IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v193y2020ics0951832018315084.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic methodology for Prognostic and Health Management system architecture definition

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Rui
  • Verhagen, Wim J.C.
  • Curran, Richard

Abstract

Prognostic and Health Management (PHM) systems support aircraft maintenance through the provision of diagnostic and prognostic capabilities, leveraging the increased availability of sensor data on modern aircraft. Diagnostics provide the functionalities of failure detection and isolation, whereas prognostics can predict the remaining useful life (RUL) of the system. In literature, PHM technologies have been studied from different perspectives, covering various aims such as improving aircraft system reliability, availability, safety and reducing the maintenance cost. From a design perspective, several conceptual formulations of design methodologies are available, enabling a set of PHM system architectures based on different frameworks and the derivation of system requirements. However, a systematic methodology towards a consistent definition of PHM architectures has not been well established. The characteristics of architectures have not been dealt with in depth. To address these gaps, this paper presents a systematic methodology for PHM architecture definition to ensure a more complete and consistent design during the development phase of the product lifecycle. Moreover, a generic PHM architecture in accordance with this systematic methodology is proposed in this article. A case study is conducted to verify and validate the architecture, ensuring it meets the requirements for a correct and complete representation of PHM characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Rui & Verhagen, Wim J.C. & Curran, Richard, 2020. "A systematic methodology for Prognostic and Health Management system architecture definition," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:193:y:2020:i:c:s0951832018315084
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106598
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832018315084
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106598?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2017. "The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 21-30.
    2. Khorasgani, Hamed & Biswas, Gautam & Sankararaman, Shankar, 2016. "Methodologies for system-level remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 8-18.
    3. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    4. Zhang, Zhengxin & Si, Xiaosheng & Hu, Changhua & Lei, Yaguo, 2018. "Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: A review on Wiener-process-based methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 775-796.
    5. Simeu-Abazi, Zineb & Di Mascolo, Maria & Knotek, Michal, 2010. "Fault diagnosis for discrete event systems: Modelling and verification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(4), pages 369-378.
    6. Liu, Bin & Liang, Zhenglin & Parlikad, Ajith Kumar & Xie, Min & Kuo, Way, 2017. "Condition-based maintenance for systems with aging and cumulative damage based on proportional hazards model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 200-209.
    7. Bozzano, Marco & Cimatti, Alessandro & Katoen, Joost-Pieter & Katsaros, Panagiotis & Mokos, Konstantinos & Nguyen, Viet Yen & Noll, Thomas & Postma, Bart & Roveri, Marco, 2014. "Spacecraft early design validation using formal methods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 20-35.
    8. Do, Phuc & Voisin, Alexandre & Levrat, Eric & Iung, Benoit, 2015. "A proactive condition-based maintenance strategy with both perfect and imperfect maintenance actions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 22-32.
    9. Julien Gardan & Nada Matta, 2017. "Enhancing Knowledge Management into Systems Engineering through New Models in SysML," Post-Print hal-02893990, HAL.
    10. de Jonge, Bram & Klingenberg, Warse & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2015. "Optimum maintenance strategy under uncertainty in the lifetime distribution," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 59-67.
    11. Liu, Jie & Zio, Enrico, 2017. "System dynamic reliability assessment and failure prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 21-36.
    12. Poisson, Pascal & Chinniah, Yuvin & Jocelyn, Sabrina, 2016. "Design of a safety control system to improve the verification step in machinery lockout procedures: A case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 266-276.
    13. Kim, Hyeonmin & Kim, Jung Taek & Heo, Gyunyoung, 2018. "Failure rate updates using condition-based prognostics in probabilistic safety assessments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 225-233.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hu, Yunpeng & Peng, Qibo & Ni, Qing & Wu, Xinfeng & Ye, Dongming, 2023. "Event-based safety and reliability analysis integration in model-based space mission design," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    2. Si, Xiao-Sheng & Li, Tianmei & Zhang, Jianxun & Lei, Yaguo, 2022. "Nonlinear degradation modeling and prognostics: A Box-Cox transformation perspective," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    3. Zang, Yu & Shangguan, Wei & Cai, Baigen & Wang, Huasheng & Pecht, Michael. G., 2021. "Hybrid remaining useful life prediction method. A case study on railway D-cables," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    4. Vrignat, Pascal & Kratz, Frédéric & Avila, Manuel, 2022. "Sustainable manufacturing, maintenance policies, prognostics and health management: A literature review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    5. Zhang, Liangwei & Lin, Jing & Shao, Haidong & Zhang, Zhicong & Yan, Xiaohui & Long, Jianyu, 2021. "End-to-end unsupervised fault detection using a flow-based model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    6. Ma, Chenyang & Li, Yongbo & Wang, Xianzhi & Cai, Zhiqiang, 2023. "Early fault diagnosis of rotating machinery based on composite zoom permutation entropy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    7. Hu, Yang & Miao, Xuewen & Si, Yong & Pan, Ershun & Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Prognostics and health management: A review from the perspectives of design, development and decision," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    