IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v205y2024ics0040162524002610.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technological social responsibility: A stakeholder theory-based measurement scale

Author

Listed:
  • Iqbal, Qaisar
  • Piwowar-Sulej, Katarzyna

Abstract

Considering the blurred understanding of technological social responsibility (TSR) and the scarcity of research in this domain, it is high time for a reliable and valid measurement to assess how firms are executing different facets of this phenomenon. Illustrated using stakeholder theory and five separate samples obtained from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, China and Malaysia, this study offers a valid measurement scale for TSR relating to specific policies and activities designed to contribute to the welfare of diverse stakeholders, taking into consideration employee-, customer-, supplier-, social-, environmental-, and shareholder-orientation within an organizational context. Current empirical evidence on the basis of exploratory factor analysis, a series of confirmatory factor analyses, and structural equation modelling, confirms the convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity of this newly-established TSR scale. Using a time-lagged study, this study also enriches stakeholder theory by exhibiting that the higher-order TSR construct significantly and indirectly relates to organizational commitment through organizational pride, going beyond the contribution of the orientation towards technological justice. This newly-developed scale can be used in future research and thus further contribute to advancing knowledge in the field of social responsibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Iqbal, Qaisar & Piwowar-Sulej, Katarzyna, 2024. "Technological social responsibility: A stakeholder theory-based measurement scale," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:205:y:2024:i:c:s0040162524002610
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524002610
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123465?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandra Castro-González & Belén Bande & Guadalupe Vila-Vázquez, 2022. "How corporate social responsibility explains salespeople’s job performance: the influence of responsible leadership," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(6), pages 1068-1084, July.
    2. Theo Papaioannou & Smita Srinivas, 2019. "Innovation as a political process of development: are neo-Schumpeterians value neutral?," Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 141-158, January.
    3. Julie Pirsch & Shruti Gupta & Stacy Grau, 2007. "A Framework for Understanding Corporate Social Responsibility Programs as a Continuum: An Exploratory Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 70(2), pages 125-140, January.
    4. Tehreem Fatima & Kamal Badar & Muhammad Waqas & Arslan Ayub & Muhammad Haris, 2023. "CSR Communication Matters! An Examination of CSR, Organisational Pride, and Task-Related Pro-Environmental Behaviour Nexus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, June.
    5. Robert M. Solow, 1956. "A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 70(1), pages 65-94.
    6. Matthias Trier & Dennis Kundisch & Daniel Beverungen & Oliver Müller & Guido Schryen & Milad Mirbabaie & Simon Trang, 2023. "Digital Responsibility," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(4), pages 463-474, August.
    7. Jayant Menon & Anna Fink, 2019. "The Fourth Industrial Revolution and Its Implications for Regional Economic Integration in ASEAN," Journal of Asian Economic Integration, , vol. 1(1), pages 32-47, April.
    8. Prisca Brosi & Matthias Spörrle & Isabell M. Welpe, 2018. "Do we work hard or are we just great? The effects of organizational pride due to effort and ability on proactive behavior," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 11(2), pages 357-373, September.
    9. Douglas A. Bosse & Robert A. Phillips & Jeffrey S. Harrison, 2009. "Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 447-456, April.
    10. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2020. "Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(6), pages 2188-2244.
    11. Katarzyna Piwowar-Sulej & Krzysztof PodsiadÅ‚y, 2022. "Technological innovation and the labor market: The two-way non-reciprocal relationships with a focus on the confectionery industry in Poland," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 18(3), pages 135-171.
    12. Katarzyna Piwowar-Sulej & Sakshi Malik & Olatunji A. Shobande & Sanjeet Singh & Vishal Dagar, 2024. "A Contribution to Sustainable Human Resource Development in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(2), pages 337-355, May.
    13. Cao, Shaopeng & Yao, Hongjiang & Zhang, Min, 2023. "CSR gap and firm performance: An organizational justice perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    14. Christina J. Herden & Ervin Alliu & André Cakici & Thibaut Cormier & Catherine Deguelle & Sahil Gambhir & Caleb Griffiths & Shrishti Gupta & Sahil R. Kamani & Yonca-Selda Kiratli & Máté Kispataki & Gr, 2021. "“Corporate Digital Responsibility”," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 13-29, March.
