IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01867786.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L’écoute des parties prenantes dans une optique de développement durable : continuité ou alternative pour le marketing de projets industriels ?

Author

Listed:
  • Fanny Romestant

    (Excelia Group | La Rochelle Business School, CEREGE [Poitiers, La Rochelle] - Centre de recherche en gestion [EA 1722] - IAE Poitiers - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - UP - Université de Poitiers = University of Poitiers - ULR - La Rochelle Université)

Abstract

This work questions the very purpose of marketing, focused on "customer value" to propose, in line with the work of Deshayes and Lecoeuvre-Soudain (2011) in industrial marketing and projects marketing, the concept of "social value". In the sustainable development mining, this involves to discuss the link between primary stakeholders (client, prime contracting support, companies) and other stakeholders (NGOs, neighborhood, etc.). This research was born through a project with an industrial company in the transport sector, initiating a CSR process. Following an exploratory study focused on the company's clients (depth analysis of tender documents, interviews with key actors of the buying process), and through collaboration with company officials (business developer), it became insufficient to limit our analyses to the cus-tomer's expectations, to understand the issues of a project. The aim of this paper is of theoretical nature. It is about developing an understanding framework to take stakeholders into account in industrial project marketing. This framework suggests that stakeholders can be designed from the perspective of "continuity" or as an "alternative" in project marketing. The objectives of this paper are threefold. Firstly, to put the notion of stakeholders as a specific issue in the business marketing, secondly to propose a new way to understand the concept of stakeholders and finally to show how the stakeholders can change the industrial project. The issue focuses on the construction dynamics of sustainability in industrial projects, seen as a new challenge for business marketing (industrial project marketing).

