IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v107y2013icp438-445.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Co-digestion of used oils and urban landfill leachates with sewage sludge and the effect on the biogas production

Author

Listed:
  • Pastor, L.
  • Ruiz, L.
  • Pascual, A.
  • Ruiz, B.

Abstract

This paper evaluates the potential of mesophilic anaerobic digestion (AD) in the treatment of used oils and landfill leachates through co-digestion of the sludge produced in a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). Biomethane potential (BMP) tests were performed on two different co-substrates and on WWTP sludge. The biogas production per kg of fresh matter of the sludge generated in a WWTP was only 6.1Nl/kg due to its low volatile solids concentration. Biogas production of landfill leachates per kg of fresh matter was found to be low (12.4Nl/kg). The biogas production per kg of fresh matter for the used oil over a period of 47days (not completely degraded) was 970.6Nl/kg. Used oil was selected as co-substrate according to these results. Anaerobic co-digestion of sludge and used oil was conducted in a pilot plant fed in semi-continuous regime in the mesophilic range (38°C) to obtain their adequate mixture in order to ensure the correct function of the process. The optimum oil percentage in the mixture was 19% (volatile solids basis). Once the appropriate mixture was obtained the co-digestion process was carried out in the digester of the Pobla de Farnals WWTP. The co-digestion process improved the performance of volatile matter removal (showing an 11% increase over the period without co-digestion) as well as the biogas production (a 23.5% increase over the period without co-digestion) without disturbing the anaerobic digestion process. The total production of biogas per day in the WWTP increased over the period without co-digestion.

