IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v180y2016icp834-848.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A numerical analysis of a composition-adjustable Kalina cycle power plant for power generation from low-temperature geothermal sources

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Enhua
  • Yu, Zhibin

Abstract

The Kalina cycle is believed to be one of the most promising technologies for power generation from low temperature heat sources such as geothermal energy. So far, most Kalina cycle power plants are designed with a working fluid mixture having a fixed composition, and thus normally operate at a fixed condensing temperature. However, the ambient temperature (i.e., heat sink) varies over a large range as the season changes over a year, particularly in continental climates. Recently, a new concept, i.e., composition-adjustable Kalina cycle, was proposed to develop power plants that can match their condensing temperature with the changing ambient conditions, aiming at improving the cycle’s overall thermal efficiency. However, no detailed analysis of its implementation and the potential benefits under various climate conditions has been reported. For this reason, this paper carried out a comprehensive numerical research on its implementation and performance analysis under several different climate conditions. A mathematical model is firstly established to simulate the working principle of a composition-adjustable Kalina cycle, based on which a numerical program is then developed to analyse the cycle’s performance under various climate conditions. The developed numerical model is verified with some published data. The dynamic composition adjustment in response to the changing ambient temperature is simulated to evaluate its effect on the plant’s performance over a year. The results show that a composition-adjustable Kalina cycle could achieve higher annual-average thermal efficiency than a conventional one with a fixed mixture composition. However, such an improvement of thermal efficiency strongly depends on the heat source temperature, climate conditions, etc. The composition-adjusting system introduces extra capital and operation costs. The economic viability of a composition-adjustable Kalina cycle power plant depends on the balance between these extra costs and the increase of thermal efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Enhua & Yu, Zhibin, 2016. "A numerical analysis of a composition-adjustable Kalina cycle power plant for power generation from low-temperature geothermal sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 834-848.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:180:y:2016:i:c:p:834-848
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261916311199
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walraven, Daniël & Laenen, Ben & D’haeseleer, William, 2015. "Minimizing the levelized cost of electricity production from low-temperature geothermal heat sources with ORCs: Water or air cooled?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 144-153.
    2. Yin, Hebi & Sabau, Adrian S. & Conklin, James C. & McFarlane, Joanna & Qualls, A. Lou, 2013. "Mixtures of SF6–CO2 as working fluids for geothermal power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 243-253.
    3. Arslan, Oguz, 2011. "Power generation from medium temperature geothermal resources: ANN-based optimization of Kalina cycle system-34," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2528-2534.
    4. Ibrahim, Mounir B. & Kovach, Ronald M., 1993. "A Kalina cycle application for power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 18(9), pages 961-969.
    5. Mergner, Hanna & Weimer, Thomas, 2015. "Performance of ammonia–water based cycles for power generation from low enthalpy heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 93-100.
    6. Liu, Qiang & Shen, Aijing & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2015. "Parametric optimization and performance analyses of geothermal organic Rankine cycles using R600a/R601a mixtures as working fluids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 410-420.
    7. Gerber, Léda & Maréchal, François, 2012. "Environomic optimal configurations of geothermal energy conversion systems: Application to the future construction of Enhanced Geothermal Systems in Switzerland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 908-923.
    8. Barkaoui, Alae-Eddine & Boldyryev, Stanislav & Duic, Neven & Krajacic, Goran & Guzović, Zvonimir, 2016. "Appropriate integration of geothermal energy sources by Pinch approach: Case study of Croatia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1343-1349.
    9. Yu, Zeting & Han, Jitian & Liu, Hai & Zhao, Hongxia, 2014. "Theoretical study on a novel ammonia–water cogeneration system with adjustable cooling to power ratios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 53-61.
    10. He, Jiacheng & Liu, Chao & Xu, Xiaoxiao & Li, Yourong & Wu, Shuangying & Xu, Jinliang, 2014. "Performance research on modified KCS (Kalina cycle system) 11 without throttle valve," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 389-397.
    11. Chan, K. T. & Yu, F. W., 2002. "Applying condensing-temperature control in air-cooled reciprocating water chillers for energy efficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(3-4), pages 565-581, July.
    12. Walmsley, Michael R.W. & Walmsley, Timothy G. & Atkins, Martin J. & Kamp, Peter J.J. & Neale, James R., 2014. "Minimising carbon emissions and energy expended for electricity generation in New Zealand through to 2050," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 656-665.
    13. Nguyen, Tuong-Van & Knudsen, Thomas & Larsen, Ulrik & Haglind, Fredrik, 2014. "Thermodynamic evaluation of the Kalina split-cycle concepts for waste heat recovery applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 277-288.
    14. Igobo, Opubo N. & Davies, Philip A., 2014. "Review of low-temperature vapour power cycle engines with quasi-isothermal expansion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 22-34.
    15. Tokimatsu, Koji & Konishi, Satoshi & Ishihara, Keiichi & Tezuka, Tetsuo & Yasuoka, Rieko & Nishio, Masahiro, 2016. "Role of innovative technologies under the global zero emissions scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1483-1493.
