IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v148y2022icp225-240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What do managers value in the leader-member exchange (LMX) relationship? Identification and measurement of the manager’s perspective of LMX (MLMX)

Author

Listed:
  • Uhl-Bien, Mary
  • Carsten, Melissa
  • Huang, Lei
  • Maslyn, John

Abstract

LMX research assumes that manager needs from the relationship are the same as those of subordinates and, therefore, the dimensions managers use to assess their relationship quality with subordinates should be the same as those used by their subordinates. Yet, seminal research in LMX theory and subsequent findings suggest that this is not the case. In this paper we theorize and develop a measure of manager-LMX (MLMX), which represents what managers want and need from leader-member relationships. Our findings across a series of studies show that what managers value in leader-member dyadic relationships is represented by three MLMX dimensions: competence (the subordinate’s ability to work effectively and independently), candor (providing helpful communication to the manager) and shared goals (being committed to the manager’s mission and vision). Our findings show that MLMX has predictive validity over SLMX-7 and the SMDM measures, and that the MLMX dimensions differentially predict manager outcomes, including follower contribution to goal attainment, manager emotional exhaustion from working with the subordinate, and follower turnover. Our research offers important theoretical and practical contributions by appropriately aligning the ontological unit (individualized manager-LMX) with the analytical unit (the MLMX measure) and establishing a measure of manager-LMX that helps us gain novel insight into the manager view of the leader-member relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Uhl-Bien, Mary & Carsten, Melissa & Huang, Lei & Maslyn, John, 2022. "What do managers value in the leader-member exchange (LMX) relationship? Identification and measurement of the manager’s perspective of LMX (MLMX)," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 225-240.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:148:y:2022:i:c:p:225-240
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296322003812
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olga Epitropaki & Anders Friis Marstand & Beatrice van Der Heijden & Nikos Bozionelos & Nikolaos Mylonopoulos & Claudia M. van Der Heijde & Dora Scholarios & Aslaug Mikkelsen & Izabela Marzec & Piotr , 2021. "What are the career implications of ‘seeing eye to eye’? Examining the role of leader‐member exchange (LMX) agreement on employability and career outcomes," Post-Print hal-03464500, HAL.
    2. Hornsby, Jeffrey S. & Kuratko, Donald F. & Zahra, Shaker A., 2002. "Middle managers' perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: assessing a measurement scale," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 253-273, May.
    3. Ethan R. Burris & James R. Detert & Alexander C. Romney, 2013. "Speaking Up vs. Being Heard: The Disagreement Around and Outcomes of Employee Voice," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 22-38, February.
    4. Nahrgang, Jennifer D. & Morgeson, Frederick P. & Ilies, Remus, 2009. "The development of leader-member exchanges: Exploring how personality and performance influence leader and member relationships over time," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 108(2), pages 256-266, March.
    5. Sy, Thomas, 2010. "What do you think of followers? Examining the content, structure, and consequences of implicit followership theories," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 73-84, November.
    6. Stefan Tengblad, 2006. "Is there a ‘New Managerial Work’? A Comparison with Henry Mintzberg's Classic Study 30 Years Later," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(7), pages 1437-1461, November.
    7. Lance B. Kurke & Howard E. Aldrich, 1983. "Note---Mintzberg was Right!: A Replication and Extension of The Nature of Managerial Work," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(8), pages 975-984, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liuqi Sun & Chongrong Huang & Zhifan Wu & Chengyan Li, 2023. "How does humble leadership influence employee improvisation? A motivational perspective," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Danuta DiskienÄ— & Virginijus TamaÅ¡eviÄ ius & AgnÄ— KalvaitytÄ—, 2018. "MANAGERIAL ROLES IN SMEs AND THEIR EFFECT ON PERCEIVED MANAGERIAL EFFECTIVENESS IN LITHUANIA," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 9(1).