    15. Cheng, Bao & Lin, Hongxia & Kong, Yurou, 2023. "Challenge or hindrance? How and when organizational artificial intelligence adoption influences employee job crafting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    16. Filippo Bertani & Marco Raberto & Andrea Teglio, 2020. "The productivity and unemployment effects of the digital transformation: an empirical and modelling assessment," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 329-355, November.
    17. Edward Freeman, R. & Phillips, Robert A., 2002. "Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian Defense," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 331-349, July.
    18. Asadullah Khaskheli & Yushi Jiang & Syed A. Raza & Muhammad A. Qureshi & Komal A. Khan & Javeria Salam, 2020. "Do CSR activities increase organizational citizenship behavior among employees? Mediating role of affective commitment and job satisfaction," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2941-2955, November.
    19. Samuel Adomako & Mai Dong Tran, 2022. "Stakeholder management, CSR commitment, corporate social performance: The moderating role of uncertainty in CSR regulation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1414-1423, September.
    20. Seyed Mostafa Seyedpour & Ali Safari & Ali Nasr Isfahani, 2020. "Formulating an organizational pride model for the National Iranian Oil Company," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1794679-179, January.
    21. Cristina Mihale-Wilson & Oliver Hinz & Wil Aalst & Christof Weinhardt, 2022. "Corporate Digital Responsibility," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(2), pages 127-132, April.
    22. Frey, Carl Benedikt & Osborne, Michael A., 2017. "The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 254-280.
    23. Anya Johnson & Shanta Dey & Helena Nguyen & Markus Groth & Sadhbh Joyce & Leona Tan & Nicholas Glozier & Samuel B Harvey, 2020. "A review and agenda for examining how technology-driven changes at work will impact workplace mental health and employee well-being," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(3), pages 402-424, August.
    24. Benjamin Mueller, 2022. "Corporate Digital Responsibility," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(5), pages 689-700, October.
    25. Assâad El Akremi & Jean-Pascal Gond & Valérie Swaen & Kenneth de Roeck & Jacques Igalens, 2018. "How Do Employees Perceive Corporate Responsibility? Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Corporate Stakeholder Responsibility Scale," Post-Print halshs-01520959, HAL.
    26. Duygu Turker, 2009. "Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility: A Scale Development Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(4), pages 411-427, April.
    27. Som Sekhar Bhattacharyya & Sumi Jha & Dinesh Sharma, 2020. "Development of a Scale on Individual Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility Constructs: Based on Microfoundation Theory," Vision, , vol. 24(1), pages 47-59, March.
    28. Tsai, Juin-Ming & Cheng, Min-Jhih & Tsai, Her-Her & Hung, Shiu-Wan & Chen, Ya-Ling, 2019. "Acceptance and resistance of telehealth: The perspective of dual-factor concepts in technology adoption," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 34-44.
    29. Ilias O. Pappas & Patrick Mikalef & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Letizia Jaccheri & John Krogstie, 2023. "Responsible Digital Transformation for a Sustainable Society," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 945-953, June.
    30. M. G. Quibria & Ted Tschang & Mari-Len Reyes-Macasaquit, 2002. "New Information and Communication Technologies and Poverty: Some evidence from developing Asia," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 285-309.
    31. Ibrahim A. Elshaer & Alaa M. S. Azazz & Chokri Kooli & Sameh Fayyad, 2023. "Green Human Resource Management and Brand Citizenship Behavior in the Hotel Industry: Mediation of Organizational Pride and Individual Green Values as a Moderator," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, April.
    32. Mattila, Anna S. & Cho, Wonae & Ro, Heejung (Cheyenne), 2011. "The role of self-service technologies in restoring justice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 348-355, April.
