IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v150y2018icp681-693.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A techno-economic assessment of gas-to-liquid and coal-to-liquid plants through the development of scale factors

Author

Listed:
  • Mohajerani, Sara
  • Kumar, Amit
  • Oni, Abayomi Olufemi

Abstract

Fluctuations in conventional crude oil price globally and initiatives towards the phase-out of coal-based power have initiated a focus on alternative sources of liquid fuels from natural gas and coal. Gas-to-liquid (GTL) and coal-to-liquid (CTL) processes are two liquefaction technologies that could be used. There is a limited work on either the development of scale factors to estimate capital costs or on techno-economic assessments of the plants. This study addresses this gap and focusses on western Canada, which has large deposits of coal and natural gas. The capital costs of the plants' key equipment are estimated through the development of cost scale-up factors. The production cost for 50,000 bbl/day of liquid fuels from GTL and CTL plants is estimated through modelling using a bottom-up approach. The developed scale-up factors for the GTL and CTL plants were found to be 0.70 and 0.65, respectively. For both plants, most of the benefits of economies of scale are achieved at a capacity of 20,000 bbl/day. The production costs of the GTL and CTL processes are 44.61 and 57.65 Canadian cents/liter respectively. With carbon capture and sequestration (CCS), the production cost of fuel from the CTL plant is higher than from the GTL plant.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohajerani, Sara & Kumar, Amit & Oni, Abayomi Olufemi, 2018. "A techno-economic assessment of gas-to-liquid and coal-to-liquid plants through the development of scale factors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 681-693.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:150:y:2018:i:c:p:681-693
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218303979
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Remer, Donald S. & Mattos, Fernando B., 2003. "Cost and scale-up factors, international inflation indexes and location factors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Chedid, R. & Kobrosly, M. & Ghajar, R., 2007. "The potential of gas-to-liquid technology in the energy market: The case of Qatar," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 4799-4811, October.
    3. Sjardin, M. & Damen, K.J. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2006. "Techno-economic prospects of small-scale membrane reactors in a future hydrogen-fuelled transportation sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(14), pages 2523-2555.
    4. Remer, Donald S. & Lin, Steve & Yu, Nancy & Hsin, Karen, 2008. "An update on cost and scale-up factors, international inflation indexes and location factors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 333-346, July.
    5. Mantripragada, Hari Chandan & Rubin, Edward S., 2011. "Techno-economic evaluation of coal-to-liquids (CTL) plants with carbon capture and sequestration," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2808-2816, May.
    6. Remer, Donald S. & Huynh, Leon & Agarwal, Kanishka & Auchard, Brian J. & Heaps-Nelson, Tom, 1998. "A compilation of inflation and location indexes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 41-55, January.
    7. Hamelinck, Carlo N. & Faaij, André P.C. & den Uil, Herman & Boerrigter, Harold, 2004. "Production of FT transportation fuels from biomass; technical options, process analysis and optimisation, and development potential," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(11), pages 1743-1771.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Junjie, 2024. "Spatialized carbon-energy-water footprint of emerging coal chemical industry in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    2. Pauletto, Gianluca & Galli, Federico & Gaillardet, Alice & Mocellin, Paolo & Patience, Gregory S., 2021. "Techno economic analysis of a micro Gas-to-Liquid unit for associated natural gas conversion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    3. Tiantian Yang & Tie Wang & Guoxing Li & Jinhong Shi & Xiuquan Sun, 2018. "Vibration Characteristics of Compression Ignition Engines Fueled with Blended Petro-Diesel and Fischer-Tropsch Diesel Fuel from Coal Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Ding, Bingqing & Makowski, Marek & Nahorski, Zbigniew & Ren, Hongtao & Ma, Tieju, 2022. "Optimizing the technology pathway of China's liquid fuel production considering uncertain oil prices: A robust programming model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    5. Zhang, Yueling & Li, Junjie & Yang, Xiaoxiao, 2021. "Comprehensive competitiveness assessment of four coal-to-liquid routes and conventional oil refining route in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    6. Gagarin, H. & Sridhar, S. & Lange, I. & Bazilian, M.D., 2020. "Considering non-power generation uses of coal in the United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    7. Karaca, Hüseyin. & Koyunoğlu, Cemil & Özdemir, Ali & Ergun, Kenan, 2019. "Co-processing behavior of Gölbaşı lignite and poplar sawdust by factorial experimental design method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1040-1048.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amigun, Bamikole & Gorgens, Johann & Knoetze, Hansie, 2010. "Biomethanol production from gasification of non-woody plant in South Africa: Optimum scale and economic performance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 312-322, January.
