IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pfr293.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Jana Friedrichsen

Personal Details

First Name:Jana
Middle Name:
Last Name:Friedrichsen
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pfr293
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
Twitter: @friedr_j

Affiliation

Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre
Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel

Kiel, Germany
http://www.vwl.uni-kiel.de/
RePEc:edi:vakiede (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Charlotte Cordes & Jana Friedrichsen & Simeon Schudy, 2024. "Motivated Procrastination," CESifo Working Paper Series 11072, CESifo.
  2. Dirk Engelmann & Jana Friedrichsen & Roel van Veldhuizen & Pauline Vorjohann & Joachim Winter, 2023. "Decomposing Trust," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 454, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
  3. Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2022. "How Communication Makes the Difference between a Cartel and Tacit Collusion: A Machine Learning Approach," CESifo Working Paper Series 10024, CESifo.
  4. Andres, Maximilian & Bruttel, Lisa & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2021. "How do sanctions work? The choice between cartel formation and tacit collusion," VfS Annual Conference 2021 (Virtual Conference): Climate Economics 242372, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
  5. Gyula Seres & Anna Balleyer & Nicola Cerutti & Jana Friedrichsen & Müge Süer, 2021. "Face Mask Use and Physical Distancing before and after Mandatory Masking: No Evidence on Risk Compensation in Public Waiting Lines," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1971, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  6. Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2021. "The Leniency Rule Revisited: Experiments on Cartel Formation with Open Communication," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1926, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  7. Jana Friedrichsen & Katharina Momsen & Stefano Piasenti, 2020. "Ignorance, Intention and Stochastic Outcomes," Working Papers 2020-31, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
  8. Jana Friedrichsen & Manja Gärtner, 2020. "Why Are We Eating so Much Meat?," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 137, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  9. Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2020. "Choosing between explicit cartel formation and tacit collusion – An experiment," CEPA Discussion Papers 19, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.
  10. Jana Friedrichsen & Manja Gärtner, 2020. "Warum essen wir so viel Fleisch?," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 137, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  11. Seres, Gyula & Balleyer, Anna Helen & Cerutti, Nicola & Danilov, Anastasia & Friedrichsen, Jana & Liu, Yiming & Süer, Müge, 2020. "Face Masks Increase Compliance with Physical Distancing Recommendations during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 253, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
  12. Seres, Gyula & Balleyer, Anna & Cerutti, Nicola & Friedrichsen, Jana & Süer, Müge, 2020. "Face mask use and physical distancing before and after mandatory masking: Evidence from public waiting lines," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change SP II 2020-305, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  13. Renaud Foucart & Jana Friedrichsen, 2019. "All-pay competition with captive consumers," Working Papers 277451127, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
  14. Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2019. "The Effect of a Leniency Rule on Cartel Formation and Stability: Experiments with Open Communication," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1835, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  15. Jana Friedrichsen & Tobias König & Tobias Lausen, 2019. "Social Status Concerns and the Political Economy of Publicly Provided Private Goods," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1824, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  16. Jana Friedrichsen & Tobias König & Renke Schmacker, 2018. "Social Image Concerns and Welfare Take-Up," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1752, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  17. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2018. "Signals Sell: Product Lines when Consumers Differ Both in Taste for Quality and Image Concern," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 70, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
  18. Engelmann, Dirk & Friedrichsen, Jana & Kübler, Dorothea, 2018. "Fairness in Markets and Market Experiments," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 64, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
  19. Jana Friedrichsen & Dirk Engelmann, 2017. "Who Cares about Social Image?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1634, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  20. Jana Friedrichsen, 2017. "Is Socially Responsible Production a Normal Good?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1644, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  21. Jana Friedrichsen & Tobias König & Renke Schmacker, 2017. "Welfare Stigma in the Lab: Evidence of Social Signaling," CESifo Working Paper Series 6519, CESifo.
  22. Foucart, Renaud & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2016. "Bidding for network size," MPRA Paper 72136, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  23. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2016. "Signals sell: Designing a product line when consumers have social image concerns," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2016-202, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  24. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2014. "Image Concerns and the Provision of Quality," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100365, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
  25. Renaud Foucart & Jana Friedrichsen, 2013. "Bidding for Network Size: Platform Competition when Quality and Network Size are Complements," Economics Series Working Papers 675, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
  26. Jana Friedrichsen & Dirk Engelmann, 2013. "Who Cares for Social Image? Interactions between Intrinsic Motivation and Social Image Concerns," CESifo Working Paper Series 4514, CESifo.
  27. Friedrichsen, Jana & Zahn, Philipp, 2013. "Political support in hard times: Do people care about national welfare?," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2013-212, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
  28. Friedrichsen, J. & Zahn, P., 2011. "The Macroeconomy and Individuals’ Support for Democracy," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1104, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.

