IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00991951.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Une Negation De L'Influence Des Theories Manageriales Sur Le Comportement A Partir D'Hirschman Et De Von Mises

Author

Listed:
  • Didier Le Maitre

    (GRANEM - Groupe de Recherche Angevin en Economie et Management - UA - Université d'Angers - AGROCAMPUS OUEST - Institut National de l'Horticulture et du Paysage)

Abstract

Firm management generally privileges by basing itself on diverse theories, the point of view of the managers and the shareholders, to the detriment of that of the employees. The article considers that the essential source of penalization is bound to the interest and behavior of individuals.First section evokes the historic foundations of the concept of financial interest by referring to Hirschman. The second drafts of the human action nature and proposes a guide for the management research by referring to the praxeology of Von Mises.

Suggested Citation

  • Didier Le Maitre, 2013. "Une Negation De L'Influence Des Theories Manageriales Sur Le Comportement A Partir D'Hirschman Et De Von Mises," Post-Print hal-00991951, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00991951
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-00991951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-00991951/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Wirtz, 1999. "Évolution institutionnelle, schémas mentaux et gouvernement des entreprises:le cas Krupp-Thyssen," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 2(1), pages 117-143, March.
    2. Fana Rasolofo-Distler, 2010. "Opérationnalisation de la RSE : une approche par les parties prenantes," Post-Print hal-03044686, HAL.
    3. Xavier Timbeau, 2002. "Le partage de la valeur ajoutée en France," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 80(1), pages 63-85.
    4. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/1628 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/1628 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Freeman, R. Edward, 1994. "The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions1," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 409-421, October.
    7. Thomas Jeanjean & Carlos Ramirez, 2008. "Aux sources des théories positives : contribution à une analyse des changements de paradigme dans la recherche en comptabilité," Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 14(2), pages 5-25.
    8. Thomas Jeanjean & Carlos Ramirez, 2008. "Aux sources des théories positives : contribution à une analyse des changements de paradigme dans la recherche en comptabilité," ACCRA, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 14(2), pages 5-25.
    9. Samuel Mercier & Jean-Pascal Gond, 2005. "La théorie des parties prenantes," Working Papers CREGO 1050502, Université de Bourgogne - CREGO EA7317 Centre de recherches en gestion des organisations.
    10. repec:dau:papers:123456789/655 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Marc Bollecker & Wilfrid Azan, 2009. "L'importation de cadres théoriques dans la recherche en contrôle," ACCRA, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 15(2), pages 61-86.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boniface Bampoky, 2016. "Accounting normalization difficulties in the OHADA zone [Les difficultés de normalisation comptable dans l’espace OHADA]," Post-Print hal-01902203, HAL.
    2. Yves Levant & Marc Nikitin, 2011. "Les comptabilités financière et de gestion peuvent elles être totalement intégrées ?," Post-Print hal-00650547, HAL.
    3. Terramorsi Patrice, 2019. "De quoi les rapports intégrés sont-ils le nom ?," Post-Print hal-03094876, HAL.
    4. Yves Fassin, 2012. "Stakeholder Management, Reciprocity and Stakeholder Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 83-96, August.
    5. Michelle Hentic-Giliberto & Sylvie Stéphan, 2018. "Entre temps et espace, les enjeux de la gouvernance des organisations du secteur médico-social : vers une évolution des postures managériales ?," Post-Print hal-02556903, HAL.
    6. Andrea Lionzo, 2017. "Italian academia facing an international scenario: Issues and trends," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(2), pages 5-22.
    7. repec:dau:papers:123456789/1059 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Andrew Lynn, 2022. "Ethics, Economics, and the Specter of Naturalism: The Enduring Relevance of the Harmony Doctrine School of Economics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 661-673, July.
    9. Ruben Burga & Davar Rezania, 2016. "Stakeholder theory in social entrepreneurship: a descriptive case study," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Wei Peng & Baogui Xin & Yekyung Kwon, 2019. "Optimal Strategies of Product Price, Quality, and Corporate Environmental Responsibility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-24, November.
    11. Kazadi, Kande & Lievens, Annouk & Mahr, Dominik, 2016. "Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 525-540.
    12. WANG Jifu & GUPTA Vipin & LYBOLT Liza & WANG Xiuli, 2022. "Corrected Game Model In Csr: Mnc Strategies And Chinese Practice," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 17(3), pages 269-287, December.
    13. Nir Halevy & Sora Jun & Eileen Y. Chou, 2020. "Intergroup Conflict is Our Business: CEOs’ Ethical Intergroup Leadership Fuels Stakeholder Support for Corporate Intergroup Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 229-246, February.
    14. Lamin B. Ceesay, 2020. "Exploring the Influence of NGOs in Corporate Sustainability Adoption: Institutional-Legitimacy Perspective," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 9(2), pages 135-147, December.
    15. Müllner, Jakob & Puck, Jonas, 2018. "Towards a holistic framework of MNE–state bargaining: A formal model and case-based analysis," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 15-26.
    16. Ayman Hassan Bazhair & Mohammed Naif Alshareef, 2022. "Dynamic relationship between ownership structure and financial performance: a Saudi experience," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 2098636-209, December.
    17. Luciana Maines da Silva & Claudia Cristina Bitencourt & Kadígia Faccin & Tatiana Iakovleva, 2019. "The Role of Stakeholders in the Context of Responsible Innovation: A Meta-Synthesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, March.
    18. Francesca Bernini & Fabio La Rosa, 2024. "Research in the greenwashing field: concepts, theories, and potential impacts on economic and social value," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(2), pages 405-444, June.
    19. Cairns, George & Wright, George & Fairbrother, Peter, 2016. "Promoting articulated action from diverse stakeholders in response to public policy scenarios: A case analysis of the use of ‘scenario improvisation’ method," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 97-108.
    20. Bazin, Damien, 2009. "What exactly is corporate responsibility towards nature?: Ecological responsibility or management of nature?: A pluri-disciplinary standpoint," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 634-642, January.
    21. Christine Pochet, 2001. "Le gouvernement de l'entreprise défaillante: étude de trente plans de continuation," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 4(2), pages 149-181, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00991951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.