IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i9p3597-d351842.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Retailers’ Low-Carbon Investment on the Supply Chain under Carbon Tax and Carbon Trading Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Fei Zou

    (Business School, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Yanju Zhou

    (Business School, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Caihua Yuan

    (Business School, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

Abstract

In the current low-carbon economy, the government has adopted carbon taxes and carbon trading policies to control the carbon emissions of manufacturers. As consumers become increasingly aware of low-carbon, some retailers have also started investing in low-carbon to shape their public image and increase their competitiveness to attract more customers. In this paper, the Stackelberg game method is utilized to solve the model, and the graphs are used to analyze the benefits of retailers' low-carbon investment on the supply chain through numerical analysis. It is found that when the emission reduction cost coefficient of manufacturers is relatively low, manufacturers are willing to reduce carbon emissions. At this time, increasing carbon tax and the carbon emission permits price can effectively promote the emission reduction behavior of manufacturers, because it increases demand for products and the profit of manufacturers and retailers. However, when the emission reduction cost coefficient of the manufacturers is quite high, increasing carbon tax and carbon emission permits price cannot effectively promote the emission reduction behavior, because this situation of the emission reduction reduces the profit of manufacturers. The main contribution of this paper discovers that the green cost coefficient of retailers' low-carbon investment will adjust the impact of the carbon tax and the carbon trading price on the profits of retailers and manufacturers which proves that retailers’ low-carbon investment is beneficial to the supply chain. When the emission reduction cost coefficient is high and the green cost coefficient is low, increasing the carbon tax or carbon emission permits price can increase the profit of manufacturers and retailers. Finally, we design a supply chain coordination of comprehensive sharing contact for retailers and manufacturers. The result shows that this contract has economic and environmental benefits, and that it is beneficial for the environment and economy of sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Fei Zou & Yanju Zhou & Caihua Yuan, 2020. "The Impact of Retailers’ Low-Carbon Investment on the Supply Chain under Carbon Tax and Carbon Trading Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-27, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3597-:d:351842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3597/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3597/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glock, C. H. & Jaber, M. Y. & El Saadany, A., 2013. "Supply Chain Coordination with Emission Reduction Incentives," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 57672, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. N. Amrouche & G. Martín-Herrán & G. Zaccour, 2008. "Pricing and Advertising of Private and National Brands in a Dynamic Marketing Channel," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 465-483, June.
    3. Pradeep K. Chintagunta & Dipak Jain, 1992. "A Dynamic Model of Channel Member Strategies for Marketing Expenditures," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 168-188.
    4. Chen, Wenbo, 2018. "Retailer-driven carbon emission abatement with consumer environmental awareness and carbon tax: Revenue-sharing versus Cost-sharingAuthor-Name: Yang, Huixiao," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 179-191.
    5. Fremstad, Anders & Paul, Mark, 2019. "The Impact of a Carbon Tax on Inequality," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 88-97.
    6. Jiafu Su & Chi Li & Qingjun Zeng & Jiaquan Yang & Jie Zhang, 2019. "A Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain Coordination Mechanism Based on Third-Party Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Liu, Zugang (Leo) & Anderson, Trisha D. & Cruz, Jose M., 2012. "Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(3), pages 602-613.
    8. Wissema, Wiepke & Dellink, Rob, 2007. "AGE analysis of the impact of a carbon energy tax on the Irish economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 671-683, March.
    9. Wu, Peng & Jin, Ying & Shi, Yongjiang & Shyu, Hawfeng, 2017. "The impact of carbon emission costs on manufacturers' production and location decision," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 193-206.
    10. Yan, Nina & Jin, Xuyu & Zhong, Hechen & Xu, Xun, 2020. "Loss-averse retailers’ financial offerings to capital-constrained suppliers: loan vs. investment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    11. Sundarakani, Balan & de Souza, Robert & Goh, Mark & Wagner, Stephan M. & Manikandan, Sushmera, 2010. "Modeling carbon footprints across the supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 43-50, November.
