IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/c/pfe4.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Vincent Feltkamp

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Blog mentions

As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
  1. Yoram Halevy & Vincent Feltkamp, 2005. "A Bayesian Approach to Uncertainty Aversion," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 72(2), pages 449-466.

    Mentioned in:

    1. How Do You Feel About the Recession?
      by Martin Ryan in Geary Behaviour Centre on 2009-05-23 21:57:00

Working papers

  1. J Arin & V Feltkamp & M Montero, 2012. "Coalitional Games with Veto Players: Myopic and Rational Behavior," Discussion Papers 2012-11, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.

    Cited by:

    1. María Gómez-Rúa & Juan Vidal-Puga, 2014. "Bargaining and membership," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(2), pages 800-814, July.

  2. Arin, J. & Feltkamp, V., 1994. "The nucleolus and kernel of veto-rich transferable utility games," Discussion Paper 1994-40, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Sylvain Béal & Éric Rémila & Philippe Solal, 2013. "Accessibility and stability of the coalition structure core," Post-Print halshs-00817008, HAL.
    2. Brânzei, R. & Tijs, S.H. & Timmer, J.B., 2000. "Collecting Information to improve Decision-Making," Discussion Paper 2000-26, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    3. Driessen, Theo S.H. & Fragnelli, Vito & Katsev, Ilya V. & Khmelnitskaya, Anna B., 2011. "On 1-convexity and nucleolus of co-insurance games," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 217-225, March.
    4. Izquierdo, Josep M. & Rafels, Carles, 2001. "Average Monotonic Cooperative Games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 174-192, August.
    5. Brânzei, R. & Solymosi, T. & Tijs, S.H., 2003. "Strongly Essential Coalitions and the Nucleolus of Peer Group Games," Discussion Paper 2003-19, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    6. J Arin & V Feltkamp & M Montero, 2012. "Coalitional Games with Veto Players: Myopic and Rational Behavior," Discussion Papers 2012-11, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    7. René van den Brink & Ilya Katsev & Gerard van der Laan, 2008. "An Algorithm for Computing the Nucleolus of Disjunctive Additive Games with An Acyclic Permission Structure," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 08-104/1, Tinbergen Institute.
    8. J. Arin & V. Feltkamp & M. Montero, 2015. "A bargaining procedure leading to the serial rule in games with veto players," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 41-66, June.
    9. Brânzei, R. & Fragnelli, V. & Tijs, S.H., 2000. "Tree-connected Peer Group Situations and Peer Group Games," Discussion Paper 2000-117, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    10. F. Grafe & A. Mauleon & E. Iñarra, 1995. "A simple procedure to compute the nucleolus of Γ-component additive games," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 3(2), pages 235-245, December.
    11. Sylvain Béal & Florian Navarro, 2020. "Necessary versus equal players in axiomatic studies," Post-Print hal-03252179, HAL.
    12. Josep Maria Izquierdo Aznar & Carlos Rafels Pallarola, 2002. "Coalitionally Monotonic Set-solutions for Cooperative TU Games," Working Papers in Economics 75, Universitat de Barcelona. Espai de Recerca en Economia.
    13. Yair Tauman & Andriy Zapechelnyuk, 2010. "On (non-) monotonicity of cooperative solutions," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 39(1), pages 171-175, March.
    14. Brânzei, R. & Tijs, S.H. & Timmer, J.B., 2000. "Cones of Games arising from Market Entry Problems," Discussion Paper 2000-44, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    15. Yair Tauman & Andriy Zapechelnyuk, 2006. "Bargaining with a Bureaucrat," Discussion Paper Series dp425, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    16. Eric Bahel, 2019. "On the properties of the nucleolus of a veto game," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 7(2), pages 221-234, December.
    17. Arin, J. & Feltkamp, V., 2007. "Coalitional games with veto players: Consistency, monotonicity and Nash outcomes," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(7-8), pages 855-870, September.
    18. J. Arin & V. Feltkamp, 2005. "Monotonicity properties of the nucleolus on the domain of veto balanced games," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 13(2), pages 331-341, December.
    19. René Brink & Ilya Katsev & Gerard Laan, 2011. "A polynomial time algorithm for computing the nucleolus for a class of disjunctive games with a permission structure," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 40(3), pages 591-616, August.
    20. Saadia El Obadi & Silvia Miquel, 2019. "Assignment Games with a Central Player," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 1129-1148, December.
    21. René van den Brink & Ilya Katsev & Gerard van der Laan, 2008. "Computation of the Nucleolus for a Class of Disjunctive Games with a Permission Structure," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 08-060/1, Tinbergen Institute.