Articles

  1. Andres, Maximilian & Bruttel, Lisa & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2023. "How communication makes the difference between a cartel and tacit collusion: A machine learning approach," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
  2. Friedrichsen, Jana & Momsen, Katharina & Piasenti, Stefano, 2022. "Ignorance, intention and stochastic outcomes," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 100, pages 1-1.
  3. Friedrichsen, Jana & Momsen, Katharina & Piasenti, Stefano, 2022. "Ignorance, intention and stochastic outcomes☆," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
  4. Gyula Seres & Anna Helen Balleyer & Nicola Cerutti & Anastasia Danilov & Jana Friedrichsen & Yiming Liu & Müge Süer, 2021. "Face masks increase compliance with physical distancing recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 7(2), pages 139-158, December.
  5. Seres, Gyula & Balleyer, Anna & Cerutti, Nicola & Friedrichsen, Jana & Süer, Müge, 2021. "Face mask use and physical distancing before and after mandatory masking: No evidence on risk compensation in public waiting lines," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 765-781.
  6. Jana Friedrichsen & Tobias König & Tobias Lausen, 2021. "Social Status Concerns and the Political Economy of Publicly Provided Private Goods [Housing markets and structural policies in OECD countries]," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 131(633), pages 220-246.
  7. Andres, Maximilian & Bruttel, Lisa & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2021. "The leniency rule revisited: Experiments on cartel formation with open communication," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
  8. Foucart, Renaud & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2021. "All-pay competition with captive consumers," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
  9. Jana Friedrichsen & Renke Schmacker, 2019. "Fear of Stigmatization Prevents Individuals from Claiming Benefits," DIW Weekly Report, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 9(26/27), pages 215-220.
  10. Jana Friedrichsen & Erich Wittenberg, 2019. "Es geht den Menschen darum, was andere Leute über sie denken: Interview," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 86(26), pages 462-462.
  11. Jana Friedrichsen & Renke Schmacker, 2019. "Die Angst vor Stigmatisierung hindert Menschen daran, Transferleistungen in Anspruch zu nehmen," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 86(26), pages 455-461.
  12. Friedrichsen, Jana & König, Tobias & Schmacker, Renke, 2018. "Social image concerns and welfare take-up," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 174-192.
  13. Pio Baake & Jana Friedrichsen & Helene Naegele, 2018. "Soziale Nachhaltigkeitssiegel: Versprechen und Realität am Beispiel von Fairtrade-Kaffee," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 85(48), pages 1031-1037.
  14. Jana Friedrichsen & Kornelia Hagen, 2018. "Stupsen und Schubsen (Nudging): Beispiele aus Altersvorsorge, Gesundheit, Ernährung," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 87(2), pages 5-16.
  15. Jana Friedrichsen & Kornelia Hagen & Lilo Wagner, 2018. "Stupsen und Schubsen (Nudging): ein neues verhaltensbasiertes Regulierungskonzept?," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 87(1), pages 5-13.
  16. Pio Baake & Jana Friedrichsen & Helene Naegele, 2018. "Social Sustainability Labels: Promises and Reality in the Example of Fairtrade-Coffee," DIW Weekly Report, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 8(48), pages 485-490.
  17. Friedrichsen, Jana & Engelmann, Dirk, 2018. "Who cares about social image?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 61-77.
  18. Sofia Amaral-Garcia & Paola Bertoli & Jana Friedrichsen & Veronica Grembi, 2016. "Haftpflichtregelungen auf Krankenhausebene können ärztliches Handeln beeinflussen und Kaiserschnittraten senken," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 83(43), pages 1035-1042.
  19. Jana Friedrichsen, 2016. ""Shopping for a better world" funktioniert nur bedingt," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 83(38), pages 851-856.
  20. Sofia Amaral-Garcia & Paola Bertoli & Jana Friedrichsen & Veronica Grembi, 2016. "Hospital-Level Policy Can Affect Physician Behavior and Reduce C-Section Rates," DIW Economic Bulletin, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 6(43), pages 495-501.
  21. Friedrichsen, Jana & Zahn, Philipp, 2014. "Political support in hard times: Do people care about national welfare?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 23-37.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Blog mentions

As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
  1. Jana Friedrichsen, 2017. "Is Socially Responsible Production a Normal Good?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1644, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Mentioned in:

    1. Who buys social responsibility
      by Nicholas Gruen in Club Troppo on 2017-03-05 18:03:40

Working papers

  1. Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2022. "How Communication Makes the Difference between a Cartel and Tacit Collusion: A Machine Learning Approach," CESifo Working Paper Series 10024, CESifo.

    Cited by:

    1. Martin, Simon & Rasch, Alexander, 2024. "Demand forecasting, signal precision, and collusion with hidden actions," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Maximilian Andres, 2023. "Communication in the Infinitely Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma: Theory and Experiments," Papers 2304.12297, arXiv.org.
    3. Polemis, Michael, 2024. "Are Cartels Forever? Global Evidence Using Quantile Regression Analysis," MPRA Paper 120534, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Zengqing Wu & Run Peng & Shuyuan Zheng & Qianying Liu & Xu Han & Brian Inhyuk Kwon & Makoto Onizuka & Shaojie Tang & Chuan Xiao, 2024. "Shall We Team Up: Exploring Spontaneous Cooperation of Competing LLM Agents," Papers 2402.12327, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    5. Isogai, Shigeki & Shen, Chaohai, 2023. "Multiproduct firm’s reputation and leniency program in multimarket collusion," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    6. Lisa Bruttel & Gerald Eisenkopf & Juri Nithammer, 2024. "Pre-election communication in public good games with endogenous leaders," CEPA Discussion Papers 73, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.
    7. Maximilian Andres, 2024. "Equilibrium selection in infinitely repeated games with communication," CEPA Discussion Papers 75, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.
    8. Xu Han & Zengqing Wu & Chuan Xiao, 2023. ""Guinea Pig Trials" Utilizing GPT: A Novel Smart Agent-Based Modeling Approach for Studying Firm Competition and Collusion," Papers 2308.10974, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    9. Zengqing Wu & Run Peng & Xu Han & Shuyuan Zheng & Yixin Zhang & Chuan Xiao, 2023. "Smart Agent-Based Modeling: On the Use of Large Language Models in Computer Simulations," Papers 2311.06330, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    10. Lisa Bruttel & Maximilian Andres, 2024. "Communicating Cartel Intentions," CEPA Discussion Papers 77, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.

  2. Gyula Seres & Anna Balleyer & Nicola Cerutti & Jana Friedrichsen & Müge Süer, 2021. "Face Mask Use and Physical Distancing before and after Mandatory Masking: No Evidence on Risk Compensation in Public Waiting Lines," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1971, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Roxanne Kovacs & Maurice Dunaiski & Janne Tukiainen, 2023. "The effect of compulsory face mask policies on community mobility in Germany," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 125(4), pages 1027-1055, October.
    2. Alexander K. Koch & Dan Mønster & Julia Nafziger, 2023. "Nudging in complex environments," Economics Working Papers 2023-06, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    3. Gyula Seres & Anna Helen Balleyer & Nicola Cerutti & Anastasia Danilov & Jana Friedrichsen & Yiming Liu & Müge Süer, 2021. "Face masks increase compliance with physical distancing recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 7(2), pages 139-158, December.

