IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eps/cepswp/25974.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparative policy recommendations on improving social dialogue articulation and effectiveness in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Akgüç, Mehtap
  • Baiocco, Sara

Abstract

Bringing together five consortium partners, the 2017-2019 EESDA project advances current knowledge and expertise on the articulation of social dialogue in Europe and its effectiveness. It studies the ways in which social dialogue at different levels functions and the channels through which EU-level social dialogue – across and within sectors – affects the actors, decisions and outcomes at national and sub-national level, and vice versa. This document summarises the comparative findings, covering both cross-sectoral and sectoral levels, from previous EESDA research outputs and provides policy recommendations to make social dialogue more effective in Europe. It also highlights specific areas where the articulation and effectiveness of social dialogue could be improved as well as including suggestions and initiatives by social partners and other stakeholders to take matters forward.

Suggested Citation

  • Akgüç, Mehtap & Baiocco, Sara, 2019. "Comparative policy recommendations on improving social dialogue articulation and effectiveness in Europe," CEPS Papers 25974, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    • Handle: RePEc:eps:cepswp:25974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/EESDA_policy_recommendations.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akgüç, Mehtap & Martišková, Monika & Szüdi, Gábor & Nordlund, Carl, 2019. "Stakeholders’ views on and experiences with the articulation of social dialogue and its effectiveness," CEPS Papers 25211, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    2. Marta Kahancová & Monika Martišková & Carl Nordlund, 2019. "Enhancing the Effectiveness of Social Dialogue Articulation in Europe: Conceptual and Analytical Framework in a Multi-Level Governance Perspective," Discussion Papers 55, Central European Labour Studies Institute (CELSI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehtap Akgüç & Marta Kahancová & Jaan Masso, 2024. "One-way street to the European Union? Between national and EU-level social dialogue 20 years after eastward EU enlargement," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 30(1), pages 33-49, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eps:cepswp:25974. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Margarita Minkova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepssbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.