IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobhdp/v113y2010i2p73-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What do you think of followers? Examining the content, structure, and consequences of implicit followership theories

Author

Listed:
  • Sy, Thomas

Abstract

Implicit followership theories (IFTs) are defined as individuals' personal assumptions about the traits and behaviors that characterize followers. Goals of this research were to: (1) Identify the content and structure of IFTs, (2) examine the relationship between IFTs and extant implicit theories in the leadership literature, and (3) establish a preliminary nomological network of leaders' implicit followership theories by examining its consequences for leader-follower interpersonal outcomes. This study included 1362 participants across five separate studies and seven samples. Results provide evidence for content, convergent, discriminant, criterion, and incremental validity, as well as internal and temporal consistency of the IFTs instrument. IFTs are represented by a first-order structure (Industry, Enthusiasm, Good Citizen, Conformity, Insubordination, and Incompetence), and a second-order structure (Followership Prototype and Antiprototype). Leaders' IFTs predicted interpersonal outcomes: liking, relationship quality, trust, and job satisfaction. Future research and practical implications are discussed for this understudied branch of leadership research.

Suggested Citation

  • Sy, Thomas, 2010. "What do you think of followers? Examining the content, structure, and consequences of implicit followership theories," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 73-84, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:113:y:2010:i:2:p:73-84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749-5978(10)00054-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johnson, Stefanie K. & Murphy, Susan Elaine & Zewdie, Selamawit & Reichard, Rebecca J., 2008. "The strong, sensitive type: Effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 39-60, May.
    2. Ensari, Nurcan & Murphy, Susan Elaine, 2003. "Cross-cultural variations in leadership perceptions and attribution of charisma to the leader," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 92(1-2), pages 52-66.
    3. Giessner, Steffen R. & van Knippenberg, Daan, 2008. ""License to Fail": Goal definition, leader group prototypicality, and perceptions of leadership effectiveness after leader failure," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 14-35, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei Zhang & Xuejun Wang & Dingnan Xie, 2021. "Evaluating the Impact of Positive Implicit Followership towards Employees’ Feedback-Seeking: Based on the Social Information Processing Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Richard Martin, 2015. "A Review of the Literature of the Followership Since 2008," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(4), pages 21582440156, October.
    3. Aï Ito & Jennifer A Harrison & Michelle C Bligh & Christine Roland-Levy, 2020. "A follower-centric perspective on charismatic leadership: An integrative review and agenda for future research," Post-Print hal-03086811, HAL.
    4. Bonner, Bryan L. & Bolinger, Alexander R., 2013. "Separating the confident from the correct: Leveraging member knowledge in groups to improve decision making and performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 214-221.
    5. Leonel Prieto, 2018. "Leadership Multiplicities before and during the Post-Truth Era," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Alexander, Katherine C. & Mackey, Jeremy D. & Maher, Liam P. & McAllister, Charn P. & Ellen, B. Parker, 2024. "An implicit leadership theory examination of cultural values as moderators of the relationship between destructive leadership and followers’ task performance," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(3).
    7. Lei Wang & Xinya Liang, 2020. "The Influence of Leaders’ Positive and Implicit Followership Theory of University Scientific Research Teams on Individual Creativity: the Mediating Effect of Individual Self-Cognition and the Moderati," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-24, March.
    8. Jeremy D. Mackey & Charn P. McAllister & Katherine C. Alexander, 2021. "Insubordination: Validation of a Measure and an Examination of Insubordinate Responses to Unethical Supervisory Treatment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(4), pages 755-775, February.
    9. Martínez-Sanchis, Paula & Aragón-Amonarriz, Cristina & Iturrioz-Landart, Cristina, 2020. "How the Pygmalion Effect operates in intra-family succession: Shared expectations in family SMEs," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 914-926.
    10. Hart, Einav & Bear, Julia B. & Ren, Zhiying (Bella), 2024. "But what if I lose the offer? Negotiators’ inflated perception of their likelihood of jeopardizing a deal," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    11. Lord, Robert G. & Gatti, Paola & Chui, Susanna L.M., 2016. "Social-cognitive, relational, and identity-based approaches to leadership," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 119-134.
    12. Fa, Ziwei & Li, Xinchun & Qiu, Zunxiang & Liu, Quanlong & Zhai, Zhengyuan, 2021. "From correlation to causality: Path analysis of accident-causing factors in coal mines from the perspective of human, machinery, environment and management," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    13. Thompson, Phillip S. & Bolino, Mark C. & Norris, Kalan R. & Kuo, Shu-Tsen, 2023. "Unconstructive curiosity killed the cat: The importance of follower political skill and constructive curiosity to avoid leader perceptions of insubordination and unlikability," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    14. Stefan Klaußner, 2013. "Führung und Feedback: zwischen Reflexion und Retention — Überlegungen zur Konzeption von Führungsgesprächen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 191-212, March.
    15. Guarana, Cristiano L. & Barnes, Christopher M., 2017. "Lack of sleep and the development of leader-follower relationships over time," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 57-73.