  3. Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2021. "The Leniency Rule Revisited: Experiments on Cartel Formation with Open Communication," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1926, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2022. "How Communication Makes the Difference between a Cartel and Tacit Collusion: A Machine Learning Approach," CESifo Working Paper Series 10024, CESifo.
    2. Burgstaller, Lilith & Pfeil, Katharina, 2024. "Why whistleblowing does not deter collaborative tax evasion," Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics 24/3, Walter Eucken Institut e.V..
    3. Haucap, Justus & Heldman, Christina & Rau, Holger A., 2024. "Gender and cooperation in the presence of negative externalities," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 148-169.
    4. Gerlach, Heiko & Li, Junqian, 2024. "Collusion in the presence of antitrust prosecution: Experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 427-445.
    5. Jeong Yeol Kim & Charles N. Noussair, 2023. "Leniency Policies and Cartel Success: An Experiment," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 63(2), pages 187-210, September.
    6. Ruben Korsten & Andrew Samuel, 2023. "Cartel formation and detection: the role of information costs and disclosure," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 117-153, August.
    7. Isogai, Shigeki & Shen, Chaohai, 2023. "Multiproduct firm’s reputation and leniency program in multimarket collusion," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    8. Karine Brisset & Francois Cochard & Eve-Angeline Lambert, 2023. "Is Amnesty Plus More Successful in Fighting Multimarket Cartels? An Exploratory Analysis," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 63(2), pages 211-237, September.
    9. Peter T. Dijkstra & Jacob Seifert, 2023. "Cartel Leniency and Settlements: A Joint Perspective," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 63(2), pages 239-273, September.
    10. Nobuyuki Hanaki & Ali I. Ozkes, 2023. "Strategic environment effect and communication," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 26(3), pages 588-621, July.
    11. Jeroen Hinloopen & Sander Onderstal & Adriaan Soetevent, 2023. "Corporate leniency programs for antitrust: Past, present, and future," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 23-045/VII, Tinbergen Institute.
    12. Fonseca, Miguel A. & Gonçalves, Ricardo & Pinho, Joana & Tabacco, Giovanni A., 2022. "How do antitrust regimes impact on cartel formation and managers’ labor market? An experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 643-662.
    13. Haucap, Justus & Heldman, Christina & Rau, Holger A., 2022. "Gender and collusion," DICE Discussion Papers 380, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    14. Lisa Bruttel & Maximilian Andres, 2024. "Communicating Cartel Intentions," CEPA Discussion Papers 77, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.

  4. Jana Friedrichsen & Katharina Momsen & Stefano Piasenti, 2020. "Ignorance, Intention and Stochastic Outcomes," Working Papers 2020-31, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.

    Cited by:

    1. Claire Rimbaud & Alice Soldà, 2021. "Avoiding the Cost of your Conscience: Belief Dependent Preferences and Information Acquisition," Working Papers 2114, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    2. Stefano Piasenti & Müge Süer, 2024. "Predictive Power of Biological Sex and Gender Identity on Economic Behavior," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 513, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    3. Momsen, Katharina & Ohndorf, Markus, 2023. "Information avoidance: Self-image concerns, inattention, and ideology," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 386-400.
    4. Kevin Bauer & Andrej Gill, 2024. "Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: Algorithmic Assessments, Transparency, and Self-Fulfilling Prophecies," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 226-248, March.

  5. Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2020. "Choosing between explicit cartel formation and tacit collusion – An experiment," CEPA Discussion Papers 19, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.

    Cited by:

    1. Comeig, Irene & Klaser, Klaudijo & Pinar, Lucía D., 2022. "The paradox of (Inter)net neutrality: An experiment on ex-ante antitrust regulation✰," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    2. Andres, Maximilian & Bruttel, Lisa & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2021. "The leniency rule revisited: Experiments on cartel formation with open communication," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 76, pages 1-1.

  6. Jana Friedrichsen & Manja Gärtner, 2020. "Warum essen wir so viel Fleisch?," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 137, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Roosen, Jutta & Staudigel, Matthias & Rahbauer, Sebastian, 2022. "Demand elasticities for fresh meat and welfare effects of meat taxes in Germany," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).

  7. Seres, Gyula & Balleyer, Anna Helen & Cerutti, Nicola & Danilov, Anastasia & Friedrichsen, Jana & Liu, Yiming & Süer, Müge, 2020. "Face Masks Increase Compliance with Physical Distancing Recommendations during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 253, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.

    Cited by:

    1. Roxanne Kovacs & Maurice Dunaiski & Janne Tukiainen, 2020. "Compulsory face mask policies do not affect community mobility in Germany," Discussion Papers 136, Aboa Centre for Economics.
    2. Seres, Gyula & Balleyer, Anna & Cerutti, Nicola & Friedrichsen, Jana & Süer, Müge, 2021. "Face Mask Use and Physical Distancing Before and After Mandatory Masking: No Evidence on Risk Compensation in Public Waiting Lines," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 300, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    3. Alfano, Vincenzo & Cicatiello, Lorenzo & Ercolano, Salvatore, 2023. "Assessing the effectiveness of mandatory outdoor mask policy: The natural experiment of Campania," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).

