IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i18p4830-d264047.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Make E-Commerce More Successful by Use of Kano’s Model to Assess Customer Satisfaction in Terms of Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Manuela Ingaldi

    (Faculty of Management, Czestochowa University of Technology, al. Armii Krajowej 19b, 42-200 Czestochowa, Poland)

  • Robert Ulewicz

    (Faculty of Management, Czestochowa University of Technology, al. Armii Krajowej 19b, 42-200 Czestochowa, Poland)

Abstract

Personalization, mobility, deliveries on the same day, and perhaps artificial intelligence—all of these elements will shape e-commerce in the near future. It is necessary to consider what features and standards online shops will have to meet in order to achieve success and to adapt to the changing preferences and requirements of the customer and their awareness of the perception of the environment through the prism of, for example, sustainable development. This means there is a need to specify a set of attributes that will influence the decision to use the services of a given e-shop. Despite all efforts, many online shops fail because they do not meet the expectations of customers. At the same time, meeting customer expectations is a big challenge for newly emerging e-shops. There are many studies on sustainable development in e-commerce, but there is no specific methodology for e-shop design, especially in the aspect of sustainable development. The authors propose a methodology based on Kano’s model and customer satisfaction to explore customers’ stated needs and unstated desires and to divided them into different groups with different impacts on customer satisfaction. In this paper, a case study on the attributes of customer satisfaction for a newly opened e-shop with organic products, which is to operate in the countries of Central Europe and takes into account selected assumptions of sustainable development, was presented. The research took the form of an original (authorial), universal survey that can be used in other similar research. A total of 1069 correctly completed surveys were taken into account for the analysis. Respondents indicated 16 must-have features for the e-shop in order to make customers benefit from its services and 11 one-dimensional features that will determine the level of customer satisfaction. Among the must-have features, there were those related to sustainable development, which indicates the environmental awareness of potential customers. The obtained results were given to the management of the research e-shop and were included during the design of its operation. After one to two years of e-shop operation, the results will be verified.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuela Ingaldi & Robert Ulewicz, 2019. "How to Make E-Commerce More Successful by Use of Kano’s Model to Assess Customer Satisfaction in Terms of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-22, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:18:p:4830-:d:264047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/18/4830/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/18/4830/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. María Teresa Ballestar & Pilar Grau-Carles & Jorge Sainz, 2019. "Predicting customer quality in e-commerce social networks: a machine learning approach," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 589-603, June.
    2. Beck, Norbert & Rygl, David, 2015. "Categorization of multiple channel retailing in Multi-, Cross-, and Omni†Channel Retailing for retailers and retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 170-178.
    3. Manuela Ingaldi & Robert Ulewicz, 2018. "Evaluation of Quality of the e-Commerce Service," International Journal of Ambient Computing and Intelligence (IJACI), IGI Global, vol. 9(2), pages 55-66, April.
    4. Dewi Hanggraeni & Beata Ślusarczyk & Liyu Adhi Kasari Sulung & Athor Subroto, 2019. "The Impact of Internal, External and Enterprise Risk Management on the Performance of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Zingales, Luigi, 2015. "Does Finance Benefit Society?," CEPR Discussion Papers 10350, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Sebastian Kot, 2018. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management in Small and Medium Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Christian Biener & Martin Eling & Jan Hendrik Wirfs, 2015. "Insurability of Cyber Risk: An Empirical Analysis†," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 40(1), pages 131-158, January.
    8. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4623 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Li, Gang & Yang, Hongjiao & Sun, Linyan & Sohal, Amrik S., 2009. "The impact of IT implementation on supply chain integration and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 125-138, July.
    10. Chou, Szu-Yu & Shen, George C. & Chiu, Hung-Chang & Chou, Yu-Tsun, 2016. "Multichannel service providers' strategy: Understanding customers' switching and free-riding behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 2226-2232.
    11. Gary Gereffi, 2014. "Global value chains in a post-Washington Consensus world," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 9-37, February.
    12. Yongrok Choi & Di Gao, 2014. "The Role of Intermediation in the Governance of Sustainable Chinese Web Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(7), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Li-Chun Hsu & Kai-Yu Wang & Wen-Hai Chih, 2013. "Effects of web site characteristics on customer loyalty in B2B e-commerce: evidence from Taiwan," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(11), pages 1026-1050, August.
