IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v94y2009i4p872-883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic fault tree analysis using Monte Carlo simulation in probabilistic safety assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Durga Rao, K.
  • Gopika, V.
  • Sanyasi Rao, V.V.S.
  • Kushwaha, H.S.
  • Verma, A.K.
  • Srividya, A.

Abstract

Traditional fault tree (FT) analysis is widely used for reliability and safety assessment of complex and critical engineering systems. The behavior of components of complex systems and their interactions such as sequence- and functional-dependent failures, spares and dynamic redundancy management, and priority of failure events cannot be adequately captured by traditional FTs. Dynamic fault tree (DFT) extend traditional FT by defining additional gates called dynamic gates to model these complex interactions. Markov models are used in solving dynamic gates. However, state space becomes too large for calculation with Markov models when the number of gate inputs increases. In addition, Markov model is applicable for only exponential failure and repair distributions. Modeling test and maintenance information on spare components is also very difficult. To address these difficulties, Monte Carlo simulation-based approach is used in this work to solve dynamic gates. The approach is first applied to a problem available in the literature which is having non-repairable components. The obtained results are in good agreement with those in literature. The approach is later applied to a simplified scheme of electrical power supply system of nuclear power plant (NPP), which is a complex repairable system having tested and maintained spares. The results obtained using this approach are in good agreement with those obtained using analytical approach. In addition to point estimates of reliability measures, failure time, and repair time distributions are also obtained from simulation. Finally a case study on reactor regulation system (RRS) of NPP is carried out to demonstrate the application of simulation-based DFT approach to large-scale problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Durga Rao, K. & Gopika, V. & Sanyasi Rao, V.V.S. & Kushwaha, H.S. & Verma, A.K. & Srividya, A., 2009. "Dynamic fault tree analysis using Monte Carlo simulation in probabilistic safety assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(4), pages 872-883.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:94:y:2009:i:4:p:872-883
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2008.09.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832008002354
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2008.09.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zio, E. & Marella, M. & Podofillini, L., 2007. "A Monte Carlo simulation approach to the availability assessment of multi-state systems with operational dependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(7), pages 871-882.
    2. Huang, Chin-Yu & Chang, Yung-Ruei, 2007. "An improved decomposition scheme for assessing the reliability of embedded systems by using dynamic fault trees," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(10), pages 1403-1412.
    3. Marseguerra, M. & Zio, E. & Devooght, J. & Labeau, P.E., 1998. "A concept paper on dynamic reliability via Monte Carlo simulation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 371-382.
    4. Zio, Enrico & Podofillini, Luca & Zille, Valérie, 2006. "A combination of Monte Carlo simulation and cellular automata for computing the availability of complex network systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 181-190.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jafary, Bentolhoda & Fiondella, Lance, 2016. "A universal generating function-based multi-state system performance model subject to correlated failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 16-27.
    2. Yan-Feng Li & Jinhua Mi & Yu Liu & Yuan-Jian Yang & Hong-Zhong Huang, 2015. "Dynamic fault tree analysis based on continuous-time Bayesian networks under fuzzy numbers," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(6), pages 530-541, December.
    3. Lindhe, Andreas & Norberg, Tommy & Rosén, Lars, 2012. "Approximate dynamic fault tree calculations for modelling water supply risks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 61-71.
    4. Badami, Marco & Fonti, Antonio & Carpignano, Andrea & Grosso, Daniele, 2018. "Design of district heating networks through an integrated thermo-fluid dynamics and reliability modelling approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 826-838.
    5. Mandelli, D. & Parisi, C. & Alfonsi, A. & Maljovec, D. & Boring, R. & Ewing, S. & St Germain, S. & Smith, C. & Rabiti, C. & Rasmussen, M., 2019. "Multi-unit dynamic PRA," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 303-317.
    6. Babykina, Génia & Brînzei, Nicolae & Aubry, Jean-François & Deleuze, Gilles, 2016. "Modeling and simulation of a controlled steam generator in the context of dynamic reliability using a Stochastic Hybrid Automaton," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 115-136.
    7. Girish Kumar & Vipul Jain & Umang Soni, 2019. "Modelling and simulation of repairable mechanical systems reliability and availability," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 10(5), pages 1221-1233, October.
    8. Gascard, Eric & Simeu-Abazi, Zineb, 2018. "Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Fault Trees by means of Monte Carlo Simulations: Event-Driven Simulation Approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 487-504.
    9. Coit, David W. & Zio, Enrico, 2019. "The evolution of system reliability optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    10. Joanna Akrouche & Mohamed Sallak & Eric Châtelet & Fahed Abdallah & Hiba Hajj Chehade, 2022. "Methodology for the Assessment of Imprecise Multi-State System Availability," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, January.
    11. Cavalieri, Francesco, 2020. "Seismic risk assessment of natural gas networks with steady-state flow computation," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    12. Song, Xiaogang & Zhai, Zhengjun & Liu, Yidong & Han, Jie, 2018. "A stochastic approach for the reliability evaluation of multi-state systems with dependent components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 257-266.
    13. Sejin Baek & Gyunyoung Heo, 2021. "Application of Dynamic Fault Tree Analysis to Prioritize Electric Power Systems in Nuclear Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    14. Maidana, Renan G. & Parhizkar, Tarannom & Gomola, Alojz & Utne, Ingrid B. & Mosleh, Ali, 2023. "Supervised dynamic probabilistic risk assessment: Review and comparison of methods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    15. Å nipas, Mindaugas & Radziukynas, Virginijus & ValakeviÄ ius, Eimutis, 2017. "Modeling reliability of power systems substations by using stochastic automata networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 13-22.
    16. Mohammad Nadjafi & Mohammad Ali Farsi & Hossein Jabbari, 2017. "Reliability analysis of multi-state emergency detection system using simulation approach based on fuzzy failure rate," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 8(3), pages 532-541, September.
    17. Vasilyev, A. & Andrews, J. & Dunnett, S.J. & Jackson, L.M., 2021. "Dynamic Reliability Assessment of PEM Fuel Cell Systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    18. Tyrväinen, T., 2013. "Risk importance measures in the dynamic flowgraph methodology," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 35-50.
    19. Durga Rao, K. & Kushwaha, H.S. & Verma, A.K. & Srividya, A., 2007. "Quantification of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties in level-1 probabilistic safety assessment studies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(7), pages 947-956.
    20. Su, Peng & Wang, Guanjun & Duan, Fengjun, 2020. "Reliability evaluation of a k-out-of-n(G)-subsystem based multi-state system with common bus performance sharing," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:94:y:2009:i:4:p:872-883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.