Suggested Citation

  • Fanny Romestant, 2017. "L’écoute des parties prenantes dans une optique de développement durable : continuité ou alternative pour le marketing de projets industriels ?," Post-Print hal-01867786, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01867786
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01867786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01867786/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samuel Mercier, 2010. "Une analyse historique du concept de parties prenantes : Quelles leçons pour l'avenir ?," Post-Print halshs-00521201, HAL.
    2. D. Cazal, 2006. "LA RSE et ses parties prenantes : enjeux socio-politiques et contrats," Post-Print hal-00266704, HAL.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2352 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Franck Aggeri & Aurélien Acquier, 2005. "La théorie des stakeholders permet-elle de rendre compte des pratiques d'entreprise en matière de RSE ?," Post-Print halshs-00645708, HAL.
    5. Daniel Michel & Jean-Paul Valla & Robert Salle, 2000. "Marketing industriel : Stratégies et mise en oeuvre," Post-Print hal-02298000, HAL.
    6. Philippe Malaval & Christophe Benaroya, 2009. "Marketing Business to Business," Post-Print halshs-00971817, HAL.
    7. I. Royer, 2005. "Le management de projet : évolutions et perspectives de recherche," Post-Print hal-00185475, HAL.
    8. Cova, Bernard & Mazet, Florence & Salle, Robert, 1996. "Milieu as a pertinent unit of analysis in project marketing," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 5(6), pages 647-664, December.
    9. Samuel Mercier & Jean-Pascal Gond, 2005. "La théorie des parties prenantes," Working Papers CREGO 1050502, Université de Bourgogne - CREGO EA7317 Centre de recherches en gestion des organisations.
    10. Thibault Daudigeos & Bertrand Valiorgue, 2010. "L es limites du traitement marchand de la Responsabilité sociale de l'entreprise," Revue française de socio-Economie, La découverte, vol. 0(2), pages 65-86.
    11. D. Cazal, 2006. "La RSE et ses parties prenantes : enjeux sociopolitiques et contrats," Post-Print hal-00256863, HAL.
    12. Dimbi Ramonjy, 2007. "Les stratégies de collaboration des organisations du commerce équitable en France," Post-Print hal-00156133, HAL.
    13. Reinhard Steurer, 2006. "Mapping stakeholder theory anew: from the ‘stakeholder theory of the firm’ to three perspectives on business–society relations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(1), pages 55-69, January.
    14. Aaltonen, Kirsi & Kujala, Jaakko, 2010. "A project lifecycle perspective on stakeholder influence strategies in global projects," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 381-397, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anne-Sophie Merot & Frédérique Grazzini & Jean-Pierre Boissin, 2014. "Gouvernance et développement durable : Le cas de la responsabilité élargie du producteur dans une filière de gestion des déchets," Post-Print halshs-01185814, HAL.
    2. Sherline Dumano & Rémy Louis Budoc & Claude Fiore, 2018. "La mise en place du Transport Maritime à Courte Distance du Plateau des Guyanes à la Mer des Caraïbes : la perception des parties prenantes," Post-Print hal-02493411, HAL.
    3. Courvoisier, François & Calmelet, Laurence, 2012. "Stratégies marketing pour PME sous-traitantes dans l’horlogerie [Marketing strategies for subcontractant SME in the watchmaking industry]," MPRA Paper 43413, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 May 2012.
    4. Kévin Pastier & François Silva, 2020. "Objet, raison d’être et praxis : les coopératives et le commun au secours de l’entreprise ?," Post-Print hal-02872799, HAL.
    5. Abderrahman Jahmane & Pierre Louart, 2013. "La Responsabilité Sociale de l'Entreprise : une diversité des concepts, des enjeux multiples et imbriqués et diverses méthodes de mesure," Post-Print hal-01898797, HAL.
    6. Hannah Charlotte Joos, 2019. "Influences on managerial perceptions of stakeholder salience: two decades of research in review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 3-37, February.
    7. Nii Antiaye Addy & Arash Shaban-Nejad & David L. Buckeridge & Laurette Dubé, 2015. "An Innovative Approach to Addressing Childhood Obesity: A Knowledge-Based Infrastructure for Supporting Multi-Stakeholder Partnership Decision-Making in Quebec, Canada," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Amel Ben Rhouma & Walid Ben Amar & Eustache Ebondo Wa Mandzila, 2014. "Quel Impact Des Mécanismes De Gouvernance Sur La Divulgation Des Risques Liés Au Changement Climatique ? Le Cas Des Entreprises Françaises Cotées," Post-Print hal-01899578, HAL.
    9. Maciej Dobrzyñski & Krzysztof Dziekoñski & Arkadiusz Jurczuk, 2015. "Stakeholders Mapping - A Case Of International Logistics Project," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 11(2), pages 17-26, June.
    10. Pablo Gomez‐Carrasco & Giovanna Michelon, 2017. "The Power of Stakeholders' Voice: The Effects of Social Media Activism on Stock Markets," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(6), pages 855-872, September.
    11. Jelena Cvijović & Vladimir Obradović & Marija Todorović, 2021. "Stakeholder Management and Project Sustainability—A Throw of the Dice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    12. Kulikauskienė Kristina, 2021. "The Theoretical Quadruple Helix Model for Digital Inclusion Increase," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 85(1), pages 13-32, June.
    13. Jennifer Goodman & Angelina Korsunova & Minna Halme, 2017. "Our Collaborative Future: Activities and Roles of Stakeholders in Sustainability‐Oriented Innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(6), pages 731-753, September.
    14. Christopher Melin, 2011. "Le management de projets des firmes multinationales comme un mécanisme de coordination des relations siège-filiales," Post-Print hal-00690839, HAL.
    15. Bent Flyvbjerg, 2014. "What You Should Know About Megaprojects, and Why: An Overview," Papers 1409.0003, arXiv.org.
    16. Barchiesi, Maria Assunta & Fronzetti Colladon, Andrea, 2021. "Corporate core values and social responsibility: What really matters to whom," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    17. Nathalie Aubourg & Béatrice Canel-Depitre & Corinne Renault-Tesson, 2012. "La RSE en question : La gouvernance des parties prenantes au service de la gouvernance d'entreprise," Post-Print hal-02332385, HAL.
    18. Jonathan Luffarelli & Amrou Awaysheh, 2018. "The Impact of Indirect Corporate Social Performance Signals on Firm Value: Evidence from an Event Study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 295-310, May.
    19. repec:dau:papers:123456789/320 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Andrew Crane & Trish Ruebottom, 2011. "Stakeholder Theory and Social Identity: Rethinking Stakeholder Identification," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 77-87, March.
    21. Diego F. Uribe & Isabel Ortiz-Marcos & Ángel Uruburu, 2018. "What Is Going on with Stakeholder Theory in Project Management Literature? A Symbiotic Relationship for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    stakeholders; CSR; industrial project marketing; RSE; marketing; Parties prenantes;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01867786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.