IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eps/cepswp/25211.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Stakeholders’ views on and experiences with the articulation of social dialogue and its effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Akgüç, Mehtap
  • Martišková, Monika
  • Szüdi, Gábor
  • Nordlund, Carl

Abstract

Bringing together five consortium partners, the EESDA project, implemented during 2017-2019, advances the current knowledge and expertise on the articulation of social dialogue in Europe and its effectiveness. It studies the ways in which social dialogue at different levels functions and the channels through which EU-level social dialogue – across and within sectors – affects the actors, decisions and outcomes at national and sub-national level, and vice versa. Research conducted within the EESDA project includes an assessment of social dialogue articulation between national and European level across 27 EU member states by means of desk research, an online survey among national social partners and interviews with EU-level social partners as well as other national stakeholders. It then concentrates on the effectiveness of social dialogue in six EU Member States (i.e. Estonia, Ireland, France, Portugal, Slovakia and Sweden – with distinct industrial relations models and traditions) and four sectors (i.e. construction, commerce, education and healthcare, with a focus on a specific occupation in each sector). Findings from interviews, case studies and discourse analysis are completed using network analysis that sets out to visualise and reveal strong and weak ties between different actors and to draw lessons for experiences and best practices in other sectors and countries. The analysis considers efforts that have a direct and indirect impact on social dialogue, such as EU Directives, Autonomous Agreements, Framework of Actions, joint projects, joint statements or programme funding.

Suggested Citation

  • Akgüç, Mehtap & Martišková, Monika & Szüdi, Gábor & Nordlund, Carl, 2019. "Stakeholders’ views on and experiences with the articulation of social dialogue and its effectiveness," CEPS Papers 25211, Centre for European Policy Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:eps:cepswp:25211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/D2.2_EESDA_Stakeholders-views.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Larsson, Bengt & Bengtsson, Mattias & Lovén Seldén, Kristina, 2012. "Transnational Trade Union Cooperation in the Nordic Countries," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 23(1), pages 32-48.
    2. Larsson, Bengt & Bengtsson, Mattias & Lovén Seldén, Kristina, 2012. "Transnational Trade Union Cooperation in the Nordic Countries," management revue. Socio-economic Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 23(1), pages 32-48.
    3. Baccaro,Lucio & Howell,Chris, 2017. "Trajectories of Neoliberal Transformation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107603691, November.
    4. Baccaro,Lucio & Howell,Chris, 2017. "Trajectories of Neoliberal Transformation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107018723, November.
    5. Bengt Larsson, 2012. "Obstacles to transnational trade union cooperation in Europe—results from a European survey," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 152-170, March.
    6. Anne Dufresne & C. Degryse & P. Pochet, 2006. "The European Sectoral Social Dialogue: Actors, developments and challenges," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/47217, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    7. Jaan Masso & Vladyslav Soloviov & Kerly Espenberg & Inta Mierina, 2019. "Social convergence of the Baltic states within the enlarged EU: Is limited social dialogue an impediment?," Chapters, in: Daniel Vaughan-Whitehead (ed.), Towards Convergence in Europe, chapter 2, pages 35-77, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Akgüç, Mehtap & Baiocco, Sara, 2019. "Comparative policy recommendations on improving social dialogue articulation and effectiveness in Europe," CEPS Papers 25974, Centre for European Policy Studies.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bengt Furåker, 2020. "European trade union cooperation, union density and employee attitudes to unions," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 26(3), pages 345-358, August.
    2. Leone Leonida & Marianna Marra & Sergio Scicchitano & Antonio Giangreco & Marco Biagetti, 2020. "Estimating the Wage Premium to Supervision for Middle Managers in Different Contexts: Evidence from Germany and the UK," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(6), pages 1004-1026, December.
    3. Neimanns, Erik & Blossey, Nils, 2022. "From media-party linkages to ownership concentration causes of cross-national variation in media outlets' economic positioning," MPIfG Discussion Paper 22/8, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    4. Martin B. Carstensen & Christian Lyhne Ibsen & Vivien A. Schmidt, 2022. "Ideas and power in employment relations studies," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(1), pages 3-21, January.
    5. Bengt Furåker & Mattias Bengtsson, 2013. "Collective and individual benefits of trade unions: a multi-level analysis of 21 European countries," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5-6), pages 548-565, November.
    6. Benassi, Chiara & Dorigatti, Lisa & Pannini, Elisa, 2018. "Explaining divergent bargaining outcomes for agency workers: the role of labour divides and labour market reforms," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 89371, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Josef Ringqvist, 2021. "How do union membership, union density and institutionalization affect perceptions of conflict between management and workers?," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 27(2), pages 131-148, June.
    8. Arthur Corazza, 2020. "Power, interest and insecurity: A comparative analysis of workplace dualization and inclusion in Europe," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 153, European Institute, LSE.
    9. Martin Behrens & Alexander J. S. Colvin & Lisa Dorigatti & Andreas H. Pekarek, 2020. "Systems for Conflict Resolution in Comparative Perspective," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 73(2), pages 312-344, March.
    10. Valeria Cirillo & Matteo Sostero & Federico Tamagni, 2019. "Firm-level pay agreements and within-firm wage inequalities: Evidence across Europe," LEM Papers Series 2019/12, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    11. Ylva Ulfsdotter Eriksson & Bengt Larsson & Petra Adolfsson, 2021. "Under the Surface of Individual and Differentiated Pay in Sweden: A Zero‐Sum Game of Performance‐Based Pay?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 59(2), pages 398-417, June.
    12. Cathie Jo Martin, 2022. "FICTION WORKS: Cultural ideas and the design of industrial relations systems in Britain and Denmark," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(1), pages 50-67, January.
    13. Lorenzo Frangi & Sinisa Hadziabdic & Anthony C. Masi, 2022. "In the interest of everyone? Support for social movement unionism among union officials in Quebec (Canada)," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(5), pages 446-465, September.
    14. Alice Evans, 2019. "Overcoming the Global Despondency Trap: Strengthening Corporate Accountability in Supply Chains," CID Working Papers 367, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    15. Lersch, Philipp M. & Schulz, Wiebke & Leckie, George, 2020. "The Variability of Occupational Attainment: How Prestige Trajectories Diversified within Birth Cohorts over the Twentieth Century," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 85(6), pages 1084-1116.
    16. Hielke Van Doorslaer & Mattias Vermeiren, 2021. "Pushing on a String: Monetary Policy, Growth Models and the Persistence of Low Inflation in Advanced Capitalism," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(5), pages 797-816, September.
    17. Rebecca J Oliver & Andrew L Morelock, 2021. "Insider and outsider support for unions across advanced industrial democracies: Paradoxes of solidarity," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 27(2), pages 167-183, June.
    18. Thomas Palley, 2023. "Theorizing Varieties of Capitalism: economics and the fallacy that 'there is no alternative (TINA)'," Chapters, in: Thomas Palley & Esteban Pérez Caldentey & Matías Vernengo (ed.), Varieties of Capitalism, chapter 1, pages 1-38, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Thomas Paster & Dennie Oude Nijhuis & Maximilian Kiecker, 2020. "To Extend or Not to Extend: Explaining the Divergent Use of Statutory Bargaining Extensions in the Netherlands and Germany," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 58(3), pages 532-557, September.
    20. Robert Boyer, 2018. "Do Globalization, Deregulation and Financialization Imply a Convergence of Contemporary Capitalisms?," PSE Working Papers halshs-01908095, HAL.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eps:cepswp:25211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Margarita Minkova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepssbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.