IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v254y2025ipas0951832024006859.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new reliability health status assessment model for complex systems based on belief rule base

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Mingyuan
  • He, Wei
  • Ma, Ning
  • Zhu, Hailong
  • Zhou, Guohui

Abstract

In complex systems, health status assessment identifies system conditions and potential issues. However, large uncertainties and variations make efficient model construction challenging. The belief rule base (BRB), which addresses uncertainty through data-driven and knowledge-driven methods, is widely used for health status assessment of complex systems. Current BRB modeling methods focus primarily on accuracy, leaving a gap in research on reliability. Therefore, a reliable BRB (RE-BRB), which enables effective modeling for complex system health assessment under high reliability requirements, is proposed in this paper. First, a systematic reliability analysis of the BRB is performed, and the reliability criteria are defined. Second, the model parameters of the RE-BRB are optimized via the nondominated sorting whale optimization algorithm with reliability constraints (NSWOA), and the reliability of the model is ensured. In addition, a perturbation analysis of the RE-BRB model is conducted to identify the perturbation thresholds. The perturbation thresholds acceptable to the model provide guidance for managers in making decisions. Last, using the WD615 diesel engine and flywheel bearing as examples, this method achieves reliable system health status assessment by accurately assessing system status, incorporating the ability to address external perturbations and providing an easily interpretable output process.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Mingyuan & He, Wei & Ma, Ning & Zhu, Hailong & Zhou, Guohui, 2025. "A new reliability health status assessment model for complex systems based on belief rule base," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:254:y:2025:i:pa:s0951832024006859
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2024.110614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832024006859
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110614?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:254:y:2025:i:pa:s0951832024006859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.