    12. Zhang, Xinhua & Gan, Dongmei & Wang, Yali & Liu, Yu & Ge, Jiali & Xie, Rui, 2020. "The impact of price and revenue floors on carbon emission reduction investment by coal-fired power plants," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    13. Thomas Eichner & Rüdiger Pethig, 2010. "EU-type carbon emissions trade and the distributional impact of overlapping emissions taxes," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 287-315, June.
    14. Woo, C.K. & Chen, Y. & Zarnikau, J. & Olson, A. & Moore, J. & Ho, T., 2018. "Carbon trading’s impact on California’s real-time electricity market prices," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 579-587.
    15. Chiang, Wei-yu Kevin, 2010. "Product availability in competitive and cooperative dual-channel distribution with stock-out based substitution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 111-126, January.
    16. Baranzini, Andrea & Goldemberg, Jose & Speck, Stefan, 2000. "A future for carbon taxes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 395-412, March.
    17. Moon, Ilkyeong & Dey, Kartick & Saha, Subrata, 2018. "Strategic inventory: Manufacturer vs. retailer investment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 63-82.
    18. Shih-Hsin Chen & Yeong-Cheng Liou & Yi-Hui Chen & Kun-Ching Wang, 2019. "Order Acceptance and Scheduling Problem with Carbon Emission Reduction and Electricity Tariffs on a Single Machine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-16, September.
    19. Sammi Y. Tang & Panos Kouvelis, 2014. "Pay-Back-Revenue-Sharing Contract in Coordinating Supply Chains with Random Yield," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(12), pages 2089-2102, December.
    20. Perdikaki, Olga & Kostamis, Dimitris & Swaminathan, Jayashankar M., 2016. "Timing of service investments for retailers under competition and demand uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(1), pages 188-201.
    21. Fang, Guochang & Lu, Longxi & Tian, Lixin & he, Yu & Yin, Huibo, 2020. "Research on the influence mechanism of carbon trading on new energy—A case study of ESER system for China," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).
    22. Gary H. Chao & Seyed M. R. Iravani & R. Canan Savaskan, 2009. "Quality Improvement Incentives and Product Recall Cost Sharing Contracts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(7), pages 1122-1138, July.
    23. Martin Achtnicht, 2012. "German car buyers’ willingness to pay to reduce CO 2 emissions," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 113(3), pages 679-697, August.
    24. Lee, Cheng F. & Lin, Sue J. & Lewis, Charles, 2008. "Analysis of the impacts of combining carbon taxation and emission trading on different industry sectors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 722-729, February.
    25. Yadoo, Annabel & Cruickshank, Heather, 2012. "The role for low carbon electrification technologies in poverty reduction and climate change strategies: A focus on renewable energy mini-grids with case studies in Nepal, Peru and Kenya," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 591-602.
    26. Rosič, Heidrun & Jammernegg, Werner, 2013. "The economic and environmental performance of dual sourcing: A newsvendor approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 109-119.
    27. Chaabane, A. & Ramudhin, A. & Paquet, M., 2012. "Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 37-49.
    28. Palsule-Desai, Omkar D., 2013. "Supply chain coordination using revenue-dependent revenue sharing contracts," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 780-796.
    29. Shengzhong Zhang & Yingmin Yu & Qihong Zhu & Chun Martin Qiu & Aixuan Tian, 2020. "Green Innovation Mode under Carbon Tax and Innovation Subsidy: An Evolutionary Game Analysis for Portfolio Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, February.
    30. Corbett, Charles J. & DeCroix, Gregory A. & Ha, Albert Y., 2005. "Optimal shared-savings contracts in supply chains: Linear contracts and double moral hazard," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(3), pages 653-667, June.
    31. Bai, Yin & Liu, Yong, 2013. "An exploration of residents’ low-carbon awareness and behavior in Tianjin, China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1261-1270.
    32. Usama Awan & Andrzej Kraslawski & Janne Huiskonen, 2018. "Governing Interfirm Relationships for Social Sustainability: The Relationship between Governance Mechanisms, Sustainable Collaboration, and Cultural Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lina Ma & Xinran Zhang & Yushen Du, 2021. "Influence Mechanism on Supplier Emission Reduction Based on a Two-Level Supply Chain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Nan Li & Beibei Shi & Rong Kang, 2021. "Information Disclosure, Coal Withdrawal and Carbon Emissions Reductions: A Policy Test Based on China’s Environmental Information Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, August.