  8. Seres, Gyula & Balleyer, Anna & Cerutti, Nicola & Friedrichsen, Jana & Süer, Müge, 2020. "Face mask use and physical distancing before and after mandatory masking: Evidence from public waiting lines," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change SP II 2020-305, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    Cited by:

    1. Kosfeld, Reinhold & Mitze, Timo & Rode, Johannes & Wälde, Klaus, 2021. "The Covid-19 containment effects of public health measures: A spatial difference-in-differences approach," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 128372, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Young-Jae Kim & Jeong-hyung Cho & Seung-Woo Kang, 2020. "Study on the Relationship between Leisure Activity Participation and Wearing a Mask among Koreans during COVID-19 Crisis: Using TPB Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-10, October.
    3. Victor Chernozhukov & Hiroyuki Kasahara & Paul Schrimpf, 2020. "Causal impact of masks, policies, behavior on early COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S," CeMMAP working papers CWP24/20, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    4. Feng Wang & Xing Ge & Danwen Huang, 2022. "Government Intervention, Human Mobility, and COVID-19: A Causal Pathway Analysis from 121 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-26, March.
    5. Karaivanov, Alexander & Lu, Shih En & Shigeoka, Hitoshi & Chen, Cong & Pamplona, Stephanie, 2021. "Face masks, public policies and slowing the spread of COVID-19: Evidence from Canada," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    6. Gyula Seres & Anna Helen Balleyer & Nicola Cerutti & Anastasia Danilov & Jana Friedrichsen & Yiming Liu & Müge Süer, 2021. "Face masks increase compliance with physical distancing recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 7(2), pages 139-158, December.

  9. Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2019. "The Effect of a Leniency Rule on Cartel Formation and Stability: Experiments with Open Communication," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1835, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Hausladen, Carina I. & Fochmann, Martin & Mohr, Peter, 2024. "Predicting compliance: Leveraging chat data for supervised classification in experimental research," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Maximilian Andres & Lisa Bruttel & Jana Friedrichsen, 2020. "Choosing between explicit cartel formation and tacit collusion – An experiment," CEPA Discussion Papers 19, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.
    3. Bodnar, Olivia & Fremerey, Melinda & Normann, Hans-Theo & Schad, Jannika Leonie, 2021. "The effects of private damage claims on cartel activity: Experimental evidence," DICE Discussion Papers 315, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE), revised 2021.
    4. Andres, Maximilian & Bruttel, Lisa & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2021. "How do sanctions work? The choice between cartel formation and tacit collusion," VfS Annual Conference 2021 (Virtual Conference): Climate Economics 242372, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.

  10. Jana Friedrichsen & Tobias König & Tobias Lausen, 2019. "Social Status Concerns and the Political Economy of Publicly Provided Private Goods," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1824, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Arijit Sen, 2024. "A tale of declining public provision and burgeoning private supplements," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 287-308, October.
    2. Andrea Gallice & Edoardo Grillo, 2022. "Legitimize through Endorsement," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 680 JEL Classification: C, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
    3. Gorbunov, Vladimir, 2021. "Market demand: a holistic theory and its verification," MPRA Paper 109154, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Hörcher, Daniel & De Borger, Bruno & Graham, Daniel J., 2023. "Subsidised transport services in a fiscal federation: Why local governments may be against decentralised service provision," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    5. Désirée I Christofzik & Sebastian G Kessing, 2024. "On the public provision of positional goods," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 76(3), pages 708-721.

  11. Jana Friedrichsen & Tobias König & Renke Schmacker, 2018. "Social Image Concerns and Welfare Take-Up," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1752, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Jia, Z. Tingting & McMahon, Matthew J., 2020. "Being watched in an investment game setting: Behavioral changes when making risky decisions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Jan Marcus & Thomas Siedler & Nicolas R. Ziebarth, 2021. "The Long-Run Effects of Sports Club Vouchers for Primary School Children," CEPA Discussion Papers 34, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.
    3. Germain, Antoine, 2023. "Basic income versus fairness: redistribution with inactive agents," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2023022, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    4. DELIS, Manthos & GALARIOTIS, Emilios & IOSIFIDI, Maria & MONNE, Jerome, 2023. "Poverty and seeking bank advice: Evidence from a survey experiment," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    5. Bastani, Spencer & Giebe, Thomas & Miao, Chizheng, 2019. "Ethnicity and tax filing behavior," MPRA Paper 97047, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Nguyen, Ha Trong & Le, Huong Thu & Connelly, Luke B., 2019. "Who’s declining the “free lunch”? New evidence from the uptake of public child dental benefits," EconStor Preprints 208378, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    7. Adam Osman & Jamin D. Speer, 2024. "Stigma and take‐up of labour market assistance: Evidence from two field experiments," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 91(361), pages 123-141, January.
    8. Reanos, Miguel Tovar & Curtis, John & Pillai, Arya & Meier, David, 2023. "Fuel poverty and financial literacy: Evidence from Irish home owners," Papers WP751, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    9. Pablo A. Celhay & Bruce D. Meyer & Nikolas Mittag, 2022. "Stigma in Welfare Programs," NBER Working Papers 30307, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Osman, Adam & Speer, Jamin D., 2023. "Stigma and Take-up of Labor Market Assistance: Evidence from Two Field Experiments," IZA Discussion Papers 16599, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Delis, Manthos & Galariotis, Emilios & Monne, Jerome, 2021. "Financial vulnerability and seeking expert advice: Evidence from a survey experiment," MPRA Paper 107095, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Feld, Lars P. & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Schnabel, Isabel & Truger, Achim & Wieland, Volker, 2019. "Den Strukturwandel meistern. Jahresgutachten 2019/20 [Dealing with Structural Change. Annual Report 2019/20]," Annual Economic Reports / Jahresgutachten, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, volume 127, number 201920, February.
    13. Wolf, Tobias, 2020. "Welfare while working: How does the life satisfaction approach help to explain job search behavior?," Discussion Papers 2020/14, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.

  12. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2018. "Signals Sell: Product Lines when Consumers Differ Both in Taste for Quality and Image Concern," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 70, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.