Suggested Citation

  • Pastor, L. & Ruiz, L. & Pascual, A. & Ruiz, B., 2013. "Co-digestion of used oils and urban landfill leachates with sewage sludge and the effect on the biogas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 438-445.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:107:y:2013:i:c:p:438-445
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261913001736
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.055?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gelegenis, John & Georgakakis, Dimitris & Angelidaki, Irini & Mavris, Vassilis, 2007. "Optimization of biogas production by co-digesting whey with diluted poultry manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(13), pages 2147-2160.
    2. Gelegenis, John & Georgakakis, Dimitris & Angelidaki, Irini & Christopoulou, Nicholetta & Goumenaki, Maria, 2007. "Optimization of biogas production from olive-oil mill wastewater, by codigesting with diluted poultry-manure," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(6), pages 646-663, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elalami, D. & Carrere, H. & Monlau, F. & Abdelouahdi, K. & Oukarroum, A. & Barakat, A., 2019. "Pretreatment and co-digestion of wastewater sludge for biogas production: Recent research advances and trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Zheng, Zehui & Liu, Jinhuan & Yuan, Xufeng & Wang, Xiaofen & Zhu, Wanbin & Yang, Fuyu & Cui, Zongjun, 2015. "Effect of dairy manure to switchgrass co-digestion ratio on methane production and the bacterial community in batch anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 249-257.
    3. Martínez-Ruano, Jimmy Anderson & Restrepo-Serna, Daissy Lorena & Carmona-Garcia, Estefanny & Giraldo, Jhonny Alejandro Poveda & Aroca, Germán & Cardona, Carlos Ariel, 2019. "Effect of co-digestion of milk-whey and potato stem on heat and power generation using biogas as an energy vector: Techno-economic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 504-518.
    4. Li, Dong & Huang, Xianbo & Wang, Qingjing & Yuan, Yuexiang & Yan, Zhiying & Li, Zhidong & Huang, Yajun & Liu, Xiaofeng, 2016. "Kinetics of methane production and hydrolysis in anaerobic digestion of corn stover," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1-9.
    5. Mata-Alvarez, J. & Dosta, J. & Romero-Güiza, M.S. & Fonoll, X. & Peces, M. & Astals, S., 2014. "A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 412-427.
    6. Budych-Gorzna, Magdalena & Smoczynski, Marcin & Oleskowicz-Popiel, Piotr, 2016. "Enhancement of biogas production at the municipal wastewater treatment plant by co-digestion with poultry industry waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 387-394.
    7. Koch, Konrad & Helmreich, Brigitte & Drewes, Jörg E., 2015. "Co-digestion of food waste in municipal wastewater treatment plants: Effect of different mixtures on methane yield and hydrolysis rate constant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 250-255.
    8. Hwangbo, Soonho & Lee, Seungchul & Yoo, Changkyoo, 2017. "Optimal network design of hydrogen production by integrated utility and biogas supply networks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 195-209.
    9. Koch, Konrad & Drewes, Jörg E., 2014. "Alternative approach to estimate the hydrolysis rate constant of particulate material from batch data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 11-15.
    10. Derick Lima & Gregory Appleby & Li Li, 2023. "A Scoping Review of Options for Increasing Biogas Production from Sewage Sludge: Challenges and Opportunities for Enhancing Energy Self-Sufficiency in Wastewater Treatment Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-34, March.
    11. Zhang, Wanqin & Wei, Quanyuan & Wu, Shubiao & Qi, Dandan & Li, Wei & Zuo, Zhuang & Dong, Renjie, 2014. "Batch anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure with dewatered sewage sludge under mesophilic conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 175-183.
    12. Zhen, Guangyin & Lu, Xueqin & Kobayashi, Takuro & Li, Yu-You & Xu, Kaiqin & Zhao, Youcai, 2015. "Mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and Egeria densa: Performance assessment and kinetic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 78-86.
    13. Silvestre, G. & Illa, J. & Fernández, B. & Bonmatí, A., 2014. "Thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge with grease waste: Effect of long chain fatty acids in the methane yield and its dewatering properties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 87-94.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martinez, E. & Marcos, A. & Al-Kassir, A. & Jaramillo, M.A. & Mohamad, A.A., 2012. "Mathematical model of a laboratory-scale plant for slaughterhouse effluents biodigestion for biogas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 210-219.
    2. Chandra, R. & Vijay, V.K. & Subbarao, P.M.V. & Khura, T.K., 2012. "Production of methane from anaerobic digestion of jatropha and pongamia oil cakes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 148-159.
    3. Behera, Shuvashish & Arora, Richa & Nandhagopal, N. & Kumar, Sachin, 2014. "Importance of chemical pretreatment for bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 91-106.
    4. Kougias, P.G. & Kotsopoulos, T.A. & Martzopoulos, G.G., 2014. "Effect of feedstock composition and organic loading rate during the mesophilic co-digestion of olive mill wastewater and swine manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 202-207.
    5. Brown, N. & Güttler, J. & Shilton, A., 2016. "Overcoming the challenges of full scale anaerobic co-digestion of casein whey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA), pages 425-432.
    6. Koch, Konrad & Helmreich, Brigitte & Drewes, Jörg E., 2015. "Co-digestion of food waste in municipal wastewater treatment plants: Effect of different mixtures on methane yield and hydrolysis rate constant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 250-255.
    7. Theofanous, Elisavet & Kythreotou, Nicoletta & Panayiotou, Gregoris & Florides, Georgios & Vyrides, Ioannis, 2014. "Energy production from piggery waste using anaerobic digestion: Current status and potential in Cyprus," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 263-270.
    8. Periyasamy Elaiyaraju & Nagarajan Partha, 2012. "Biogas Production from Sago (Tapioca) Wastewater Using Anaerobic Batch Reactor," Energy & Environment, , vol. 23(4), pages 631-645, June.
    9. Dae-Yeol Cheong & Jeffrey Todd Harvey & Jinsu Kim & Changsoo Lee, 2019. "Improving Biomethanation of Chicken Manure by Co-Digestion with Ethanol Plant Effluent," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-10, December.
    10. González-Fernández, Cristina & Molinuevo-Salces, Beatriz & García-González, Maria Cruz, 2011. "Evaluation of anaerobic codigestion of microalgal biomass and swine manure via response surface methodology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(10), pages 3448-3453.
    11. George Lazaroiu & Katarina Valaskova & Elvira Nica & Pavol Durana & Pavol Kral & Petr Bartoš & Anna Maroušková, 2020. "Techno-Economic Assessment: Food Emulsion Waste Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-12, September.
    12. Sorgüven, Esra & Özilgen, Mustafa, 2012. "Energy utilization, carbon dioxide emission, and exergy loss in flavored yogurt production process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 214-225.
    13. Martínez-Ruano, Jimmy Anderson & Restrepo-Serna, Daissy Lorena & Carmona-Garcia, Estefanny & Giraldo, Jhonny Alejandro Poveda & Aroca, Germán & Cardona, Carlos Ariel, 2019. "Effect of co-digestion of milk-whey and potato stem on heat and power generation using biogas as an energy vector: Techno-economic assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C), pages 504-518.
    14. Anahita Rabii & Saad Aldin & Yaser Dahman & Elsayed Elbeshbishy, 2019. "A Review on Anaerobic Co-Digestion with a Focus on the Microbial Populations and the Effect of Multi-Stage Digester Configuration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, March.
    15. Yang Mo Gu & Seon Young Park & Ji Yeon Park & Byoung-In Sang & Byoung Seong Jeon & Hyunook Kim & Jin Hyung Lee, 2021. "Impact of Attrition Ball-Mill on Characteristics and Biochemical Methane Potential of Food Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-10, April.
    16. Ayub, Yousaf & Ren, Jingzheng & Shi, Tao & Shen, Weifeng & He, Chang, 2023. "Poultry litter valorization: Development and optimization of an electro-chemical and thermal tri-generation process using an extreme gradient boosting algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    17. Allen, Eoin & Wall, David M. & Herrmann, Christiane & Murphy, Jerry D., 2016. "A detailed assessment of resource of biomethane from first, second and third generation substrates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 656-665.
    18. Markou, Giorgos & Georgakakis, Dimitris, 2011. "Cultivation of filamentous cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) in agro-industrial wastes and wastewaters: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(10), pages 3389-3401.
    19. Hassan, Muhammad & Zhao, Chao & Ding, Weimin, 2020. "Enhanced methane generation and biodegradation efficiencies of goose manure by thermal-sonication pretreatment and organic loading management in CSTR," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    20. Mutesasira J. & Mukasa-Tebandeke I. Z. & Wasajja H. Z. & Nankinga R., 2018. "Assessing Performance of Cattle Dung and Waste Cooked Foods in Producing Biogas as Single Substrate and Mixed Substrates in Kampala Uganda," Academic Journal of Chemistry, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 3(11), pages 101-108, 11-2018.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:107:y:2013:i:c:p:438-445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.