  3. Feltkamp, V. & Tijs, S.H. & Muto, S., 1994. "Minimum cost spanning extension problems : The proportional rule and the decentralized rule," Discussion Paper 1994-96, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Peter Borm & Herbert Hamers & Ruud Hendrickx, 2001. "Operations research games: A survey," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 9(2), pages 139-199, December.
    2. Gerichhausen, Marloes & Hamers, Herbert, 2009. "Partitioning sequencing situations and games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 207-216, July.
    3. Norde, H.W., 2013. "The Degree and Cost Adjusted Folk Solution for Minimum Cost Spanning Tree Games," Discussion Paper 2013-039, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    4. Gustavo Bergantiños & Juan Vidal-Puga, 2004. "Defining rules in cost spanning tree problems through the canonical form," Game Theory and Information 0402004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Julio R. Fernández & Inés Gallego & Andrés Jiménez-Losada & Manuel Ordóñez, 2022. "Cost-allocation problems for fuzzy agents in a fixed-tree network," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 531-551, December.
    6. Feltkamp, V. & Tijs, S.H. & Muto, S., 1994. "On the irreducible core and the equal remaining obligations rule of minimum cost spanning extension problems," Other publications TiSEM 56ea8c64-a05f-4b3f-ab61-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Ciftci, B.B. & Tijs, S.H., 2007. "A Vertex Oriented Approach to Minimum Cost Spanning Tree Problems," Other publications TiSEM 1b5a01d9-e7e4-43da-acf0-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Norde, Henk, 2019. "The degree and cost adjusted folk solution for minimum cost spanning tree games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 734-742.
    9. Gerichhausen, M. & Hamers, H.J.M., 2007. "Partitioning Sequencing Situations and Games," Discussion Paper 2007-40, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    10. Gerichhausen, M. & Hamers, H.J.M., 2007. "Partitioning Sequencing Situations and Games," Other publications TiSEM 2bddbf5c-c56d-4b10-ba47-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Norde, H.W., 2013. "The Degree and Cost Adjusted Folk Solution for Minimum Cost Spanning Tree Games," Other publications TiSEM 7ac3a323-f736-46a6-b568-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    12. Tijs, S.H. & Brânzei, R. & Moretti, S. & Norde, H.W., 2004. "Obligation Rules for Minimum Cost Spanning Tree Situations and their Monotonicity Properties," Discussion Paper 2004-53, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    13. Feltkamp, V. & Tijs, S.H. & Muto, S., 1994. "On the irreducible core and the equal remaining obligations rule of minimum cost spanning extension problems," Discussion Paper 1994-106, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    14. Stefano Moretti & Stef Tijs & Rodica Branzei & Henk Norde, 2009. "Cost allocation protocols for supply contract design in network situations," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 69(1), pages 181-202, March.
    15. Ciftci, B.B. & Tijs, S.H., 2007. "A Vertex Oriented Approach to Minimum Cost Spanning Tree Problems," Discussion Paper 2007-89, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.

  4. Feltkamp, V. & Tijs, S.H. & Muto, S., 1994. "Bird's tree allocations revisited," Discussion Paper 1994-35, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Feltkamp, V. & Tijs, S.H. & Muto, S., 1994. "Minimum cost spanning extension problems : The proportional rule and the decentralized rule," Discussion Paper 1994-96, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    2. Feltkamp, V. & Tijs, S.H. & Muto, S., 1994. "Minimum cost spanning extension problems : The proportional rule and the decentralized rule," Other publications TiSEM 2c6cd46b-7e72-4262-a479-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Lind, M. & van Megen, F.J.C., 1996. "Order Based Cost Allocation Rules," Discussion Paper 1996-56, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.

