IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i22p11988-d679536.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of Biomethane Production via Fermentation of Chicken Manure Using Marine Sediment: A Modeling Approach Using Response Surface Methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Fatma Abouelenien

    (Department of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafer Elshikh University, Kafrelsheikh 33516, Egypt)

  • Toyokazu Miura

    (Unit of Biotechnology, Division of Biological and Life Sciences, Graduate School of Integrated Sciences for Life, Hiroshima University, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8530, Japan)

  • Yutaka Nakashimada

    (Unit of Biotechnology, Division of Biological and Life Sciences, Graduate School of Integrated Sciences for Life, Hiroshima University, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8530, Japan)

  • Nooran S. Elleboudy

    (Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt)

  • Mohammad S. Al-Harbi

    (Department of Biology, College of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia)

  • Esmat F. Ali

    (Department of Biology, College of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mustafa Shukry

    (Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh 33516, Egypt)

Abstract

In this study, marine sediment (MS) was successfully used as a source of methanogenic bacteria for the anaerobic digestion (AD) of chicken manure (CM). Using MS showed high production in liquid and semi-solid conditions. Even in solid conditions, 169.3 mL/g volatile solids of chicken manure (VS-CM) was produced, despite the accumulation of ammonia (4.2 g NH 3 -N/kg CM). To the best of our knowledge, this is the highest methane production from CM alone, without pretreatment, in solid conditions (20%). Comparing MS to Ozouh sludge (excess activated sewage sludge) (OS), using OS under semi-solid conditions resulted in higher methane production, while using MS resulted in more ammonia tolerance (301 mL/gVS-CM at 8.58 g NH 3 -N/kg). Production optimization was carried out via a response surface methodology (RDM) model involving four independent variables (inoculum ratio, total solid content, NaCl concentration, and incubation time). Optimized methane production (324.36 mL/gVS-CM) was at a CM:MS ratio of 1:2.5 with no NaCl supplementation, 10% total solid content, and an incubation time of 45 days.

