IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pbr525.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Kevin Bryan

Personal Details

First Name:Kevin
Middle Name:A
Last Name:Bryan
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pbr525
http://afinetheorem.wordpress.com

Affiliation

Strategic Management
Rotman School of Management
University of Toronto

Toronto, Canada
http://www.rotman.utoronto.ca/FacultyAndResearch/AcademicAreas/StrategicManagement.aspx
RePEc:edi:sdtorca (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Kevin A. Bryan & Mitchell Hoffman & Amir Sariri, 2022. "Information Frictions and Employee Sorting Between Startups," NBER Working Papers 30449, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  2. Kevin A. Bryan & Heidi L. Williams, 2021. "Innovation: Market Failures and Public Policies," NBER Working Papers 29173, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  3. Susan C. Athey & Kevin A. Bryan & Joshua S. Gans, 2020. "The Allocation of Decision Authority to Human and Artificial Intelligence," NBER Working Papers 26673, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  4. Kevin Bryan & Michael Ryall & Burkhard C. Schipper, 2019. "Value-Capture in the Face of Known and Unknown Unknowns," Working Papers 333, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
  5. Kevin A. Bryan & Yasin Ozcan & Bhaven N. Sampat, 2019. "In-Text Patent Citations: A User’s Guide," NBER Working Papers 25742, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  6. Kevin A. Bryan & Joshua S. Gans, 2018. "A Theory of Multihoming in Rideshare Competition," NBER Working Papers 24806, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

Articles

  1. Susan C. Athey & Kevin A. Bryan & Joshua S. Gans, 2020. "The Allocation of Decision Authority to Human and Artificial Intelligence," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 110, pages 80-84, May.
  2. Bryan, Kevin A. & Ozcan, Yasin & Sampat, Bhaven, 2020. "In-text patent citations: A user's guide," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(4).
  3. Kevin A. Bryan & Erik Hovenkamp, 2020. "Antitrust Limits on Startup Acquisitions," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 56(4), pages 615-636, June.
  4. Kevin A. Bryan, 2019. "Young “Stars” In Economics: What They Do And Where They Go," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 57(3), pages 1392-1407, July.
  5. Kevin A. Bryan & Joshua S. Gans, 2019. "A theory of multihoming in rideshare competition," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 89-96, January.
  6. Bryan, Kevin A. & Lemus, Jorge, 2017. "The direction of innovation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 247-272.
  7. Kevin A. Bryan & András Tilcsik & Brooklynn Zhu, 2017. "Which Entrepreneurs Are Coachable and Why?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(5), pages 312-316, May.
  8. Kevin A. Bryan & Pierre-Daniel G. Sarte, 2009. "Semiparametric estimation of land price gradients using large data sets," Economic Quarterly, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, vol. 95(Win), pages 53-74.
  9. Kevin A. Bryan & Pierre-Daniel G. Sarte, 2009. "Residential externalities," Richmond Fed Economic Brief, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, issue Feb.
  10. Kevin A. Bryan & Leonardo Martinez, 2008. "On the evolution of income inequality in the United States," Economic Quarterly, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, vol. 94(Spr), pages 97-120.
  11. Kevin A. Bryan, 2007. "Jargon alert : Arbitrage," Econ Focus, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, vol. 11(Spr), pages 1-6.
  12. Kevin A. Bryan & Brian D. Minton & Pierre-Daniel G. Sarte, 2007. "The evolution of city population density in the United States," Economic Quarterly, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, vol. 93(Fall), pages 341-360.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Kevin A. Bryan & Heidi L. Williams, 2021. "Innovation: Market Failures and Public Policies," NBER Working Papers 29173, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Cited by:

    1. Obschonka, Martin & Tavassoli, Sam & Rentfrow, P. Jason & Potter, Jeff & Gosling, Samuel D., 2023. "Innovation and inter-city knowledge spillovers: Social, geographical, and technological connectedness and psychological openness," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    2. Teichgraeber, Andreas & Van Reenen, John, 2022. "A policy toolkit to increase research and innovation in the European Union," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117801, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Chiappinelli, Olga & Giuffrida, Leonardo M. & Spagnolo, Giancarlo, 2023. "Public procurement as an innovation policy: Where do we stand?," ZEW Discussion Papers 23-002, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    4. Dominique Foray, 2022. "The Economics of Incomplete Plan -on Conditions, Procedures and Design of Future Mission- Oriented Innovation Policies," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 243(4), pages 123-146, December.
    5. Joshua S. Gans, 2023. "Artificial intelligence adoption in a monopoly market," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(2), pages 1098-1106, March.

