Mechanism Design for Stochastic Dynamic Parking Resource Allocation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3615-3634, October.

  10. Birgit Heydenreich & Rudolf Müller & Marc Uetz & Rakesh V. Vohra, 2009. "Characterization of Revenue Equivalence," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 77(1), pages 307-316, January.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  11. Muller, Rudolf & Perea, Andres & Wolf, Sascha, 2007. "Weak monotonicity and Bayes-Nash incentive compatibility," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 344-358, November.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  12. Elena Grigorieva & P. Herings & Rudolf Müller & Dries Vermeulen, 2007. "The private value single item bisection auction," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 30(1), pages 107-118, January.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  13. Anderhub, Vital & Muller, Rudolf & Schmidt, Carsten, 2001. "Design and evaluation of an economic experiment via the Internet," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 227-247, October.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  14. Stan van Hoesel & Rudolf Müller, 2001. "Optimization in electronic markets: examples in combinatorial auctions," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 23-33, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Dries R. Goossens & Sander Onderstal & Jan Pijnacker & Frits C. R. Spieksma, 2014. "Solids: A Combinatorial Auction for Real Estate," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 44(4), pages 351-363, August.
    2. Drexl, Andreas & Jørnsten, Kurt & Knof, Diether, 2009. "Non-linear anonymous pricing combinatorial auctions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(1), pages 296-302, November.
    3. Jing Yu & Lining Xing & Xu Tan, 0. "The new treatment mode research of hepatitis B based on ant colony algorithm," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    4. Jing Yu & Lining Xing & Xu Tan, 2021. "The new treatment mode research of hepatitis B based on ant colony algorithm," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 740-759, November.

  15. Carsten Schmidt & Rudolf Müller, 1999. "A framework for micropayment evaluation," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 187-200, October.
    See citations under working paper version above.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.