8. Jain, Amit Kumar & Lad, Bhupesh Kumar, 2020. "Prognosticating RULs while exploiting the future characteristics of operating profiles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    9. Yang, Zhe & Baraldi, Piero & Zio, Enrico, 2022. "A method for fault detection in multi-component systems based on sparse autoencoder-based deep neural networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    10. Xu, Yanwen & Kohtz, Sara & Boakye, Jessica & Gardoni, Paolo & Wang, Pingfeng, 2023. "Physics-informed machine learning for reliability and systems safety applications: State of the art and challenges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    11. Zou, Xinyu & Tao, Laifa & Sun, Lulu & Wang, Chao & Ma, Jian & Lu, Chen, 2023. "A case-learning-based paradigm for quantitative recommendation of fault diagnosis algorithms: A case study of gearbox," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    12. He, Jiahui & Cheng, Zhijun & Guo, Bo, 2024. "Anomaly detection in telemetry data using a jointly optimal one-class support vector machine with dictionary learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    13. Tao, Xin & Mårtensson, Jonas & Warnquist, Håkan & Pernestål, Anna, 2022. "Short-term maintenance planning of autonomous trucks for minimizing economic risk," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    14. Wang, Chao & Zhu, Tao & Yang, Bing & Yin, Minxuan & Xiao, Shoune & Yang, Guangwu, 2023. "Remaining useful life prediction framework for crack propagation with a case study of railway heavy duty coupler condition monitoring," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    15. Lee, Jinwook & Kim, Myungyon & Ko, Jin Uk & Jung, Joon Ha & Sun, Kyung Ho & Youn, Byeng D., 2022. "Asymmetric inter-intra domain alignments (AIIDA) method for intelligent fault diagnosis of rotating machinery," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    16. Park, Chan Hee & Kim, Hyeongmin & Suh, Chaehyun & Chae, Minseok & Yoon, Heonjun & Youn, Byeng D., 2022. "A health image for deep learning-based fault diagnosis of a permanent magnet synchronous motor under variable operating conditions: Instantaneous current residual map," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    2. Aizpurua, J.I. & Catterson, V.M. & Papadopoulos, Y. & Chiacchio, F. & D'Urso, D., 2017. "Supporting group maintenance through prognostics-enhanced dynamic dependability prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 171-188.
    3. Vanderschueren, Toon & Boute, Robert & Verdonck, Tim & Baesens, Bart & Verbeke, Wouter, 2023. "Optimizing the preventive maintenance frequency with causal machine learning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    4. Hoseyni, Seyed Mojtaba & Di Maio, Francesco & Zio, Enrico, 2019. "Condition-based probabilistic safety assessment for maintenance decision making regarding a nuclear power plant steam generator undergoing multiple degradation mechanisms," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Mosayebi Omshi, E. & Grall, A. & Shemehsavar, S., 2020. "A dynamic auto-adaptive predictive maintenance policy for degradation with unknown parameters," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 81-92.
    6. Pedersen, Tom Ivar & Vatn, Jørn, 2022. "Optimizing a condition-based maintenance policy by taking the preferences of a risk-averse decision maker into account," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    7. Zheng, Rui & Zhou, Yifan, 2021. "Comparison of three preventive maintenance warranty policies for products deteriorating with age and a time-varying covariate," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    8. Wang, Yukun & Li, Xiaopeng & Chen, Junyan & Liu, Yiliu, 2022. "A condition-based maintenance policy for multi-component systems subject to stochastic and economic dependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    9. Pedersen, Tom Ivar & Liu, Xingheng & Vatn, Jørn, 2023. "Maintenance optimization of a system subject to two-stage degradation, hard failure, and imperfect repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    10. Moradi, Ramin & Groth, Katrina M., 2020. "Modernizing risk assessment: A systematic integration of PRA and PHM techniques," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    11. Hu, Yang & Miao, Xuewen & Si, Yong & Pan, Ershun & Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Prognostics and health management: A review from the perspectives of design, development and decision," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    12. Giovanni Rinaldi & Philipp R. Thies & Lars Johanning, 2021. "Current Status and Future Trends in the Operation and Maintenance of Offshore Wind Turbines: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, April.
    13. Xu, Gaowei & Azhari, Fae, 2022. "Data-driven optimization of repair schemes and inspection intervals for highway bridges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    14. Chatenet, Q. & Remy, E. & Gagnon, M. & Fouladirad, M. & Tahan, A.S., 2021. "Modeling cavitation erosion using non-homogeneous gamma process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    15. Zhang, Nan & Cai, Kaiquan & Zhang, Jun & Wang, Tian, 2022. "A condition-based maintenance policy considering failure dependence and imperfect inspection for a two-component system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    16. Lewis, Austin D. & Groth, Katrina M., 2022. "Metrics for evaluating the performance of complex engineering system health monitoring models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    17. Mancuso, A. & Compare, M. & Salo, A. & Zio, E., 2021. "Optimal Prognostics and Health Management-driven inspection and maintenance strategies for industrial systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    18. de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2017. "The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 21-30.
    19. Kampitsis, Dimitris & Panagiotidou, Sofia, 2022. "A Bayesian condition-based maintenance and monitoring policy with variable sampling intervals," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    20. Huynh, K.T., 2021. "An adaptive predictive maintenance model for repairable deteriorating systems using inverse Gaussian degradation process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:193:y:2020:i:c:s0951832018315084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.