IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/par388.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Erik Arnold

Personal Details

First Name:Erik
Middle Name:
Last Name:Arnold
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:par388

Affiliation

Technopolis Group

http://www.technopolis-group.com
UK, Brighton

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles Chapters Books

Working papers

  1. Wise, Emily & Arnold, Erik, 2022. "Evaluating Transformation – what can we learn from the literature?," Papers in Innovation Studies 2022/10, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
  2. Dominique Guellec & Stephan Vincent-Lancrin & Patrick Llerena & Philippe Mustar & Erik Arnold & Mickaël Benaïm & Mireille Matt & Giulia Ajmone-Marsan, 2014. "OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy: France 2014 [Examens de l'OCDE des politiques d'innovation : France 2014]," Post-Print hal-01174826, HAL.
  3. Hanna, N. & Guy, K. & Arnold, E., 1995. "The Diffusion of Information Technology. Experience of Industrial Countries and Lessons for Developing Countries," World Bank - Discussion Papers 281, World Bank.

Articles

  1. Barbara Good & Niki Vermeulen & Brigitte Tiefenthaler & Erik Arnold, 2015. "Counting quality? The Czech performance-based research funding system," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 91-105.
  2. Erik Arnold, 2012. "Understanding long-term impacts of R&D funding: The EU framework programme," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(5), pages 332-343, October.
  3. Erik Arnold & John Clark & Alessandro Muscio, 2005. "What the evaluation record tells us about European Union Framework Programme performance," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 32(5), pages 385-397, October.
  4. Erik Arnold, 2004. "Evaluating research and innovation policy: a systems world needs systems evaluations," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 3-17, April.
  5. Erik Arnold & Ben Thuriaux, 2001. "Contribution of basic research to the Irish national innovation system," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 28(2), pages 86-98, April.
  6. Ken Guy & Erik Arnold, 1993. "UK Government practice in science and technology evaluation," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 3(3), pages 179-186, December.
  7. Arnold, Erik, 1989. "Targeting the computer : K. Flamm, (The Brookings Institution, Washington, 1987)," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 304-305, October.

Chapters

  1. Erik Arnold, 1985. "A ‘Managerial-Behavioural’ Paradigm," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Competition and Technological Change in the Television Industry, chapter 2, pages 26-36, Palgrave Macmillan.
  2. Erik Arnold, 1985. "Marketing — Distribution," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Competition and Technological Change in the Television Industry, chapter 11, pages 148-158, Palgrave Macmillan.
  3. Erik Arnold, 1985. "A ‘Schumpeterian’ Paradigm," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Competition and Technological Change in the Television Industry, chapter 3, pages 37-49, Palgrave Macmillan.
  4. Erik Arnold, 1985. "Strategy and Control of the Firm," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Competition and Technological Change in the Television Industry, chapter 7, pages 93-108, Palgrave Macmillan.
  5. Erik Arnold, 1985. "The Semiconductor Industry," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Competition and Technological Change in the Television Industry, chapter 6, pages 84-90, Palgrave Macmillan.
  6. Erik Arnold, 1985. "Implications for Theory," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Competition and Technological Change in the Television Industry, chapter 14, pages 204-217, Palgrave Macmillan.
  7. Erik Arnold, 1985. "Marketing — Quality," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Competition and Technological Change in the Television Industry, chapter 10, pages 136-147, Palgrave Macmillan.
  8. Erik Arnold, 1985. "Viewdata and British Telecom," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Competition and Technological Change in the Television Industry, chapter 5, pages 75-83, Palgrave Macmillan.
  9. Erik Arnold, 1985. "Conclusions for Theory," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Competition and Technological Change in the Television Industry, chapter 13, pages 173-203, Palgrave Macmillan.
  10. Erik Arnold, 1985. "The UK Television Industry," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Competition and Technological Change in the Television Industry, chapter 4, pages 53-74, Palgrave Macmillan.
  11. Erik Arnold, 1985. "Marketing — Price," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Competition and Technological Change in the Television Industry, chapter 9, pages 122-135, Palgrave Macmillan.
  12. Erik Arnold, 1985. "The Neoclassical Paradigm," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Competition and Technological Change in the Television Industry, chapter 1, pages 13-25, Palgrave Macmillan.
  13. Erik Arnold, 1985. "Introduction," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Competition and Technological Change in the Television Industry, pages 1-10, Palgrave Macmillan.
  14. Erik Arnold, 1985. "Interaction Between Supply and Demand," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Competition and Technological Change in the Television Industry, chapter 12, pages 159-169, Palgrave Macmillan.
  15. Erik Arnold, 1985. "Technical Change," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Competition and Technological Change in the Television Industry, chapter 8, pages 109-121, Palgrave Macmillan.

