IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v248y2024ics0951832024002564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial-temporal modeling of oil condition monitoring: A review

Author

Listed:
  • Pan, Yan
  • Liang, Bin
  • Yang, Lei
  • Liu, Houde
  • Wu, Tonghai
  • Wang, Shuo

Abstract

Lubricating oil plays a vital role as the information carrier for equipment tribological performance. Therefore, oil condition monitoring (OCM) serves as a crucial technology for assessing and predicting state degradation, providing the first-line defense against functional failure. However, limited by random fluctuation and insufficient knowledge, the modeling of OCM has suffered from uncertainty problems, leading to poor applicability and insufficient generalizability. The existing reviews are less elaborated on the information uncertainty for description, characterization, and treatment, which expresses the essence of modeling constraints. To bridge this gap, the paper provides a comprehensive review of the oil state modeling in terms of uncertainty. The existing methods and metrics are reviewed from the perspective of the spatial oil state assessment (OCA) and temporal remaining useful life (RUL) prediction modeling. Further, the existing methods are analyzed to solve the uncertainty problem, and then the solutions in oil state modeling considering uncertainty are discussed. Finally, targeting the challenges of the monitoring technology, the future trends of OCM are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Pan, Yan & Liang, Bin & Yang, Lei & Liu, Houde & Wu, Tonghai & Wang, Shuo, 2024. "Spatial-temporal modeling of oil condition monitoring: A review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:248:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024002564
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024002564
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110182?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vališ, David & Žák, Libor & Pokora, Ondřej & Lánský, Petr, 2016. "Perspective analysis outcomes of selected tribodiagnostic data used as input for condition based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 231-242.
    2. Chang, Mingu & Lee, Jongsoo, 2020. "Early stage data-based probabilistic wear life prediction and maintenance interval optimization of driving wheels," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    3. Wang, Wenbin & Hussin, B. & Jefferis, Tim, 2012. "A case study of condition based maintenance modelling based upon the oil analysis data of marine diesel engines using stochastic filtering," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 84-92.
    4. Zheng, Xiao-Wei & Li, Hong-Nan & Gardoni, Paolo, 2023. "Hybrid Bayesian-Copula-based risk assessment for tall buildings subject to wind loads considering various uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    5. Yu, Wennian & Tu, Wenbing & Kim, Il Yong & Mechefske, Chris, 2021. "A nonlinear-drift-driven Wiener process model for remaining useful life estimation considering three sources of variability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    6. Wenbin Wang & Wenjuan Zhang, 2005. "A model to predict the residual life of aircraft engines based upon oil analysis data," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(3), pages 276-284, April.
    7. Pan, Yan & Jing, Yunteng & Wu, Tonghai & Kong, Xiangxing, 2021. "An Integrated Data and Knowledge Model Addressing Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainty for Oil Condition Monitoring," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    8. Talavera, Alejandro & Aguasca, Ricardo & Galván, Blas & Cacereño, Andrés, 2013. "Application of Dempster–Shafer theory for the quantification and propagation of the uncertainty caused by the use of AIS data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 95-105.
    9. Li, Xinglin & Xie, Luofeng & Deng, Bo & Lu, Houhong & Zhu, Yangyang & Yin, Ming & Yin, Guofu & Gao, Wenxiang, 2024. "Deep dynamic high-order graph convolutional network for wear fault diagnosis of hydrodynamic mechanical seal," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    10. Rashid, H.S.J. & Place, C.S. & Mba, D. & Keong, R.L.C. & Healey, A. & Kleine-Beek, W. & Romano, M., 2015. "Reliability model for helicopter main gearbox lubrication system using influence diagrams," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 50-57.
    11. D Lin & D Banjevic & A K S Jardine, 2006. "Using principal components in a proportional hazards model with applications in condition-based maintenance," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(8), pages 910-919, August.
    12. W Wang & B Hussin, 2009. "Plant residual time modelling based on observed variables in oil samples," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(6), pages 789-796, June.
    13. Yin, Xiuxian & He, Wei & Cao, You & Ma, Ning & Zhou, Guohui & Li, Hongyu, 2024. "A new health state assessment method based on interpretable belief rule base with bimetric balance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    14. Pan, Yan & Jing, Yunteng & Wu, Tonghai & Kong, Xiangxing, 2022. "Knowledge-based data augmentation of small samples for oil condition prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    15. Bin Liu & Xiujie Zhao & Yiqi Liu & Phuc Do, 2021. "Maintenance optimisation for systems with multi-dimensional degradation and imperfect inspections," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(24), pages 7537-7559, December.
    16. Liu, Bin & Zhao, Xiujie & Liu, Guoquan & Liu, Yiqi, 2020. "Life cycle cost analysis considering multiple dependent degradation processes and environmental influence," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    17. Wakiru, James & Pintelon, Liliane & Muchiri, Peter N. & Chemweno, Peter K. & Mburu, Stanley, 2020. "Towards an innovative lubricant condition monitoring strategy for maintenance of ageing multi-unit systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    18. Drieschner, Martin & Petryna, Yuri & Gruhlke, Robert & Eigel, Martin & Hömberg, Dietmar, 2020. "Comparison of various uncertainty models with experimental investigations regarding the failure of plates with holes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    19. Jiang, R., 2013. "A multivariate CBM model with a random and time-dependent failure threshold," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 178-185.
