IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dij/wpfarg/1050502.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La théorie des parties prenantes

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel Mercier

    (Université de Bourgogne)

  • Jean-Pascal Gond

    (Université de Nottingham et Université de Toulouse I)

Abstract

l’objectif de cet article est de présenter une mise en perspective critique du vaste corpus théorique regroupé sous l’étiquette de théorie des parties prenantes (stakeholder theory) qui s’est développé depuis l’ouvrage de Freeman (1984). Cette approche propose une analyse des relations nouées entre l’entreprise et son environnement entendu au sens large. Nous présentons les origines et principaux fondements conceptuels de cette théorie. Puis, nous montrons que la grande diversité des approches qui en relèvent invite à évoquer des théories des parties prenantes. Une analyse critique des problèmes conceptuels de ces théories est ensuite menée, en se focalisant sur le thème de leur intégration, de leur absence de caractère dynamique et de leur difficile conciliation avec un modèle de gouvernance actionnarial.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel Mercier & Jean-Pascal Gond, 2005. "La théorie des parties prenantes," Working Papers CREGO 1050502, Université de Bourgogne - CREGO EA7317 Centre de recherches en gestion des organisations.
    • Handle: RePEc:dij:wpfarg:1050502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec-crego.u-bourgogne.fr/images/stories/wp/1050502.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gérard Charreaux & Philippe Desbrières, 1998. "Gouvernance des entreprises:valeur partenariale contre valeur actionnariale," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 1(2), pages 57-88, June.
    2. Goodpaster, Kenneth E., 1991. "Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 53-73, January.
    3. Richard A. Wolfe & Daniel S. Putler, 2002. "How Tight Are the Ties that Bind Stakeholder Groups?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 64-80, February.
    4. Amy J. Hillman & Gerald D. Keim, 2001. "Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 125-139, February.
    5. Andrew L. Friedman & Samantha Miles, 2002. "Developing Stakeholder Theory," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Inès Ben Cheikh & Hédi Noubbigh, 2019. "The Effect of Intellectual Capital Drivers on Performance and Value Creation: the Case of Tunisian Non-financial Listed Companies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(1), pages 147-167, March.
    2. Fanny Romestant, 2017. "L’écoute des parties prenantes dans une optique de développement durable : continuité ou alternative pour le marketing de projets industriels ?," Post-Print hal-01867786, HAL.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1059 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. David Carassus & Damien Gardey & Stéphane Ouvrard, 2012. "Natures et cibles de l’information sur la performance des entreprises cotées : analyse de la pertinence du modèle de l’IASB," Post-Print hal-02432072, HAL.
    5. Sana Saidi & Mohamed Sellami, 2011. "Communications publicitaires des cabinets d'audit et d'expertise comptable en France : Une étude exploratoire," Post-Print hal-00650569, HAL.
    6. Angèle Renaud, 2013. "Configurations of the Interactive Use of Environmental Management Control [Les configurations de contrôle interactif dans le domaine environnemental]," Post-Print halshs-01178070, HAL.
    7. Yves Fassin, 2012. "Stakeholder Management, Reciprocity and Stakeholder Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 83-96, August.
    8. Pierre Baret & Vincent Helfrich, 2019. "The “trilemma” of non-financial reporting and its pitfalls," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(2), pages 485-511, June.
    9. Carine Girard & André Sobczak, 2010. "Pour une cartographie des parties prenantes fondée sur leur engagement : une application aux sociétaires d'une banque mutualiste française," Post-Print hal-00771148, HAL.
    10. Michelle Hentic-Giliberto & Sylvie Stéphan, 2018. "Entre temps et espace, les enjeux de la gouvernance des organisations du secteur médico-social : vers une évolution des postures managériales ?," Post-Print hal-02556903, HAL.
    11. Sherline Dumano & Rémy Louis Budoc & Claude Fiore, 2018. "La mise en place du Transport Maritime à Courte Distance du Plateau des Guyanes à la Mer des Caraïbes : la perception des parties prenantes," Post-Print hal-02493411, HAL.
    12. Amel Ben Rhouma & Walid Ben Amar & Eustache Ebondo Wa Mandzila, 2014. "Quel Impact Des Mécanismes De Gouvernance Sur La Divulgation Des Risques Liés Au Changement Climatique ? Le Cas Des Entreprises Françaises Cotées," Post-Print hal-01899578, HAL.
    13. repec:dau:papers:123456789/320 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Didier Le Maitre, 2013. "Une Negation De L'Influence Des Theories Manageriales Sur Le Comportement A Partir D'Hirschman Et De Von Mises," Post-Print hal-00991951, HAL.
    15. Kévin Pastier & François Silva, 2020. "Objet, raison d’être et praxis : les coopératives et le commun au secours de l’entreprise ?," Post-Print hal-02872799, HAL.
    16. Anne-Sophie Merot & Frédérique Grazzini & Jean-Pierre Boissin, 2014. "Gouvernance et développement durable : Le cas de la responsabilité élargie du producteur dans une filière de gestion des déchets," Post-Print halshs-01185814, HAL.
    17. Anne-Marie Bocquet & Claude Jameux, 2011. "Le rôle des partenariats distributeurs / producteurs dans le développement des filières agroalimentaires durables," Post-Print hal-00947880, HAL.
    18. Ezzeddine Boussoura & Olfa Zeribi-Benslimane, 2008. "La Stakeholder Theory permet-elle d'appréhender le concept de RSE ?," Post-Print hal-04488144, HAL.