Books

  1. Erik Arnold, 1985. "Competition and Technological Change in the Television Industry," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-07492-1, October.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Wise, Emily & Arnold, Erik, 2022. "Evaluating Transformation – what can we learn from the literature?," Papers in Innovation Studies 2022/10, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Alejandra Boni & Diana Velasco & Jordi Molas-Gallart & Johan Schot, 2023. "Evaluating transformative innovation policy in a formative way: Insights from Vinnova’s food mission experiment," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 32(3), pages 577-590.

  2. Hanna, N. & Guy, K. & Arnold, E., 1995. "The Diffusion of Information Technology. Experience of Industrial Countries and Lessons for Developing Countries," World Bank - Discussion Papers 281, World Bank.

    Cited by:

    1. Dowling, Malcolm & Ray, David, 2000. "The structure and composition of international trade in Asia:: historical trends and future prospects," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 301-318, December.
    2. Dimitrios Pontikakis & Mathieu Doussineau & Nicholas Harrap & Mark Boden, 2018. "Mobilising European Structural and Investment Funds and Horizon 2020 in support of innovation in less developed regions," JRC Research Reports JRC112442, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Jain, R., 1997. "Key constructs in successful IS implementation: South-East Asian experience," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 267-284, June.
    4. Hao Lu & Qin Zhang & Qinghong Cui & Yuanyuan Luo & Pardis Pishdad-Bozorgi & Xiancun Hu, 2021. "How Can Information Technology Use Improve Construction Labor Productivity? An Empirical Analysis from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Henderson, Dylan & Roche, Neil, 2018. "From consensus to conflict in the regional policy mix for broadband deployment: examining the role of informal coordination," 29th European Regional ITS Conference, Trento 2018 184944, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    6. Rossitsa Rousseva, 2003. "The Impact of Innovation Networks upon the Innovation Activity in Companies in the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) Industry in BG," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 82-109.
    7. Hao Lu & Pardis Pishdad-Bozorgi & Guangbin Wang & Yingxia Xue & Dan Tan, 2019. "ICT Implementation of Small- and Medium-Sized Construction Enterprises: Organizational Characteristics, Driving Forces, and Value Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, June.
    8. AFAWUBO, Komivi & NOGLO, Yawo Agbényégan, 2022. "ICT and entrepreneurship: A comparative analysis of developing, emerging and developed countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    9. Ted Tschang & Mathurot Chuladul & Thuy Thu Le, 2002. "Scaling-up information services for development: a framework of increasing returns for telecentres," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(1), pages 129-141.
    10. Hassanlou, Khadige & Fathian, Mohammad & Akhavan, Peyman & Azari, Ali, 2009. "Information technology policy trends in the world," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 125-132.
    11. Poh-Kam Wong, 1998. "Leveraging the Global Information Revolution for Economic Development: Singapore's Evolving Information Industry Strategy," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 323-341, December.
    12. Nagy Hanna, 2011. "E-Sri Lanka as a Deliberate and Emergent Strategy Process," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 2(1), pages 3-37, March.
    13. Luis Rubalcaba & Diego Aboal & Paula Garda, 2016. "Service Innovation in Developing Economies: Evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(5), pages 607-626, May.

Articles

  1. Barbara Good & Niki Vermeulen & Brigitte Tiefenthaler & Erik Arnold, 2015. "Counting quality? The Czech performance-based research funding system," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 91-105.

