IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v7y2014i12p8294-8316d43419.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Part-Load Performance of aWet Indirectly Fired Gas Turbine Integrated with an Organic Rankine Cycle Turbogenerator

Author

Listed:
  • Leonardo Pierobon

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Building 403, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark)

  • Tuong-Van Nguyen

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Building 403, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark)

  • Andrea Mazzucco

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Building 403, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark)

  • Ulrik Larsen

    (Department of Shipping and Marine Technology, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden)

  • Fredrik Haglind

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Building 403, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark)

Abstract

Over the last years, much attention has been paid to the development of efficient and low-cost power systems for biomass-to-electricity conversion. This paper aims at investigating the design- and part-load performance of an innovative plant based on a wet indirectly fired gas turbine (WIFGT) fueled by woodchips and an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) turbogenerator. An exergy analysis is performed to identify the sources of inefficiencies, the optimal design variables, and the most suitable working fluid for the organic Rankine process. This step enables to parametrize the part-load model of the plant and to estimate its performance at different power outputs. The novel plant has a nominal power of 250 kW and a thermal efficiency of 43%. The major irreversibilities take place in the burner, recuperator, compressor and in the condenser. Toluene is the optimal working fluid for the organic Rankine engine. The part-load investigation indicates that the plant can operate at high efficiencies over a wide range of power outputs (50%–100%), with a peak thermal efficiency of 45% at around 80% load. While the ORC turbogenerator is responsible for the efficiency drop at low capacities, the off-design performance is governed by the efficiency characteristics of the compressor and turbine serving the gas turbine unit.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonardo Pierobon & Tuong-Van Nguyen & Andrea Mazzucco & Ulrik Larsen & Fredrik Haglind, 2014. "Part-Load Performance of aWet Indirectly Fired Gas Turbine Integrated with an Organic Rankine Cycle Turbogenerator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-23, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:7:y:2014:i:12:p:8294-8316:d:43419
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/7/12/8294/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/7/12/8294/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Larjola, J., 1995. "Electricity from industrial waste heat using high-speed organic Rankine cycle (ORC)," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1-3), pages 227-235, October.
    2. Pierobon, Leonardo & Rokni, Masoud & Larsen, Ulrik & Haglind, Fredrik, 2013. "Thermodynamic analysis of an integrated gasification solid oxide fuel cell plant combined with an organic Rankine cycle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 226-234.
    3. Datta, Amitava & Ganguly, Ranjan & Sarkar, Luna, 2010. "Energy and exergy analyses of an externally fired gas turbine (EFGT) cycle integrated with biomass gasifier for distributed power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 341-350.
    4. Haglind, F. & Elmegaard, B., 2009. "Methodologies for predicting the part-load performance of aero-derivative gas turbines," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1484-1492.
    5. Lund, H. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2009. "Energy system analysis of 100% renewable energy systems—The case of Denmark in years 2030 and 2050," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 524-531.
    6. Bang-Møller, C. & Rokni, M. & Elmegaard, B., 2011. "Exergy analysis and optimization of a biomass gasification, solid oxide fuel cell and micro gas turbine hybrid system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 4740-4752.
    7. Quoilin, Sylvain & Broek, Martijn Van Den & Declaye, Sébastien & Dewallef, Pierre & Lemort, Vincent, 2013. "Techno-economic survey of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 168-186.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Enhua & Yu, Zhibin & Collings, Peter, 2017. "Dynamic control strategy of a distillation system for a composition-adjustable organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1038-1051.
    2. Roy, Dibyendu & Samanta, Samiran & Ghosh, Sudip, 2020. "Performance assessment of a biomass fuelled advanced hybrid power generation system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 639-661.
    3. Wang, Enhua & Yu, Zhibin, 2016. "A numerical analysis of a composition-adjustable Kalina cycle power plant for power generation from low-temperature geothermal sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 834-848.
    4. Youcef Redjeb & Khatima Kaabeche-Djerafi & Anna Stoppato & Alberto Benato, 2021. "The IRC-PD Tool: A Code to Design Steam and Organic Waste Heat Recovery Units," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-37, September.
    5. Mondejar, M.E. & Andreasen, J.G. & Pierobon, L. & Larsen, U. & Thern, M. & Haglind, F., 2018. "A review of the use of organic Rankine cycle power systems for maritime applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 126-151.
    6. Ivan Korolija & Richard Greenough, 2016. "Modelling the Influence of Climate on the Performance of the Organic Rankine Cycle for Industrial Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Collings, Peter & Yu, Zhibin & Wang, Enhua, 2016. "A dynamic organic Rankine cycle using a zeotropic mixture as the working fluid with composition tuning to match changing ambient conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 581-591.