    Cited by:

    1. Dertwinkel-Kalt, Markus & Köster, Mats & Peiseler, Florian, 2019. "Attention-driven demand for bonus contracts," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1-24.
    2. Friedrichsen, Jana & Engelmann, Dirk, 2018. "Who cares about social image?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 61-77.
    3. Ourania Karakosta & Eleftherios Zacharias, 2023. "Optimal taxation with positional considerations," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 25(2), pages 342-358, April.
    4. George Deltas & Eleftherios Zacharias, 2018. "Product Proliferation and Pricing in a Market with Positional Effects," Working Papers 242312853, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    5. Oliver Bos & Martin Pollrich, 2020. "Optimal Auctions With Signaling Bidders," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2020_158, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    6. Sebald, Alexander & Vikander, Nick, 2019. "Optimal firm behavior with consumer social image concerns and asymmetric information," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 311-330.
    7. Florian H. Schneider, 2020. "Signaling ideology through consumption," ECON - Working Papers 367, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Jul 2022.
    8. Heidhues, Paul & Köszegi, Botond, 2018. "Behavioral Industrial Organization," CEPR Discussion Papers 12988, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

  13. Engelmann, Dirk & Friedrichsen, Jana & Kübler, Dorothea, 2018. "Fairness in Markets and Market Experiments," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 64, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.

    Cited by:

    1. Riehm, Tobias & Fugger, Nicolas & Gillen, Philippe & Gretschko, Vitali & Werner, Peter, 2022. "Social norms, sanctions, and conditional entry in markets with externalities: Evidence from an artefactual field experiment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    2. Friedrichsen, Jana & Engelmann, Dirk, 2018. "Who cares about social image?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 61-77.
    3. Björn Bartling & Vanessa Valero & Roberto A. Weber, 2018. "The causal effect of income on market social responsibility," ECON - Working Papers 299, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Aug 2024.
    4. Engelmann, Dirk & Kübler, Dorothea, 2008. "Do legal standards affect ethical concerns of consumers?," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2008-008, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    5. Björn Bartling & Vanessa Valero & Roberto A. Weber, 2018. "Is Social Responsibility a Normal Good?," CESifo Working Paper Series 7263, CESifo.
    6. Brunen, Ann-Christine & Laubach, Oliver, 2022. "Do sustainable consumers prefer socially responsible investments? A study among the users of robo advisors," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    7. Riehm, Tobias & Fugger, Nicolas & Gillen, Philippe & Gretschko, Vitali & Werner, Peter, 2021. "Social norms and market behavior: Evidence from a large population sample," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-017, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    8. Björn Bartling & Vanessa Valero & Roberto A. Weber & Yao Lan, 2020. "Public Discourse and Socially Responsible Market Behavior," CESifo Working Paper Series 8531, CESifo.

  14. Jana Friedrichsen & Dirk Engelmann, 2017. "Who Cares about Social Image?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1634, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Jannis Engel & Nora Szech, 2017. "A Little Good is Good Enough: Ethical Consumption, Cheap Excuses, and Moral Self-Licensing," Working Papers 2017-025, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    2. Petrishcheva, Vasilisa & Riener, Gerhard & Schildberg-Hörisch, Hannah, 2020. "Loss aversion in social image concerns," VfS Annual Conference 2020 (Virtual Conference): Gender Economics 224581, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    3. Riehm, Tobias & Fugger, Nicolas & Gillen, Philippe & Gretschko, Vitali & Werner, Peter, 2022. "Social norms, sanctions, and conditional entry in markets with externalities: Evidence from an artefactual field experiment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    4. Jia, Z. Tingting & McMahon, Matthew J., 2020. "Being watched in an investment game setting: Behavioral changes when making risky decisions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    5. Friedrichsen, Jana & König, Tobias & Schmacker, Renke, 2018. "Social image concerns and welfare take-up," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2016-208r, WZB Berlin Social Science Center, revised 2018.
    6. Jana Friedrichsen & Tobias König & Renke Schmacker, 2017. "Welfare Stigma in the Lab: Evidence of Social Signaling," CESifo Working Paper Series 6519, CESifo.
    7. Naegele, Helene, 2020. "Where does the Fair Trade money go? How much consumers pay extra for Fair Trade coffee and how this value is split along the value chain," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    8. Blacklow, Paul & Sibly, Hugh & Corman, Amy Beth, 2021. "Do we prefer praise from acquaintances or strangers? An experiment on esteem seeking in one-shot versus repeated interactions," Working Papers 2021-08, University of Tasmania, Tasmanian School of Business and Economics.
    9. Engelmann, Dirk & Friedrichsen, Jana & Kübler, Dorothea, 2018. "Fairness in markets and market experiments," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2018-203, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    10. Dannenberg, Astrid & Weingärtner, Eva, 2023. "The effects of observability and an information nudge on food choice," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    11. Rincke, Johannes & Boyer, Pierre & Dwenger, Nadja, 2015. "Do Taxes Crowd Out Intrinsic Motivation? Field-Experimental Evidence from Germany," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 112951, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    12. Pascale Bazoche & Nicolas Guinet & Sylvaine Poret & Sabrina Teyssier, 2021. "Does the provision of information increase the substitution of animal proteins with plant-based proteins? An experimental investigation into consumer choices," Working Papers SMART 21-07, INRAE UMR SMART.
    13. Pio Baake & Helene Naegele, 2017. "Competition between For-Profit and Industry Labels: The Case of Social Labels in the Coffee Market," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1686, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    14. Munro, Alistair & Valente, Marieta, 2008. "Green goods: are they good or bad news for the environment? Evidence from a laboratory experiment on impure public goods," MPRA Paper 13024, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 14 Jan 2009.
    15. Adam Osman & Jamin D. Speer, 2024. "Stigma and take‐up of labour market assistance: Evidence from two field experiments," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 91(361), pages 123-141, January.
    16. Banuri,Sheheryar & Keefer,Philip E. & De Walque,Damien B. C. M., 2018. "Love the job... or the patient ? task vs. mission-based motivations in health care," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8338, The World Bank.
    17. Margherita Del Prete & Antonella Samoggia, 2020. "Chocolate Consumption and Purchasing Behaviour Review: Research Issues and Insights for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-18, July.
    18. Jasmin Droege, 2022. "The Handmade Effect: A Model of Conscious Shopping in an Industrialised Economy," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 60(2), pages 263-292, March.
    19. Dannenberg, Astrid & Klatt, Charlotte & Weingärtner, Eva, 2024. "The effects of social norms and observability on food choice," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    20. Ferdinand A. von Siemens, 2020. "I care what you think: social image concerns and the strategic revelation of past pro-social behavior," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 6(1), pages 43-56, June.
    21. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2018. "Signals Sell: Product Lines when Consumers Differ Both in Taste for Quality and Image Concern," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 70, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    22. Sheheryar Banuri & Katarina Dankova & Philip Keefer, 2017. "It's not all fun and games: Feedback, task motivation, and effort," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 17-10, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    23. Holm, Hakan J. & Samahita, Margaret, 2018. "Curating social image: Experimental evidence on the value of actions and selfies," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 83-104.
    24. Boyer, Pierre C. & Dwenger, Nadja & Rincke, Johannes, 2016. "Do norms on contribution behavior affect intrinsic motivation? Field-experimental evidence from Germany," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 140-153.
    25. Blacklow, Paul & Corman, Amy Beth & Sibly, Hugh, 2018. "The demand and supply for esteem: an experimental analysis," Working Papers 2018-03, University of Tasmania, Tasmanian School of Business and Economics.
    26. Florian H. Schneider, 2020. "Signaling ideology through consumption," ECON - Working Papers 367, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Jul 2022.
    27. Jonathan Levy, 2021. "Mutual monitoring, approval motivation and fostering cooperation in teams," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 7(1), pages 74-87, September.
    28. Vasilisa Petrishcheva & Gerhard Riener & Hannah Schildberg-Hörisch, 2023. "Loss aversion in social image concerns," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 26(3), pages 622-645, July.
    29. Osman, Adam & Speer, Jamin D., 2023. "Stigma and Take-up of Labor Market Assistance: Evidence from Two Field Experiments," IZA Discussion Papers 16599, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    30. Lefoll, Erwin & Günther, Isabel & Veronesi, Marcella, 2022. "Low Demand for Fair Trade Chocolate: Lack of Efficiency, Attention, Knowledge or Trust?," VfS Annual Conference 2022 (Basel): Big Data in Economics 264065, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    31. Ro’i Zultan & Yamit Asulin & Yuval Heller & Nira Munichor, 2024. "Social Image, Observer Identity, And Crowding Up," Working Papers 2410, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
    32. Helene Naegele, 2019. "Where Does the Fairtrade Money Go? How Much Consumers Pay Extra for Fairtrade Coffee and How This Value Is Split along the Value Chain," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1783, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