    Cited by:

    1. Yaşar Tonta & Müge Akbulut, 2020. "Does monetary support increase citation impact of scholarly papers?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 1617-1641, November.
    2. Romina Rodela, 2016. "On the use of databases about research performance: comments on Karlovčec and Mladenić (2015) and others using the SICRIS database," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(3), pages 2151-2157, December.
    3. Hladchenko, Myroslava & Moed, Henk F., 2021. "The effect of publication traditions and requirements in research assessment and funding policies upon the use of national journals in 28 post-socialist countries," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(4).
    4. Malgorzata Karpinska-Krakowiak & Edyta Rudawska & Barbara Mroz-Gorgon & Lukasz Skowron, 2021. "Academic Research on Marketing in Central and Eastern Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Scholarly Papers Published in Polish versus International Journals," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 198-209.
    5. Gabriel-Alexandru Vîiu & Mihai Păunescu, 2021. "The citation impact of articles from which authors gained monetary rewards based on journal metrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(6), pages 4941-4974, June.
    6. Emanuel Kulczycki & Raf Guns & Janne Pölönen & Tim C. E. Engels & Ewa A. Rozkosz & Alesia A. Zuccala & Kasper Bruun & Olli Eskola & Andreja Istenič Starčič & Michal Petr & Gunnar Sivertsen, 2020. "Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities: A seven‐country European study," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(11), pages 1371-1385, November.
    7. Demir, Selcuk Besir, 2018. "Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 1296-1311.
    8. Aridi, Anwar & Querejazu, Daniel & Zuniga, Pluvia, 2021. "Knowledge transfer activities and conditions for impact in Bulgarian public research institutions: A survey-based diagnostic," MERIT Working Papers 2021-026, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    9. Renata Kudaibergenova & Sandugash Uzakbay & Asselya Makanova & Kymbat Ramadinkyzy & Erlan Kistaubayev & Ruslan Dussekeev & Kadyrzhan Smagulov, 2022. "Managing publication change at Al-Farabi Kazakh National University: a case study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(1), pages 453-479, January.
    10. Martin Ricker, 2017. "Letter to the Editor: About the quality and impact of scientific articles," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1851-1855, June.
    11. Kulczycki, Emanuel & Korzeń, Marcin & Korytkowski, Przemysław, 2017. "Toward an excellence-based research funding system: Evidence from Poland," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 282-298.
    12. Brauer, Rene & Dymitrow, Mirek & Tribe, John, 2019. "The impact of tourism research," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 64-78.
    13. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo & Myroslava Hladchenko, 2023. "Assessing the effects of publication requirements for professorship on research performance and publishing behaviour of Ukrainian academics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(8), pages 4589-4609, August.
    14. Selcuk Besir Demir, 2018. "Pros and cons of the new financial support policy for Turkish researchers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(3), pages 2053-2068, September.
    15. Emanuel Kulczycki & Tim C. E. Engels & Janne Pölönen & Kasper Bruun & Marta Dušková & Raf Guns & Robert Nowotniak & Michal Petr & Gunnar Sivertsen & Andreja Istenič Starčič & Alesia Zuccala, 2018. "Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from eight European countries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(1), pages 463-486, July.
    16. Vít Macháček & Martin Srholec, 2021. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(3), pages 1897-1921, March.
    17. Jappelli, Tullio & Nappi, Carmela Anna & Torrini, Roberto, 2017. "Gender effects in research evaluation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 911-924.
    18. Astrid Jaime & Constanza Pérez‐Martelo & Bernardo Herrera & Gonzalo Ordóñez‐Matamoros & Dominique Vinck, 2023. "Functioning strategies of the research groups' leaders in the context of funding and policy instabilities," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(2), pages 282-306, March.
    19. Saarela, Mirka & Kärkkäinen, Tommi & Lahtonen, Tommi & Rossi, Tuomo, 2016. "Expert-based versus citation-based ranking of scholarly and scientific publication channels," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 693-718.
    20. Pisár Peter & Šipikal Miroslav, 2017. "Negative Effects of Performance Based Funding of Universities: The Case of Slovakia," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 171-189, December.

  2. Erik Arnold, 2012. "Understanding long-term impacts of R&D funding: The EU framework programme," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(5), pages 332-343, October.