  2. Susan C. Athey & Kevin A. Bryan & Joshua S. Gans, 2020. "The Allocation of Decision Authority to Human and Artificial Intelligence," NBER Working Papers 26673, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Cited by:

    1. Lyu, Wenjing & Liu, Jin, 2021. "Soft skills, hard skills: What matters most? Evidence from job postings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    2. Laura Abrardi & Carlo Cambini & Laura Rondi, 2022. "Artificial intelligence, firms and consumer behavior: A survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 969-991, September.
    3. Bauer, Kevin & von Zahn, Moritz & Hinz, Oliver, 2023. "Please take over: XAI, delegation of authority, and domain knowledge," SAFE Working Paper Series 394, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    4. Lyu, Wenjing & Liu, Jin, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence and emerging digital technologies in the energy sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    5. Bryce McLaughlin & Jann Spiess, 2022. "Algorithmic Assistance with Recommendation-Dependent Preferences," Papers 2208.07626, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    6. Laura Blattner & Scott Nelson & Jann Spiess, 2021. "Unpacking the Black Box: Regulating Algorithmic Decisions," Papers 2110.03443, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    7. Marie Obidzinski & Yves Oytana, 2022. "Advisory algorithms and liability rules," Working Papers hal-04222291, HAL.
    8. Antonio Rodríguez Andrés & Voxi Heinrich S. Amavilah & Abraham Otero, 2021. "Evaluation of technology clubs by clustering: a cautionary note," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(52), pages 5989-6001, November.
    9. Talia Gillis & Bryce McLaughlin & Jann Spiess, 2021. "On the Fairness of Machine-Assisted Human Decisions," Papers 2110.15310, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    10. Agrawal, Ajay & Gans, Joshua S. & Goldfarb, Avi, 2024. "Prediction machines, insurance, and protection: An alternative perspective on AI’s role in production," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    11. Ashesh Rambachan & Jon Kleinberg & Sendhil Mullainathan & Jens Ludwig, 2020. "An Economic Approach to Regulating Algorithms," NBER Working Papers 27111, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Caro-Burnett, Johann & Kaneko, Shinji, 2022. "Is Society Ready for AI Ethical Decision Making? Lessons from a Study on Autonomous Cars," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    13. Jonathan Gruber & Benjamin R. Handel & Samuel H. Kina & Jonathan T. Kolstad, 2020. "Managing Intelligence: Skilled Experts and AI in Markets for Complex Products," NBER Working Papers 27038, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Feldhaus, Christoph & Lingens, Jörg & Löschel, Andreas & Zunker, Gerald, 2022. "Encouraging consumer activity through automatic switching of the electricity contract - A field experiment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    15. Marie Obidzinski & Yves Oytana, 2022. "Prediction, human decision and liability rules, CRED Working paper No 2022-06," Working Papers hal-04034871, HAL.

  3. Kevin A. Bryan & Yasin Ozcan & Bhaven N. Sampat, 2019. "In-Text Patent Citations: A User’s Guide," NBER Working Papers 25742, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Cited by:

