IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v154y2015icp317-332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integration of next-generation biofuel production in the Swedish forest industry – A geographically explicit approach

Author

Listed:
  • Pettersson, Karin
  • Wetterlund, Elisabeth
  • Athanassiadis, Dimitris
  • Lundmark, Robert
  • Ehn, Christian
  • Lundgren, Joakim
  • Berglin, Niklas

Abstract

The geographic locations of biofuel production facilities should be strategically chosen in order to minimise the total cost of using biofuels. Proximity to biomass resources, possibilities for integration, and distance to biofuel users are aspects that need to be considered. In this paper, the geographically explicit optimisation model BeWhere Sweden was used to investigate the future production of next-generation biofuels from forest biomass in Sweden. A focus was placed on the integration of biofuel production with the existing forest industry, as well as on how different parameters affect biofuel production costs, the choice of technologies and biofuels, and the localisation of new biofuel plants. Six examples of different biofuel routes were considered. A methodology was developed considering detailed, site-specific conditions for potential host industries. The results show that the cost of biomass and the biofuel plant capital cost generally dominate the biofuel cost, but the cost for biomass transportation and biofuel distribution can also have a significant impact. DME produced via black liquor gasification (naturally integrated with chemical pulp mills) and SNG produced via solid biomass gasification (mainly integrated with sawmills), dominate the solutions. The distribution of these technology cases varies depending on a number of parameters, including criteria for sizing biofuel plants, the electricity price, the biofuel distribution cost and the cost of biomass, and is sensitive to changes in these parameters. Generally, plants with low specific investment costs (i.e., high biofuel production) and/or plants with low specific biomass transportation costs occur most frequently in the solutions. Because these properties often vary significantly among biofuel production facilities at different host industry sites of the same type, the results show the advantage of including site-specific data in this type of model.

Suggested Citation

  • Pettersson, Karin & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Athanassiadis, Dimitris & Lundmark, Robert & Ehn, Christian & Lundgren, Joakim & Berglin, Niklas, 2015. "Integration of next-generation biofuel production in the Swedish forest industry – A geographically explicit approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 317-332.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:154:y:2015:i:c:p:317-332
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261915004961
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Leduc, Sylvain & Dotzauer, Erik & Kindermann, Georg, 2012. "Optimal localisation of biofuel production on a European scale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 462-472.
    2. Börjesson, Martin & Ahlgren, Erik O., 2012. "Modelling transport fuel pathways: Achieving cost-effective oil use reduction in passenger cars in Sweden," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(5), pages 801-818.
    3. von Schenck, A. & Berglin, N. & Uusitalo, J., 2013. "Ethanol from Nordic wood raw material by simplified alkaline soda cooking pre-treatment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 229-240.
    4. Isaksson, Johan & Pettersson, Karin & Mahmoudkhani, Maryam & Åsblad, Anders & Berntsson, Thore, 2012. "Integration of biomass gasification with a Scandinavian mechanical pulp and paper mill – Consequences for mass and energy balances and global CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 420-428.
    5. Leduc, Sylvain & Natarajan, Karthikeyan & Dotzauer, Erik & McCallum, Ian & Obersteiner, Michael, 2009. "Optimizing biodiesel production in India," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(Supplemen), pages 125-131, November.
    6. Natarajan, Karthikeyan & Leduc, Sylvain & Pelkonen, Paavo & Tomppo, Erkki & Dotzauer, Erik, 2014. "Optimal locations for second generation Fischer Tropsch biodiesel production in Finland," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 319-330.
    7. Pettersson, Karin & Harvey, Simon, 2012. "Comparison of black liquor gasification with other pulping biorefinery concepts – Systems analysis of economic performance and CO2 emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 136-153.
    8. Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Pettersson, Karin & Harvey, Simon, 2011. "Systems analysis of integrating biomass gasification with pulp and paper production – Effects on economic performance, CO2 emissions and energy use," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 932-941.
