IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v64y2011i4p348-355.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of self-service technologies in restoring justice

Author

Listed:
  • Mattila, Anna S.
  • Cho, Wonae
  • Ro, Heejung (Cheyenne)

Abstract

As an increasing number of customers choose to interact with service firms via technology, there is an urgent need to understand whether consumers react differently to technology-based failures/recovery efforts than human failures/recovery efforts. Using resource exchange theory as a framework, the present investigation examined the role of failure mode (SST vs. face-to-face encounter) and recovery mode on customers' fairness perceptions. Results from Study 1 suggest that compensation offered by a front-line employee might be more effective in restoring justice with traditional failures (match condition) than with SST failures (mismatch condition). Findings from Study 2 further support the matching hypothesis in terms of distributive justice. On the other hand, human touch seems more effective in restoring interactional fairness than on-line recovery. The follow-up study extends the matching hypothesis to satisfaction with problem handling and repurchase intent. Managerial implications of these findings are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Mattila, Anna S. & Cho, Wonae & Ro, Heejung (Cheyenne), 2011. "The role of self-service technologies in restoring justice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 348-355, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:64:y:2011:i:4:p:348-355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148-2963(10)00057-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Harris, Katherine E. & Grewal, Dhruv & Mohr, Lois A. & Bernhardt, Kenneth L., 2006. "Consumer responses to service recovery strategies: The moderating role of online versus offline environment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(4), pages 425-431, April.
    3. Meuter, Matthew L. & Ostrom, Amy L. & Bitner, Mary Jo & Roundtree, Robert, 2003. "The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 899-906, November.
    4. Goodwin, Cathy & Ross, Ivan, 1992. "Consumer responses to service failures: Influence of procedural and interactional fairness perceptions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 149-163, September.
    5. Brinberg, David & Wood, Ronald, 1983. "A Resource Exchange Theory Analysis of Consumer Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 10(3), pages 330-338, December.
    6. Gustafsson, Anders, 2009. "Customer satisfaction with service recovery," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(11), pages 1220-1222, November.
    7. Chebat, Jean-Charles & Slusarczyk, Witold, 2005. "How emotions mediate the effects of perceived justice on loyalty in service recovery situations: an empirical study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(5), pages 664-673, May.
    8. Sparks, Beverley A. & McColl-Kennedy, Janet R., 2001. "Justice strategy options for increased customer satisfaction in a services recovery setting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 209-218, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ying Kai Liao & Chih Ying Wu & Giang Nu To Truong & Yen Thi Do, 2022. "The Roles of Service Recovery and Perceived Justice on Post-Recovery Satisfaction in M-Commerce," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Dao, Hung M. & Theotokis, Aristeidis, 2021. "Self-Service Technology Recovery: The Effect of Recovery Initiation and Locus of Responsibility," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 25-39.
    3. Chen, Nuoya & Mohanty, Smaraki & Jiao, Jinfeng & Fan, Xiucheng, 2021. "To err is human: Tolerate humans instead of machines in service failure," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    4. Verhulst, Nanouk & Vermeir, Iris & Slabbinck, Hendrik & Larivière, Bart & Mauri, Maurizio & Russo, Vincenzo, 2020. "A neurophysiological exploration of the dynamic nature of emotions during the customer experience," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    5. Virginie Schweitzer & Françoise Simon, 2021. "Self-construals as the locus of paradoxical consumer empowerment in self-service retail technology environments," Post-Print hal-03110766, HAL.
    6. Devina Oodith, 2019. "Enhanced Customer Interactions through Customer-Centric Technology within a Call Centre," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 11(2), pages 79-91.
    7. Manika, Danae & Papagiannidis, Savvas & Bourlakis, Michael, 2017. "Understanding the effects of a social media service failure apology: A comparative study of customers vs. potential customers," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 214-228.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sharifi, Seyed Shahin & Aghazadeh, Hashem, 2016. "Discount reference moderates customers' reactions to discount frames after online service failure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4074-4080.