  5. Feltkamp, V. & Tijs, S.H. & Muto, S., 1994. "On the irreducible core and the equal remaining obligations rule of minimum cost spanning extension problems," Discussion Paper 1994-106, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Gustavo Bergantiños & María Gómez-Rúa, 2010. "Minimum cost spanning tree problems with groups," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 43(2), pages 227-262, May.
    2. Christian Trudeau, 2013. "Characterizations of the cycle-complete and folk solutions for minimum cost spanning tree problems," Working Papers 1303, University of Windsor, Department of Economics.
    3. Giménez Gómez, José M. (José Manuel) & Peris, Josep E. & Subiza, Begoña, 2019. "An egalitarian approach for sharing the cost of a spanning tree," Working Papers 2072/376029, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    4. Bergantiños, Gustavo & Vidal-Puga, Juan, 2009. "Additivity in minimum cost spanning tree problems," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1-2), pages 38-42, January.
    5. Bergantiños, Gustavo & Vidal-Puga, Juan, 2010. "Realizing fair outcomes in minimum cost spanning tree problems through non-cooperative mechanisms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 811-820, March.
    6. Christian Trudeau, 2013. "Minimum cost spanning tree problems with indifferent agents," Working Papers 1306, University of Windsor, Department of Economics.
    7. Hernández, Penélope & Peris, Josep E. & Vidal-Puga, Juan, 2023. "A non-cooperative approach to the folk rule in minimum cost spanning tree problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 922-928.
    8. Bogomolnaia, Anna & Moulin, Hervé, 2010. "Sharing a minimal cost spanning tree: Beyond the Folk solution," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 238-248, July.
    9. Bhaskar Dutta & Debasis Mishra, 2008. "Minimum cost arborescences," Discussion Papers 08-12, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi.
    10. Gustavo Bergantiños & Juan Vidal-Puga, 2015. "Characterization of monotonic rules in minimum cost spanning tree problems," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 44(4), pages 835-868, November.
    11. Chun, Youngsub & Lee, Joosung, 2012. "Sequential contributions rules for minimum cost spanning tree problems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 136-143.
    12. Gustavo Bergantiños & Juan Vidal-Puga, 2004. "Defining rules in cost spanning tree problems through the canonical form," Game Theory and Information 0402004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Brânzei, R. & Moretti, S. & Norde, H.W. & Tijs, S.H., 2003. "The P-Value for Cost Sharing in Minimum Cost Spanning Tree Situations," Other publications TiSEM de0e437c-1588-469d-a2ff-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Subiza, Begoña & Giménez Gómez, José M. (José Manuel) & Peris, Josep E., 2015. "Folk solution for simple minimum cost spanning tree problems," Working Papers 2072/260958, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    15. Ata Atay & Christian Trudeau, 2024. "Optimistic and pessimistic approaches for cooperative games," Papers 2403.01442, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    16. Kusunoki, Yoshifumi & Tanino, Tetsuzo, 2017. "Investigation on irreducible cost vectors in minimum cost arborescence problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 214-221.
    17. Brânzei, R. & Moretti, S. & Norde, H.W. & Tijs, S.H., 2003. "The P-Value for Cost Sharing in Minimum Cost Spanning Tree Situations," Discussion Paper 2003-129, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    18. Tijs, S.H. & Moretti, S. & Brânzei, R. & Norde, H.W., 2005. "The Bird Core for Minimum Cost Spanning Tree problems Revisited : Monotonicity and Additivity Aspects," Other publications TiSEM 530f2c60-024d-4f3e-b724-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    19. Davila-Pena, Laura & Borm, Peter & Garcia-Jurado, Ignacio & Schouten, Jop, 2023. "An Allocation Rule for Graph Machine Scheduling Problems," Discussion Paper 2023-009, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    20. Gómez-Rúa, María & Vidal-Puga, Juan, 2015. "A monotonic and merge-proof rule in minimum cost spanning tree situations," MPRA Paper 62923, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Hervé Moulin, 2013. "Cost Sharing In Networks: Some Open Questions," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-10.
    22. Bergantinos, Gustavo & Lorenzo-Freire, Silvia, 2008. ""Optimistic" weighted Shapley rules in minimum cost spanning tree problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 289-298, February.
    23. Leticia Lorenzo & Silvia Lorenzo-Freire, 2009. "A characterization of Kruskal sharing rules for minimum cost spanning tree problems," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 38(1), pages 107-126, March.
    24. Stefano Moretti & Rodica Branzei & Henk Norde & Stef Tijs, 2004. "The P-value for cost sharing in minimum," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 47-61, April.
    25. Christian Trudeau, 2023. "Minimum cost spanning tree problems as value sharing problems," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 52(1), pages 253-272, March.
    26. Gustavo Bergantiños & Juan Vidal-Puga, 2005. "A fair rule in minimum cost spanning tree problems," Game Theory and Information 0504001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    27. Jens Hougaard & Hervé Moulin & Lars Østerdal, 2010. "Decentralized pricing in minimum cost spanning trees," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 44(2), pages 293-306, August.
    28. Ciftci, B.B. & Tijs, S.H., 2007. "A Vertex Oriented Approach to Minimum Cost Spanning Tree Problems," Other publications TiSEM 1b5a01d9-e7e4-43da-acf0-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    29. Gustavo Bergantiños & Juan Vidal-Puga, 2004. "Additivity in cost spanning tree problems," Game Theory and Information 0405001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    30. Begoña Subiza & Josep E. Peris, 2021. "Sharing the cost of maximum quality optimal spanning trees," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(2), pages 470-493, July.
    31. Moulin, Hervé, 2014. "Pricing traffic in a spanning network," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 475-490.
    32. Gustavo Bergantinos & Juan Vidal-Puga, 2008. "On Some Properties of Cost Allocation Rules in Minimum Cost Spanning Tree Problems," Czech Economic Review, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, vol. 2(3), pages 251-267, December.
    33. Gustavo Bergantiños & María Gómez-Rúa, 2015. "An axiomatic approach in minimum cost spanning tree problems with groups," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 225(1), pages 45-63, February.