    16. Collings, Peter & Yu, Zhibin & Wang, Enhua, 2016. "A dynamic organic Rankine cycle using a zeotropic mixture as the working fluid with composition tuning to match changing ambient conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 581-591.
    17. Sun, Faming & Zhou, Weisheng & Ikegami, Yasuyuki & Nakagami, Kenichi & Su, Xuanming, 2014. "Energy–exergy analysis and optimization of the solar-boosted Kalina cycle system 11 (KCS-11)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 268-279.
    18. Alcaraz, Mar & García-Gil, Alejandro & Vázquez-Suñé, Enric & Velasco, Violeta, 2016. "Use rights markets for shallow geothermal energy management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 34-46.
    19. Clarke, Joshua & McLeskey, James T., 2015. "Multi-objective particle swarm optimization of binary geothermal power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 302-314.
    20. Leonardo Pierobon & Tuong-Van Nguyen & Andrea Mazzucco & Ulrik Larsen & Fredrik Haglind, 2014. "Part-Load Performance of aWet Indirectly Fired Gas Turbine Integrated with an Organic Rankine Cycle Turbogenerator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-23, December.
    21. Cao, Liyan & Wang, Jiangfeng & Dai, Yiping, 2014. "Thermodynamic analysis of a biomass-fired Kalina cycle with regenerative heater," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 760-770.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Enhua & Yu, Zhibin & Collings, Peter, 2017. "Dynamic control strategy of a distillation system for a composition-adjustable organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1038-1051.
    2. Zhuang, Yu & Zhou, Congcong & Dong, Yachao & Du, Jian & Shen, Shengqiang, 2021. "A hierarchical optimization and design of double Kalina Cycles for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    3. Huster, Wolfgang R. & Schweidtmann, Artur M. & Mitsos, Alexander, 2020. "Globally optimal working fluid mixture composition for geothermal power cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    4. Bonalumi, D. & Lasala, S. & Macchi, E., 2020. "CO2-TiCl4 working fluid for high-temperature heat source power cycles and solar application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P3), pages 2842-2854.
    5. Chen, Jingping & Feng, Shaohang, 2020. "Evaluating a large geothermal absorber’s energy extraction and storage performance in a common geological condition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    6. Zhou, Xiao & Cai, Yangchao & Li, Xuetao, 2024. "Process arrangement and multi-aspect study of a novel environmentally-friendly multigeneration plant relying on a geothermal-based plant combined with the goswami cycle booted by kalina and desalinati," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    7. Obara, Shin'ya & Tanaka, Ryu, 2021. "Waste heat recovery system for nuclear power plants using the gas hydrate heat cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    8. Wang, Jianyong & Wang, Jiangfeng & Dai, Yiping & Zhao, Pan, 2017. "Assessment of off-design performance of a Kalina cycle driven by low-grade heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 459-472.
    9. Lee, Inkyu & Tester, Jefferson William & You, Fengqi, 2019. "Systems analysis, design, and optimization of geothermal energy systems for power production and polygeneration: State-of-the-art and future challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 551-577.
    10. Qu, Wanjun & Hong, Hui & Su, Bosheng & Tang, Sanli & Jin, Hongguang, 2018. "A concentrating photovoltaic/Kalina cycle coupled with absorption chiller," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 481-493.
    11. Sindhu Preetham Burugupally & Leland Weiss, 2018. "Power Generation via Small Length Scale Thermo-Mechanical Systems: Current Status and Challenges, a Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, August.
    12. Hong Gao & Fuxiang Chen, 2018. "Thermo-Economic Analysis of a Bottoming Kalina Cycle for Internal Combustion Engine Exhaust Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.
    13. Wang, Enhua & Zhang, Mengru & Meng, Fanxiao & Zhang, Hongguang, 2022. "Zeotropic working fluid selection for an organic Rankine cycle bottoming with a marine engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    14. Varma, G.V. Pradeep & Srinivas, T., 2017. "Power generation from low temperature heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 402-414.
    15. Zhao, Shifei & Ge, Zhihua & He, Jie & Wang, Chunlan & Yang, Yongping & Li, Peifeng, 2017. "A novel mechanism for exhaust steam waste heat recovery in combined heat and power unit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 596-606.
    16. Jiang, L. & Lu, Y.J. & Roskilly, A.P. & Wang, R.Z. & Wang, L.W. & Tang, K., 2018. "Exploration of ammonia resorption cycle for power generation by using novel composite sorbent," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 457-467.
    17. Mahmoudan, Alireza & Esmaeilion, Farbod & Hoseinzadeh, Siamak & Soltani, Madjid & Ahmadi, Pouria & Rosen, Marc, 2022. "A geothermal and solar-based multigeneration system integrated with a TEG unit: Development, 3E analyses, and multi-objective optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    18. Sun, Xiaocun & Shi, Lingfeng & Tian, Hua & Wang, Xuan & Zhang, Yonghao & Yao, Yu & Sun, Rui & Shu, Gequn, 2022. "Analysis of an ideal composition tunable combined cooling and power cycle with CO2-based mixture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    19. Marenco-Porto, Carlos A. & Fierro, José J. & Nieto-Londoño, César & Lopera, Leonardo & Escudero-Atehortua, Ana & Giraldo, Mauricio & Jouhara, Hussam, 2023. "Potential savings in the cement industry using waste heat recovery technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    20. Jiang, L. & Roskilly, A.P. & Wang, R.Z. & Wang, L.W., 2018. "Analysis on innovative resorption cycle for power and refrigeration cogeneration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 10-21.
