IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/indbez/268822.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Berufsgewerkschaften als autonome Akteure der Tarifpolitik. Konsequenzen für das System etablierter Arbeitsbeziehungen
[Trade unions as autonomous actors in collective bargaining. Consequences for the system of established employment relations]

Author

Listed:
  • Keller, Berndt

Abstract

Der Beitrag behandelt in multidisziplinärer Perspektive Berufsgewerkschaften als neue, unabhängig-autonome Akteure der Tarifpolitik. Im Mittelpunkt stehen drei Fragestellungen: Wie kann ihre Mutation von Berufsverbänden zu Berufsgewerkschaften nicht nur beschrieben, sondern auch theoretisch erklärt werden? Wie sind aktuelle Entwicklungen, wie gesetzliche Regelungen sowie freiwillig-autonome Vereinbarungen der Verbände, einzuordnen? Welche Konsequenzen hat ihre Etablierung für die bestehenden Arbeitsbeziehungen auf Makro- und Branchenebene? ‒ Bei der Unterscheidung zwischen ökonomischen und organisatorischen Zielen zeigt der Beitrag, dass Berufsgewerkschaften in besonderem Maße ihre organisationspolitischen Eigeninteressen der dauerhaften, rechtlichen und faktischen Anerkennung als autonom-unabhängige Tarifpartner durchsetzen konnten.