    1. Cyril Verluise & Gabriele Cristelli & Kyle Higham & Gaetan de Rassenfosse, 2020. "The Missing 15 Percent of Patent Citations," Working Papers 13, Chair of Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy.
    2. Higham, Kyle & de Rassenfosse, Gaétan & Jaffe, Adam B., 2021. "Patent Quality: Towards a Systematic Framework for Analysis and Measurement," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(4).
    3. Choi, Jaewoong & Yoon, Janghyeok, 2022. "Measuring knowledge exploration distance at the patent level: Application of network embedding and citation analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).
    4. Sijie Feng, 2020. "The proximity of ideas: An analysis of patent text using machine learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Kevin A. Bryan & Heidi L. Williams, 2021. "Innovation: Market Failures and Public Policies," NBER Working Papers 29173, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Xiaojun Hu & Ronald Rousseau & Sandra Rousseau, 2019. "Does Environmental Economics lead to patentable research?," Papers 1905.02875, arXiv.org.
    7. Font-Julián, Cristina I & Ontalba-Ruipérez, José-Antonio & Orduña-Malea, Enrique & Thelwall, Mike, 2022. "Which types of online resource support US patent claims?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    8. Daniel P. Gross & Bhaven N. Sampat, 2023. "America, Jump-Started: World War II R&D and the Takeoff of the US Innovation System," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 113(12), pages 3323-3356, December.
    9. Matt Marx & Aaron Fuegi, 2020. "Reliance on science: Worldwide front‐page patent citations to scientific articles," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(9), pages 1572-1594, September.
    10. Ashish Arora & Sharon Belenzon & Jungkyu Suh, 2022. "Science and the Market for Technology," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(10), pages 7176-7201, October.
    11. Ribeiro, Barbara & Shapira, Philip, 2020. "Private and public values of innovation: A patent analysis of synthetic biology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    12. N. N., 2020. "WIFO-Monatsberichte, Heft 9/2020," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 93(9), September.

  4. Kevin A. Bryan & Joshua S. Gans, 2018. "A Theory of Multihoming in Rideshare Competition," NBER Working Papers 24806, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Cited by:

    1. Mishra, Soumya Kanta & Sarkar, Sumit, 2023. "Can social media platforms charge their users?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    2. Tremblay, Mark J. & Adachi, Takanori & Sato, Susumu, 2023. "Cournot platform competition with mixed-homing," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Joan Calzada & Ester Manna & Andrea Mantovani, 2022. "Platform price parity clauses and market segmentation," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 609-637, August.
    4. Yao Wang & Abdul Majeed & Zahid Hussain & József Popp & Judit Oláh, 2022. "Online Second-Hand Bookstores’ Strategic Decisions: A Theoretical Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Liu, He & Amit, Raphael & Qiao, Han & Wang, Shouyang, 2024. "Digital platform compatibility strategies in platform co-opetition," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    6. Wang, Yao & Jin, Huan & Zheng, Shiyuan & Shang, Wen-Long & Wang, Kun, 2023. "Bike-sharing duopoly competition under government regulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
    7. Wang, Hai & Yang, Hai, 2019. "Ridesourcing systems: A framework and review," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 122-155.
    8. Guangyu Cao & Ginger Zhe Jin & Xi Weng & Li-An Zhou, 2018. "Market Expanding or Market Stealing? Competition with Network Effects in BikeSharing," NBER Working Papers 24938, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Boffa, Federico & Piolatto, Amedeo & Piva, Evila & Schuett, Florian, 2022. "Industry dynamics in digital markets," Other publications TiSEM 2c92dc1f-7ef4-48ff-99ce-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Yannis Bakos & Hanna Halaburda, 2020. "Platform Competition with Multi-Homing on Both Sides: Subsidize or Not?," CESifo Working Paper Series 8126, CESifo.
    11. Soheil Ghili & Vineet Kumar, 2020. "Spatial Distribution of Supply and the Role of Market Thickness: Theory and Evidence from Ride Sharing," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2219, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    12. Soheil Ghili & Vineet Kumar, 2020. "Spatial Distribution of Supply and the Role of Market Thickness: Theory and Evidence from Ride Sharing," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2219R, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Aug 2020.
    13. Fuyuki Saruta, 2022. "Exclusive Contracts and Multihoming Agents in Two-sided Markets," Discussion Paper Series DP2022-26, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    14. Oksana Loginova & X. Henry Wang & Qihong Liu, 2022. "The impact of multi-homing in a ride-sharing market," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 69(1), pages 239-254, August.
    15. Soheil Ghili & Vineet Kumar, 2021. "Spatial Distribution of Supply and the Role of Market Thickness: Theory and Evidence from Ride Sharing," Papers 2108.05954, arXiv.org.
    16. Soheil Ghili, 2021. "Optimal Bundling: Characterization, Interpretation, and Implications for Empirical Work," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2273, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    17. Ravula, Prashanth, 2022. "Monetary and hassle savings as strategic variables in the ride-sharing market," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    18. Andrei Hagiu & Julian Wright, 2019. "The status of workers and platforms in the sharing economy," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 97-108, January.
    19. Singh, Neeraj & Kumar, Niraj & Kapoor, Sanjeev, 2022. "Consumer multihoming predisposition on food platforms: Does gender matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    20. Chenglong Zhang & Jianqing Chen & Srinivasan Raghunathan, 2022. "Two-Sided Platform Competition in a Sharing Economy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(12), pages 8909-8932, December.
    21. Saruta, Fuyuki, 2021. "Exclusive contracts and multihoming agents in two-sided markets," MPRA Paper 110070, University Library of Munich, Germany.