  15. Jana Friedrichsen, 2017. "Is Socially Responsible Production a Normal Good?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1644, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Fehr, Dietmar & Rau, Hannes & Trautmann, Stefan T. & Xu, Yilong, 2020. "Inequality, fairness and social capital," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. Björn Bartling & Vanessa Valero & Roberto A. Weber, 2018. "The causal effect of income on market social responsibility," ECON - Working Papers 299, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Aug 2024.
    3. Björn Bartling & Vanessa Valero & Roberto A. Weber, 2018. "Is Social Responsibility a Normal Good?," CESifo Working Paper Series 7263, CESifo.
    4. Stehr, Frauke & Werner, Peter, 2021. "Making Up for Harming Others — An Experiment on Voluntary Compensation Behavior," VfS Annual Conference 2021 (Virtual Conference): Climate Economics 242396, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.

  16. Jana Friedrichsen & Tobias König & Renke Schmacker, 2017. "Welfare Stigma in the Lab: Evidence of Social Signaling," CESifo Working Paper Series 6519, CESifo.

    Cited by:

    1. Cameron, Anna & Tedds, Lindsay M., 2021. "Gender-Based Violence, Economic Security, and the Potential of Basic Income: A Discussion Paper," MPRA Paper 107478, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Tedds, Lindsay M. & Crisan, I. Daria & Petit, Gillian, 2020. "Basic Income in Canada: Principles and Design Features," MPRA Paper 105911, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  17. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2016. "Signals sell: Designing a product line when consumers have social image concerns," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2016-202, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    Cited by:

    1. Ronen Gradwohl & Rann Smorodinsky, 2021. "Privacy, Patience, and Protection," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 759-784, December.
    2. Friedrichsen, Jana & Engelmann, Dirk, 2018. "Who cares about social image?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 61-77.

  18. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2014. "Image Concerns and the Provision of Quality," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100365, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.

    Cited by:

    1. Lundberg, Sofia & Marklund, Per-Olov & Strömbäck, Elon, 2015. "Is Environmental Policy by Public Procurement Effective?," Umeå Economic Studies 911, Umeå University, Department of Economics.
    2. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2013. "Image concerns and the provision of quality," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2013-211, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    3. Friedrichsen, Jana & Engelmann, Dirk, 2013. "Who cares for social image? Interactions between intrinsic motivation and social image concerns," VfS Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 79746, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.

  19. Jana Friedrichsen & Dirk Engelmann, 2013. "Who Cares for Social Image? Interactions between Intrinsic Motivation and Social Image Concerns," CESifo Working Paper Series 4514, CESifo.

