IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/anture/v75y2019icp92-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance measurement in the networked context of convention and visitors bureaus (CVBs)

Author

Listed:
  • Aureli, Selena
  • Del Baldo, Mara

Abstract

The management of Convention Bureau offices (CBs) requires coordination of several tourism-related operators and that the CB private/public members’ demand for accountability be met. Building on the argument that CB managers could employ a multi-dimensional performance measurement system (PMS) to face the challenge of managing different stakeholders’ expectations, this study aimed to understand which performance metrics CBs monitor, the group of stakeholders the metrics refer to, and if they are integrated into a formalized PMS. The research is based on multiple case study analyses. The findings indicate that the management function and number of CB partners affect the presence of a multi-dimensional analysis. Managers dedicate their attention to salient stakeholders, whose legitimacy is strongly related to their contribution to the CB (i.e. shareholders and partners providing financial support). The salience perceived by CB managers is resource-dependent and affects the dimensions on which the process of performance measurement focuses. Thus, a single performance measurement model for all CBs that would be useful for dialogue with stakeholders is not feasible.

Suggested Citation

  • Aureli, Selena & Del Baldo, Mara, 2019. "Performance measurement in the networked context of convention and visitors bureaus (CVBs)," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 92-105.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:anture:v:75:y:2019:i:c:p:92-105
    DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2018.12.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160738318301348
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.annals.2018.12.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Volgger, Michael & Pechlaner, Harald, 2014. "Requirements for destination management organizations in destination governance: Understanding DMO success," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 64-75.
    2. Margaret A. Abernethy & Jan Bouwens, 2005. "Determinants of accounting innovation implementation," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 41(3), pages 217-240, October.
    3. Bornhorst, Tom & Brent Ritchie, J.R. & Sheehan, Lorn, 2010. "Determinants of tourism success for DMOs & destinations: An empirical examination of stakeholders' perspectives," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 572-589.
    4. J. Kaler, 2006. "Evaluating Stakeholder Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 69(3), pages 249-268, December.
    5. Pedro Sena Ferreira & A.H.M. Shamsuzzoha & Cesar Toscano & Pedro Cunha, 2012. "Framework for performance measurement and management in a collaborative business environment," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 61(6), pages 672-690, July.
    6. Dorothea Greiling, 2010. "Balanced scorecard implementation in German non‐profit organisations," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 59(6), pages 534-554, July.
    7. Braam, Geert & Nijssen, Ed, 2011. "Exploring antecedents of experimentation and implementation of the balanced scorecard," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(6), pages 714-728, November.
    8. Benjamin Neville & Bulent Menguc, 2006. "Stakeholder Multiplicity: Toward an Understanding of the Interactions between Stakeholders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 66(4), pages 377-391, July.
    9. Halinen, Aino & Tornroos, Jan-Ake, 2005. "Using case methods in the study of contemporary business networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(9), pages 1285-1297, September.
    10. Pike, Steven & Page, Stephen J., 2014. "Destination Marketing Organizations and destination marketing: A narrative analysis of the literature," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 202-227.
    11. Getz, Donald & Page, Stephen J., 2016. "Progress and prospects for event tourism research," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 593-631.
    12. Tashman, Pete & Raelin, Jonathan, 2013. "Who and What Really Matters to the Firm: Moving Stakeholder Salience beyond Managerial Perceptions," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(4), pages 591-616, October.
    13. Goodpaster, Kenneth E., 1991. "Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 53-73, January.
    14. Daniela Cristofoli & Laura Macciò & Laura Pedrazzi, 2015. "Structure, Mechanisms, and Managers in Successful Networks," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 489-516, April.