    34. Quant, Marieke & Borm, Peter & Reijnierse, Hans, 2006. "Congestion network problems and related games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(3), pages 919-930, August.
    35. Trudeau, Christian & Vidal-Puga, Juan, 2017. "On the set of extreme core allocations for minimal cost spanning tree problems," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 425-452.
    36. Tijs, S.H. & Brânzei, R. & Moretti, S. & Norde, H.W., 2004. "Obligation Rules for Minimum Cost Spanning Tree Situations and their Monotonicity Properties," Other publications TiSEM 78d24994-1074-4329-b911-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    37. Gustavo Bergantiños & Juan Vidal-Puga, 2004. "Realizing efficient outcomes in cost spanning problems," Game Theory and Information 0403001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    38. Gomez-Rua, Maria & Vidal-Puga, Juan, 2006. "No advantageous merging in minimum cost spanning tree problems," MPRA Paper 601, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    39. José-Manuel Giménez-Gómez & Josep E. Peris & Begoña Subiza, 2022. "A claims problem approach to the cost allocation of a minimum cost spanning tree," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 2785-2801, July.
    40. Moretti, S. & Alparslan-Gok, S.Z. & Brânzei, R. & Tijs, S.H., 2008. "Connection Situations under Uncertainty," Other publications TiSEM e9771ffd-ce59-4b8d-a2c8-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    41. Eric Bahel & Christian Trudeau, 2017. "Minimum incoming cost rules for arborescences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 49(2), pages 287-314, August.
    42. Tijs, S.H. & Moretti, S. & Brânzei, R. & Norde, H.W., 2005. "The Bird Core for Minimum Cost Spanning Tree problems Revisited : Monotonicity and Additivity Aspects," Discussion Paper 2005-3, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    43. Christian Trudeau, 2014. "Linking the Kar and folk solutions through a problem separation property," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 43(4), pages 845-870, November.
    44. Bergantiños, Gustavo & Vidal-Puga, Juan, 2020. "Cooperative games for minimum cost spanning tree problems," MPRA Paper 104911, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    45. Tijs, S.H. & Brânzei, R. & Moretti, S. & Norde, H.W., 2004. "Obligation Rules for Minimum Cost Spanning Tree Situations and their Monotonicity Properties," Discussion Paper 2004-53, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    46. Lind, M. & van Megen, F.J.C., 1996. "Order Based Cost Allocation Rules," Discussion Paper 1996-56, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    47. Gustavo Bergantiños & Juan Vidal-Puga, 2005. "On the Shapley value of a minimum cost spanning tree problem," Game Theory and Information 0509001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    48. Moretti, S. & Tijs, S.H. & Brânzei, R. & Norde, H.W., 2005. "Cost Monotonic "Cost and Charge" Rules for Connection Situations," Other publications TiSEM 52b2694e-5a67-4fec-a46b-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    49. Moretti, S. & Alparslan-Gok, S.Z. & Brânzei, R. & Tijs, S.H., 2008. "Connection Situations under Uncertainty," Discussion Paper 2008-64, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    50. Lind, M. & van Megen, F.J.C., 1996. "Order Based Cost Allocation Rules," Other publications TiSEM a8da6fe8-9b5e-49b2-8b56-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    51. Subiza, Begoña & Giménez-Gómez, José Manuel & Peris, Josep E., 2024. "Non-Emptiness of the Core of MCST Games with Revenues: a Necessary and Some Sufficient Conditions," QM&ET Working Papers 24-4, University of Alicante, D. Quantitative Methods and Economic Theory.
    52. Bergantiños, Gustavo & Lorenzo, Leticia & Lorenzo-Freire, Silvia, 2011. "A generalization of obligation rules for minimum cost spanning tree problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(1), pages 122-129, May.
    53. Liu, Siwen & Borm, Peter & Norde, Henk, 2023. "Induced Rules for Minimum Cost Spanning Tree Problems : Towards Merge-Proofness and Coalitional Stability," Discussion Paper 2023-021, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    54. Hougaard, Jens Leth & Tvede, Mich, 2012. "Truth-telling and Nash equilibria in minimum cost spanning tree models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 566-570.
    55. Stefano Moretti & Stef Tijs & Rodica Branzei & Henk Norde, 2009. "Cost allocation protocols for supply contract design in network situations," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 69(1), pages 181-202, March.
    56. Hernández, Penélope & Peris, Josep E. & Silva-Reus, José A., 2012. "Strategic Sharing of a Costly Network," QM&ET Working Papers 12-10, University of Alicante, D. Quantitative Methods and Economic Theory.
    57. Moretti, S. & Tijs, S.H. & Brânzei, R. & Norde, H.W., 2005. "Cost Monotonic "Cost and Charge" Rules for Connection Situations," Discussion Paper 2005-104, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    58. Ciftci, B.B. & Tijs, S.H., 2007. "A Vertex Oriented Approach to Minimum Cost Spanning Tree Problems," Discussion Paper 2007-89, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    59. Gustavo Bergantiños & Leticia Lorenzo & Silvia Lorenzo-Freire, 2010. "The family of cost monotonic and cost additive rules in minimum cost spanning tree problems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 34(4), pages 695-710, April.
    60. Christian Trudeau, 2013. "Characterizations Of The Kar And Folk Solutions For Minimum Cost Spanning Tree Problems," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-16.
    61. Gustavo Bergantiños & Juan Vidal-Puga, 2021. "A review of cooperative rules and their associated algorithms for minimum-cost spanning tree problems," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 12(1), pages 73-100, March.
    62. Eric Bahel & Christian Trudeau, 2016. "From spanning trees to arborescences: new and extended cost sharing solutions," Working Papers 1601, University of Windsor, Department of Economics.
    63. María Gómez-Rúa & Juan Vidal-Puga, 2011. "Merge-proofness in minimum cost spanning tree problems," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 40(2), pages 309-329, May.
    64. Trudeau, Christian, 2012. "A new stable and more responsive cost sharing solution for minimum cost spanning tree problems," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 402-412.
    65. Bergantiños, G. & Gómez-Rúa, M. & Llorca, N. & Pulido, M. & Sánchez-Soriano, J., 2014. "A new rule for source connection problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(3), pages 780-788.
    66. Bergantiños, Gustavo & Kar, Anirban, 2010. "On obligation rules for minimum cost spanning tree problems," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 224-237, July.