Suggested Citation

  • Fatma Abouelenien & Toyokazu Miura & Yutaka Nakashimada & Nooran S. Elleboudy & Mohammad S. Al-Harbi & Esmat F. Ali & Mustafa Shukry, 2021. "Optimization of Biomethane Production via Fermentation of Chicken Manure Using Marine Sediment: A Modeling Approach Using Response Surface Methodology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:22:p:11988-:d:679536
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/11988/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/11988/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dae-Yeol Cheong & Jeffrey Todd Harvey & Jinsu Kim & Changsoo Lee, 2019. "Improving Biomethanation of Chicken Manure by Co-Digestion with Ethanol Plant Effluent," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Ji-Hong Jeon & Chan-Gi Park & Bernard A. Engel, 2015. "Evaluating Effects of Poultry Waste Application on Phosphorus Loads to Lake Tenkiller," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Burra, K.G. & Hussein, M.S. & Amano, R.S. & Gupta, A.K., 2016. "Syngas evolutionary behavior during chicken manure pyrolysis and air gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 408-415.
    4. Fei Wang & Mengfu Pei & Ling Qiu & Yiqing Yao & Congguang Zhang & Hong Qiang, 2019. "Performance of Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure Under Gradually Elevated Organic Loading Rates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-17, June.
    5. David G Jenkins & Pedro F Quintana-Ascencio, 2020. "A solution to minimum sample size for regressions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oluwafunmilayo Abiola Aworanti & Oluseye Omotoso Agbede & Samuel Enahoro Agarry & Ayobami Olu Ajani & Oyetola Ogunkunle & Opeyeolu Timothy Laseinde & S. M. Ashrafur Rahman & Islam Md Rizwanul Fattah, 2023. "Decoding Anaerobic Digestion: A Holistic Analysis of Biomass Waste Technology, Process Kinetics, and Operational Variables," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-36, April.
    2. Rahul Kadam & Sangyeol Jo & Jonghwa Lee & Kamonwan Khanthong & Heewon Jang & Jungyu Park, 2024. "A Review on the Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Livestock Manures in the Context of Sustainable Waste Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-27, January.
    3. Peter Mako & Andrej Dávid & Patrik Böhm & Sorin Savu, 2021. "Sustainable Transport in the Danube Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Cody J. Strom & Samantha M. McDonald & Mary-Margaret Remchak & Kimberly A. Kew & Blake R. Rushing & Joseph A. Houmard & David A. Tulis & Roman Pawlak & George A. Kelley & Lisa Chasan-Taber & Edward Ne, 2022. "Maternal Aerobic Exercise, but Not Blood Docosahexaenoic Acid and Eicosapentaenoic Acid Concentrations, during Pregnancy Influence Infant Body Composition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-15, July.
    5. Xuejun Qian & Seong Lee & Ana-maria Soto & Guangming Chen, 2018. "Regression Model to Predict the Higher Heating Value of Poultry Waste from Proximate Analysis," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, June.
    6. Dufhues, Thomas & Möllers, Judith & Jantsch, Antje & Buchenrieder, Gertrud & Camfield, Laura, 2023. "Don’t look up! Individual income comparisons and subjective well-being of students in Thailand," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 24(2), pages 477-503.
    7. Dae-Yeol Cheong & Jeffrey Todd Harvey & Jinsu Kim & Changsoo Lee, 2019. "Improving Biomethanation of Chicken Manure by Co-Digestion with Ethanol Plant Effluent," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Erica Neri & Federica Genova & Marcello Stella & Alessandra Provera & Augusto Biasini & Francesca Agostini, 2022. "Parental Distress and Affective Perception of Hospital Environment after a Pictorial Intervention in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-13, July.
    9. Li, Zekun & Chen, Zhenhua, 2023. "Predicting the future development scale of high-speed rail through the urban scaling law," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    10. Tobias Keller & Martin Glaum & Andreas Bausch & Thorsten Bunz, 2023. "The “CEO in context” technique revisited: A replication and extension of Hambrick and Quigley (2014)," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 1111-1138, April.
    11. Giorgos Gouzoulis, 2022. "Financialisation, globalisation, and the industrial labour share: A comparison between Iran and Thailand," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 35-52, January.
    12. Xiaodong Pu & Mingdong Wei & Xiaopeng Chen & Linlin Wang & Liangwei Deng, 2022. "Thermal Decomposition Characteristics and Kinetic Analysis of Chicken Manure in Various Atmospheres," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-12, April.
    13. Zhang, Yanquan & Chang, Ruidong & Zuo, Jian & Shabunko, Veronika & Zheng, Xian, 2023. "Regional disparity of residential solar panel diffusion in Australia: The roles of socio-economic factors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 808-819.
    14. Charatsari, Chrysanthi & Michailidis, Anastasios & Lioutas, Evagelos D., 2024. "Do farm advisory organizations promote sustainability? A study in Greece," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    15. Burra, K.G. & Gupta, A.K., 2018. "Synergistic effects in steam gasification of combined biomass and plastic waste mixtures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 230-236.
    16. Ng, Wei Cheng & You, Siming & Ling, Ran & Gin, Karina Yew-Hoong & Dai, Yanjun & Wang, Chi-Hwa, 2017. "Co-gasification of woody biomass and chicken manure: Syngas production, biochar reutilization, and cost-benefit analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 732-742.
    17. Burra, K.G. & Gupta, A.K., 2018. "Kinetics of synergistic effects in co-pyrolysis of biomass with plastic wastes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 408-418.
    18. Aghdam, Ali Nassiri & Behdarvand, Shahin & Sheshdeh, Mohammad Ghasemi, 2023. "The effect of credit composition on entrepreneurship," Latin American Journal of Central Banking (previously Monetaria), Elsevier, vol. 4(4).
    19. Lyhour Hin & Chan Makara Mean & Meng Chhay Kim & Chhengven Chhoem & Borarin Bunthong & Lytour Lor & Taingaun Sourn & P. V. Vara Prasad, 2024. "Development and Performance Assessment of Sensor-Mounted Solar Dryer for Micro-Climatic Modeling and Optimization of Dried Fish Quality in Cambodia," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-19, July.
    20. Daya Shankar Pandey & Giannis Katsaros & Christian Lindfors & James J. Leahy & Savvas A. Tassou, 2019. "Fast Pyrolysis of Poultry Litter in a Bubbling Fluidised Bed Reactor: Energy and Nutrient Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:22:p:11988-:d:679536. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.