    Cited by:

    1. Anthony G. Bartlett, 2018. "Factors Affecting the Relative Success of Collaborative Forestry Research Projects in Indonesia," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 30(5), pages 892-913, December.
    2. Wolf-Hendrik Uhlbach & Pierre-Alexandre Balland & Thomas Scherngell, 2017. "R&D Policy and Technological Trajectories of Regions: Evidence from the EU Framework Programmes," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1722, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Sep 2017.
    3. Pierre-Alexandre Balland & Ron Boschma & Julien Ravet, 2019. "Network dynamics in collaborative research in the EU, 2003-2017," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1911, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Apr 2019.
    4. Subtil Lacerda, Juliana & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., 2020. "Effectiveness of an ‘open innovation’ approach in renewable energy: Empirical evidence from a survey on solar and wind power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    5. Benedetto Lepori & Valerio Veglio & Barbara Heller-Schuh & Thomas Scherngell & Michael Barber, 2015. "Participations to European Framework Programs of higher education institutions and their association with organizational characteristics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 2149-2178, December.
    6. Adriana Bin & Sergio Salles-Filho & Luiza Maria Capanema & Fernando Antonio Basile Colugnati, 2015. "What difference does it make? Impact of peer-reviewed scholarships on scientific production," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(2), pages 1167-1188, February.
    7. Umut Yilmaz Cetinkaya & Erkan Erdil, 2015. "Cohesion and Competition of Europe: Policy Suggestions from The Perspective of Network and Entropy," STPS Working Papers 1505, STPS - Science and Technology Policy Studies Center, Middle East Technical University, revised Dec 2015.
    8. Kim, Eungdo & Kim, Soyoung & Kim, Hongbum, 2017. "Development of an evaluation framework for publicly funded R&D projects: The case of Korea's Next Generation Network," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 18-28.

  3. Erik Arnold & John Clark & Alessandro Muscio, 2005. "What the evaluation record tells us about European Union Framework Programme performance," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 32(5), pages 385-397, October.

    Cited by:

    1. Daniela Filippo & Pablo Sastrón-Toledo, 2023. "Influence of research on open science in the public policy sphere," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(3), pages 1995-2017, March.
    2. A. Gaunand & L. Colinet & P.-B. Joly & M. Matt, 2022. "Counting what really counts? Assessing the political impact of science," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 699-721, June.
    3. Mafini Dosso & Antonio Vezzani, 2017. "Firm market valuation and intellectual property assets," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2017-07, Joint Research Centre.
    4. Marco Marinucci, 2014. "Cooperative R&D networks among firms and public research institutions," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 962, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    5. Yiannis Spanos, 2012. "Conditionally-mediated effects of scale in collaborative R&D," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 37(5), pages 696-714, October.
    6. Fabrizi, Andrea & Guarini, Giulio & Meliciani, Valentina, 2018. "Green patents, regulatory policies and research network policies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1018-1031.
    7. Hemert, P. van & Nijkamp, P., 2008. "Thematic research prioritization in the EU and the Netherlands: an assessment on the basis of content analysis," Serie Research Memoranda 0023, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    8. Stefano Breschi & Franco Malerba, 2011. "Assessing the scientific and technological output of EU Framework Programmes: evidence from the FP6 projects in the ICT field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 88(1), pages 239-257, July.
    9. Sara Amoroso & Alex Coad & Nicola Grassano, 2017. "European R&D networks: A snapshot from the 7th EU Framework Programme," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2017-05, Joint Research Centre.
    10. Ebersberger, Bernd & Edler, Jakob & Lo, Vivien, 2006. "Improving policy understanding by means of secondary analyses of policy evaluation: a concept development," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 12, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    11. Daniela Cagno & Andrea Fabrizi & Valentina Meliciani, 2014. "The impact of participation in European joint research projects on knowledge creation and economic growth," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 39(6), pages 836-858, December.
    12. Jiri Vanecek & Martin Fatun & Vladimir Albrecht, 2010. "Bibliometric evaluation of the FP-5 and FP-6 results in the Czech Republic," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 83(1), pages 103-114, April.