Articles

  1. Susan C. Athey & Kevin A. Bryan & Joshua S. Gans, 2020. "The Allocation of Decision Authority to Human and Artificial Intelligence," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 110, pages 80-84, May.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Bryan, Kevin A. & Ozcan, Yasin & Sampat, Bhaven, 2020. "In-text patent citations: A user's guide," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(4).
    See citations under working paper version above.
  3. Kevin A. Bryan & Erik Hovenkamp, 2020. "Antitrust Limits on Startup Acquisitions," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 56(4), pages 615-636, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Weichselbaumer, Michael, 2024. "Competition after mergers near review thresholds," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Jin, Ginger Zhe & Leccese, Mario & Wagman, Liad, 2023. "How Do Top Acquirers Compare in Technology Mergers? New Evidence from an S&P Taxonomy," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Katz, Michael L., 2021. "Big Tech mergers: Innovation, competition for the market, and the acquisition of emerging competitors," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    4. Lefouili, Yassine & Madio, Leonardo, 2023. "Market Structure and Investments : A Progress Report," TSE Working Papers 23-1491, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Sep 2024.
    5. Sai Krishna Kamepalli & Raghuram G. Rajan & Luigi Zingales, 2020. "Kill Zone," Working Papers 2020-19, Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics.
      • Zingales, Luigi & Kamepalli, Sai Krishna & Rajan, Raghuram, 2020. "Kill Zone," CEPR Discussion Papers 14709, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
      • Kamepalli, Sai Krishna & Rajan, Raghuram G. & Zingales, Luigi, 2020. "Kill Zone," Working Papers 294, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
      • Sai Krishna Kamepalli & Raghuram Rajan & Luigi Zingales, 2020. "Kill Zone," NBER Working Papers 27146, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Fons-Rosen, Christian & Roldan-Blanco, Pau & Schmitz, Tom, 2022. "The Effects of Startup Acquisitions on Innovation and Economic Growth," CEPR Discussion Papers 17752, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Motta, Massimo & Peitz, Martin, 2021. "Big tech mergers," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    8. Zelda Brutti & Luis E. Rojas, 2022. "M&A and early investment decisions by digital platforms," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 49(3), pages 509-543, September.
    9. Geoffrey Parker & Georgios Petropoulos & Marshall Van Alstyne, 2021. "Platform mergers and antitrust," Working Papers 43276, Bruegel.
    10. Schmutzler, Armin & Letina, Igor & Seibel, Regina, 2021. "Killer Aquisitions and Beyond: Policy Effects on Innovation Strategies," VfS Annual Conference 2021 (Virtual Conference): Climate Economics 242420, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    11. Gugler, Klaus & Szücs, Florian & Wohak, Ulrich, 2023. "Start-up Acquisitions, Venture Capital and Innovation: A Comparative Study of Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 340, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    12. Juan Manuel Sanchez‐Cartas & Gonzalo León, 2021. "Multisided Platforms And Markets: A Survey Of The Theoretical Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 452-487, April.
    13. Gautier, Axel & Lamesch, Joe, 2021. "Mergers in the digital economy," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    14. Geoffrey Parker & Georgios Petropoulos & Marshall Van Alstyne, 2021. "Platform mergers and antitrust [Ex-post assessment of merger control decisions in digital markets]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(5), pages 1307-1336.
    15. Koski, Heli & Kässi, Otto & Braesemann, Fabian, 2020. "Killers on the Road of Emerging Start-ups – Implications for Market Entry and Venture Capital Financing," ETLA Working Papers 81, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    16. Ioramashvili, Carolin & Feldman, Maryann & Guy, Frederick & Iammarino, Simona, 2024. "Gathering round Big Tech: how the market for acquisitions concentrates the digital sector," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 123670, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Gilbert, Richard J. & Katz, Michael L., 2022. "Dynamic merger policy and pre-merger product choice by an entrant," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    18. Axel Gautier & Joe Lamesch, 2020. "Mergers in the Digital Economy," CESifo Working Paper Series 8056, CESifo.
    19. Watzinger, Martin & Schnitzer, Monika, 2022. "The Breakup of the Bell System and its Impact on US Innovation," CEPR Discussion Papers 17635, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    20. Pauline Affeldt & Reinhold Kesler, 2021. "Competitors’ Reactions to Big Tech Acquisitions: Evidence from Mobile Apps," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1987, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    21. Shaker A. Zahra & Niron Hashai, 2022. "The effect of MNEs’ technology startup acquisitions on small open economies’ entrepreneurial ecosystems," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(3), pages 277-295, September.
    22. Christopher Teh & Dyuti Banerjee & Chengsi Wang, 2022. "Acquisition-induced kill zone," Monash Economics Working Papers 2022-24, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    23. Steffen, Nico & Wiewiorra, Lukas & Kroon, Peter, 2021. "Wettbewerb und Regulierung in der Plattform- und Datenökonomie," WIK Discussion Papers 481, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH.
    24. Esmée Dijk & José Luis Moraga-González & Evgenia Motchenkova, 2023. "Start-up Acquisitions and the Entrant’s and Incumbent’s Innovation Portfolios," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 23-047/VII, Tinbergen Institute.
    25. Roger D. Blair, 2020. "The Intellectual Property-Antitrust Interface," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 56(4), pages 557-561, June.

