IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v299y2024ics036054422401154x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process arrangement and multi-aspect study of a novel environmentally-friendly multigeneration plant relying on a geothermal-based plant combined with the goswami cycle booted by kalina and desalination cycles

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, Xiao
  • Cai, Yangchao
  • Li, Xuetao

Abstract

In this study, a novel trigeneration system for cooling, heating, freshwater, and electricity generation, driven by geothermal energy is evaluated from thermodynamics, thermoeconomic, and environmental perspectives. To gain a better understanding of the system's performance, energy and exergy analyses are conducted, and the outcomes are compared with other studies. The proposed structure includes a single-flash geothermal plant, a water desalination unit, the Goswami power and cooling cycle, and the Kalina power cycle. This analysis is conducted using Aspen HYSYS software, and the results demonstrated that the single-flash geothermal plant has the highest irreversibility (48 %), and the major sources of irreversibility among all equipment are the heat exchangers, contributing to 68 % of the total exergy destruction rate. Additionally, it is observed from the thermodynamic analysis results that the energy and exergy efficiencies and the total unit cost of products of the proposed process are 32.28 %, 51.71 %, and 5.66 $/GJ, respectively. According to the results, the production rate of the products is cooling (24.8 m3/h), steam (27.44 m3/h), domestic hot water (209.7 m3/h), fresh water (45.02 m3/h), and electric power (16260 kW). The environmental analysis shows that the new process has zero CO2 emission and can save an annual consumption of petroleum equal to 4325160 L, and when compared to the power plants with natural gas and oil as fuel, CO2 emissions are prevented equal to 5691000 kg/year and 13804740 kg/year, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, Xiao & Cai, Yangchao & Li, Xuetao, 2024. "Process arrangement and multi-aspect study of a novel environmentally-friendly multigeneration plant relying on a geothermal-based plant combined with the goswami cycle booted by kalina and desalinati," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:299:y:2024:i:c:s036054422401154x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.131381
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036054422401154X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.131381?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Tailu & Qin, Haosen & Wang, Jianqiang & Gao, Xiang & Meng, Nan & Jia, Yanan & Liu, Qinghua, 2021. "Energetic and exergetic performance of a novel polygeneration energy system driven by geothermal energy and solar energy for power, hydrogen and domestic hot water," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 318-336.
    2. Mohammadzadeh Bina, Saeid & Jalilinasrabady, Saeid & Fujii, Hikari, 2017. "Energy, economic and environmental (3E) aspects of internal heat exchanger for ORC geothermal power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 1096-1106.
    3. Shengjun, Zhang & Huaixin, Wang & Tao, Guo, 2011. "Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2740-2754, August.
    4. Wang, Enhua & Yu, Zhibin, 2016. "A numerical analysis of a composition-adjustable Kalina cycle power plant for power generation from low-temperature geothermal sources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 834-848.
    5. Chys, M. & van den Broek, M. & Vanslambrouck, B. & De Paepe, M., 2012. "Potential of zeotropic mixtures as working fluids in organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 623-632.
    6. Yin, Jiqiang & Yu, Zeting & Zhang, Chenghui & Tian, Minli & Han, Jitian, 2018. "Thermodynamic analysis of a novel combined cooling and power system driven by low-grade heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 319-327.
    7. Ebadollahi, Mohammad & Rostamzadeh, Hadi & Pedram, Mona Zamani & Ghaebi, Hadi & Amidpour, Majid, 2019. "Proposal and assessment of a new geothermal-based multigeneration system for cooling, heating, power, and hydrogen production, using LNG cold energy recovery," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 66-87.
    8. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    9. Yari, Mortaza, 2010. "Exergetic analysis of various types of geothermal power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 112-121.
    10. Hekmatshoar, Maziyar & Deymi-Dashtebayaz, Mahdi & Gholizadeh, Mohammad & Dadpour, Daryoush & Delpisheh, Mostafa, 2022. "Thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of a geothermal-driven multi-generation system producing power, freshwater, and hydrogen," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    11. Jana, Kuntal & Ray, Avishek & Majoumerd, Mohammad Mansouri & Assadi, Mohsen & De, Sudipta, 2017. "Polygeneration as a future sustainable energy solution – A comprehensive review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 88-111.