Suggested Citation

  • Keller, Berndt, 2020. "Berufsgewerkschaften als autonome Akteure der Tarifpolitik. Konsequenzen für das System etablierter Arbeitsbeziehungen [Trade unions as autonomous actors in collective bargaining. Consequences for," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 27(4), pages 437-460.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:indbez:268822
    DOI: 10.3224/indbez.v27i4.05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/268822/1/indbez-v27i4-05.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3224/indbez.v27i4.05?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bachmann, Ronald & Henssler, Martin & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Talmann, Anna, 2011. "Empirische Analyse der Auswirkungen der Tarifpluralität auf das deutsche Tarifvertragssystem und auf die Häufigkeit von Arbeitskämpfen: Enbericht - Februar 2011," RWI Projektberichte, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, number 69956.
    2. Dütsch, Matthias & Stephan, Gesine & Struck, Olaf, 2017. "Lohnpolitik von Berufsgewerkschaften und Gerechtigkeitswahrnehmungen: Eine quasi-experimentelle Analyse [Wage negotiations by craft unions and fairness perceptions: A quasi-experimental study]," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 24(3), pages 271-295.
    3. Lesch, Hagen & Kestermann, Christian, 2020. "Tarifpolitischer Bericht. 2. Halbjahr 2019: Konfliktlösung durch Schlichtung und Mediation," IW-Reports 4/2020, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.
    4. Christian Lyhne Ibsen & Maarten Keune, 2018. "Organised Decentralisation of Collective Bargaining: Case studies of Germany, Netherlands and Denmark," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 217, OECD Publishing.
    5. Lesch Hagen, 2015. "Spartengewerkschaften, Statuskonflikte und Gemeinwohl: Gesetzlicher Ordnungsrahmen statt Laissez-faire," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 64(1), pages 111-136, April.
    6. Wolfgang Schroeder & Samuel Greef, 2008. "Industrie- und Spartengewerkschaften im Konflikt. Organisatorische Voraussetzungen und realisierte Gelegenheitsstrukturen," Industrielle Beziehungen - Zeitschrift fuer Arbeit, Organisation und Management - The German Journal of Industrial Relations, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 15(4), pages 329-355.
    7. John R. Dobson, 1997. "The Effects of Multi-unionism: a Survey of Large Manufacturing Establishments," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 35(4), pages 547-566, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dütsch, Matthias & Stephan, Gesine & Struck, Olaf, 2017. "Lohnpolitik von Berufsgewerkschaften und Gerechtigkeitswahrnehmungen: Eine quasi-experimentelle Analyse [Wage negotiations by craft unions and fairness perceptions: A quasi-experimental study]," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 24(3), pages 271-295.
    2. Bryson, Alex, 2001. "Union effects on managerial and employee perceptions of employee relations in Britain," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 4957, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Francesco Palma & Yann Thommen, 2020. "Employment Protection Reform in European Labor Markets: The Collective Bargaining Regime Matters," De Economist, Springer, vol. 168(4), pages 541-575, December.
    4. Ramos, Raul & Sanromá, Esteban & Simón, Hipólito, 2022. "Collective bargaining levels, employment and wage inequality in Spain," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 375-395.
    5. Tom Redman & Ed Snape, 2014. "The antecedents of union commitment and participation: evaluating moderation effects across unions," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(6), pages 486-506, November.
    6. Andrea Garnero, 2021. "The impact of collective bargaining on employment and wage inequality: Evidence from a new taxonomy of bargaining systems," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 27(2), pages 185-202, June.
    7. Beckmann, Thore & Likaj, Xhulia & Steimer, Paul & Stöckel, Michael, 2019. "Precarisation, individualisation and the development of trade unions in Germany," IPE Working Papers 130/2019, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    8. Berndt Keller, 2018. "Professional unions in Germany: theoretical explanations and practical consequences for industrial relations," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 24(4), pages 437-450, November.
    9. Dieter Hundt & Hagen Lesch, 2012. "Aufhebung der Tarifeinheit: Welche Folgen hat das Nebeneinander mehrerer Tarifverträge in einem Unternehmen?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 65(09), pages 03-11, May.
    10. Norbert Berthold & Claus Schnabel & Hagen Lesch & Michael Fuchs & Klaus Dauderstädt, 2014. "Die Macht kleiner Gewerkschaften: Sollte der Einfluss der Spartengewerkschaften eingedämmt werden?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 67(24), pages 03-19, December.
    11. Bofinger, Peter & Schnabel, Isabel & Feld, Lars P. & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Wieland, Volker, 2014. "Mehr Vertrauen in Marktprozesse. Jahresgutachten 2014/15 [More confidence in market processes. Annual Report 2014/15]," Annual Economic Reports / Jahresgutachten, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, volume 127, number 201415.
    12. Saskia Boumans, 2022. "Neoliberalisation of industrial relations: The ideational development of Dutch employers’ organisations between 1976 and 2019," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(4), pages 1610-1631, November.
    13. Jens Arnholtz, 2023. "The embedded flexibility of Nordic labor market models under pressure from EU‐induced dualization—The case of posted work in Denmark and Sweden," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 372-388, April.
    14. Maarten Keune, 2021. "Inequality between capital and labour and among wage-earners: the role of collective bargaining and trade unions," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 27(1), pages 29-46, February.
    15. Pablo PÉREZ AHUMADA & Gino OCAMPO, 2023. "Labour disputes in contexts of trade union fragmentation and pluralism: An empirical analysis of the case of Chile," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 162(3), pages 459-480, September.
    16. Thomas Paster & Dennie Oude Nijhuis & Maximilian Kiecker, 2020. "To Extend or Not to Extend: Explaining the Divergent Use of Statutory Bargaining Extensions in the Netherlands and Germany," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 58(3), pages 532-557, September.
    17. Dongwoo Park, 2023. "Lopsided inclusion: The impact of multi‐employer bargaining and class‐based unionism on non‐regular employment in South Korea," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 61(1), pages 110-132, March.
    18. Britta Rehder, 2009. "“Adversarial legalism” in the German system of industrial relations?," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(3), pages 217-234, September.
    19. Greef, Samuel & Speth, Rudolf, 2013. "Berufsgewerkschaften als lobbyistische Akteure: Potenziale, Instrumente und Strategien," Arbeitspapiere 275, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Berufsgewerkschaften; sektorale Arbeitsbeziehungen; Tarifeinheit; Tarifpluralität; Organisationspolitik; professional unions; sectoral industrial relations; collective bargaining unity; collective bargaining plurality; organisational policy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J39 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Other
    • J51 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Trade Unions: Objectives, Structure, and Effects
    • J53 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Labor-Management Relations; Industrial Jurisprudence
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:indbez:268822. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.budrich-journals.de/index.php/indbez/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.