    16. Uhl-Bien, Mary & Carsten, Melissa & Huang, Lei & Maslyn, John, 2022. "What do managers value in the leader-member exchange (LMX) relationship? Identification and measurement of the manager’s perspective of LMX (MLMX)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 225-240.
    17. Swanson, Steve & Billsberry, Jon & Kent, Aubrey & Skinner, James & Mueller, Jacqueline, 2020. "Leader prototypicality in sport: The implicit leadership theories of women and men entering sport management careers," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 640-656.
    18. Sheng-Wen Liu & Ming-Tsang Hsieh & Ralph Norcio & Harika Rao, 2022. "Organic Leadership—Implicit Followership Interaction: Relations among Trust in Supervisor, Active Followership and OCB," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, October.
    19. Wei Liang & Tingyi Li & Li Lu & Jaehyoung Kim & Sanggyun Na, 2020. "Influence of Implicit Followership Cognitive Differences on Innovation Behavior: An Empirical Analysis in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, June.
    20. Lund, Anne Kamilla, 2019. "Leading knowledge-workers through situated ambiguity," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oc, Burak & Daniels, Michael A. & Diefendorff, James M. & Bashshur, Michael R. & Greguras, Gary J., 2020. "Humility breeds authenticity: How authentic leader humility shapes follower vulnerability and felt authenticity," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 112-125.
    2. Gartzia, Leire & Baniandrés, Josune, 2016. "Are people-oriented leaders perceived as less effective in task performance? Surprising results from two experimental studies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 508-516.
    3. Li, Houjian & Tang, Mengqian & Cao, Andi & Guo, Lili, 2024. "How to reduce firm pollution discharges: Does political leaders' gender matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    4. Jamie L. Gloor & Manuela Morf & Samantha Paustian-Underdahl & Uschi Backes-Gellner, 2020. "Fix the Game, Not the Dame: Restoring Equity in Leadership Evaluations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(3), pages 497-511, January.
    5. Akfırat, Serap & Bayrak, Fatih & Üzümçeker, Emir & Ergiyen, Tolga & Yurtbakan, Taylan & Uysal, Mete Sefa, 2023. "The roles of social norms and leadership in health communication in the context of COVID-19," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    6. Sousa, Cátia & Gonçalves, Gabriela, 2019. "Multiculturality as an antecedent to work wellbeing and work passion," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 7(2), pages 101-124.
    7. Giessner, S.R. & van Knippenberg, D.L. & Sleebos, E., 2008. "License to Fail? How Leader Group Prototypicality Moderates the Effects of Leader Performance on Perceptions of Leadership Effectiveness," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2008-066-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    8. Kwantes, Catherine T. & Boglarsky, Cheryl A., 2007. "Perceptions of organizational culture, leadership effectiveness and personal effectiveness across six countries," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 204-230, June.
    9. Ying Zhang & Yuting Guo & Aiman Nurdazym, 2023. "How do female CEOs affect corporate environmental policies?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 459-472, January.
    10. Raina A. Brands & Jochen I. Menges & Martin Kilduff, 2015. "The Leader-in-Social-Network Schema: Perceptions of Network Structure Affect Gendered Attributions of Charisma," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 1210-1225, August.
    11. Niels Van Quaquebeke & Jan U. Becker & Niko Goretzki & Christian Barrot, 2019. "Perceived Ethical Leadership Affects Customer Purchasing Intentions Beyond Ethical Marketing in Advertising Due to Moral Identity Self-Congruence Concerns," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 357-376, May.
    12. Venus, Merlijn & Stam, Daan & van Knippenberg, Daan, 2013. "Leader emotion as a catalyst of effective leader communication of visions, value-laden messages, and goals," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 53-68.
    13. Joshua Keller & Jeffrey Loewenstein, 2011. "The Cultural Category of Cooperation: A Cultural Consensus Model Analysis for China and the United States," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 299-319, April.
    14. Giessner, Steffen R. & van Knippenberg, Daan, 2008. ""License to Fail": Goal definition, leader group prototypicality, and perceptions of leadership effectiveness after leader failure," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 14-35, January.
    15. Catherine Eckel & Lata Gangadharan & Philip J. Grossman & Nina Xue, 2021. "The gender leadership gap: insights from experiments," Chapters, in: Ananish Chaudhuri (ed.), A Research Agenda for Experimental Economics, chapter 7, pages 137-162, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Andranik Tumasjan & Maria Strobel & Isabell Welpe, 2011. "Ethical Leadership Evaluations After Moral Transgression: Social Distance Makes the Difference," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 99(4), pages 609-622, April.
    17. Alina Georgiana PROFIROIU & Corina Cristiana NASTACÃ, 2016. "The gender influence on leadership style practiced in the Romanian Government?s working apparatus (Office)," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2016(27), pages 74-93, Decembre.
    18. Sousa, Cátia & Gonçalves, Gabriela & Cunha, Miguel, 2015. "Cultural Values As A Support To The Development Of Intercultural Competences," Spatial and Organizational Dynamics Discussion Papers 2015-1, CIEO-Research Centre for Spatial and Organizational Dynamics, University of Algarve.
    19. Ayşe Elif Şengün & Çetin Önder, 2011. "The Conditional Impact of Competence Trust on Inter-Firm Learning in a Collectivist SME Context," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(8), pages 791-812, November.
    20. Oc, Burak & Netchaeva, Ekaterina & Kouchaki, Maryam, 2021. "It’s a man’s world! the role of political ideology in the early stages of leader recruitment," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 24-41.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:113:y:2010:i:2:p:73-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.