    33. Agusfianto, Nendy Pratama & Andayani, Sri Umiatun & , Anwar & Sihombing, Lukertina & Setiawan, Adi & Amelia, Dahlia & Gunawan, Ce & Indraswati, Tris Dewi & Wati, Krisna Mutiara & Octasylva, Annuridya , 2023. "Pengantar Bisnis (Respons Dinamika Era Digital)," Thesis Commons mrzs5, Center for Open Science.
    34. Albert Satorra & Peter Bentler, 2010. "Ensuring Positiveness of the Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(2), pages 243-248, June.
    35. Pasricha, Palvi & Nivedhitha, K.S. & Raghuvanshi, Juhi, 2023. "The perceived CSR-innovative behavior conundrum: Towards unlocking the socio-emotional black box," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dario Cords & Klaus Prettner, 2022. "Technological unemployment revisited: automation in a search and matching framework [The future of work: meeting the global challenges of demographic change and automation]," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 74(1), pages 115-135.
    2. Castaldo, Sandro & Ciacci, Andrea & Penco, Lara, 2023. "Perceived corporate social responsibility and job satisfaction in grocery retail: A comparison between low- and high-productivity stores," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. David Autor & Anna Salomons, 2018. "Is Automation Labor Share–Displacing? Productivity Growth, Employment, and the Labor Share," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 49(1 (Spring), pages 1-87.
    4. Dosi, G. & Pereira, M.C. & Roventini, A. & Virgillito, M.E., 2022. "Technological paradigms, labour creation and destruction in a multi-sector agent-based model," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    5. Gasteiger, Emanuel & Prettner, Klaus, 2022. "Automation, Stagnation, And The Implications Of A Robot Tax," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(1), pages 218-249, January.
    6. Sasaki, Hiroaki, 2023. "Growth with automation capital and declining population," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    7. Abeliansky, Ana Lucia & Prettner, Klaus, 2017. "Automation and demographic change," VfS Annual Conference 2017 (Vienna): Alternative Structures for Money and Banking 168215, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    8. Jesus Felipe & Donna Faye Bajaro & Gemma Estrada & John McCombie, 2020. "What do tests of the relationship between employment and technical progress hide?," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 73(295), pages 367-392.
    9. Abeliansky, Ana Lucia & Prettner, Klaus, 2023. "Automation and population growth: Theory and cross-country evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 345-358.
    10. Neumann, Uwe, 2023. "Regional adaptability to digital change: May the Swabian force be with you," Ruhr Economic Papers 1004, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    11. Abeliansky, Ana Lucia & Prettner, Klaus, 2021. "Population growth and automation density: theory and cross-country evidence," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 315, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    12. Florent Bordot & Andre Lorentz, 2021. "Automation and labor market polarization in an evolutionary model with heterogeneous workers," LEM Papers Series 2021/32, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    13. Gasteiger, Emanuel & Prettner, Klaus, 2017. "A note on automation, stagnation, and the implications of a robot tax," Discussion Papers 2017/17, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    14. Geiger, Niels & Prettner, Klaus & Schwarzer, Johannes A., 2018. "Automatisierung, Wachstum und Ungleichheit," Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences 13-2018, University of Hohenheim, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences.
    15. repec:bin:bpeajo:v:49:y:2019:i:2018-01:p:1-87 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Basso, Henrique S. & Jimeno, Juan F., 2021. "From secular stagnation to robocalypse? Implications of demographic and technological changes," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 833-847.
    17. Franck Brulhart & Sandrine Gherra & Bertrand V. Quelin, 2019. "Do Stakeholder Orientation and Environmental Proactivity Impact Firm Profitability?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 25-46, August.
    18. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Fernández, Gastón P. & Rammer, Christian, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and firm-level productivity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 188-205.
    19. Colombo, Emilio & Mercorio, Fabio & Mezzanzanica, Mario, 2019. "AI meets labor market: Exploring the link between automation and skills," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 27-37.
    20. Sonal Pandey, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence and Food Industry," RAIS Conference Proceedings 2021 0058, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    21. Alejandro Micco, 2019. "The Impact of Automation in Developed Countries," Working Papers wp480, University of Chile, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:205:y:2024:i:c:s0040162524002610. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.