    2. Alt, Elisabeth & Gelbrich, Katja, 2009. "Beschwerdebehandlung und Nachbeschwerdeverhalten im interkulturellen Kontext," Ilmenauer Schriften zur Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, volume 1, number 12009.
    3. Kuo, Ying-Feng & Wu, Chi-Ming, 2012. "Satisfaction and post-purchase intentions with service recovery of online shopping websites: Perspectives on perceived justice and emotions," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 127-138.
    4. Goudarzi, Kiane & Borges, Adilson & Chebat, Jean Charles, 2013. "Should retailers pay to bring customers back? The impact of quick response and coupons on purchase outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(5), pages 665-669.
    5. Vikas Gautam, 2011. "Investigating the Moderating Role of Corporate Image in the Relationship between Perceived Justice and Recovery Satisfaction: Evidence from Indian Aviation Industry," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 1(4), pages 74-85.
    6. Wang, Yi-Shun & Wu, Shun-Cheng & Lin, Hsin-Hui & Wang, Yu-Yin, 2011. "The relationship of service failure severity, service recovery justice and perceived switching costs with customer loyalty in the context of e-tailing," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 350-359.
    7. Joseph Lok-Man Lee & Calvin Wah-On Cheng & Vanessa Shun-Wah Liu, 2022. "Core Chinese cultural values: Perceived justice and post-recovery satisfaction in higher education services," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 16(3), pages 743-770, September.
    8. Gelbrich, Katja & Gäthke, Jana & Grégoire, Yany, 2016. "How a firm's best versus normal customers react to compensation after a service failure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4331-4339.
    9. Gohary, Ali & Hamzelu, Bahman & Alizadeh, Hamid, 2016. "Please explain why it happened! How perceived justice and customer involvement affect post co-recovery evaluations: A study of Iranian online shoppers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 127-142.
    10. Hyun-Kyung Choi & Sang-Soo Kim & Bum-Seok Kim, 2023. "Perceived Justice and Customer Loyalty in the Situation of Beauty Service Failure," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    11. Arora, Swapan Deep & Chakraborty, Anirban, 2021. "Intellectual structure of consumer complaining behavior (CCB) research: A bibliometric analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 60-74.
    12. Gohary, Ali & Hamzelu, Bahman & Pourazizi, Lida & Hanzaee, Kambiz Heidarzadeh, 2016. "Understanding effects of co-creation on cognitive, affective and behavioral evaluations in service recovery: An ethnocultural analysis," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 182-198.
    13. Zhou, Yuanyuan & Tsang, Alex S.L. & Huang, Minxue & Zhou, Nan, 2014. "Does delaying service-failure resolution ever make sense?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 159-166.
    14. Yuan-Shuh Lii & May-Ching Ding & Chih-Huang Lin, 2018. "Fair or Unfair: The Moderating Effect of Sustainable CSR Practices on Anticipatory Justice Following Service Failure Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Rodolfo Vázquez-Casielles & Víctor Iglesias & Concepción Varela-Neira, 2010. "Service recovery, satisfaction and behaviour intentions: analysis of compensation and social comparison communication strategies," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 83-103, July.
    16. McColl-Kennedy, Janet R. & Sparks, Beverley A. & Nguyen, Doan T., 2011. "Customer's angry voice: Targeting employees or the organization?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(7), pages 707-713, July.
    17. Watson, Stevie, 2012. "Consumer responses to service situations: Tests for main and interaction effects," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 287-296.
    18. Shaheen MANSORI & Goh Guann TYNG & Zarina Mizam Mohd ISMAIL, 2014. "Service Recovery, Satisfaction and Customers' Post Service Behavior in the Malaysian Banking Sector," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 2(4), pages 5-20, April.
    19. Sharma, Dheeraj & Pandey, S.K. & Chandwani, Rajesh & Pandey, Peeyush & Joseph, Rojers, 2018. "Internet Channel Cannibalization and its influence on salesperson performance outcomes in an emerging economy context," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 179-189.
    20. Oznur Ozkan Tektas, 2017. "Perceived justice and post-recovery satisfaction in banking service failures: Do commitment types matter?," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 11(4), pages 851-870, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:64:y:2011:i:4:p:348-355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.