    12. Gholizadeh, Towhid & Vajdi, Mohammad & Rostamzadeh, Hadi, 2020. "A new trigeneration system for power, cooling, and freshwater production driven by a flash-binary geothermal heat source," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 31-43.
    13. Farzad Hamrang & Afshar Shokri & S. M. Seyed Mahmoudi & Biuk Ehghaghi & Marc A. Rosen, 2020. "Performance Analysis of a New Electricity and Freshwater Production System Based on an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle and Multi-Effect Desalination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-29, September.
    14. Li, Jiaojiao & Zoghi, Mohammad & Zhao, Linfeng, 2022. "Thermo-economic assessment and optimization of a geothermal-driven tri-generation system for power, cooling, and hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    15. Azizi, Saeid & Shakibi, Hamid & Shokri, Afshar & Chitsaz, Ata & Yari, Mortaza, 2023. "Multi-aspect analysis and RSM-based optimization of a novel dual-source electricity and cooling cogeneration system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    16. Gang Xu & Feifei Liang & Yongping Yang & Yue Hu & Kai Zhang & Wenyi Liu, 2014. "An Improved CO 2 Separation and Purification System Based on Cryogenic Separation and Distillation Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-19, May.
    17. Zhou, Yuhong & Li, Shanshan & Sun, Lei & Zhao, Shupeng & Ashraf Talesh, Seyed Saman, 2020. "Optimization and thermodynamic performance analysis of a power generation system based on geothermal flash and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles using zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    18. Lolos, P.A. & Rogdakis, E.D., 2009. "A Kalina power cycle driven by renewable energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 457-464.
    19. Li, Tailu & Zhang, Zhigang & Lu, Jian & Yang, Junlan & Hu, Yujie, 2015. "Two-stage evaporation strategy to improve system performance for organic Rankine cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 323-334.
    20. Zhang, Mingming & Timoshin, Anton & Al-Ammar, Essam A. & Sillanpaa, Mika & Zhang, Guiju, 2023. "Power, cooling, freshwater, and hydrogen production system from a new integrated system working with the zeotropic mixture, using a flash-binary geothermal system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    21. M. A. Ehyaei & Simin Baloochzadeh & A. Ahmadi & Stéphane Abanades, 2021. "Energy, exergy, economic, exergoenvironmental, and environmental analyses of a multigeneration system to produce electricity, cooling, potable water, hydrogen and sodium-hypochlorite," Post-Print hal-03221045, HAL.
    22. Li, Kun & Ding, Yi-Zhe & Ai, Chen & Sun, Hongwei & Xu, Yi-Peng & Nedaei, Navid, 2022. "Multi-objective optimization and multi-aspect analysis of an innovative geothermal-based multi-generation energy system for power, cooling, hydrogen, and freshwater production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Inkyu & Tester, Jefferson William & You, Fengqi, 2019. "Systems analysis, design, and optimization of geothermal energy systems for power production and polygeneration: State-of-the-art and future challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 551-577.
    2. Mahmoudan, Alireza & Samadof, Parviz & Hosseinzadeh, Siamak & Garcia, Davide Astiaso, 2021. "A multigeneration cascade system using ground-source energy with cold recovery: 3E analyses and multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    3. Zhu, Chaoyang & Wang, Mengxia & Guo, Mengxing & Deng, Jinxin & Du, Qipei & Wei, Wei & Zhang, Yunxiang & Mohebbi, Amir, 2024. "An innovative process design and multi-criteria study/optimization of a biomass digestion-supercritical carbon dioxide scenario toward boosting a geothermal-driven cogeneration system for power and he," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    4. Mohammadzadeh Bina, Saeid & Jalilinasrabady, Saeid & Fujii, Hikari, 2017. "Energy, economic and environmental (3E) aspects of internal heat exchanger for ORC geothermal power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 1096-1106.
