IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i24p5023-d296161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving Biomethanation of Chicken Manure by Co-Digestion with Ethanol Plant Effluent

Author

Listed:
  • Dae-Yeol Cheong

    (GeoSynFuels, LLC, Golden, CO 80401, USA
    Present address: Institute of Environmental Technology, Techcross Water & Energy Inc., Bucheon 14523, Korea.)

  • Jeffrey Todd Harvey

    (GeoSynFuels, LLC, Golden, CO 80401, USA)

  • Jinsu Kim

    (School of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan 44919, Korea)

  • Changsoo Lee

    (School of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan 44919, Korea)

Abstract

As the global production of chicken manure has steadily increased, its proper management has become a challenging issue. This study examined process effluent from a bioethanol plant as a co-substrate for efficient anaerobic digestion of chicken manure. An anaerobic continuous reactor was operated in mono- and co-digestion modes by adding increasing amounts of the ethanol plant effluent (0%, 10%, and 20% (v/v) of chicken manure). Methanogenic performance improved significantly in terms of both methane production rate and yield (by up to 66% and 36%, respectively), with an increase in organic loading rate over the experimental phases. Correspondingly, the specific methanogenic activity was significantly higher in the co-digestion sludge than in the mono-digestion sludge. The reactor did not suffer any apparent process imbalance, ammonia inhibition, or nutrient limitation throughout the experiment, with the removal of volatile solids being stably maintained (56.3–58.9%). The amount of ethanol plant effluent appears to directly affect the rate of acidification, and its addition at ≥20% (v/v) to chicken manure needs to be avoided to maintain a stable pH. The overall results suggest that anerobic co-digestion with ethanol plant effluent may provide a practical means for the stable treatment and valorization of chicken manure.