    9. Schmidt, Johannes & Leduc, Sylvain & Dotzauer, Erik & Kindermann, Georg & Schmid, Erwin, 2010. "Cost-effective CO2 emission reduction through heat, power and biofuel production from woody biomass: A spatially explicit comparison of conversion technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(7), pages 2128-2141, July.
    10. Kraxner, Florian & Aoki, Kentaro & Leduc, Sylvain & Kindermann, Georg & Fuss, Sabine & Yang, Jue & Yamagata, Yoshiki & Tak, Kwang-Il & Obersteiner, Michael, 2014. "BECCS in South Korea—Analyzing the negative emissions potential of bioenergy as a mitigation tool," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 102-108.
    11. Fornell, Rickard & Berntsson, Thore & Åsblad, Anders, 2013. "Techno-economic analysis of a kraft pulp-mill-based biorefinery producing both ethanol and dimethyl ether," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 83-92.
    12. Näyhä, Annukka & Pesonen, Hanna-Leena, 2014. "Strategic change in the forest industry towards the biorefining business," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 259-271.
    13. Ljungstedt, Hanna & Pettersson, Karin & Harvey, Simon, 2013. "Evaluation of opportunities for heat integration of biomass-based Fischer–Tropsch crude production at Scandinavian kraft pulp and paper mill sites," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 349-361.
    14. Börjesson, Pål & Gustavsson, Leif, 1996. "Regional production and utilization of biomass in Sweden," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 21(9), pages 747-764.
    15. Schmidt, Johannes & Leduc, Sylvain & Dotzauer, Erik & Schmid, Erwin, 2011. "Cost-effective policy instruments for greenhouse gas emission reduction and fossil fuel substitution through bioenergy production in Austria," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3261-3280, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shu, Kesheng & Schneider, Uwe A. & Scheffran, Jürgen, 2017. "Optimizing the bioenergy industry infrastructure: Transportation networks and bioenergy plant locations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 247-261.
    2. Svanberg, Martin & Finnsgård, Christian & Flodén, Jonas & Lundgren, Joakim, 2018. "Analyzing animal waste-to-energy supply chains: The case of horse manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PB), pages 830-837.
    3. Zhixue Liu & Shukun Wang & Yanfeng Ouyang, 2017. "Reliable Biomass Supply Chain Design under Feedstock Seasonality and Probabilistic Facility Disruptions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Nwachukwu, Chinedu Maureen & Olofsson, Elias & Lundmark, Robert & Wetterlund, Elisabeth, 2022. "Evaluating fuel switching options in the Swedish iron and steel industry under increased competition for forest biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    5. Harahap, Fumi & Leduc, Sylvain & Mesfun, Sennai & Khatiwada, Dilip & Kraxner, Florian & Silveira, Semida, 2020. "Meeting the bioenergy targets from palm oil based biorefineries: An optimal configuration in Indonesia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    6. Zimmer, Tobias & Rudi, Andreas & Müller, Ann-Kathrin & Fröhling, Magnus & Schultmann, Frank, 2017. "Modeling the impact of competing utilization paths on biomass-to-liquid (BtL) supply chains," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 954-971.
    7. Fischer, Robert & Toffolo, Andrea, 2022. "Is total system cost minimization fair to all the actors of an energy system? Not according to game theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    8. Darmawan, Arif & Hardi, Flabianus & Yoshikawa, Kunio & Aziz, Muhammad & Tokimatsu, Koji, 2017. "Enhanced process integration of black liquor evaporation, gasification, and combined cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1035-1042.
    9. Zetterholm, Jonas & Pettersson, Karin & Leduc, Sylvain & Mesfun, Sennai & Lundgren, Joakim & Wetterlund, Elisabeth, 2018. "Resource efficiency or economy of scale: Biorefinery supply chain configurations for co-gasification of black liquor and pyrolysis liquids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 912-924.