  6. Feltkamp, V., 1993. "Alternative Axiomatic Characterizations of the Shapley and Banzhaf Values," Papers 9353, Tilburg - Center for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Sylvain Béal & Marc Deschamps & Mostapha Diss & Rodrigue Tido Takeng, 2024. "Cooperative games with diversity constraints," Working Papers 2024-06, CRESE.
    2. Alonso-Meijide, J.M. & Casas-Mendez, B. & Holler, M.J. & Lorenzo-Freire, S., 2008. "Computing power indices: Multilinear extensions and new characterizations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(2), pages 540-554, July.
    3. Kamijo, Yoshio & Kongo, Takumi, 2012. "Whose deletion does not affect your payoff? The difference between the Shapley value, the egalitarian value, the solidarity value, and the Banzhaf value," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(3), pages 638-646.
    4. Carreras, Francesc & Giménez, José Miguel, 2010. "Semivalues: power,potential and multilinear extensions," MPRA Paper 27620, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. André Casajus, 2014. "Collusion, quarrel, and the Banzhaf value," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 43(1), pages 1-11, February.
    6. J.M. Alonso‐Meijide & M.G. Fiestras‐Janeiro, 2006. "The Banzhaf value and communication situations," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(3), pages 198-203, April.
    7. Bernardi Mauro & Roy Cerqueti & Arsen Palestini, 2016. "Allocation of risk capital in a cost cooperative game induced by a modified Expected Shortfall," Papers 1608.02365, arXiv.org.
    8. Carreras, Francesc & Freixas, Josep & Puente, Maria Albina, 2003. "Semivalues as power indices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(3), pages 676-687, September.
    9. Tejada, O. & Álvarez-Mozos, M., 2018. "Graphs and (levels of) cooperation in games: Two ways how to allocate the surplus," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 114-122.
    10. Sylvain Béal & Marc Deschamps & Mostapha Diss & Rodrigue Tido Takeng, 2025. "Cooperative games with diversity constraints," Post-Print hal-04834011, HAL.
    11. Meinhardt, Holger Ingmar, 2021. "Disentangle the Florentine Families Network by the Pre-Kernel," MPRA Paper 106482, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Federico Valenciano & Annick Laruelle, 2000. "- Shapley-Shubik And Banzhaf Indices Revisited," Working Papers. Serie AD 2000-02, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    13. Amer, Rafael & Carreras, Francese & Gimenez, Jose Miguel, 2002. "The modified Banzhaf value for games with coalition structure: an axiomatic characterization," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 45-54, January.
    14. Francesc Carreras & María Albina Puente, 2018. "A note on multinomial probabilistic values," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 26(1), pages 164-186, April.
    15. Carreras, Francesc, 2005. "A decisiveness index for simple games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(2), pages 370-387, June.
    16. André Casajus & Rodrigue Tido Takeng, 2024. "Second-order productivity, second-order payoffs, and the Banzhaf value," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 53(3), pages 989-1004, September.
    17. Josep Freixas, 2020. "The Banzhaf Value for Cooperative and Simple Multichoice Games," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 61-74, February.
    18. Encarnaciön Algaba & Sylvain Béal & Eric Rémila & Phillippe Solal, 2018. "Harsanyi power solutions for cooperative games on voting structures," Working Papers 2018-05, CRESE.
    19. Dragan, Irinel, 1996. "New mathematical properties of the Banzhaf value," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 451-463, December.
    20. Emilio Calvo, 2021. "Redistribution of tax resources: a cooperative game theory approach," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 12(4), pages 633-686, December.
    21. Sanchez-Soriano, Joaquin, 2003. "The pairwise egalitarian solution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(1), pages 220-231, October.
    22. Oriol Tejada & Mikel Álvarez-Mozos, 2017. "Games with Graph Restricted Communication and Levels Structure of Cooperation," UB School of Economics Working Papers 2017/363, University of Barcelona School of Economics.
    23. Francesc Carreras & Antonio Magaña, 2008. "The Shapley–Shubik index for simple games with multiple alternatives," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 81-97, February.
    24. Manfred Besner, 2020. "Parallel axiomatizations of weighted and multiweighted Shapley values, random order values, and the Harsanyi set," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 55(1), pages 193-212, June.
    25. Lorenzo-Freire, S. & Alonso-Meijide, J.M. & Casas-Mendez, B. & Fiestras-Janeiro, M.G., 2007. "Characterizations of the Deegan-Packel and Johnston power indices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 431-444, February.
    26. Conrado M. Manuel & Daniel Martín, 2021. "A Monotonic Weighted Banzhaf Value for Voting Games," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-23, June.
    27. Josep Freixas & Montserrat Pons, 2021. "An Appropriate Way to Extend the Banzhaf Index for Multiple Levels of Approval," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 447-462, April.
    28. Jilei Shi & Erfang Shan, 2021. "The Banzhaf value for generalized probabilistic communication situations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 301(1), pages 225-244, June.
    29. Carreras, Francesc & Giménez, José Miguel, 2011. "Power and potential maps induced by any semivalue: Some algebraic properties and computation by multilinear extensions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(1), pages 148-159, May.
    30. de Clippel, Geoffroy, 2018. "Membership separability: A new axiomatization of the Shapley value," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 125-129.
    31. André Casajus, 2011. "Marginality, differential marginality, and the Banzhaf value," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 365-372, September.
    32. Margarita Domènech & José Miguel Giménez & María Albina Puente, 2022. "Weak null, necessary defender and necessary detractor players: characterizations of the Banzhaf and the Shapley bisemivalues," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(2), pages 889-910, November.
    33. Amer, Rafael & Gimenez, Jose Miguel, 2006. "An axiomatic characterization for regular semivalues," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 217-226, March.
    34. José M. Alonso-Meijide & Julián Costa & Ignacio García-Jurado, 2019. "Null, Nullifying, and Necessary Agents: Parallel Characterizations of the Banzhaf and Shapley Values," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 180(3), pages 1027-1035, March.
    35. Borkotokey, Surajit & Kumar, Rajnish & Sarangi, Sudipta, 2015. "A solution concept for network games: The role of multilateral interactions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 912-920.
    36. Giulia Bernardi, 2018. "A New Axiomatization of the Banzhaf Index for Games with Abstention," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 165-177, February.
    37. Josep Freixas & Roberto Lucchetti, 2016. "Power in voting rules with abstention: an axiomatization of a two components power index," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 244(2), pages 455-474, September.
    38. Federico Valenciano & Annick Laruelle, 2003. "Potential, Value And Probability," Working Papers. Serie AD 2003-01, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    39. Rafael Amer & José Miguel Giménez, 2007. "Technical note: Characterization of binomial semivalues through delegation games," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(6), pages 702-708, September.
    40. Francesc Carreras & María Albina Puente, 2012. "Symmetric Coalitional Binomial Semivalues," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 637-662, September.