  4. Erik Arnold, 2004. "Evaluating research and innovation policy: a systems world needs systems evaluations," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 3-17, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Laatsit, Mart & Lindholm-Dahlstrand, Åsa & Nilsson, Magnus, 2023. "Capturing the system-level effects of innovation policy: an assessment of publicly funded innovative entrepreneurship in Sweden," Papers in Innovation Studies 2023/12, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    2. Lee, Jun Gon & Park, Min Jae, 2019. "Rethinking the national defense R&D innovation system for latecomer: Defense R&D governance matrix," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1-11.
    3. Magro, Edurne & Wilson, James R., 2019. "Policy-mix evaluation: Governance challenges from new place-based innovation policies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(10).
    4. Aleksander Galas & Aleksandra Pilat & Matilde Leonardi & Beata Tobiasz-Adamczyk, 2018. "Research Project Evaluation—Learnings from the PATHWAYS Project Experience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Denis Gray & Lindsey McGowen & Timothy L. Michaelis & Olena Leonchuk & Drew Rivers, 2022. "A policy mix experiment to promote start-up success: exploratory evaluation of the NSF Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)/Industry University Cooperative Research Center (IUCRC) membership supp," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 176-212, February.
    6. Kalpazidou Schmidt, Evanthia & Graversen, Ebbe Krogh, 2020. "Developing a conceptual evaluation framework for gender equality interventions in research and innovation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    7. Barge-Gil, Andrés & López, Alberto, 2012. "R&D Determinants: accounting for the differences between research and development," MPRA Paper 41270, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Tea Petrin & Dragana Radicic, 2023. "Instrument policy mix and firm size: is there complementarity between R&D subsidies and R&D tax credits?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 181-215, February.
    9. Colleen Kaiser & Michal Miedzinski & Will McDowall & Geoffrey R. McCarney, 2024. "Reflective Appraisal of Transformative Innovation Policy: Development of the Sustainability Transition and Innovation Review (STIR) Approach and Application to Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-23, June.
    10. Jakob Edler & Jan Fagerberg, 2017. "Innovation policy: what, why, and how," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(1), pages 2-23.
    11. Hamid Bouabid & Ben R. Martin, 2009. "Evaluation of Moroccan research using a bibliometric-based approach: investigation of the validity of the h-index," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 78(2), pages 203-217, February.
    12. Olena Leonchuk & Denis O. Gray, 2019. "Scientific and technological (human) social capital formation and Industry–University Cooperative Research Centers: a quasi-experimental evaluation of graduate student outcomes," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 1638-1664, October.
    13. Barge-Gil, Andrés & López, Alberto, 2011. "R versus D: Estimating the differentiated effect of research and development on innovation results," MPRA Paper 29091, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Reiljan, Janno & Paltser, Ingra, 2013. "The implementation of research and development policy in European and Asian countries," Discourses in Social Market Economy 2013-03, OrdnungsPolitisches Portal (OPO).
    15. Magro, Edurne & Wilson, James R., 2013. "Complex innovation policy systems: Towards an evaluation mix," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 1647-1656.
    16. Esparza Masana, Ricard & Fernández, Tatiana, 2019. "Monitoring S3: Key dimensions and implications," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    17. Kirsi Hyytinen & Sampsa Ruutur & Mika Nieminen & Faïz Gallouj & Marja Toivonen, 2014. "Evaluation of services linked to the sustainability: a dynamic and multi-criteria approach," Post-Print hal-01111817, HAL.
    18. Rosa Caiazza, 2016. "A cross-national analysis of policies affecting innovation diffusion," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(6), pages 1406-1419, December.
    19. Stefano Breschi & Franco Malerba, 2011. "Assessing the scientific and technological output of EU Framework Programmes: evidence from the FP6 projects in the ICT field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 88(1), pages 239-257, July.
    20. R. Núñez-Sánchez & A. Barge-Gil & A. Modrego-Rico, 2012. "Performance of knowledge interactions between public research centres and industrial firms in Spain: a project-level analysis," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 330-354, June.
    21. Steve Talbot, 2016. "Creating a smart rural economy through smart specialisation: The microsphere model," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 31(8), pages 892-919, December.
    22. Fernando Jiménez-Sáez & Jon Mikel Zabala-Iturriagagoitia & Jose Luis Zofío, 2013. "Who leads research productivity growth? Guidelines for R&D policy-makers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(1), pages 273-303, January.
    23. Haddad, Carolina R. & Bergek, Anna, 2023. "Towards an integrated framework for evaluating transformative innovation policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    24. Purkus, Alexandra & Lüdtke, Jan, 2020. "A systemic evaluation framework for a multi-actor, forest-based bioeconomy governance process: The German Charter for Wood 2.0 as a case study," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    25. Sh Moradi & S Abdi, 2023. "Open science–related policies in Europe," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(3), pages 521-530.