    19. Aliona Birca, 2016. "The Impact of Management Control on Sustainability Reports," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 427-433, February.
    20. Florian Marcel Nuta & Anca Gabriela Turtureanu, 2012. "Considerations Regarding the Environmental Responsibility and Taxation," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 1(1), pages 195-203, March.
    21. Annelise Mathieu, 2006. "Développement durable et entreprises : du concept à la typologie," Post-Print hal-00995765, HAL.
    22. Chantal Rouvrais-Charron & Christophe Durand, 2009. "European football under close scrutiny," Post-Print halshs-02110690, HAL.
    23. Abderrahman Jahmane & Shoei Kadogami & Amira Nouri Belhadj, 2020. "Relation entre motivation et implication organisationnelle. Une étude dans le secteur de l'hôtellerie en France," Post-Print hal-02872473, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oluyomi A. Osobajo & David Moore, 2017. "Who is Who? Identifying the Different Sub-groups of Secondary Stakeholders within a Community: A Case Study of the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria Communities," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(9), pages 188-209, September.
    2. Andrew Crane & Trish Ruebottom, 2011. "Stakeholder Theory and Social Identity: Rethinking Stakeholder Identification," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 77-87, March.
    3. Yves Fassin, 2008. "Imperfections and Shortcomings of the Stakeholder Model’s Graphical Representation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 80(4), pages 879-888, July.
    4. Päivi Myllykangas & Johanna Kujala & Hanna Lehtimäki, 2010. "Analyzing the Essence of Stakeholder Relationships: What do we Need in Addition to Power, Legitimacy, and Urgency?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 65-72, August.
    5. Vikraman R & Shulagna Sarkar & Vishnukumar K & Selvarasu A, 2021. "Leading Sustainable CSR Efforts: A Case of Sneha Opportunity School by NLCIL," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 14(1), pages 110-125, June.
    6. Jose Luis Retolaza & Maite Ruiz & Leire San‐Jose, 2009. "CSR in business start‐ups: an application method for stakeholder engagement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(6), pages 324-336, November.
    7. Viveros, Hector, 2017. "Unpacking stakeholder mechanisms to influence corporate social responsibility in the mining sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-12.
    8. Samantha Miles, 2017. "Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 437-459, May.
    9. Del Bosco, Barbara & Misani, Nicola, 2011. "Keeping the enemies close: The contribution of corporate social responsibility to reducing crime against the firm," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 87-98, March.
    10. Encarnacion García-Sánchez & Víctor Jesús García-Morales & Rodrigo Martín-Rojas, 2018. "Analysis of the influence of the environment, stakeholder integration capability, absorptive capacity, and technological skills on organizational performance through corporate entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 345-377, June.
    11. Cesar, Saenz, 2019. "Earning a social license to operate in mining: A case study from Peru," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    12. Karan Sonpar & Federica Pazzaglia & Jurgita Kornijenko, 2010. "The Paradox and Constraints of Legitimacy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(1), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Ali M. Shahzad & Matthew A. Rutherford & Mark P. Sharfman, 2016. "Stakeholder‐Centric Governance and Corporate Social Performance: A Cross‐National Study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(2), pages 100-112, March.
    14. Irene Henriques & Sanjay Sharma, 2005. "Pathways of stakeholder influence in the Canadian forestry industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(6), pages 384-398, November.
    15. Michael Pirson & Deepak Malhotra, 2011. "Foundations of Organizational Trust: What Matters to Different Stakeholders?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 1087-1104, August.
    16. Y. Fassin, 2008. "The Stakeholder Model Refined," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 08/529, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    17. Jose-Luis Retolaza & Leire San-Jose & Maite Ruiz-Roqueñi, 2014. "Ontological Stakeholder View: An Innovative Proposition," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 15(1), pages 25-36, March.
    18. Michal Varmus & Milan Kubina & Gabriel Koman & Patrik Ferenc, 2018. "Ensuring the Long-Term Sustainability Cooperation with Stakeholders of Sports Organizations in SLOVAKIA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.
    19. Silvana Signori & Leire San-Jose & Jose Luis Retolaza & Gianfranco Rusconi, 2021. "Stakeholder Value Creation: Comparing ESG and Value Added in European Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, January.
    20. Tanja Schwarzmüller & Prisca Brosi & Vera Stelkens & Matthias Spörrle & Isabell M. Welpe, 2017. "Investors’ reactions to companies’ stakeholder management: the crucial role of assumed costs and perceived sustainability," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 10(1), pages 79-96, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    construction théorique; gouvernance; légitimité; partie prenante; pouvoir; responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise; stakeholder.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J52 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Dispute Resolution: Strikes, Arbitration, and Mediation
    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dij:wpfarg:1050502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Angèle RENAUD (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.