IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v145y2016icp231-242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspective analysis outcomes of selected tribodiagnostic data used as input for condition based maintenance

Author

Listed:
  • ValiÅ¡, David
  • Žák, Libor
  • Pokora, OndÅ™ej
  • Lánský, Petr

Abstract

The aim of this article is to estimate system soft failure occurrence and residual technical life in order to optimise firmly planned preventive maintenance. To do this, selected wear particles from oil field data are analysed. Using a large tribodiagnostic dataset we estimate the residual technical life of the observed system statistically. The dataset includes information about particles contained in oil which testify to oil conditions as well as system conditions. We focus here on the wear particles which we (and other analysts) consider to be interesting, ferrum (Fe) and lead (Pb), regarded as contact degradation and wear products. By modelling the occurrence of particles in oil we plan to determine the expected moment when soft failure occurs; this moment might then be set as the time to perform preventive maintenance (PM). Both operation time and calendar time are used here for modelling, for soft failure occurrence determination and for residual technical life estimation. The modelling is based on the specific characteristics of two diffusion processes, the Wiener process (WP) with positive drift and the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process (OUP). We also applied a fuzzy inference system to support our first results from the diffusion processes as there is a level of uncertainty and fuzziness in the oil field data. Following the modelling outcomes we are able to judge the system hazard rate, predict expected mean residual life and set up principles of “condition based maintenance†(CBM) for this system. However, the possible uses of our outcomes are much wider. For example, they can be used as inputs for operation and mission planning, and life cycle costs can be significantly reduced thanks to the maintenance optimisation.

