IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v119y2013icp178-185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multivariate CBM model with a random and time-dependent failure threshold

Author

Listed:
  • Jiang, R.

Abstract

In a condition-based maintenance setting, the degradation of an item is usually represented by several condition variables, and they can be combined into a composite condition variable. In this case, the functional failure threshold associated with the composite condition variable is usually not a fixed and known constant. It is an open issue to model the failure threshold and accordingly determine a threshold of preventive maintenance (PM). This paper addresses this issue. The condition variables are combined using a weighted power model, the failure threshold is represented by the Gaussian process model, and the PM threshold is determined by two approaches. Based on the gamma process and stress–strength interference models, the distributions of time to failure and to the PM threshold are derived, respectively. The appropriateness of the approach is illustrated by a real-world example.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiang, R., 2013. "A multivariate CBM model with a random and time-dependent failure threshold," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 178-185.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:119:y:2013:i:c:p:178-185
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.05.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832013001543
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2013.05.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiang, R. & Jardine, A.K.S., 2006. "Composite scale modeling in the presence of censored data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(7), pages 756-764.
    2. Jiang, R., 2013. "A tradeoff BX life and its applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-6.
    3. Jiang, R. & Jardine, A.K.S., 2008. "Health state evaluation of an item: A general framework and graphical representation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 89-99.
    4. Wang, Wenbin, 2012. "A simulation-based multivariate Bayesian control chart for real time condition-based maintenance of complex systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(3), pages 726-734.
    5. van Noortwijk, J.M., 2009. "A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 2-21.
    6. Jiang, R. & Murthy, D.N.P., 2011. "A study of Weibull shape parameter: Properties and significance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1619-1626.
    7. Jiang, R., 2010. "Optimization of alarm threshold and sequential inspection scheme," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 208-215.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pan, Yan & Liang, Bin & Yang, Lei & Liu, Houde & Wu, Tonghai & Wang, Shuo, 2024. "Spatial-temporal modeling of oil condition monitoring: A review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    2. Caballé, N.C. & Castro, I.T. & Pérez, C.J. & Lanza-Gutiérrez, J.M., 2015. "A condition-based maintenance of a dependent degradation-threshold-shock model in a system with multiple degradation processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 98-109.
    3. de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2017. "The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 21-30.
    4. Li, Ting & He, Shuguang & Zhao, Xiujie, 2022. "Optimal warranty policy design for deteriorating products with random failure threshold," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    5. Gössinger, Ralf & Helmke, Hanna & Kaluzny, Michael, 2017. "Condition-based release of maintenance jobs in a decentralised production-maintenance system – An analysis of alternative stochastic approaches," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 528-537.
    6. Jiang, R., 2018. "Performance evaluation of seven optimization models of age replacement policy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 302-311.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiang, R., 2010. "Optimization of alarm threshold and sequential inspection scheme," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 208-215.
    2. de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2017. "The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 21-30.
    3. Havinga, Maik J.A. & de Jonge, Bram, 2020. "Condition-based maintenance in the cyclic patrolling repairman problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    4. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    5. Zio, Enrico & Compare, Michele, 2013. "Evaluating maintenance policies by quantitative modeling and analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 53-65.
    6. Zhang, Zhengxin & Si, Xiaosheng & Hu, Changhua & Lei, Yaguo, 2018. "Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: A review on Wiener-process-based methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 775-796.
    7. Salazar, Jean C. & Weber, Philippe & Nejjari, Fatiha & Sarrate, Ramon & Theilliol, Didier, 2017. "System reliability aware Model Predictive Control framework," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 663-672.
    8. Peng, Weiwen & Li, Yan-Feng & Mi, Jinhua & Yu, Le & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2016. "Reliability of complex systems under dynamic conditions: A Bayesian multivariate degradation perspective," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 75-87.
    9. Kozłowski Edward & Kowalska Beata & Kowalski Dariusz & Mazurkiewicz Dariusz, 2019. "Survival Function in the Analysis of the Factors Influencing the Reliability of Water Wells Operation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(14), pages 4909-4921, November.
    10. Jiang, R., 2018. "Performance evaluation of seven optimization models of age replacement policy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 302-311.
    11. Song, Kai & Shi, Jian & Yi, Xiaojian, 2020. "A time-discrete and zero-adjusted gamma process model with application to degradation analysis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 560(C).
    12. Thomas Michael Welte & Iver Bakken Sperstad & Espen Høegh Sørum & Magne Lorentzen Kolstad, 2017. "Integration of Degradation Processes in a Strategic Offshore Wind Farm O&M Simulation Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Finkelstein, Maxim & Cha, Ji Hwan & Langston, Amy, 2023. "Improving classical optimal age-replacement policies for degrading items," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    14. Dewan, Isha & Dijoux, Yann, 2015. "Modelling repairable systems with an early life under competing risks and asymmetric virtual age," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 215-224.
    15. Phuc Do & Christophe Bérenguer, 2022. "Residual life-based importance measures for predictive maintenance decision-making," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(1), pages 98-113, February.
    16. Wang, Xiaolin & Liu, Bin & Zhao, Xiujie, 2021. "A performance-based warranty for products subject to competing hard and soft failures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    17. Nicolai, R.P. & Frenk, J.B.G. & Dekker, R., 2007. "Modelling and Optimizing Imperfect Maintenance of Coatings on Steel Structures," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2007-043-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    18. Lin Wang & Zhiqiang Lu & Yifei Ren, 2019. "A rolling horizon approach for production planning and condition-based maintenance under uncertain demand," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(6), pages 1014-1028, December.
    19. Liang, Qingzhu & Yang, Yinghao & Peng, Changhong, 2023. "A reliability model for systems subject to mutually dependent degradation processes and random shocks under dynamic environments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    20. Shen, Jingyuan & Cui, Lirong & Ma, Yizhong, 2019. "Availability and optimal maintenance policy for systems degrading in dynamic environments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 133-143.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:119:y:2013:i:c:p:178-185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.