    Cited by:

    1. Jannis Engel & Nora Szech, 2017. "A Little Good is Good Enough: Ethical Consumption, Cheap Excuses, and Moral Self-Licensing," Working Papers 2017-025, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    2. Rainer Michael Rilke, 2017. "On the duty to give (and not to take): An experiment on moralistic punishment," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(9), pages 1129-1150, December.
    3. Marieta Valente, 2015. "Ethical Differentiation and Consumption in an Incentivized Market Experiment," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 47(1), pages 51-69, August.
    4. Munro, Alistair & Valente, Marieta, 2008. "Green goods: are they good or bad news for the environment? Evidence from a laboratory experiment on impure public goods," MPRA Paper 13024, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 14 Jan 2009.
    5. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2013. "Image concerns and the provision of quality," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2013-211, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    6. Goytom Abraha Kahsay & Laura Mørch Andersen & Lars Gårn Hansen, 2014. "Price reactions when consumers are concerned about pro-social reputation," IFRO Working Paper 2014/09, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    7. Friedrichsen, Jana, 2016. "Signals sell: Designing a product line when consumers have social image concerns," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2016-202, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    8. Antonio Filippin & Carlo V. Fiorio & Eliana Viviano, 2013. "The effect of tax enforcement on tax morale," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 937, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.

  20. Friedrichsen, Jana & Zahn, Philipp, 2013. "Political support in hard times: Do people care about national welfare?," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2013-212, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    Cited by:

    1. Dominik Schraff & Frank Schimmelfennig, 2019. "Eurozone bailouts and national democracy: Detachment or resilience?," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(3), pages 361-383, September.
    2. Georgia Kaplanoglou & Vassilis T. Rapanos & Ioanna C. Bardakas, 2015. "Does Fairness Matter for the Success of Fiscal Consolidation?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(2), pages 197-219, May.
    3. Gebhard Kirchgässner, 2016. "Voting and Popularity," CESifo Working Paper Series 6182, CESifo.
    4. Selim Jürgen Ergun & M. Fernanda Rivas & Máximo Rossi, 2016. "Satisfaction with Democracy in Latin America: Do the Characteristics of the Political System Matter?," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 0816, Department of Economics - dECON.
    5. Guido Merzoni & Federico Trombetta, 2016. "The cost of doing the right thing. A model of populism with rent-seeking politicians and the economic crisis," DISEIS - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia internazionale, delle istituzioni e dello sviluppo dis1602, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimento di Economia internazionale, delle istituzioni e dello sviluppo (DISEIS).
    6. Agnello, Luca & Castro, Vitor & Jalles, João Tovar & Sousa, Ricardo M., 2015. "What determines the likelihood of structural reforms?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 129-145.
    7. Christian Pfeifer, 2023. "Can worker codetermination stabilize democracies? Works councils and satisfaction with democracy in Germany," Working Paper Series in Economics 420, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    8. Salih BARIŞIK & Kubilay ERGEN, 2023. "Heterogenous Effects of the Determinants of Pro-market Reforms: Panel Quantile Estimation for OECD Countries," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(2), pages 36-51, June.
    9. Gourley, Patrick & Khamis, Melanie, 2023. "It is not easy being a Green party: Green politics as a normal good," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    10. Tim Friehe & Christian Pfeifer, 2024. "Predicting satisfaction with democracy in Germany using local economic conditions, social capital, and individual characteristics," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 335-377, September.

  21. Friedrichsen, J. & Zahn, P., 2011. "The Macroeconomy and Individuals’ Support for Democracy," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1104, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.

    Cited by:

    1. Dominik Schraff & Frank Schimmelfennig, 2019. "Eurozone bailouts and national democracy: Detachment or resilience?," European Union Politics, , vol. 20(3), pages 361-383, September.
    2. Georgia Kaplanoglou & Vassilis T. Rapanos & Ioanna C. Bardakas, 2015. "Does Fairness Matter for the Success of Fiscal Consolidation?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(2), pages 197-219, May.
    3. Gebhard Kirchgässner, 2016. "Voting and Popularity," CESifo Working Paper Series 6182, CESifo.
    4. Selim Jürgen Ergun & M. Fernanda Rivas & Máximo Rossi, 2016. "Satisfaction with Democracy in Latin America: Do the Characteristics of the Political System Matter?," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 0816, Department of Economics - dECON.
    5. Gustavo Gouvêa Maciel & Luís de Sousa, 2018. "Legal Corruption and Dissatisfaction with Democracy in the European Union," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 653-674, November.
    6. Guido Merzoni & Federico Trombetta, 2016. "The cost of doing the right thing. A model of populism with rent-seeking politicians and the economic crisis," DISEIS - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia internazionale, delle istituzioni e dello sviluppo dis1602, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimento di Economia internazionale, delle istituzioni e dello sviluppo (DISEIS).
    7. Agnello, Luca & Castro, Vitor & Jalles, João Tovar & Sousa, Ricardo M., 2015. "What determines the likelihood of structural reforms?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 129-145.
    8. Christian Pfeifer, 2023. "Can worker codetermination stabilize democracies? Works councils and satisfaction with democracy in Germany," Working Paper Series in Economics 420, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    9. Salih BARIŞIK & Kubilay ERGEN, 2023. "Heterogenous Effects of the Determinants of Pro-market Reforms: Panel Quantile Estimation for OECD Countries," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(2), pages 36-51, June.
    10. Gourley, Patrick & Khamis, Melanie, 2023. "It is not easy being a Green party: Green politics as a normal good," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    11. Tim Friehe & Christian Pfeifer, 2024. "Predicting satisfaction with democracy in Germany using local economic conditions, social capital, and individual characteristics," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 335-377, September.

Articles

  1. Andres, Maximilian & Bruttel, Lisa & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2023. "How communication makes the difference between a cartel and tacit collusion: A machine learning approach," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Friedrichsen, Jana & Momsen, Katharina & Piasenti, Stefano, 2022. "Ignorance, intention and stochastic outcomes," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 100, pages 1-1.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  3. Gyula Seres & Anna Helen Balleyer & Nicola Cerutti & Anastasia Danilov & Jana Friedrichsen & Yiming Liu & Müge Süer, 2021. "Face masks increase compliance with physical distancing recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 7(2), pages 139-158, December.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  4. Seres, Gyula & Balleyer, Anna & Cerutti, Nicola & Friedrichsen, Jana & Süer, Müge, 2021. "Face mask use and physical distancing before and after mandatory masking: No evidence on risk compensation in public waiting lines," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 765-781.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  5. Jana Friedrichsen & Tobias König & Tobias Lausen, 2021. "Social Status Concerns and the Political Economy of Publicly Provided Private Goods [Housing markets and structural policies in OECD countries]," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 131(633), pages 220-246.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  6. Andres, Maximilian & Bruttel, Lisa & Friedrichsen, Jana, 2021. "The leniency rule revisited: Experiments on cartel formation with open communication," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    See citations under working paper version above.
  7. Friedrichsen, Jana & König, Tobias & Schmacker, Renke, 2018. "Social image concerns and welfare take-up," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 174-192.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  8. Pio Baake & Jana Friedrichsen & Helene Naegele, 2018. "Soziale Nachhaltigkeitssiegel: Versprechen und Realität am Beispiel von Fairtrade-Kaffee," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 85(48), pages 1031-1037.