Suggested Citation

  • ValiÅ¡, David & Žák, Libor & Pokora, OndÅ™ej & Lánský, Petr, 2016. "Perspective analysis outcomes of selected tribodiagnostic data used as input for condition based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 231-242.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:145:y:2016:i:c:p:231-242
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.07.026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183201500232X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2015.07.026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sheu, Shey-Huei & Chang, Chin-Chih & Chen, Yen-Luan & George Zhang, Zhe, 2015. "Optimal preventive maintenance and repair policies for multi-state systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 78-87.
    2. W Wang & B Hussin, 2009. "Plant residual time modelling based on observed variables in oil samples," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(6), pages 789-796, June.
    3. Asadzadeh, S.M. & Azadeh, A., 2014. "An integrated systemic model for optimization of condition-based maintenance with human error," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 117-131.
    4. W Wang, 2007. "A prognosis model for wear prediction based on oil-based monitoring," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(7), pages 887-893, July.
    5. M J Carr & W Wang, 2008. "A case comparison of a proportional hazards model and a stochastic filter for condition-based maintenance applications using oil-based condition monitoring information," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 222(1), pages 47-55, March.
    6. de Jonge, Bram & Dijkstra, Arjan S. & Romeijnders, Ward, 2015. "Cost benefits of postponing time-based maintenance under lifetime distribution uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 15-21.
    7. Do, Phuc & Voisin, Alexandre & Levrat, Eric & Iung, Benoit, 2015. "A proactive condition-based maintenance strategy with both perfect and imperfect maintenance actions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 22-32.
    8. Flage, Roger & Coit, David W. & Luxhøj, James T. & Aven, Terje, 2012. "Safety constraints applied to an adaptive Bayesian condition-based maintenance optimization model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 16-26.
    9. Fouladirad, Mitra & Grall, Antoine, 2011. "Condition-based maintenance for a system subject to a non-homogeneous wear process with a wear rate transition," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(6), pages 611-618.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pan, Yan & Jing, Yunteng & Wu, Tonghai & Kong, Xiangxing, 2022. "Knowledge-based data augmentation of small samples for oil condition prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Pan, Yan & Liang, Bin & Yang, Lei & Liu, Houde & Wu, Tonghai & Wang, Shuo, 2024. "Spatial-temporal modeling of oil condition monitoring: A review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    3. Houda Ghamlouch & Mitra Fouladirad & Antoine Grall, 2019. "The use of real option in condition-based maintenance scheduling for wind turbines with production and deterioration uncertainties," Post-Print hal-02365402, HAL.
    4. Wen, Yuxin & Wu, Jianguo & Das, Devashish & Tseng, Tzu-Liang(Bill), 2018. "Degradation modeling and RUL prediction using Wiener process subject to multiple change points and unit heterogeneity," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 113-124.
    5. Yaqiong Lv & Pan Zheng & Jiabei Yuan & Xiaohua Cao, 2023. "A Predictive Maintenance Strategy for Multi-Component Systems Based on Components’ Remaining Useful Life Prediction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-23, September.
    6. Shu, Yin & Feng, Qianmei & Liu, Hao, 2019. "Using degradation-with-jump measures to estimate life characteristics of lithium-ion battery," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    7. Ghamlouch, Houda & Fouladirad, Mitra & Grall, Antoine, 2019. "The use of real option in condition-based maintenance scheduling for wind turbines with production and deterioration uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 614-623.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    2. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    3. Mosayebi Omshi, E. & Grall, A. & Shemehsavar, S., 2020. "A dynamic auto-adaptive predictive maintenance policy for degradation with unknown parameters," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 81-92.
    4. Zhou, Zhi-Jie & Hu, Chang-Hua & Xu, Dong-Ling & Chen, Mao-Yin & Zhou, Dong-Hua, 2010. "A model for real-time failure prognosis based on hidden Markov model and belief rule base," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 269-283, November.
    5. de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2017. "The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 21-30.
    6. Azadeh, A. & Asadzadeh, S.M. & Salehi, N. & Firoozi, M., 2015. "Condition-based maintenance effectiveness for series–parallel power generation system—A combined Markovian simulation model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 357-368.
    7. Nguyen, Khanh T. P. & Do, Phuc & Huynh, Khac Tuan & Bérenguer, Christophe & Grall, Antoine, 2019. "Joint optimization of monitoring quality and replacement decisions in condition-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 177-195.
    8. Cai, Yue & Teunter, Ruud H. & de Jonge, Bram, 2023. "A data-driven approach for condition-based maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 730-738.
    9. Pan, Yan & Liang, Bin & Yang, Lei & Liu, Houde & Wu, Tonghai & Wang, Shuo, 2024. "Spatial-temporal modeling of oil condition monitoring: A review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    10. David Vališ & Libor Žák & Ondřej Pokora, 2015. "Contribution to system failure occurrence prediction and to system remaining useful life estimation based on oil field data," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(1), pages 36-45, February.
    11. Truong-Ba, Huy & Cholette, Michael E. & Borghesani, Pietro & Ma, Lin & Kent, Geoff, 2021. "Condition-based inspection policies for boiler heat exchangers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 232-243.
    12. Guo, Chunhui & Liang, Zhenglin, 2022. "A predictive Markov decision process for optimizing inspection and maintenance strategies of partially observable multi-state systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    13. Aizpurua, J.I. & Catterson, V.M. & Papadopoulos, Y. & Chiacchio, F. & D'Urso, D., 2017. "Supporting group maintenance through prognostics-enhanced dynamic dependability prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 171-188.
    14. Caballé, N.C. & Castro, I.T. & Pérez, C.J. & Lanza-Gutiérrez, J.M., 2015. "A condition-based maintenance of a dependent degradation-threshold-shock model in a system with multiple degradation processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 98-109.
    15. Asadzadeh, S.M. & Azadeh, A., 2014. "An integrated systemic model for optimization of condition-based maintenance with human error," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 117-131.
    16. Zarei, Esmaeil & Khan, Faisal & Abbassi, Rouzbeh, 2021. "Importance of human reliability in process operation: A critical analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    17. Zhao, Xian & He, Zongda & Wu, Yaguang & Qiu, Qingan, 2022. "Joint optimization of condition-based performance control and maintenance policies for mission-critical systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    18. Zhengxin Zhang & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Xiangyu Kong, 2015. "Degradation modeling–based remaining useful life estimation: A review on approaches for systems with heterogeneity," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(4), pages 343-355, August.
    19. Tsai, Hsin-Nan & Sheu, Shey-Huei & Zhang, Zhe George, 2017. "A trivariate optimal replacement policy for a deteriorating system based on cumulative damage and inspections," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 74-88.
    20. Lin Wang & Zhiqiang Lu & Yifei Ren, 2019. "A rolling horizon approach for production planning and condition-based maintenance under uncertain demand," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(6), pages 1014-1028, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:145:y:2016:i:c:p:231-242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.