IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v240y2023ics0951832023004878.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consequence assessment of gas pipeline failure caused by external pitting corrosion using an integrated Bayesian belief network and GIS model: Application with Alberta pipeline

Author

Listed:
  • Woldesellasse, Haile
  • Tesfamariam, Solomon

Abstract

Corrosion is one of the main reasons for pipeline failure in the oil and gas industry. Because a pipeline failure can result in serious personal injury, monetary loss, and environmental damage, pipeline operators need to make timely, and cost-effective decisions to prevent accidents in high consequence areas. The current study proposed integrating GIS and Bayesian belief network to assess the consequence of transmission pipeline failure on the society (casualty) and environment. To calculate the casualty of the pipe segment, the model incorporates information such as pipe characteristics, failure mode, and population density. An event tree is used to represent all potential outcomes of a gas release based on the two most important variables that have a significant impact on accident evolution: the amount of time between a gas leak and a potential ignition, and the possibility of an explosion due to confinement from the environment. Finally the societal and environmental consequence are estimated based on empirical equations, and subjective judgement, respectively. The spatial GIS capabilities combined with the Bayesian network’s reasoning power creates a powerful tool for estimating the severity of pipe failure in a given area based on the information currently available.

Suggested Citation

  • Woldesellasse, Haile & Tesfamariam, Solomon, 2023. "Consequence assessment of gas pipeline failure caused by external pitting corrosion using an integrated Bayesian belief network and GIS model: Application with Alberta pipeline," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:240:y:2023:i:c:s0951832023004878
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109573
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832023004878
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109573?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiang, Fengyuan & Dong, Sheng, 2024. "Probabilistic-based burst failure mechanism analysis and risk assessment of pipelines with random non-uniform corrosion defects, considering the interacting effects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    2. Wang, Fang & Bai, Jie & Liu, Linlin & Ye, Tianyuan, 2024. "Temporal noisy-adder of bayesian network for scalable consecutive-k-out-of-n:F system reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    3. Zerouali, Bilal & Sahraoui, Yacine & Nahal, Mourad & Chateauneuf, Alaa, 2024. "Reliability-based maintenance optimization of long-distance oil and gas transmission pipeline networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    4. Yin, Xiuxian & He, Wei & Cao, You & Ma, Ning & Zhou, Guohui & Li, Hongyu, 2024. "A new health state assessment method based on interpretable belief rule base with bimetric balance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:240:y:2023:i:c:s0951832023004878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.