    10. Mei Gong & Göran Wall, 2016. "Exergy Analysis of the Supply of Energy and Material Resources in the Swedish Society," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-16, September.
    11. Mustapha, Walid Fayez & Trømborg, Erik & Bolkesjø, Torjus Folsland, 2019. "Forest-based biofuel production in the Nordic countries: Modelling of optimal allocation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 45-54.
    12. Jonker, J.G.G. & Junginger, H.M. & Verstegen, J.A. & Lin, T. & Rodríguez, L.F. & Ting, K.C. & Faaij, A.P.C. & van der Hilst, F., 2016. "Supply chain optimization of sugarcane first generation and eucalyptus second generation ethanol production in Brazil," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 494-510.
    13. Nwachukwu, Chinedu M. & Toffolo, Andrea & Wetterlund, Elisabeth, 2020. "Biomass-based gas use in Swedish iron and steel industry – Supply chain and process integration considerations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2797-2811.
    14. Bryngemark, Elina, 2019. "Second generation biofuels and the competition for forest raw materials: A partial equilibrium analysis of Sweden," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    15. Harahap, Fumi & Silveira, Semida & Khatiwada, Dilip, 2019. "Cost competitiveness of palm oil biodiesel production in Indonesia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 62-72.
    16. Patrizio, P. & Leduc, S. & Chinese, D. & Dotzauer, E. & Kraxner, F., 2015. "Biomethane as transport fuel – A comparison with other biogas utilization pathways in northern Italy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 25-34.
    17. Magdalena Fallde & Johan Torén & Elisabeth Wetterlund, 2017. "Energy System Models as a Means of Visualising Barriers and Drivers of Forest-Based Biofuels: An Interview Study of Developers and Potential Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, October.
    18. de Jong, Sierk & Hoefnagels, Ric & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Pettersson, Karin & Faaij, André & Junginger, Martin, 2017. "Cost optimization of biofuel production – The impact of scale, integration, transport and supply chain configurations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1055-1070.
    19. Vanzetti, Nicolás & Corsano, Gabriela & Montagna, Jorge M., 2017. "A comparison between individual factories and industrial clusters location in the forest supply chain," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 88-98.
    20. Magdeldin, Mohamed & Järvinen, Mika, 2020. "Supercritical water gasification of Kraft black liquor: Process design, analysis, pulp mill integration and economic evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    21. Venturini, Giada & Pizarro-Alonso, Amalia & Münster, Marie, 2019. "How to maximise the value of residual biomass resources: The case of straw in Denmark," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 369-388.
    22. Fumi Harahap & Sylvain Leduc & Sennai Mesfun & Dilip Khatiwada & Florian Kraxner & Semida Silveira, 2019. "Opportunities to Optimize the Palm Oil Supply Chain in Sumatra, Indonesia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, January.
    23. Ahlström, Johan M. & Pettersson, Karin & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Harvey, Simon, 2017. "Value chains for integrated production of liquefied bio-SNG at sawmill sites – Techno-economic and carbon footprint evaluation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1590-1608.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magdalena Fallde & Johan Torén & Elisabeth Wetterlund, 2017. "Energy System Models as a Means of Visualising Barriers and Drivers of Forest-Based Biofuels: An Interview Study of Developers and Potential Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Mesfun, Sennai & Sanchez, Daniel L. & Leduc, Sylvain & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Lundgren, Joakim & Biberacher, Markus & Kraxner, Florian, 2017. "Power-to-gas and power-to-liquid for managing renewable electricity intermittency in the Alpine Region," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 361-372.
    3. Holmgren, Kristina M. & Andersson, Eva & Berntsson, Thore & Rydberg, Tomas, 2014. "Gasification-based methanol production from biomass in industrial clusters: Characterisation of energy balances and greenhouse gas emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 622-637.