    21. Dehghani, Mohammad Javad & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2020. "Three-step modification and optimization of Kalina power-cooling cogeneration based on energy, pinch, and economics analyses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    22. Uemura, Yuta & Kawasaki, Toshiyuki & Obara, Shin’ya, 2021. "Analysis of the performance of an electricity generation system using the CO2 hydrate formation and dissociation process for heat recover," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    23. Michał Kaczmarczyk & Barbara Tomaszewska & Agnieszka Operacz, 2020. "Sustainable Utilization of Low Enthalpy Geothermal Resources to Electricity Generation through a Cascade System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Enhua & Yu, Zhibin & Collings, Peter, 2017. "Dynamic control strategy of a distillation system for a composition-adjustable organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1038-1051.
    2. Patrick Linke & Athanasios I. Papadopoulos & Panos Seferlis, 2015. "Systematic Methods for Working Fluid Selection and the Design, Integration and Control of Organic Rankine Cycles—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-47, May.
    3. Magdalena Santos-Rodriguez, M. & Flores-Tlacuahuac, Antonio & Zavala, Victor M., 2017. "A stochastic optimization approach for the design of organic fluid mixtures for low-temperature heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 145-159.
    4. Youcef Redjeb & Khatima Kaabeche-Djerafi & Anna Stoppato & Alberto Benato, 2021. "The IRC-PD Tool: A Code to Design Steam and Organic Waste Heat Recovery Units," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-37, September.
    5. Wang, Jianyong & Wang, Jiangfeng & Dai, Yiping & Zhao, Pan, 2017. "Assessment of off-design performance of a Kalina cycle driven by low-grade heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 459-472.
    6. Li, Jian & Liu, Qiang & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen, 2017. "Performance analysis of organic Rankine cycles using R600/R601a mixtures with liquid-separated condensation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 376-389.
    7. Zhuang, Yu & Zhou, Congcong & Dong, Yachao & Du, Jian & Shen, Shengqiang, 2021. "A hierarchical optimization and design of double Kalina Cycles for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    8. Huster, Wolfgang R. & Schweidtmann, Artur M. & Mitsos, Alexander, 2020. "Globally optimal working fluid mixture composition for geothermal power cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    9. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    10. Wang, Jiangfeng & Yan, Zhequan & Wang, Man & Dai, Yiping, 2013. "Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of an ammonia-water power system with LNG (liquefied natural gas) as its heat sink," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 513-522.
    11. Kyoung Hoon Kim & Chul Ho Han & Hyung Jong Ko, 2018. "Comparative Thermodynamic Analysis of Kalina and Kalina Flash Cycles for Utilizing Low-Grade Heat Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, November.
    12. Satanphol, K. & Pridasawas, W. & Suphanit, B., 2017. "A study on optimal composition of zeotropic working fluid in an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for low grade heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 326-339.
    13. Melikoglu, Mehmet, 2017. "Geothermal energy in Turkey and around the World: A review of the literature and an analysis based on Turkey's Vision 2023 energy targets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 485-492.
    14. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2012. "Exergy analysis and parameter study on a novel auto-cascade Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 539-547.
    15. Nazila Nematzadeh & Hadi Ghaebi & Ebrahim Abdi Aghdam, 2022. "Thermo-Economic Analysis of Innovative Integrated Power Cycles for Low-Temperature Heat Sources Based on Heat Transformer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-27, October.
    16. Daniilidis, Alexandros & Scholten, Tjardo & Hooghiem, Joram & De Persis, Claudio & Herber, Rien, 2017. "Geochemical implications of production and storage control by coupling a direct-use geothermal system with heat networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 254-270.
    17. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Ruikai & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S., 2021. "Is zeotropic working fluid a promising option for organic Rankine cycle: A quantitative evaluation based on literature data," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    18. Li, Zhouhang & Tang, Guoli & Wu, Yuxin & Zhai, Yuling & Xu, Jianxin & Wang, Hua & Lu, Junfu, 2016. "Improved gas heaters for supercritical CO2 Rankine cycles: Considerations on forced and mixed convection heat transfer enhancement," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 126-141.
    19. Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Varbanov, Petar Sabev & Walmsley, Timothy G. & Jia, Xuexiu, 2018. "New directions in the implementation of Pinch Methodology (PM)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 439-468.
    20. Xu, Weicong & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Zhang, Yue & Li, Shuangjun, 2019. "Performance analysis on novel thermodynamic cycle under the guidance of 3D construction method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 478-492.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:180:y:2016:i:c:p:834-848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.