    26. Ebersberger, Bernd & Edler, Jakob & Lo, Vivien, 2006. "Improving policy understanding by means of secondary analyses of policy evaluation: a concept development," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 12, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    27. Kern, Florian & Rogge, Karoline S. & Howlett, Michael, 2019. "Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: New approaches and insights through bridging innovation and policy studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(10).
    28. Dirk Meissner & Sandrine Kergroach, 2021. "Innovation policy mix: mapping and measurement," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 197-222, February.
    29. Evgeny Popov & Maxim Vlasov & Hanusch Horst, 2016. "Resource Potential of Knowledge Generation," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 12(3), pages 101-114.
    30. Kirsi Hyttinen & Sampsa Ruutu & Mika Nieminen & Faiz Gallouj & Marja Toivonen, 2014. "A system dynamic and multi-criteria evaluation of innovations in environmental services," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(3), pages 29-52.
    31. Torregrosa-Hetland, Sara & Pelkonen, Antti & Oksanen, Juha & Kander, Astrid, 2019. "The prevalence of publicly stimulated innovations –A comparison of Finland and Sweden, 1970–2013," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1373-1384.
    32. Svetlana Panikarova & Maxim Vlasov & Ivan Boyko, 2017. "Assessing Research Productivity in University Environment: Institutional Approach," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(02), pages 1-12, June.
    33. Navidreza Alizadeh Bazrafshan & Omid Ali Kharazmi, 2022. "Contextual challenges of smart city implementation in Mashhad, Iran's second‐largest metropolis," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(5), September.
    34. Junwen Luo & Gonzalo Ordóñez-Matamoros & Stefan Kuhlmann, 2019. "The balancing role of evaluation mechanisms in organizational governance—The case of publicly funded research institutions," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 28(4), pages 344-354.
    35. Janssen, Matthijs J., 2019. "What bangs for your buck? Assessing the design and impact of Dutch transformative policy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 78-94.
    36. Kincsö Izsak & Paresa Markianidou & Slavo Radošević, 2015. "Convergence of National Innovation Policy Mixes in Europe – Has It Gone Too Far? An Analysis of Research and Innovation Policy Measures in the Period 2004–12," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 786-802, July.
    37. Jesper Lindgaard Christensen & Daniel Stefan Hain & Letícia Antunes Nogueira, 2019. "Joining forces: collaboration patterns and performance of renewable energy innovators," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 793-814, April.
    38. Jerald Hage & Jonathon Mote & Gretchen Jordan, 2013. "Ideas, innovations, and networks: a new policy model based on the evolution of knowledge," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 46(2), pages 199-216, June.
    39. Ricard Esparza-Masana, 2022. "Towards Smart Specialisation 2.0. Main Challenges When Updating Strategies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(1), pages 635-655, March.
    40. Wise, Emily & Arnold, Erik, 2022. "Evaluating Transformation – what can we learn from the literature?," Papers in Innovation Studies 2022/10, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    41. Claire Nauwelaers & Inger Midtkandal & Inmaculada Periañez Forte, 2014. "RIS3 Implementation and Policy Mixes. S3 Policy Brief Series n° 07/2014 September 2014," JRC Research Reports JRC91917, Joint Research Centre.
    42. Borrás, Susana & Laatsit, Mart, 2019. "Towards system oriented innovation policy evaluation? Evidence from EU28 member states," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 312-321.
    43. Joanna Dziendziora & Małgorzata Smolarek & Barbara Piontek, 2021. "Activation of Investment Processes in the Context of Operation of Special Economic Zones in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 130-146.
    44. Chung, Chao-chen, 2013. "Government, policy-making and the development of innovation system: The cases of Taiwanese pharmaceutical biotechnology policies (2000–2008)," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 1053-1071.
    45. Thomas Brenner & Carsten Emmrich & Charlotte Schlump, 2013. "Regional Effects of a Cluster-oriented policy measure. The Case of the InnoRegio program in Germany," Working Papers on Innovation and Space 2013-05, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    46. Andrés Barge-Gil & Aurelia Modrego, 2011. "The impact of research and technology organizations on firm competitiveness. Measurement and determinants," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 61-83, February.
    47. Mari Jose Aranguren & Edurne Magro & James R Wilson, 2017. "Regional competitiveness policy evaluation as a transformative process: From theory to practice," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(4), pages 703-720, June.
    48. Bleda, Mercedes & del Río, Pablo, 2013. "The market failure and the systemic failure rationales in technological innovation systems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 1039-1052.
    49. Michael Rothgang & Bernhard Lageman & Anne-Marie Scholz, 2021. "Why are there so few hard facts about the impact of cluster policies in Germany? A critical review of evaluation studies," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 105-139, April.
    50. Kirsi Hyytinen & Faïz Gallouj & Marja Toivonen, 2014. "A multi-criteria and multi-actor perspective for the evaluation of sustainability services," Post-Print halshs-01133963, HAL.