    15. Jones, Calvin & Li, ShiNa, 2015. "The economic importance of meetings and conferences: A satellite account approach," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 117-133.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aureli, Selena & Del Baldo, Mara, 2019. "The changing role of convention bureaus: An analysis of business models currently adopted by privately owned CBS," MPRA Paper 93996, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariani, Marcello M. & Giorgio, Luisa, 2017. "The “Pink Night” festival revisited: Meta-events and the role of destination partnerships in staging event tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 89-109.
    2. O. Cenk Demiroglu & Dieter K. Müller, 2021. "Managing Emerging Destinations: the Case of Azerbaijan," Journal of Tourismology, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-27, June.
    3. Cristina Gianfelici & Andrea Casadei & Federica Cembali, 2018. "The Relevance of Nationality and Industry for Stakeholder Salience: An Investigation Through Integrated Reports," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 541-558, June.
    4. Diana Foris & Adriana Florescu & Tiberiu Foris & Sorin Barabas, 2020. "Improving the Management of Tourist Destinations: A New Approach to Strategic Management at the DMO Level by Integrating Lean Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Aureli, Selena & Del Baldo, Mara, 2019. "The changing role of convention bureaus: An analysis of business models currently adopted by privately owned CBS," MPRA Paper 93996, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Hannah Charlotte Joos, 2019. "Influences on managerial perceptions of stakeholder salience: two decades of research in review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 3-37, February.
    7. Viveros, Hector, 2017. "Unpacking stakeholder mechanisms to influence corporate social responsibility in the mining sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-12.
    8. Selena Aureli & Andrea Cardoni & Mara Del Baldo & Rosa Lombardi, 2018. "The Balanced Scorecard Logic in The Management Control and Reporting of Small Business Company Networks: A Case Study," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 17(2), pages 191-215, June.
    9. Michel Ferrary, 2019. "The structure and dynamics of the CEO's “small world” of stakeholders. An application to industrial downsizing," Post-Print hal-03214823, HAL.
    10. Richard W. Carney & Sadok El Ghoul & Omrane Guedhami & Jane W. Lu & He Wang, 2022. "Political corporate social responsibility: The role of deliberative capacity," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(8), pages 1766-1784, October.
    11. Thomas Thijssens & Laury Bollen & Harold Hassink, 2015. "Secondary Stakeholder Influence on CSR Disclosure: An Application of Stakeholder Salience Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(4), pages 873-891, December.
    12. Line, Nathaniel D. & Runyan, Rodney C., 2014. "Destination marketing and the service-dominant logic: A resource-based operationalization of strategic marketing assets," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 91-102.
    13. Samuel Mansell, 2013. "Shareholder Theory and Kant’s ‘Duty of Beneficence’," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(3), pages 583-599, October.
    14. Cairns, George & Goodwin, Paul & Wright, George, 2016. "A decision-analysis-based framework for analysing stakeholder behaviour in scenario planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 1050-1062.
    15. Maria Martini Barzolai & Anna Moretti, 2018. "A dynamic perspective on destination governance success: The case of an emerging network in the Dolomites," Working Papers 04, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    16. Eunhye Grace Kim & Deepak Chhabra & Dallen J. Timothy, 2022. "Towards a Creative MICE Tourism Destination Branding Model: Integrating Heritage Tourism in New Orleans, USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    17. Lei Wang & Heikki Juslin, 2013. "Corporate Social Responsibility in the Chinese Forest Industry: Understanding Multiple Stakeholder Perceptions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3), pages 129-145, May.
    18. Ferrary, Michel, 2019. "The structure and dynamics of the CEO's “small world” of stakeholders. An application to industrial downsizing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 147-159.
    19. Azadegan, Arash & Golara, Sina & Kach, Andrew & Mousavi, Nasim, 2018. "Corporate environmental investments: A cross-national study on managerial decision making," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 47-64.
    20. Johanna Kujala & Anna Heikkinen & Hanna Lehtimäki, 2012. "Understanding the Nature of Stakeholder Relationships: An Empirical Examination of a Conflict Situation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 53-65, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:anture:v:75:y:2019:i:c:p:92-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/annals-of-tourism-research/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.