    2. Qin, Shiyue & Chang, Shiyan & Yao, Qiang, 2018. "Modeling, thermodynamic and techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquids process with different entrained flow coal gasifiers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 413-432.
    3. Höök, Mikael & Fantazzini, Dean & Angelantoni, André & Snowden, Simon, 2013. "Hydrocarbon liquefaction: viability as a peak oil mitigation strategy," MPRA Paper 46957, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Wang, Wei-Cheng & Tao, Ling, 2016. "Bio-jet fuel conversion technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 801-822.
    5. Meerman, J.C. & Ramírez, A. & Turkenburg, W.C. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2012. "Performance of simulated flexible integrated gasification polygeneration facilities, Part B: Economic evaluation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 6083-6102.
    6. Qin, Shiyue & Zhang, Xuzhi & Wang, Ming & Cui, Hongyou & Li, Zhihe & Yi, Weiming, 2021. "Comparison of BGL and Lurgi gasification for coal to liquid fuels (CTL): Process modeling, simulation and thermodynamic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    7. Haarlemmer, Geert & Boissonnet, Guillaume & Peduzzi, Emanuela & Setier, Pierre-Alexandre, 2014. "Investment and production costs of synthetic fuels – A literature survey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 667-676.
    8. Im-orb, Karittha & Simasatitkul, Lida & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2016. "Techno-economic analysis of the biomass gasification and Fischer–Tropsch integrated process with off-gas recirculation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 483-496.
    9. Gassner, Martin & Maréchal, François, 2009. "Thermodynamic comparison of the FICFB and Viking gasification concepts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1744-1753.
    10. van Vliet, Oscar & van den Broek, Machteld & Turkenburg, Wim & Faaij, André, 2011. "Combining hybrid cars and synthetic fuels with electricity generation and carbon capture and storage," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 248-268, January.
    11. Batidzirai, B. & Mignot, A.P.R. & Schakel, W.B. & Junginger, H.M. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2013. "Biomass torrefaction technology: Techno-economic status and future prospects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 196-214.
    12. Becker, W.L. & Braun, R.J. & Penev, M. & Melaina, M., 2012. "Production of Fischer–Tropsch liquid fuels from high temperature solid oxide co-electrolysis units," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 99-115.
    13. Zhaoyang Kong & Xiucheng Dong & Bo Xu & Rui Li & Qiang Yin & Cuifang Song, 2015. "EROI Analysis for Direct Coal Liquefaction without and with CCS: The Case of the Shenhua DCL Project in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-22, January.
    14. Meerman, J.C. & Ramírez, A. & Turkenburg, W.C. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2011. "Performance of simulated flexible integrated gasification polygeneration facilities. Part A: A technical-energetic assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 2563-2587, August.
    15. Herz, Gregor & Reichelt, Erik & Jahn, Matthias, 2017. "Design and evaluation of a Fischer-Tropsch process for the production of waxes from biogas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 370-381.
    16. Asadullah, Mohammad, 2014. "Biomass gasification gas cleaning for downstream applications: A comparative critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 118-132.
    17. Ryi, Shin-Kun & Lee, Chun-Boo & Lee, Sung-Wook & Hwang, Kyung-Ran & Park, Jong-Soo, 2012. "Hydrogen recovery from ethylene mixture with PD-AU composite membrane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 3-10.
    18. Zhang, Hanfei & Wang, Ligang & Van herle, Jan & Maréchal, François & Desideri, Umberto, 2020. "Techno-economic evaluation of biomass-to-fuels with solid-oxide electrolyzer," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    19. Zhang, Hanfei & Wang, Ligang & Van herle, Jan & Maréchal, François & Desideri, Umberto, 2020. "Techno-economic comparison of green ammonia production processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    20. Zhang, Hanfei & Wang, Ligang & Van herle, Jan & Maréchal, François & Desideri, Umberto, 2021. "Techno-economic comparison of 100% renewable urea production processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:150:y:2018:i:c:p:681-693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.