  5. Erik Arnold & Ben Thuriaux, 2001. "Contribution of basic research to the Irish national innovation system," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 28(2), pages 86-98, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Thuriaux, Ben, 2002. "Letter to the editor," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 847-848, July.

  6. Ken Guy & Erik Arnold, 1993. "UK Government practice in science and technology evaluation," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 3(3), pages 179-186, December.

    Cited by:

    1. Ekin Taş & Erkan Erdil, 2024. "Effectiveness of R&D Tax Incentives in Turkey," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 6226-6272, June.
    2. Mikhail Gershman & Galina Kitova, 2017. "Assessing Government Support for Research and Innovation in Russian Universities," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(3), pages 1067-1084, September.
    3. Mikhail A. Gershman & Galina A. Kitova, 2016. "Evaluation of Research and Innovation Policies: The Case of Russian Universities," HSE Working papers WP BRP 57/STI/2016, National Research University Higher School of Economics.

Chapters

  1. Erik Arnold, 1985. "The UK Television Industry," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Competition and Technological Change in the Television Industry, chapter 4, pages 53-74, Palgrave Macmillan.

    Cited by:

    1. S Milne, 1990. "New Forms of Manufacturing and Their Spatial Implications: The UK Electronic Consumer Goods Industry," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 22(2), pages 211-232, February.

  2. Erik Arnold, 1985. "Introduction," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Competition and Technological Change in the Television Industry, pages 1-10, Palgrave Macmillan.

    Cited by:

    1. Adamides, George & Stylianou, Andreas & Kosmas, Petros C. & Apostolopoulos, Constantinos D., 2013. "Factors Affecting PC and Internet Usage by the Rural Population of Cyprus," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21.
    2. Gayla S. Napier, 2014. "An Exploration of Communitas Among Road Warriors," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 3(1), pages 89-100, June.

Books

  1. Erik Arnold, 1985. "Competition and Technological Change in the Television Industry," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-07492-1, October.

    Cited by:

    1. Zhu Wang, 2006. "Learning, diffusion and the industry life cycle," Payments System Research Working Paper PSR WP 04-01, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
    2. S Milne, 1990. "New Forms of Manufacturing and Their Spatial Implications: The UK Electronic Consumer Goods Industry," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 22(2), pages 211-232, February.
    3. Zhu Wang, 2008. "Income Distribution, Market Size and the Evolution of Industry," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 11(3), pages 542-565, July.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 1 paper announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-HME: Heterodox Microeconomics (1) 2022-10-31
  2. NEP-INO: Innovation (1) 2022-10-31
  3. NEP-TID: Technology and Industrial Dynamics (1) 2022-10-31

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Erik Arnold should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.