    8. Soo-Yong Cho & Chong-Hyun Cho & Chae Whan Rim & Sang-Kyu Choi, 2015. "Experimental Study in a Cascade Row for Improving the Performance of a Partially Admitted Turbo-Expander," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Bou Nader, Wissam S. & Mansour, Charbel J. & Nemer, Maroun G., 2018. "Optimization of a Brayton external combustion gas-turbine system for extended range electric vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 745-758.
    10. Patrick Linke & Athanasios I. Papadopoulos & Panos Seferlis, 2015. "Systematic Methods for Working Fluid Selection and the Design, Integration and Control of Organic Rankine Cycles—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-47, May.
    11. Lykas, Panagiotis & Bellos, Evangelos & Kitsopoulou, Angeliki & Sammoutos, Christos & Tzivanidis, Christos, 2024. "Electricity and hydrogen cogeneration: A case study simulation via the Aspen plus tool," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    12. Cho, Soo-Yong & Cho, Chong-Hyun & Choi, Sang-Kyu, 2017. "An experimental study of partial admission losses with various blade tip clearances using a linear cascade," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 627-637.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo, Xinru & Zhang, Houcheng & Hu, Ziyang & Hou, Shujin & Ni, Meng & Liao, Tianjun, 2021. "Energetic, exergetic and ecological evaluations of a hybrid system based on a phosphoric acid fuel cell and an organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Teng, Su & Hamrang, Farzad & Ashraf Talesh, Seyed Saman, 2021. "Economic performance assessment of a novel combined power generation cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    3. Sarkar, Jahar, 2015. "Review and future trends of supercritical CO2 Rankine cycle for low-grade heat conversion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 434-451.
    4. Gürgen, Samet & Altın, İsmail, 2022. "Novel decision-making strategy for working fluid selection in Organic Rankine Cycle: A case study for waste heat recovery of a marine diesel engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    5. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    6. Chintala, Venkateswarlu & Kumar, Suresh & Pandey, Jitendra K., 2018. "A technical review on waste heat recovery from compression ignition engines using organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 493-509.
    7. Truong, Nguyen Le & Gustavsson, Leif, 2014. "Cost and primary energy efficiency of small-scale district heating systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 419-427.
    8. Pierobon, L. & Benato, A. & Scolari, E. & Haglind, F. & Stoppato, A., 2014. "Waste heat recovery technologies for offshore platforms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 228-241.
    9. Emadi, Mohammad Ali & Chitgar, Nazanin & Oyewunmi, Oyeniyi A. & Markides, Christos N., 2020. "Working-fluid selection and thermoeconomic optimisation of a combined cycle cogeneration dual-loop organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system for solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) waste-heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    10. Jesper Graa Andreasen & Andrea Meroni & Fredrik Haglind, 2017. "A Comparison of Organic and Steam Rankine Cycle Power Systems for Waste Heat Recovery on Large Ships," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.
    11. Do, Truong Xuan & Lim, Young-il & Yeo, Heejung & Lee, Uen-do & Choi, Young-tai & Song, Jae-hun, 2014. "Techno-economic analysis of power plant via circulating fluidized-bed gasification from woodchips," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 547-560.
    12. Hyung-Seok Park & Hong-Jun Heo & Bum-Seog Choi & Kyung Chun Kim & Jang-Mok Kim, 2019. "Speed Control for Turbine-Generator of ORC Power Generation System and Experimental Implementation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, January.
    13. Abedinia, Oveis & Shakibi, Hamid & Shokri, Afshar & Sobhani, Behnam & Sobhani, Behrouz & Yari, Mortaza & Bagheri, Mehdi, 2024. "Optimization of a syngas-fueled SOFC-based multigeneration system: Enhanced performance with biomass and gasification agent selection," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    14. Jia, Junxi & Shu, Lingyun & Zang, Guiyan & Xu, Lijun & Abudula, Abuliti & Ge, Kun, 2018. "Energy analysis and techno-economic assessment of a co-gasification of woody biomass and animal manure, solid oxide fuel cells and micro gas turbine hybrid system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 750-761.
    15. Sattari Sadat, Seyed Mohammad & Ghaebi, Hadi & Lavasani, Arash Mirabdolah, 2020. "4E analyses of an innovative polygeneration system based on SOFC," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 986-1007.
    16. Mazzucco, Andrea & Rokni, Masoud, 2014. "Thermo-economic analysis of a solid oxide fuel cell and steam injected gas turbine plant integrated with woodchips gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 114-129.
    17. Buonomano, Annamaria & Calise, Francesco & d’Accadia, Massimo Dentice & Palombo, Adolfo & Vicidomini, Maria, 2015. "Hybrid solid oxide fuel cells–gas turbine systems for combined heat and power: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 32-85.
    18. Peter Collings & Andrew Mckeown & Enhua Wang & Zhibin Yu, 2019. "Experimental Investigation of a Small-Scale ORC Power Plant Using a Positive Displacement Expander with and without a Regenerator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    19. Landelle, Arnaud & Tauveron, Nicolas & Haberschill, Philippe & Revellin, Rémi & Colasson, Stéphane, 2017. "Organic Rankine cycle design and performance comparison based on experimental database," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1172-1187.
    20. Fuhaid Alshammari & Apostolos Karvountzis-Kontakiotis & Apostolos Pesyridis & Muhammad Usman, 2018. "Expander Technologies for Automotive Engine Organic Rankine Cycle Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-36, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:7:y:2014:i:12:p:8294-8316:d:43419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.