    20. Yoo, Yeongmin & Jung, Ui-Jin & Han, Yong Ha & Lee, Jongsoo, 2021. "Data Augmentation-Based Prediction of System Level Performance under Model and Parameter Uncertainties: Role of Designable Generative Adversarial Networks (DGAN)," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    21. Liu, Xingchen & Sun, Qiuzhuang & Ye, Zhi-Sheng & Yildirim, Murat, 2021. "Optimal multi-type inspection policy for systems with imperfect online monitoring," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    22. Si, Xiao-Sheng & Li, Tianmei & Zhang, Jianxun & Lei, Yaguo, 2022. "Nonlinear degradation modeling and prognostics: A Box-Cox transformation perspective," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    23. W Wang, 2007. "A prognosis model for wear prediction based on oil-based monitoring," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(7), pages 887-893, July.
    24. Li, Xiao-Yang & Chen, Wen-Bin & Kang, Rui, 2021. "Performance margin-based reliability analysis for aircraft lock mechanism considering multi-source uncertainties and wear," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    25. Certa, Antonella & Hopps, Fabrizio & Inghilleri, Roberta & La Fata, Concetta Manuela, 2017. "A Dempster-Shafer Theory-based approach to the Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) under epistemic uncertainty: application to the propulsion system of a fishing vessel," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 69-79.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Vališ & Libor Žák & Ondřej Pokora, 2015. "Contribution to system failure occurrence prediction and to system remaining useful life estimation based on oil field data," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(1), pages 36-45, February.
    2. Pan, Yan & Jing, Yunteng & Wu, Tonghai & Kong, Xiangxing, 2022. "Knowledge-based data augmentation of small samples for oil condition prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    3. W Wang, 2011. "Overview of a semi-stochastic filtering approach for residual life estimation with applications in condition based maintenance," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 225(2), pages 185-197, June.
    4. Zhou, Zhi-Jie & Hu, Chang-Hua & Xu, Dong-Ling & Chen, Mao-Yin & Zhou, Dong-Hua, 2010. "A model for real-time failure prognosis based on hidden Markov model and belief rule base," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 269-283, November.
    5. Vališ, David & Žák, Libor & Pokora, Ondřej & Lánský, Petr, 2016. "Perspective analysis outcomes of selected tribodiagnostic data used as input for condition based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 231-242.
    6. Shangguan, Anqi & Xie, Guo & Fei, Rong & Mu, Lingxia & Hei, Xinhong, 2023. "Train wheel degradation generation and prediction based on the time series generation adversarial network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    7. Aizpurua, J.I. & Stewart, B.G. & McArthur, S.D.J. & Penalba, M. & Barrenetxea, M. & Muxika, E. & Ringwood, J.V., 2022. "Probabilistic forecasting informed failure prognostics framework for improved RUL prediction under uncertainty: A transformer case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    8. Zheng, Bokai & Chen, Cen & Lin, Yigang & Hu, Yifan & Ye, Xuerong & Zhai, Guofu & Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Optimal design of step-stress accelerated degradation test oriented by nonlinear and distributed degradation process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    9. Si, Xiao-Sheng & Wang, Wenbin & Hu, Chang-Hua & Zhou, Dong-Hua, 2011. "Remaining useful life estimation - A review on the statistical data driven approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 1-14, August.
    10. Jiang, Deyin & Chen, Tianyu & Xie, Juanzhang & Cui, Weimin & Song, Bifeng, 2023. "A mechanical system reliability degradation analysis and remaining life estimation method——With the example of an aircraft hatch lock mechanism," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    11. Chen, Chuanhai & Li, Bowen & Guo, Jinyan & Liu, Zhifeng & Qi, Baobao & Hua, Chunlei, 2022. "Bearing life prediction method based on the improved FIDES reliability model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    12. Zhang, Ao & Wang, Zhihua & Bao, Rui & Liu, Chengrui & Wu, Qiong & Cao, Shihao, 2023. "A novel failure time estimation method for degradation analysis based on general nonlinear Wiener processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    13. Wen, Yuxin & Wu, Jianguo & Das, Devashish & Tseng, Tzu-Liang(Bill), 2018. "Degradation modeling and RUL prediction using Wiener process subject to multiple change points and unit heterogeneity," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 113-124.
    14. Ta, Yuntian & Li, Yanfeng & Cai, Wenan & Zhang, Qianqian & Wang, Zhijian & Dong, Lei & Du, Wenhua, 2023. "Adaptive staged remaining useful life prediction method based on multi-sensor and multi-feature fusion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    15. Nan Zhang & Sen Tian & Le Li & Zhongbin Wang & Jun Zhang, 2023. "Maintenance analysis of a partial observable K-out-of-N system with load sharing units," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(4), pages 703-713, August.
    16. Miguel A. Rodríguez-López & Luis M. López-González & Luis M. López-Ochoa & Jesús Las-Heras-Casas, 2018. "Methodology for Detecting Malfunctions and Evaluating the Maintenance Effectiveness in Wind Turbine Generator Bearings Using Generic versus Specific Models from SCADA Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, March.
    17. Zhengxin Zhang & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Xiangyu Kong, 2015. "Degradation modeling–based remaining useful life estimation: A review on approaches for systems with heterogeneity," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(4), pages 343-355, August.
    18. Liang, Qingzhu & Yang, Yinghao & Peng, Changhong, 2023. "A reliability model for systems subject to mutually dependent degradation processes and random shocks under dynamic environments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    19. Braglia, Marcello & Carmignani, Gionata & Frosolini, Marco & Zammori, Francesco, 2012. "Data classification and MTBF prediction with a multivariate analysis approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 27-35.
    20. Chen, Xiaowu & Liu, Zhen, 2022. "A long short-term memory neural network based Wiener process model for remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:248:y:2024:i:c:s0951832024002564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.