  7. Feltkamp, V. & Koster, A. & Van Den Nouweland, A. & Borm, P. & Tijs, S., 1993. "Linear Production with Transport of Products, Resources and Technology," Papers 9332, Tilburg - Center for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Peter Borm & Herbert Hamers & Ruud Hendrickx, 2001. "Operations research games: A survey," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 9(2), pages 139-199, December.
    2. Francisco Fernández & MarÍa Fiestras-Janeiro & Ignacio GarcÍa-Jurado & Justo Puerto, 2005. "Competition and Cooperation in Non-Centralized Linear Production Games," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 91-100, July.
    3. Ichiro Nishizaki & Tomohiro Hayashida & Shinya Sekizaki & Kojiro Furumi, 2023. "A two-stage linear production planning model with partial cooperation under stochastic demands," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(1), pages 293-324, January.
    4. van Gellekom, J. R. G. & Potters, J. A. M. & Reijnierse, J. H. & Engel, M. C. & Tijs, S. H., 2000. "Characterization of the Owen Set of Linear Production Processes," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 139-156, July.
    5. van Beek, Andries & Malmberg, Benjamin & Borm, Peter & Quant, Marieke & Schouten, Jop, 2021. "Cooperation and Competition in Linear Production and Sequencing Processes," Other publications TiSEM fd7a301b-7ef3-4142-835d-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Borrero, D.V. & Hinojosa, M.A. & Mármol, A.M., 2016. "DEA production games and Owen allocations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(3), pages 921-930.
    7. Lozano, S., 2013. "DEA production games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(2), pages 405-413.

