IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2018i1p89-d192912.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Achieving Sustainable E-Commerce in Environmental, Social and Economic Dimensions by Taking Possible Trade-Offs

Author

Listed:
  • Judit Oláh

    (Institute of Applied Informatics and Logistics, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Nicodemus Kitukutha

    (Károly Ihrig Doctoral School of Management and Business, University of Debrecen, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Hossam Haddad

    (Károly Ihrig Doctoral School of Management and Business, University of Debrecen, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Miklós Pakurár

    (Institute of Applied Informatics and Logistics, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • Domicián Máté

    (Controlling Department, Institute of Accounting and Finance, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, 4028 Debrecen, Hungary)

  • József Popp

    (Institute of Sectoral Economics and Methodology, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary)

Abstract

The Internet revolution has led to the advancement of online business all over the world. The environmental, social, and economic aspects are significant to the e-commerce sector, on both the retailer and consumer sides. It cannot be over-emphasized how important the sustainability of e-commerce in all three dimensions is. E-commerce will allow consumers to shop online easily, at any hour of the day, using secure payment systems; furthermore, trust in retailers’ websites is of paramount importance to consumers. This calls our attention to the gap in previous studies, and consequently, the purpose of this study is to fill the gap, to ensure sustainable e-commerce in three dimensions; environmental, social, and economic. The question and aim under investigation are: How to integrate three dimensions into e-commerce to ensure that sustainability is achieved now and for future generations, while thriving as an industry? Collaboration is required, and all stakeholders in the virtual market must take appropriate responsibility. The methodology adopted is a review of previous studies done on each individual dimension of sustainability, since no joint studies have been carried out and integrated into the same literature framework. Furthermore, a case study involving companies in Kenya and Jordan is used in order to collect empirical data. The findings of the study show that: First, integration is essential for the sustainability of e-commerce in its three dimensions; second, trade-offs must be taken in the various dimensions in order for companies to realize sustainable e-commerce. This will go in hand with the realization of the maximum benefits of integrating the three dimensions in e-commerce to make it more sustainable. In conclusion, by applying these aspects of sustainability in e-commerce, it is clear that everyone wins. This is achieved by improving and safeguarding the quality of life by protecting the environment, preserving natural resources, and maintaining and sustaining the economy. The implications of the study are that, in order to make e-commerce more sustainable, to make decisions and take action, social/environmental/economic aspects must be considered as a fundamental element, and must be treated as a group and not separately as in previous studies. In this way, we can realize greater benefits, not only in online business sustainability, but also in policy-making and environmental protection, while companies will create economic value as well as avoiding labor unrest.

