IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i12p2239-d242787.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance of Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure Under Gradually Elevated Organic Loading Rates

Author

Listed:
  • Fei Wang

    (College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
    Western Scientific Observation and Experiment Station of Development and Utilization of Rural Renewable Energy of Ministry of Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
    Mengfu Pei and Fei Wang contributed equally to the work.)

  • Mengfu Pei

    (College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
    College of Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
    Mengfu Pei and Fei Wang contributed equally to the work.)

  • Ling Qiu

    (College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
    Western Scientific Observation and Experiment Station of Development and Utilization of Rural Renewable Energy of Ministry of Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

  • Yiqing Yao

    (College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
    Western Scientific Observation and Experiment Station of Development and Utilization of Rural Renewable Energy of Ministry of Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

  • Congguang Zhang

    (College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
    Western Scientific Observation and Experiment Station of Development and Utilization of Rural Renewable Energy of Ministry of Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

  • Hong Qiang

    (Western Scientific Observation and Experiment Station of Development and Utilization of Rural Renewable Energy of Ministry of Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
    College of Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

Abstract

Poultry manure is the main source of agricultural and rural non-point source pollution, and its effective disposal through anaerobic digestion (AD) is of great significance; meanwhile, the high nitrogen content of chicken manure makes it a typical feedstock for anaerobic digestion. The performance of chicken-manure-based AD at gradient organic loading rates (OLRs) in a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) was investigated herein. The whole AD process was divided into five stages according to different OLRs, and it lasted for 150 days. The results showed that the biogas yield increased with increasing OLR, which was based on the volatile solids (VS), before reaching up to 11.5 g VS/(L·d), while the methane content was kept relatively stable and maintained at approximately 60%. However, when the VS was further increased to 11.5 g VS/(L·d), the total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), pH, and alkalinity (CaCO 3 ) rose to 2560 mg·L ?1 , 8.2, and 15,000 mg·L ?1 , respectively, while the volumetric biogas production rate (VBPR), methane content, and VS removal efficiency decreased to 0.30 L·(L·d) ?1 , 45%, and 40%, respectively. Therefore, the AD performance immediately deteriorated and ammonia inhibition occurred. Further analysis demonstrated that the microbial biomass yield and concentrations dropped dramatically in this period. These results indicated that the AD stayed steady when the OLR was lower than 11.5 g VS/(L·d); this also provides valuable information for improving the efficiency and stability of AD of a nitrogen-rich substrate.