  8. Feltkamp, V. & van den Nouweland, C.G.A.M., 1992. "Controlled communication networks," Research Memorandum FEW 538, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    Cited by:

    1. Susana López & Guillermo Owen & Martha Saboya, 2022. "The impact of intermediaries on a negotiation: an approach from game theory," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(3), pages 837-859, September.

  9. Yoram Halevy & Vincent Feltkamp, "undated". "A Bayesian Approach to Uncentainty Aversion," Penn CARESS Working Papers f17f3e2c6ad93e4b53fd58fc9, Penn Economics Department.

    Cited by:

    1. Halevy, Yoram & Ozdenoren, Emre, 2008. "Uncertainty and Compound Lotteries: Calibration," Microeconomics.ca working papers yoram_halevy-2008-7, Vancouver School of Economics, revised 17 Jun 2008.
    2. Filiz-Ozbay, Emel & Gulen, Huseyin & Masatlioglu, Yusufcan & Ozbay, Erkut Y., 2022. "Comparing ambiguous urns with different sizes," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Gregory DeAngelo & Gary Charness, 2012. "Deterrence, expected cost, uncertainty and voting: Experimental evidence," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 73-100, February.
    4. Jim Engle-Warnick & Sonia Laszlo Author Email: sonia.laszlo@mcgill.ca, 2006. "Learning By Doing In An Ambiguous Environment," Departmental Working Papers 2006-29, McGill University, Department of Economics.
    5. Norio Takeoka & Takashi Ui, 2021. "Imprecise Information and Second-Order Beliefs," Working Papers on Central Bank Communication 037, University of Tokyo, Graduate School of Economics.
    6. Ahn, David & Choi, Syngjoo & Gale, Douglas & Kariv, Shachar, 2013. "Estimating Ambiguity Aversion in a Portfolio Choice Experiment," Working Papers 13-22, University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School, Weiss Center.
    7. Nabil I. Al-Najjar, 2015. "A Bayesian Framework for the Precautionary Principle," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 44(S2), pages 337-365.
    8. Al-Najjar, Nabil I. & Weinstein, Jonathan, 2013. "A Bayesian Model of Knightian Uncertainty," Economics Series 300, Institute for Advanced Studies.
    9. Yoram Halevy & Guy Mayraz, 2024. "Identifying Rule-Based Rationality," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 106(5), pages 1369-1380, September.
    10. Evan Calford, 2017. "Uncertainty Aversion in Game Theory: Experimental Evidence," Purdue University Economics Working Papers 1291, Purdue University, Department of Economics.
    11. Ambuehl, Sandro & Li, Shengwu, 2018. "Belief updating and the demand for information," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 21-39.
    12. Sadowski, Philipp & Sarver, Todd, 2024. "Adaptive preferences: An evolutionary model of non-expected utility and ambiguity aversion," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    13. Park, Hyeon, 2019. "Inter-temporal choices with temporal reference dependence," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 107-122.
    14. Igor Kopylov, 2016. "Subjective probability, confidence, and Bayesian updating," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 62(4), pages 635-658, October.
    15. Mark Dean & Pietro Ortoleva, 2012. "Allais, Ellsberg, and Preferences for Hedging," Working Papers 2012-2, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    16. Rick Harbaugh, 2005. "Prospect Theory or Skill Signaling?," Working Papers 2005-06, Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy.
    17. Uri Gneezy & Alex Imas & John List, 2015. "Estimating Individual Ambiguity Aversion: A Simple Approach," Artefactual Field Experiments 00588, The Field Experiments Website.
    18. Gee, Laura Katherine, 2016. "The More You Know: Information Effects on Job Application Rates in a Large Field Experiment," IZA Discussion Papers 10372, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Rasmusen, Eric, 2010. "Career concerns and ambiguity aversion," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 108(2), pages 175-177, August.
    20. Zvi Safra & Uzi Segal, 2005. "Are Universal Preferences Possible? Calibration Results for Non-Expected Utility Theories," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 633, Boston College Department of Economics.
    21. David Weisbach, 2015. "Introduction: Legal Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 44(S2), pages 319-335.
    22. Alex Berger & Agnieszka Tymula, 2022. "Controlling ambiguity: The illusion of control in choice under risk and ambiguity," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 65(3), pages 261-284, December.
    23. Christopher Dobronyi & Christian Gouri'eroux, 2020. "Consumer Theory with Non-Parametric Taste Uncertainty and Individual Heterogeneity," Papers 2010.13937, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2021.
    24. Keyu Wu & Ernst Fehr & Sean Hofland & Martin Schonger, 2024. "On the psychological foundations of ambiguity and compound risk aversion," ECON - Working Papers 444, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    25. Safra, Zvi & Segal, Uzi, 2022. "A lot of ambiguity," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    26. Kuzmics, Christoph, 2014. "Inferring preferences from choices under uncertainty," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 462, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    27. Prokosheva, Sasha, 2016. "Comparing decisions under compound risk and ambiguity: The importance of cognitive skills," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 94-105.
    28. Angelini, Pierpaolo & Maturo, Fabrizio, 2022. "The price of risk based on multilinear measures," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 39-57.
    29. Christian A. Vossler & Dong Yan, 2019. "An Experimental Investigation of Updating under Ambiguity," Working Papers 2019-02, University of Tennessee, Department of Economics.
    30. Alfred Müller & Marco Scarsini, 2002. "Even Risk-Averters may Love Risk," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 81-99, February.
    31. Pierre Fleckinger, 2007. "On Multiagent Moral Hazard under Technological Uncertainty," Working Papers hal-00240716, HAL.
    32. Takashi Kamihigashi & John Stachurski, 2014. "Partial Stochastic Dominance," Discussion Paper Series DP2014-23, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    33. Yang, Chun-Lei & Yao, Lan, 2011. "Ellsberg Paradox and Second-order Preference Theories on Ambiguity: Some New Experimental Evidence," MPRA Paper 28531, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    34. Zvi Safra & Uzi Segal, 2018. "A Lot of Ambiguity," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 954, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 31 Mar 2020.
    35. Crockett, Erin & Crockett, Sean, 2019. "Endowments and risky choice," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 344-354.
    36. Sasha Prokosheva, 2014. "Comparing Decisions under Compound Risk and Ambiguity: The Importance of Cognitive Skills," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp525, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    37. Gomez-Herrera, Estrella & Mueller-Langer, Frank, 2024. "Does information disclosure affect the gender gap in bidding behavior? Empirical evidence from a natural experiment on a large online labor platform," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    38. Byounghyun Jeon & Sung Won Seo & Jun Sik Kim, 2020. "Uncertainty and the volatility forecasting power of option‐implied volatility," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(7), pages 1109-1126, July.