Suggested Citation

  • Judit Oláh & Nicodemus Kitukutha & Hossam Haddad & Miklós Pakurár & Domicián Máté & József Popp, 2018. "Achieving Sustainable E-Commerce in Environmental, Social and Economic Dimensions by Taking Possible Trade-Offs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2018:i:1:p:89-:d:192912
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/1/89/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/1/89/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joanna Cygler & Włodzimierz Sroka & Marina Solesvik & Katarzyna Dębkowska, 2018. "Benefits and Drawbacks of Coopetition: The Roles of Scope and Durability in Coopetitive Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Miriam Jankalová & Radoslav Jankal, 2018. "Sustainability Assessment According to the Selected Business Excellence Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Se-Yeon Ahn & So-Hyung Kim, 2017. "What Makes Firms Innovative? The Role of Social Capital in Corporate Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Kovács, Eszter & Kelemen, Eszter & Kalóczkai, Ágnes & Margóczi, Katalin & Pataki, György & Gébert, Judit & Málovics, György & Balázs, Bálint & Roboz, Ágnes & Krasznai Kovács, Eszter & Mihók, Barbara, 2015. "Understanding the links between ecosystem service trade-offs and conflicts in protected areas," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 117-127.
    5. Charlotte Fourcroy, 2014. "Innovation logics and energy consumption in the service sector: a characteristics-based approach and its application to food retail services," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(3), pages 115-138.
    6. Jinhuan Tang & Shoufeng Ji & Liwen Jiang, 2016. "The Design of a Sustainable Location-Routing-Inventory Model Considering Consumer Environmental Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Charles Edquist & Leif Hommen & Maureen McKelvey, 2001. "Innovation and Employment," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2138.
    8. Jessica Robinson & Gary Brase & Wendy Griswold & Chad Jackson & Larry Erickson, 2014. "Business Models for Solar Powered Charging Stations to Develop Infrastructure for Electric Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-30, October.
    9. Radonjič, Gregor & Tompa, Saša, 2018. "Carbon footprint calculation in telecommunications companies – The importance and relevance of scope 3 greenhouse gases emissions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 361-375.
    10. Emilia Madudova & Tatiana Čorejova & Marek Valica, 2018. "Economic Sustainability in a Wider Context: Case Study of Considerable ICT Sector Sub-Divisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Teodora Roman & Ionel Bostan & Adriana Manolică & Iustin Mitrica, 2015. "Profile of Green Consumers in Romania in Light of Sustainability Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Jia Wang & Xijia Huang, 2018. "The Optimal Carbon Reduction and Return Strategies under Carbon Tax Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    13. Yadoo, Annabel & Cruickshank, Heather, 2012. "The role for low carbon electrification technologies in poverty reduction and climate change strategies: A focus on renewable energy mini-grids with case studies in Nepal, Peru and Kenya," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 591-602.
    14. Yongrok Choi, 2017. "Sustainable Governance in Northeast Asia: Challenges for the Sustainable Frontier," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-7, January.
    15. Ting Shao & Zhenyu Liu, 2012. "How to maintain the sustainability of an e-commerce firm? From the perspective of social network," International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(3/4), pages 212-224.
    16. Wan Yu Chang & I Ying Chang, 2014. "The Influences of Humorous Advertising on Brand Popularity and Advertising Effects in the Tourism Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Li, Gang & Yang, Hongjiao & Sun, Linyan & Sohal, Amrik S., 2009. "The impact of IT implementation on supply chain integration and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 125-138, July.
    18. Sadiq M. Sait & Khalid M. Al-Tawil, 2007. "Impact of Internet Usage in Saudi Arabia: A Social Perspective," International Journal of Information Technology and Web Engineering (IJITWE), IGI Global, vol. 2(2), pages 81-115, April.
    19. Chaabane, A. & Ramudhin, A. & Paquet, M., 2012. "Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 37-49.
    20. Han-Shen Chen & Bi-Kun Tsai & Chi-Ming Hsieh, 2017. "Determinants of Consumers’ Purchasing Intentions for the Hydrogen-Electric Motorcycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-12, August.
    21. Judit Nagy & Judit Oláh & Edina Erdei & Domicián Máté & József Popp, 2018. "The Role and Impact of Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things on the Business Strategy of the Value Chain—The Case of Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, September.
    22. Sung Yul Ryoo & Chulmo Koo, 2013. "Green practices-IS alignment and environmental performance: The mediating effects of coordination," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(5), pages 799-814, November.
    23. Nisar, Tahir M. & Prabhakar, Guru, 2017. "What factors determine e-satisfaction and consumer spending in e-commerce retailing?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 135-144.
    24. Yongrok Choi & Di Gao, 2014. "The Role of Intermediation in the Governance of Sustainable Chinese Web Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(7), pages 1-17, June.
    25. Biagi, Federico & Falk, Martin, 2017. "The impact of ICT and e-commerce on employment in Europe," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 1-18.
    26. Rodrigo Lozano, 2007. "Collaboration as a pathway for sustainability," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(6), pages 370-381.
    27. Suk-Joo Lee & Cheolhwi Ahn & Kelly Minjung Song & Hyunchul Ahn, 2018. "Trust and Distrust in E-Commerce," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, March.
    28. Biagi, Federico & Falk, Martin, 2017. "The Impact of ICT and E-Commerce Activities on Employment in Europe," Ratio Working Papers 285, The Ratio Institute.
    29. Pol, Eduardo & Ville, Simon, 2009. "Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 878-885, December.
    30. Carrillo, Janice E. & Vakharia, Asoo J. & Wang, Ruoxuan, 2014. "Environmental implications for online retailing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 744-755.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yot Amornkitvikai & Siew Yean Tham & Charles Harvie & Wonlop Writthym Buachoom, 2022. "Barriers and Factors Affecting the E-Commerce Sustainability of Thai Micro-, Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises (MSMEs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-28, July.