    2. Lord, Robert G. & Gatti, Paola & Chui, Susanna L.M., 2016. "Social-cognitive, relational, and identity-based approaches to leadership," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 119-134.
    3. Elena Ahmadi & Gloria Macassa & Johan Larsson, 2021. "Managers’ work and behaviour patterns in profitable growth SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 849-863, August.
    4. Guarana, Cristiano L. & Barnes, Christopher M., 2017. "Lack of sleep and the development of leader-follower relationships over time," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 57-73.
    5. Swen Nadkarni & Reinhard Prügl, 2021. "Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 233-341, April.
    6. Hussin J. Hejase & Bassam Hamdar & Ziad Haddad & Mariam Chaaya & Ale J. Hejase & Nouri Beyrouti, 2015. "Corporate Entrepreneurship in Lebanon: An Exploratory Research," Quarterly Journal of Business Studies, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 94-118.
    7. Poduška, Zoran & Nedeljković, Jelena & Nonić, Dragan & Ratknić, Tatjana & Ratknić, Mihailo & Živojinović, Ivana, 2020. "Intrapreneurial climate as momentum for fostering employee innovativeness in public forest enterprises," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    8. Gavin M Schwarz & Karin Sanders & Dave Bouckenooghe, 2020. "In the driving seat: Executive’s perceived control over environment," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(2), pages 317-342, May.
    9. Hall, Matthew, 2010. "Accounting information and managerial work," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 28539, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Gonçalo Rodrigues Brás & Miguel Torres Preto, 2021. "The consequences of intrapreneurship in exporting firms: a structural-model approach," CeBER Working Papers 2021-06, Centre for Business and Economics Research (CeBER), University of Coimbra.
    11. Iris Aaltio & Hans Menzel & Jan Ulijn, 2006. "On the way to creativity: engineers as intrapreneurs in organizations," Working Papers 06-06, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies, revised Mar 2006.
    12. Vishal K. Gupta & Suman Niranjan & Banu A. Goktan & John Eriskon, 2016. "Individual entrepreneurial orientation role in shaping reactions to new technologies," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 935-961, December.
    13. UMRANI Waheed Ali & MAHMOOD Rosli & AHMED Umair, 2016. "Unveiling The Direct Effect Of Corporate Entrepreneurship’S Dimensions On The Business Performance: A Case Of Big Five Banks In Pakistan," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 11(1), pages 181-195, April.
    14. Muhammad Zubair Alam & Shazia Kousar & Muhammad Rizwan Ullah & Amber Pervaiz, 2022. "How creative destruction functions in corporate entrepreneurial process: an empirical investigation of Schumpeterian concept in engineering firm settings in Pakistan," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Belén Casales Morici, 2022. "Strategic corporate entrepreneurship practices in financial services firms: the role of organizational factors," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(9), pages 1-26, September.
    16. Águeda Gil-López & Unai Arzubiaga & Elena San Román & Alfredo Massis, 2022. "The Visible Hand of corporate entrepreneurship in state-owned enterprises: a longitudinal study of the Spanish National Postal Operator," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 1033-1071, September.
    17. Sue-Chan, Christina & Au, Al K.C. & Hackett, Rick D., 2012. "Trust as a mediator of the relationship between leader/member behavior and leader-member-exchange quality," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 459-468.
    18. Jeremy D. Mackey & Charn P. McAllister & Katherine C. Alexander, 2021. "Insubordination: Validation of a Measure and an Examination of Insubordinate Responses to Unethical Supervisory Treatment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(4), pages 755-775, February.
    19. Kelley, Donna J. & Peters, Lois & O'Connor, Gina Colarelli, 2009. "Intra-organizational networking for innovation-based corporate entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 221-235, May.
    20. Elad N. Sherf & Subrahmaniam Tangirala & Vijaya Venkataramani, 2019. "Why Managers Do Not Seek Voice from Employees: The Importance of Managers’ Personal Control and Long-Term Orientation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 447-466, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:148:y:2022:i:c:p:225-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.