Articles

  1. Arin, J. & Feltkamp, V., 2012. "Coalitional games: Monotonicity and core," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(1), pages 208-213.

    Cited by:

    1. J. Arin, 2013. "Monotonic core solutions: beyond Young’s theorem," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 42(2), pages 325-337, May.
    2. Kamijo, Yoshio & Kongo, Takumi, 2012. "Whose deletion does not affect your payoff? The difference between the Shapley value, the egalitarian value, the solidarity value, and the Banzhaf value," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(3), pages 638-646.
    3. J Arin & V Feltkamp & M Montero, 2012. "Coalitional Games with Veto Players: Myopic and Rational Behavior," Discussion Papers 2012-11, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    4. J. Arin & V. Feltkamp & M. Montero, 2015. "A bargaining procedure leading to the serial rule in games with veto players," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 41-66, June.
    5. J. Arin & I. Katsev, 2014. "The SD-prenucleolus for TU games," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 80(3), pages 307-327, December.
    6. Pedro Calleja & Francesc Llerena, 2017. "Rationality, aggregate monotonicity and consistency in cooperative games: some (im)possibility results," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(1), pages 197-220, January.

  2. Arin, J. & Feltkamp, V., 2007. "Coalitional games with veto players: Consistency, monotonicity and Nash outcomes," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(7-8), pages 855-870, September.

    Cited by:

    1. J Arin & V Feltkamp & M Montero, 2012. "Coalitional Games with Veto Players: Myopic and Rational Behavior," Discussion Papers 2012-11, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    2. J. Arin & V. Feltkamp & M. Montero, 2015. "A bargaining procedure leading to the serial rule in games with veto players," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 41-66, June.

  3. Yoram Halevy & Vincent Feltkamp, 2005. "A Bayesian Approach to Uncertainty Aversion," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 72(2), pages 449-466.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  4. J. Arin & V. Feltkamp, 2005. "Monotonicity properties of the nucleolus on the domain of veto balanced games," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 13(2), pages 331-341, December.

    Cited by:

    1. J. Arin, 2013. "Monotonic core solutions: beyond Young’s theorem," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 42(2), pages 325-337, May.
    2. Arin, J. & Feltkamp, V., 2012. "Coalitional games: Monotonicity and core," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(1), pages 208-213.
    3. Pedro Calleja & Carles Rafels & Stef Tijs, 2006. "The Aggregate-Monotonic Core," Working Papers 280, Barcelona School of Economics.
    4. Arin, J. & Feltkamp, V., 2007. "Coalitional games with veto players: Consistency, monotonicity and Nash outcomes," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(7-8), pages 855-870, September.
    5. Josep Maria Izquierdo & Carlos Rafels, 2017. "The incentive core in co-investment problems," UB School of Economics Working Papers 2017/369, University of Barcelona School of Economics.

  5. V. Feltkamp & Javier Arin, 2002. "Lorenz undominated allocations for TU-games: The weighted Coalitional Lorenz Solutions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 19(4), pages 869-884.

    Cited by:

    1. Josep M. Izquierdo & Jesús Montes & Carlos Rafels, 2024. "Population Lorenz-monotonic allocation schemes for TU-games," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 63(2), pages 417-436, September.
    2. Vincent Iehlé, 2015. "The lattice structure of the S-Lorenz core," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 78(1), pages 141-151, January.

  6. Vincent Feltkamp & Javier Arin, 1997. "The Nucleolus and Kernel of Veto-Rich Transferable Utility Games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 26(1), pages 61-73.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  7. Feltkamp, Vincent, 1995. "Alternative Axiomatic Characterizations of the Shapley and Banzhaf Values," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 24(2), pages 179-186.
    See citations under working paper version above.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.