    2. Lyulyov, Oleksii & Pimonenko, Tetyana & Saura, Jose Ramon & Barbosa, Belem, 2024. "How do e-governance and e-business drive sustainable development goals?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Zhenxiang Cao & Liqing Peng, 2023. "The Impact of Digital Economics on Environmental Quality: A System Dynamics Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    4. Pham Quang Huy & Vu Kien Phuc, 2023. "Big data in relation with business intelligence capabilities and e-commerce during COVID-19 pandemic in accountant’s perspective," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Eliza Nichifor & Radu Constantin Lixăndroiu & Silvia Sumedrea & Ioana Bianca Chițu & Gabriel Brătucu, 2021. "How Can SMEs Become More Sustainable? Modelling the M-Commerce Consumer Behaviour with Contingent Free Shipping and Customer Journey’s Touchpoints Optimisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-27, June.
    6. Yaoguang Zhong & Ivan Ka Wai Lai & Fangfang Guo & Huajun Tang, 2020. "Effects of Partnership Quality and Information Sharing on Express Delivery Service Performance in the E-commerce Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Usman Akbar & Akash Kumar & Hameed Khan & Muhammad Asif Khan & Khansa Parvaiz & Judit Oláh, 2020. "Trade-Offs in Competitive Transport Operations," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Meqbel Mishary Aliedan, 2020. "Overall business climate and its impact on environmental sustainability: analyzing evidence from ASEAN countries," Post-Print hal-03121009, HAL.
    9. Jose Alejandro Cano & Abraham Londoño-Pineda & Maria Fanny Castro & Hugo Bécquer Paz & Carolina Rodas & Tatiana Arias, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review on E-Marketplaces, Open Innovation, and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-42, May.
    10. Vijay Victor, 2019. "Consumer Attitude and Reaction towards Personalised Pricing in the E-Commerce Sector," GATR Journals jmmr220, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    11. Paulo Rita & Ricardo F. Ramos, 2022. "Global Research Trends in Consumer Behavior and Sustainability in E-Commerce: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Knowledge Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mashalah, Heider Al & Hassini, Elkafi & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Bhatt (Mishra), Deepa, 2022. "The impact of digital transformation on supply chains through e-commerce: Literature review and a conceptual framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    2. Adriana Dima & Elena Radu & Ecaterina Milica Dobrota & Adrian Otoiu & Alina Florentina Saracu, 2023. "Sustainable Development of E-commerce in the Post-COVID Times: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Pestle Factors," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 25(S17), pages 1095-1095, November.
    3. Martin Falk & Eva Hagsten, 2018. "Employment impacts of market novelty sales: evidence for nine European Countries," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 8(2), pages 119-137, June.
    4. Muhammad Khalid Anser & Zahid Yousaf & Muhammad Usman & Seemab Yousaf, 2020. "Towards Strategic Business Performance of the Hospitality Sector: Nexus of ICT, E-Marketing and Organizational Readiness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Mariana Kaneva, 2019. "Broadband and e-Commerce in the Balkans - Econometric Analysis," Izvestia Journal of the Union of Scientists - Varna. Economic Sciences Series, Union of Scientists - Varna, Economic Sciences Section, vol. 8(2), pages 100-109, August.
    6. Carmen Adina Paștiu & Ionica Oncioiu & Daniel Adrian Gârdan & Silvia Ștefania Maican & Iuliana Petronela Gârdan & Andreea Cipriana Muntean, 2020. "The Perspective of E-Business Sustainability and Website Accessibility of Online Stores," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Shoufeng Ji & Qi Sun, 2017. "Low-Carbon Planning and Design in B&R Logistics Service: A Case Study of an E-Commerce Big Data Platform in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-27, November.
    8. Aleksander Banasik & Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard & Argyris Kanellopoulos & G. D. H. Claassen & Jack G. A. J. Vorst, 2018. "Multi-criteria decision making approaches for green supply chains: a review," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 366-396, September.
    9. IWAMOTO Koichi & TANOUE Yuta, 2018. "Digitization, Computerization, Networking, Automation, and the Future of Jobs in Japan," Policy Discussion Papers 18013, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    10. Maarten Goos & Melanie Arntz & Ulrich Zierahn & Terry Gregory & Stephanie Carretero Gomez & Ignacio Gonzalez Vazquez & Koen Jonkers, 2019. "The Impact of Technological Innovation on the Future of Work," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2019-03, Joint Research Centre.
    11. Tamara Bińczak & Filip Kaczmarek & Jakub Rybacki, 2018. "Determinants of E-Commerce Turnover in Europe: Consumer Protection Matters," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 3, pages 125-141.
    12. Jianli Gao & Abu Bakkar Siddik & Sayyed Khawar Abbas & Muhammad Hamayun & Mohammad Masukujjaman & Syed Shah Alam, 2023. "Impact of E-Commerce and Digital Marketing Adoption on the Financial and Sustainability Performance of MSMEs during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    13. Yongrok Choi & Do Quynh Mai, 2018. "The Sustainable Role of the E-Trust in the B2C E-Commerce of Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, January.
    14. Quoc Trung Pham & Xuan Phuc Tran & Sanjay Misra & Rytis Maskeliūnas & Robertas Damaševičius, 2018. "Relationship between Convenience, Perceived Value, and Repurchase Intention in Online Shopping in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    15. Manuela Ingaldi & Robert Ulewicz, 2019. "How to Make E-Commerce More Successful by Use of Kano’s Model to Assess Customer Satisfaction in Terms of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-22, September.
    16. Judit Oláh & Nemer Aburumman & József Popp & Muhammad Asif Khan & Hossam Haddad & Nicodemus Kitukutha, 2020. "Impact of Industry 4.0 on Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, June.
    17. Hidemichi Fujii & Akihiko Shinozaki & Shigemi Kagawa & Shunsuke Managi, 2019. "How Does Information and Communication Technology Capital Affect Productivity in the Energy Sector? New Evidence from 14 Countries, Considering the Transition to Renewable Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, May.
    18. Fei Zou & Yanju Zhou & Caihua Yuan, 2020. "The Impact of Retailers’ Low-Carbon Investment on the Supply Chain under Carbon Tax and Carbon Trading Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-27, April.
    19. Hongpeng Guo & Zhihao Lv & Junyi Hua & Hongxu Yuan & Qingyu Yu, 2021. "Design of Combined Auction Model for Emission Rights of International Forestry Carbon Sequestration and Other Pollutants Based on SMRA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    20. Teimuraz Gogokhia & George Berulava, 2021. "Business environment reforms, innovation and firm productivity in transition economies," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(2), pages 221-245, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2018:i:1:p:89-:d:192912. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.