    4. Holmgren, Kristina M. & Berntsson, Thore S. & Andersson, Eva & Rydberg, Tomas, 2016. "Comparison of integration options for gasification-based biofuel production systems – Economic and greenhouse gas emission implications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 272-294.
    5. Börjesson Hagberg, Martin & Pettersson, Karin & Ahlgren, Erik O., 2016. "Bioenergy futures in Sweden – Modeling integration scenarios for biofuel production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1026-1039.
    6. Mesfun, Sennai & Leduc, Sylvain & Patrizio, Piera & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Mendoza-Ponce, Alma & Lammens, Tijs & Staritsky, Igor & Elbersen, Berien & Lundgren, Joakim & Kraxner, Florian, 2018. "Spatio-temporal assessment of integrating intermittent electricity in the EU and Western Balkans power sector under ambitious CO2 emission policies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 676-693.
    7. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C. & Pinto, P.C.R., 2020. "Gasification-based biorefinery integration in the pulp and paper industry: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    8. Rey, J.R.C. & Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C., 2021. "Biomass direct gasification for electricity generation and natural gas replacement in the lime kilns of the pulp and paper industry: A techno-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    9. Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Leduc, Sylvain & Dotzauer, Erik & Kindermann, Georg, 2012. "Optimal localisation of biofuel production on a European scale," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 462-472.
    10. Patrizio, P. & Leduc, S. & Chinese, D. & Kraxner, F., 2017. "Internalizing the external costs of biogas supply chains in the Italian energy sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 85-96.
    11. Cambero, Claudia & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2014. "Assessment and optimization of forest biomass supply chains from economic, social and environmental perspectives – A review of literature," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 62-73.
    12. de Jong, Sierk & Hoefnagels, Ric & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Pettersson, Karin & Faaij, André & Junginger, Martin, 2017. "Cost optimization of biofuel production – The impact of scale, integration, transport and supply chain configurations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1055-1070.
    13. Holmgren, Kristina M. & Berntsson, Thore S. & Andersson, Eva & Rydberg, Tomas, 2015. "The influence of biomass supply chains and by-products on the greenhouse gas emissions from gasification-based bio-SNG production systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 148-162.
    14. Kolb, Sebastian & Plankenbühler, Thomas & Hofmann, Katharina & Bergerson, Joule & Karl, Jürgen, 2021. "Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of renewable gas technologies: A comparative review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    15. Haro, Pedro & Aracil, Cristina & Vidal-Barrero, Fernando & Ollero, Pedro, 2015. "Rewarding of extra-avoided GHG emissions in thermochemical biorefineries incorporating Bio-CCS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 255-266.
    16. Mohd Idris, Muhammad Nurariffudin & Leduc, Sylvain & Yowargana, Ping & Hashim, Haslenda & Kraxner, Florian, 2021. "Spatio-temporal assessment of the impact of intensive palm oil-based bioenergy deployment on cross-sectoral energy decarbonization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    17. Andersson, Jim & Lundgren, Joakim, 2014. "Techno-economic analysis of ammonia production via integrated biomass gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 484-490.
    18. Ljungstedt, Hanna & Pettersson, Karin & Harvey, Simon, 2013. "Evaluation of opportunities for heat integration of biomass-based Fischer–Tropsch crude production at Scandinavian kraft pulp and paper mill sites," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 349-361.
    19. Steubing, Bernhard & Ballmer, Isabel & Gassner, Martin & Gerber, Léda & Pampuri, Luca & Bischof, Sandro & Thees, Oliver & Zah, Rainer, 2014. "Identifying environmentally and economically optimal bioenergy plant sizes and locations: A spatial model of wood-based SNG value chains," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 57-68.
    20. Mendiara, T. & García-Labiano, F. & Abad, A. & Gayán, P. & de Diego, L.F. & Izquierdo, M.T. & Adánez, J., 2018. "Negative CO2 emissions through the use of biofuels in chemical looping technology: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 657-684.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:154:y:2015:i:c:p:317-332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.