    5. Liu, Fei & Yang, Changjin & Li, Biao & Silang, Yangji & Zhu, Yuhui & Farkoush, Saeid Gholami, 2022. "Thermodynamic and economic sensitivity analyses of a geothermal-based trigeneration system; performance enhancement through determining the best zeotropic working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    6. Chen, Ying & Liu, Yuxuan & Nam, Eun-Young & Zhang, Yang & Dahlak, Aida, 2023. "Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analysis and optimization of an integrated double-flash-binary geothermal system and dual-pressure ORC using zeotropic mixtures; multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    7. Zhou, Zongming & Cao, Yan & Anqi, Ali E. & Zoghi, Mohammad & Habibi, Hamed & Rajhi, Ali A. & Alamri, Sagr, 2022. "Converting a geothermal-driven steam flash cycle into a high-performance polygeneration system by waste heat recovery: 3E analysis and Genetic-Fgoalattain optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 609-627.
    8. Yu, Jie & Hu, Jianqiang & Yan, Pengyang & Ashraf Talesh, Seyed Saman, 2023. "Optimizing sustainable energy solutions: A comprehensive analysis of geothermal-powered compressed air energy storage system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    9. Huster, Wolfgang R. & Schweidtmann, Artur M. & Mitsos, Alexander, 2020. "Globally optimal working fluid mixture composition for geothermal power cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    10. Nemati Mofarrah, Ali & Jalalvand, Meysam & Abdolmaleki, Abbas, 2023. "Design, multi-aspect analyses, and multi-objective optimization of a biomass/geothermal-based cogeneration of power and freshwater," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    11. Wang, Enhua & Yu, Zhibin & Collings, Peter, 2017. "Dynamic control strategy of a distillation system for a composition-adjustable organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1038-1051.
    12. Donald Ukpanyang & Julio Terrados-Cepeda, 2022. "Decarbonizing Vehicle Transportation with Hydrogen from Biomass Gasification: An Assessment in the Nigerian Urban Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    13. Liu, Qiang & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen, 2014. "Effect of condensation temperature glide on the performance of organic Rankine cycles with zeotropic mixture working fluids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 394-404.
    14. Yari, M. & Mehr, A.S. & Zare, V. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Rosen, M.A., 2015. "Exergoeconomic comparison of TLC (trilateral Rankine cycle), ORC (organic Rankine cycle) and Kalina cycle using a low grade heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 712-722.
    15. Dan, Ma & He, Ang & Ren, Qiliang & Li, Wenbo & Huang, Kang & Wang, Xiangda & Feng, Boxuan & Sardari, Farshid, 2024. "Multi-aspect evaluation of a novel double-flash geothermally-powered integrated multigeneration system for generating power, cooling, and liquefied Hydrogen," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    16. Tan, Hua & Bo, Likang & Nutakki, Tirumala Uday Kumar & Agrawal, Manoj Kumar & Seikh, Asiful H. & Tahir Chauhdary, Sohaib & Shah, Nehad Ali & Ji, Tiancheng, 2024. "A comprehensive multi-variable approach for evaluating the feasibility of integration a novel heat recovery model into a gas turbine power plant, producing electricity, heat, and methanol," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    17. Wang, Shiqi & Yuan, Zhongyuan & Yu, Nanyang, 2023. "Thermo-economic optimization of organic Rankine cycle with steam-water dual heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    18. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    19. Moein Shamoushaki & Mehdi Aliehyaei & Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary, 2021. "Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic, and Exergoenvironmental Assessment of Flash-Binary Geothermal Combined Cooling, Heating and Power Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-24, July.
    20. Dou, Zhenhai & Zou, Yunhe & Mohebbi, Amir, 2024. "Design and multi-aspect analysis of a geothermal and biomass dual-source power, cooling, heating, and hybrid freshwater production system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:299:y:2024:i:c:s036054422401154x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.