    Cited by:

    1. Hellwig, Robert & Atasoy, Ayse Tugba & Madlener, Reinhard, 2020. "The Impact of Social Preferences and Information on the Willingness to Pay for Fairtrade Products," FCN Working Papers 6/2020, E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN).

  9. Friedrichsen, Jana & Engelmann, Dirk, 2018. "Who cares about social image?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 61-77.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  10. Sofia Amaral-Garcia & Paola Bertoli & Jana Friedrichsen & Veronica Grembi, 2016. "Hospital-Level Policy Can Affect Physician Behavior and Reduce C-Section Rates," DIW Economic Bulletin, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 6(43), pages 495-501.

    Cited by:

    1. David Card & Alessandra Fenizia & David Silver, 2019. "The Health Impacts of Hospital Delivery Practices," NBER Working Papers 25986, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

  11. Friedrichsen, Jana & Zahn, Philipp, 2014. "Political support in hard times: Do people care about national welfare?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 23-37.
    See citations under working paper version above.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 42 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (28) 2014-02-02 2017-01-01 2017-02-05 2017-03-05 2017-11-05 2018-01-22 2018-02-05 2018-04-30 2018-08-13 2018-08-20 2018-08-27 2019-10-21 2019-12-16 2020-08-10 2020-08-17 2020-11-30 2021-01-25 2021-03-01 2021-05-03 2021-09-20 2022-06-27 2022-10-10 2022-10-17 2022-10-31 2022-12-05 2023-12-04 2024-01-22 2024-05-27. Author is listed
  2. NEP-COM: Industrial Competition (16) 2013-11-02 2014-02-02 2015-02-16 2016-03-29 2016-06-25 2018-02-19 2019-10-21 2019-12-16 2020-08-17 2021-01-25 2021-03-01 2021-11-08 2022-06-27 2022-10-10 2022-10-31 2022-12-05. Author is listed
  3. NEP-LAW: Law and Economics (8) 2019-12-16 2020-08-17 2021-01-25 2021-03-01 2021-11-08 2022-06-27 2022-10-31 2022-12-05. Author is listed
  4. NEP-GTH: Game Theory (6) 2018-02-05 2019-10-21 2020-11-30 2022-10-10 2022-10-10 2023-12-04. Author is listed
  5. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (5) 2013-11-02 2018-02-19 2019-10-21 2019-10-28 2022-10-10. Author is listed
  6. NEP-MKT: Marketing (5) 2014-02-02 2015-02-16 2016-03-29 2017-03-05 2018-02-19. Author is listed
  7. NEP-BIG: Big Data (4) 2020-08-17 2022-06-27 2022-10-31 2022-12-05
  8. NEP-CMP: Computational Economics (4) 2020-08-17 2022-06-27 2022-10-31 2022-12-05
  9. NEP-DCM: Discrete Choice Models (4) 2017-02-05 2018-02-05 2018-04-30 2021-11-08
  10. NEP-POL: Positive Political Economics (4) 2011-06-04 2012-07-23 2014-02-02 2019-10-28
  11. NEP-REG: Regulation (4) 2021-11-08 2022-06-27 2022-10-10 2022-12-05
  12. NEP-SOC: Social Norms and Social Capital (4) 2014-02-02 2017-02-05 2018-01-22 2023-12-04
  13. NEP-BEC: Business Economics (3) 2016-06-25 2021-01-25 2021-03-01
  14. NEP-CBE: Cognitive and Behavioural Economics (3) 2014-02-02 2021-05-03 2024-01-22
  15. NEP-HEA: Health Economics (3) 2020-08-10 2021-05-03 2022-10-17
  16. NEP-HPE: History and Philosophy of Economics (3) 2018-02-05 2018-04-30 2020-11-30
  17. NEP-IND: Industrial Organization (3) 2018-02-19 2021-01-25 2021-03-01
  18. NEP-UPT: Utility Models and Prospect Theory (3) 2023-12-04 2024-01-22 2024-05-27
  19. NEP-CTA: Contract Theory and Applications (2) 2016-03-29 2022-12-05
  20. NEP-EUR: Microeconomic European Issues (2) 2012-07-23 2021-09-20
  21. NEP-EVO: Evolutionary Economics (2) 2023-12-04 2024-05-27
  22. NEP-NET: Network Economics (2) 2013-11-02 2016-06-25
  23. NEP-ORE: Operations Research (2) 2020-11-30 2021-11-08
  24. NEP-CDM: Collective Decision-Making (1) 2019-10-28
  25. NEP-FDG: Financial Development and Growth (1) 2011-06-04
  26. NEP-GER: German Papers (1) 2020-03-16
  27. NEP-HAP: Economics of Happiness (1) 2011-06-04
  28. NEP-HRM: Human Capital and Human Resource Management (1) 2024-05-27
  29. NEP-ISF: Islamic Finance (1) 2021-09-20
  30. NEP-NEU: Neuroeconomics (1) 2024-05-27
  31. NEP-PBE: Public Economics (1) 2017-01-01
  32. NEP-URE: Urban and Real Estate Economics (1) 2017-11-05

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Jana Friedrichsen should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.