Suggested Citation

  • Dae-Yeol Cheong & Jeffrey Todd Harvey & Jinsu Kim & Changsoo Lee, 2019. "Improving Biomethanation of Chicken Manure by Co-Digestion with Ethanol Plant Effluent," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-10, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:24:p:5023-:d:296161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/24/5023/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/24/5023/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Jinsu & Baek, Gahyun & Kim, Jaai & Lee, Changsoo, 2019. "Energy production from different organic wastes by anaerobic co-digestion: Maximizing methane yield versus maximizing synergistic effect," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 683-690.
    2. Na Duan & Xia Ran & Ruirui Li & Panagiotis G. Kougias & Yuanhui Zhang & Cong Lin & Hongbin Liu, 2018. "Performance Evaluation of Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure with Algal Digestate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-11, July.
    3. Gelegenis, John & Georgakakis, Dimitris & Angelidaki, Irini & Christopoulou, Nicholetta & Goumenaki, Maria, 2007. "Optimization of biogas production from olive-oil mill wastewater, by codigesting with diluted poultry-manure," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(6), pages 646-663, June.
    4. Christy E. Manyi-Loh & Sampson N. Mamphweli & Edson L. Meyer & Anthony I. Okoh & Golden Makaka & Michael Simon, 2013. "Microbial Anaerobic Digestion (Bio-Digesters) as an Approach to the Decontamination of Animal Wastes in Pollution Control and the Generation of Renewable Energy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-28, September.
    5. Hassan, Muhammad & Umar, Muhammad & Ding, Weimin & Mehryar, Esmaeil & Zhao, Chao, 2017. "Methane enhancement through co-digestion of chicken manure and oxidative cleaved wheat straw: Stability performance and kinetic modeling perspectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2314-2320.
    6. Fei Wang & Mengfu Pei & Ling Qiu & Yiqing Yao & Congguang Zhang & Hong Qiang, 2019. "Performance of Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure Under Gradually Elevated Organic Loading Rates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Gelegenis, John & Georgakakis, Dimitris & Angelidaki, Irini & Mavris, Vassilis, 2007. "Optimization of biogas production by co-digesting whey with diluted poultry manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(13), pages 2147-2160.
    8. Li, Kun & Liu, Ronghou & Cui, Shaofeng & Yu, Qiong & Ma, Ruijie, 2018. "Anaerobic co-digestion of animal manures with corn stover or apple pulp for enhanced biogas production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 335-342.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shivangi Jha & Sonil Nanda & Bishnu Acharya & Ajay K. Dalai, 2022. "A Review of Thermochemical Conversion of Waste Biomass to Biofuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Rahul Kadam & Sangyeol Jo & Jonghwa Lee & Kamonwan Khanthong & Heewon Jang & Jungyu Park, 2024. "A Review on the Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Livestock Manures in the Context of Sustainable Waste Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-27, January.
    3. Oluwafunmilayo Abiola Aworanti & Oluseye Omotoso Agbede & Samuel Enahoro Agarry & Ayobami Olu Ajani & Oyetola Ogunkunle & Opeyeolu Timothy Laseinde & S. M. Ashrafur Rahman & Islam Md Rizwanul Fattah, 2023. "Decoding Anaerobic Digestion: A Holistic Analysis of Biomass Waste Technology, Process Kinetics, and Operational Variables," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-36, April.
    4. Fatma Abouelenien & Toyokazu Miura & Yutaka Nakashimada & Nooran S. Elleboudy & Mohammad S. Al-Harbi & Esmat F. Ali & Mustafa Shukry, 2021. "Optimization of Biomethane Production via Fermentation of Chicken Manure Using Marine Sediment: A Modeling Approach Using Response Surface Methodology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-21, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Jialiang & Qu, Anan & Ming, Siqi & Zhang, Yuanhui & Duan, Na, 2022. "Binary-component anaerobic co-digestion: Synergies and microbial profiles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P2), pages 1-10.
    2. Periyasamy Elaiyaraju & Nagarajan Partha, 2012. "Biogas Production from Sago (Tapioca) Wastewater Using Anaerobic Batch Reactor," Energy & Environment, , vol. 23(4), pages 631-645, June.
    3. Martinez, E. & Marcos, A. & Al-Kassir, A. & Jaramillo, M.A. & Mohamad, A.A., 2012. "Mathematical model of a laboratory-scale plant for slaughterhouse effluents biodigestion for biogas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 210-219.
    4. Soha, Tamás & Papp, Luca & Csontos, Csaba & Munkácsy, Béla, 2021. "The importance of high crop residue demand on biogas plant site selection, scaling and feedstock allocation – A regional scale concept in a Hungarian study area," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    5. González-Fernández, Cristina & Molinuevo-Salces, Beatriz & García-González, Maria Cruz, 2011. "Evaluation of anaerobic codigestion of microalgal biomass and swine manure via response surface methodology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(10), pages 3448-3453.
    6. Chandra, R. & Vijay, V.K. & Subbarao, P.M.V. & Khura, T.K., 2012. "Production of methane from anaerobic digestion of jatropha and pongamia oil cakes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 148-159.
    7. Manthos, Georgios & Dareioti, Margarita & Zagklis, Dimitris & Kornaros, Michael, 2023. "Using biochemical methane potential results for the economic optimization of continuous anaerobic digestion systems: the effect of substrates’ synergy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 296-306.
    8. George Lazaroiu & Katarina Valaskova & Elvira Nica & Pavol Durana & Pavol Kral & Petr Bartoš & Anna Maroušková, 2020. "Techno-Economic Assessment: Food Emulsion Waste Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-12, September.
    9. Hassan, Muhammad & Zhao, Chao & Ding, Weimin, 2020. "Enhanced methane generation and biodegradation efficiencies of goose manure by thermal-sonication pretreatment and organic loading management in CSTR," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    10. Behera, Shuvashish & Arora, Richa & Nandhagopal, N. & Kumar, Sachin, 2014. "Importance of chemical pretreatment for bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 91-106.
    11. Oluwafunmilayo Abiola Aworanti & Oluseye Omotoso Agbede & Samuel Enahoro Agarry & Ayobami Olu Ajani & Oyetola Ogunkunle & Opeyeolu Timothy Laseinde & S. M. Ashrafur Rahman & Islam Md Rizwanul Fattah, 2023. "Decoding Anaerobic Digestion: A Holistic Analysis of Biomass Waste Technology, Process Kinetics, and Operational Variables," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-36, April.
    12. Kougias, P.G. & Kotsopoulos, T.A. & Martzopoulos, G.G., 2014. "Effect of feedstock composition and organic loading rate during the mesophilic co-digestion of olive mill wastewater and swine manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 202-207.
    13. Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Duan, Na & Tsapekos, Panagiotis & Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Liu, Zhidan & Mohammadi, Ali & Angelidaki, Irini & Tsang, Daniel CW. & Zhang, Zengqiang & Pan, Junting & Ma, Lin & Ag, 2021. "A critical review on livestock manure biorefinery technologies: Sustainability, challenges, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    14. Brown, N. & Güttler, J. & Shilton, A., 2016. "Overcoming the challenges of full scale anaerobic co-digestion of casein whey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA), pages 425-432.
    15. Sorgüven, Esra & Özilgen, Mustafa, 2012. "Energy utilization, carbon dioxide emission, and exergy loss in flavored yogurt production process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 214-225.
    16. Pastor, L. & Ruiz, L. & Pascual, A. & Ruiz, B., 2013. "Co-digestion of used oils and urban landfill leachates with sewage sludge and the effect on the biogas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 438-445.
    17. Martínez-Ruano, Jimmy Anderson & Restrepo-Serna, Daissy Lorena & Carmona-Garcia, Estefanny & Giraldo, Jhonny Alejandro Poveda & Aroca, Germán & Cardona, Carlos Ariel, 2019. "Effect of co-digestion of milk-whey and potato stem on heat and power generation using biogas as an energy vector: Techno-economic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 504-518.
    18. Anahita Rabii & Saad Aldin & Yaser Dahman & Elsayed Elbeshbishy, 2019. "A Review on Anaerobic Co-Digestion with a Focus on the Microbial Populations and the Effect of Multi-Stage Digester Configuration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, March.
    19. Koch, Konrad & Helmreich, Brigitte & Drewes, Jörg E., 2015. "Co-digestion of food waste in municipal wastewater treatment plants: Effect of different mixtures on methane yield and hydrolysis rate constant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 250-255.
    20. Theofanous, Elisavet & Kythreotou, Nicoletta & Panayiotou, Gregoris & Florides, Georgios & Vyrides, Ioannis, 2014. "Energy production from piggery waste using anaerobic digestion: Current status and potential in Cyprus," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 263-270.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:24:p:5023-:d:296161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.