Suggested Citation

  • Fei Wang & Mengfu Pei & Ling Qiu & Yiqing Yao & Congguang Zhang & Hong Qiang, 2019. "Performance of Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure Under Gradually Elevated Organic Loading Rates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:12:p:2239-:d:242787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/12/2239/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/12/2239/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Ziyi & Wang, Wen & He, Yanfeng & Zhang, Ruihong & Liu, Guangqing, 2018. "Effect of ammonia on methane production, methanogenesis pathway, microbial community and reactor performance under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 915-925.
    2. Yao, Yiqing & Sheng, Hongmei & Luo, Yang & He, Mulan & Li, Xiangkai & Zhang, Hua & He, Wenliang & An, Lizhe, 2014. "Optimization of anaerobic co-digestion of Solidago canadensis L. biomass and cattle slurry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 122-127.
    3. Bi, Shaojie & Qiao, Wei & Xiong, Linpeng & Ricci, Marina & Adani, Fabrizio & Dong, Renjie, 2019. "Effects of organic loading rate on anaerobic digestion of chicken manure under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 242-250.
    4. Hynek Roubík & Jana Mazancová & Phung Le Dinh & Dung Dinh Van & Jan Banout, 2018. "Biogas Quality across Small-Scale Biogas Plants: A Case of Central Vietnam," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-12, July.
    5. Alessandro Chiumenti & Davide Boscaro & Francesco Da Borso & Luigi Sartori & Andrea Pezzuolo, 2018. "Biogas from Fresh Spring and Summer Grass: Effect of the Harvesting Period," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Spyridon Achinas & Gerrit Jan Willem Euverink, 2019. "Effect of Combined Inoculation on Biogas Production from Hardly Degradable Material," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dae-Yeol Cheong & Jeffrey Todd Harvey & Jinsu Kim & Changsoo Lee, 2019. "Improving Biomethanation of Chicken Manure by Co-Digestion with Ethanol Plant Effluent," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Wei-Jhan Syu & Tsun-Kuo Chang & Shu-Yuan Pan, 2020. "Establishment of an Automatic Real-Time Monitoring System for Irrigation Water Quality Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Oluwafunmilayo Abiola Aworanti & Oluseye Omotoso Agbede & Samuel Enahoro Agarry & Ayobami Olu Ajani & Oyetola Ogunkunle & Opeyeolu Timothy Laseinde & S. M. Ashrafur Rahman & Islam Md Rizwanul Fattah, 2023. "Decoding Anaerobic Digestion: A Holistic Analysis of Biomass Waste Technology, Process Kinetics, and Operational Variables," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-36, April.
    4. Jing Wang & Bing Liu & Meng Sun & Feiyong Chen & Mitsuharu Terashima & Hidenari Yasui, 2022. "A Kinetic Model for Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production of Plant Biomass under High Salinity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Fatma Abouelenien & Toyokazu Miura & Yutaka Nakashimada & Nooran S. Elleboudy & Mohammad S. Al-Harbi & Esmat F. Ali & Mustafa Shukry, 2021. "Optimization of Biomethane Production via Fermentation of Chicken Manure Using Marine Sediment: A Modeling Approach Using Response Surface Methodology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Marie-Noël Mansour & Thomas Lendormi & Nicolas Louka & Richard G. Maroun & Zeina Hobaika & Jean-Louis Lanoisellé, 2023. "Anaerobic Digestion of Poultry Droppings in Semi-Continuous Mode and Effect of Their Co-Digestion with Physico-Chemical Sludge on Methane Yield," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ao, Tianjie & Chen, Lin & Zhou, Pan & Liu, Xiaofeng & Li, Dong, 2021. "The role of oxidation-reduction potential as an early warning indicator, and a microbial instability mechanism in a pilot-scale anaerobic mesophilic digestion of chicken manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 223-232.
    2. Xiao, Youqian & Yang, Hongnan & Zheng, Dan & Liu, Yi & Deng, Liangwei, 2022. "Alleviation of ammonia inhibition in dry anaerobic digestion of swine manure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    3. M. Devendran Manogaran & Mohd Hakimi & Mohammad Harith Nizam Basheer Ahmad & Rashid Shamsuddin & Jun Wei Lim & Muzamil Abdalla M Hassan & Nurul Tasnim Sahrin, 2023. "Effect of Temperature on Co-Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure and Empty Fruit Bunch: A Kinetic Parametric Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-11, March.
    4. Spyridon Achinas & Johan Horjus & Vasileios Achinas & Gerrit Jan Willem Euverink, 2019. "A PESTLE Analysis of Biofuels Energy Industry in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, October.
    5. Spyridon Achinas & Gerrit Jan Willem Euverink, 2019. "Feasibility Study of Biogas Production from Hardly Degradable Material in Co-Inoculated Bioreactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-11, March.
    6. Song, Yapeng & Hu, Wanrong & Qiao, Wei & Westerholm, Maria & Wandera, Simon M. & Dong, Renjie, 2022. "Upgrading the performance of high solids feeding anaerobic digestion of chicken manure under extremely high ammonia level," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 13-20.
    7. Bi, Shaojie & Westerholm, Maria & Hu, Wanrong & Mahdy, Ahmed & Dong, Taili & Sun, Yingcai & Qiao, Wei & Dong, Renjie, 2021. "The metabolic performance and microbial communities of anaerobic digestion of chicken manure under stressed ammonia condition: A case study of a 10-year successful biogas plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 644-651.
    8. Yapeng Song & Wei Qiao & Jiahao Zhang & Renjie Dong, 2023. "Process Performance and Functional Microbial Community in the Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-22, June.
    9. Zhang, Le & Loh, Kai-Chee & Lim, Jun Wei & Zhang, Jingxin, 2019. "Bioinformatics analysis of metagenomics data of biogas-producing microbial communities in anaerobic digesters: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 110-126.
    10. Ao, Tianjie & Chen, Lin & Chen, Yichao & Liu, Xiaofeng & Wan, Liping & Li, Dong, 2021. "The screening of early warning indicators and microbial community of chicken manure thermophilic digestion at high organic loading rate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    11. Saha, Chayan Kumer & Nandi, Rajesh & Akter, Shammi & Hossain, Samira & Kabir, Kazi Bayzid & Kirtania, Kawnish & Islam, Md Tahmid & Guidugli, Laura & Reza, M. Toufiq & Alam, Md Monjurul, 2024. "Technical prospects and challenges of anaerobic co-digestion in Bangladesh: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    12. Alberto Benato & Alarico Macor, 2019. "Italian Biogas Plants: Trend, Subsidies, Cost, Biogas Composition and Engine Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-31, March.
    13. Moritz von Cossel & Andrea Bauerle & Meike Boob & Ulrich Thumm & Martin Elsaesser & Iris Lewandowski, 2019. "The Performance of Mesotrophic Arrhenatheretum Grassland under Different Cutting Frequency Regimes for Biomass Production in Southwest Germany," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-17, September.
    14. Jabeen, Gul & Yan, Qingyou & Ahmad, Munir & Fatima, Nousheen & Jabeen, Maria & Li, Heng & Qamar, Shoaib, 2020. "Household-based critical influence factors of biogas generation technology utilization: A case of Punjab province of Pakistan," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 650-660.
    15. Zohaib Ur Rehman Afridi & Wu Jing & Hassan Younas, 2019. "Biogas Production and Fundamental Mass Transfer Mechanism in Anaerobic Granular Sludge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-15, August.
    16. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Piotr Banaszuk & Grzegorz Zając & Martin J. Wassen, 2023. "Grass from Road Verges as a Substrate for Biogas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, June.
    17. Denis Nsubuga & Noble Banadda & Isa Kabenge & Kerstin D. Wydra, 2024. "Potential of Jackfruit Waste for Biogas, Briquettes and as a Carbondioxide Sink-A Review," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(4), pages 1-60, July.
    18. Anna Jasińska & Anna Grosser & Erik Meers, 2023. "Possibilities and Limitations of Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Animal Manure—A Critical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-30, May.
    19. Valerii Havrysh & Antonina Kalinichenko & Grzegorz Mentel & Tadeusz Olejarz, 2020. "Commercial Biogas Plants: Lessons for Ukraine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    20. Bhatnagar, N. & Ryan, D. & Murphy, R. & Enright, A.M., 2022. "A comprehensive review of green policy, anaerobic digestion of animal manure and chicken litter feedstock potential – Global and Irish perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:12:p:2239-:d:242787. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.