    3. Gil Cohen & Mahmoud Qadan, 2024. "Carbon permits price and real emissions," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 872-886, December.
    4. Wenbing Luo & Ziyan Tian & Shihu Zhong & Qinke Lyu & Mingjun Deng, 2022. "Global Evolution of Research on Sustainable Finance from 2000 to 2021: A Bibliometric Analysis on WoS Database," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Xiaoping & He, Ping & Xu, Hao & Zhang, Quanpeng, 2017. "Supply chain coordination with green technology under cap-and-trade regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 433-442.
    2. Yang, Yuxiang & Goodarzi, Shadi & Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Fahimnia, Behnam, 2022. "In-house production and outsourcing under different emissions reduction regulations: An equilibrium decision model for global supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. Meng, Xiaoge & Yao, Zhong & Nie, Jiajia & Zhao, Yingxue & Li, Zenglu, 2018. "Low-carbon product selection with carbon tax and competition: Effects of the power structure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 224-230.
    4. Palak, Gökçe & Ekşioğlu, Sandra Duni & Geunes, Joseph, 2014. "Analyzing the impacts of carbon regulatory mechanisms on supplier and mode selection decisions: An application to a biofuel supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 198-216.
    5. Chen, Wenbo, 2018. "Retailer-driven carbon emission abatement with consumer environmental awareness and carbon tax: Revenue-sharing versus Cost-sharingAuthor-Name: Yang, Huixiao," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 179-191.
    6. Chunhai Yu & Yingxiang Zhang & Ling Liu & Thomas W. Archibald, 2024. "Low-carbon supply chain strategy and contract coordination considering manufacturers′ fairness concerns," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1-51, December.
    7. Li, Dong & Cruz, Jose M., 2022. "Multiperiod supply chain network dynamics under investment in sustainability, externality cost, and consumers’ willingness to pay," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    8. Youcef MECHOUAR & V Hovelaque & C Gaigné, 2021. "Effect of raw material substitution on the facility location decision under a carbon tax policy," Post-Print hal-04155066, HAL.
    9. Xiutian Shi & Xiaoli Zhang & Ciwei Dong & Subin Wen, 2018. "Economic Performance and Emission Reduction of Supply Chains in Different Power Structures: Perspective of Sustainable Investment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    10. Zhitao Xu & Adel Elomri & Shaligram Pokharel & Fatih Mutlu, 2019. "The Design of Green Supply Chains under Carbon Policies: A Literature Review of Quantitative Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Qiang Du & Jiajie Zhou, 2022. "Evolution of Low Carbon Supply Chain Research: A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-20, November.
    12. Jian Li & Kin Keung Lai, 2023. "The abatement contract for low-carbon demand in supply chain with single and multiple abatement mechanism under asymmetric information," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 437-459, May.
    13. El Ouardighi, Fouad & Sim, Jeongeun & Kim, Bowon, 2021. "Pollution accumulation and abatement policies in two supply chains under vertical and horizontal competition and strategy types," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    14. Longfei He & Daozhi Zhao & Liangjie Xia, 2015. "Game Theoretic Analysis of Carbon Emission Abatement in Fashion Supply Chains Considering Vertical Incentives and Channel Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-30, April.
    15. Y Bouchery & Asma Ghaffari & Zied Jemai & Jan C Fransoo, 2016. "Sustainable transportation and order quantity: insights from multiobjective optimization," Post-Print hal-01954465, HAL.
    16. Jun Wang & Rui Ma & Xinman Lu & Baoqin Yu, 2022. "Emission reduction cooperation in a dynamic supply chain with competitive retailers," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 14261-14297, December.
    17. Zhou, Xiaoyang & Wei, Xiaoya & Lin, Jun & Tian, Xin & Lev, Benjamin & Wang, Shouyang, 2021. "Supply chain management under carbon taxes: A review and bibliometric analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    18. Han, Xiaoya & Khouja, Moutaz & Liu, Xin, 2023. "A dynamic model considering consumer green awareness and environmental subsidy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    19. Schaefer, Brian & Konur, Dinçer, 2015. "Economic and environmental considerations in a continuous review inventory control system with integrated transportation decisions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 142-165.
    20. Dong, Ciwei & Liu, Qingyu & Shen, Bin, 2019. "To be or not to be green? Strategic investment for green product development in a supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 193-227.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3597-:d:351842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.