    14. Luigi Zingales, 2015. "Presidential Address: Does Finance Benefit Society?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 70(4), pages 1327-1363, August.
    15. S. Rolland & Ina Freeman, 2010. "A new measure of e-service quality in France," Post-Print hal-00576616, HAL.
    16. Christopher L. Weber & Jonathan G. Koomey & H. Scott Matthews, 2010. "The Energy and Climate Change Implications of Different Music Delivery Methods," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 14(5), pages 754-769, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Willard Munyoka, 2022. "Inclusive Digital Innovation in South Africa: Perspectives from Disadvantaged and Marginalized Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Paulina Jusiuk, 2023. "Influence of Pro-Environmental Attitudes on the Choice between Tangible and Virtual Product Forms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-24, July.
    3. Christina Kleisiari & Marie-Noelle Duquenne & George Vlontzos, 2021. "E-Commerce in the Retail Chain Store Market: An Alternative or a Main Trend?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Robert Ulewicz & Dominika Siwiec & Andrzej Pacana, 2023. "A New Model of Pro-Quality Decision Making in Terms of Products’ Improvement Considering Customer Requirements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Manuela Ingaldi & Robert Ulewicz, 2019. "Problems with the Implementation of Industry 4.0 in Enterprises from the SME Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Daniel Baier & Theresa Maria Rausch & Timm F. Wagner, 2020. "The Drivers of Sustainable Apparel and Sportswear Consumption: A Segmented Kano Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, April.
    7. Rausch, Theresa Maria & Baier, Daniel & Wening, Stefanie, 2021. "Does sustainability really matter to consumers? Assessing the importance of online shop and apparel product attributes," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dani Rodrik, 2018. "Populism and the economics of globalization," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 1(1), pages 12-33, June.
    2. John Y. Campbell, 2016. "Restoring Rational Choice: The Challenge of Consumer Financial Regulation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 1-30, May.
    3. Steven J. Davis & John C. Haltiwanger & Kyle Handley & Ben Lipsius & Josh Lerner & Javier Miranda, 2021. "The economic effects of private equity buyouts," Jena Economics Research Papers 2021-013, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    4. Girardone, Claudia & Kokas, Sotirios & Wood, Geoffrey, 2021. "Diversity and women in finance: Challenges and future perspectives," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    5. Stefano Di Bucchianico, 2020. "A note on financialization from a Classical-Keynesian standpoint," Department of Economics University of Siena 824, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    6. Cai, Ya-Jun & Lo, Chris K.Y., 2020. "Omni-channel management in the new retailing era: A systematic review and future research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    7. Ian Webster, 2022. "Making the municipal capital market in nineteenth‐century England," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 75(1), pages 56-79, February.
    8. Max Deter, 2020. "Prosociality and Risk Preferences in the Financial Sector," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1075, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    9. Berger, Allen N. & Molyneux, Phil & Wilson, John O.S., 2020. "Banks and the real economy: An assessment of the research," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    10. van Dijk, Mathijs A. & van Dalen, Hendrik P. & Hyde, Martin, 2020. "Who bears the brunt? The impact of banking crises on younger and older workers," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 17(C).
    11. Gunther Capelle-Blancard, 2018. "What is the Point of (the Hundreds of Thousands of Billions of) Stock Transactions?," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 60(1), pages 15-33, March.
    12. Cheah, Chee Keong & Masih, Mansur, 2017. "Does the growth of islamic bank financing depend on stock market growth? evidence from Malaysia," MPRA Paper 106192, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Bai, Jennie & Philippon, Thomas & Savov, Alexi, 2016. "Have financial markets become more informative?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 625-654.
    14. Clark, Brian & Ebrahim, Alireza, 2022. "Risk shifting and regulatory arbitrage: Evidence from operational risk," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    15. Hélène Rainelli & Hélène Rainelli-Weiss, 2019. "Recherche en finance : quand la performativité invite à la réflexivité," Post-Print halshs-02025011, HAL.
    16. Atanas Pekanov & Margit Schratzenstaller-Altzinger, 2019. "A Global Financial Transaction Tax. Theory, Practice and Potential Revenues," WIFO Working Papers 582, WIFO.
    17. Uras, Burak R., 2019. "Unbundling Financial Imperfections: Lending Frictions Vs. Trading Frictions," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(4), pages 1401-1441, June.
    18. Tomasz Potocki, 2022. "Locating Financial Capability Within Capability Approach – Theoretical Survey," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 1, pages 96-106.
    19. Felix Holzmeister & Martin Holmén & Michael Kirchler & Matthias Stefan & Erik Wengström, 2023. "Delegation Decisions in Finance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(8), pages 4828-4844, August.
    20. Fufa, Tolina & Kim, Jaebeom, 2018. "Stock markets, banks, and economic growth: Evidence from more homogeneous panels," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 504-517.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:18:p:4830-:d:264047. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.