  4. Kevin A. Bryan, 2019. "Young “Stars” In Economics: What They Do And Where They Go," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 57(3), pages 1392-1407, July.

    Cited by:

    1. Yihui Lan & Kenneth W Clements & Zong Ken Chai, 2022. "Australian PhDs in Economics and Finance: Professional Activities, Productivity and Prospects," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 22-04, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    2. Nano, Enrico & Panizza, Ugo & Viarengo, Martina, 2021. "A Generation of Italian Economists," IZA Discussion Papers 14368, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Auriol, Emmanuelle & Friebel, Guido & Weinberger, Alisa & Wilhelm, Sascha, 2022. "Women in Economics: Europe and the World," TSE Working Papers 22-1288, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    4. Jones, Todd R. & Sloan, Arielle A., 2021. "The Academic Origins of Economics Faculty," IZA Discussion Papers 14965, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. David I. Stern & Richard S. J. Tol, 2021. "Depth and breadth relevance in citation metrics," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 59(3), pages 961-977, July.

  5. Kevin A. Bryan & Joshua S. Gans, 2019. "A theory of multihoming in rideshare competition," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 89-96, January.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  6. Bryan, Kevin A. & Lemus, Jorge, 2017. "The direction of innovation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 247-272.

    Cited by:

    1. Bavly, Gilad & Heller, Yuval & Schreiber, Amnon, 2022. "Social welfare in search games with asymmetric information," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    2. Stefano Comino & Fabio M. Manenti, 2020. "Patent Portfolios and Firms Technological Choices," "Marco Fanno" Working Papers 0254, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche "Marco Fanno".
    3. Choi, Jay Pil & Jeon, Doh-Shin, 2020. "Platform Design Biases in Two-Sided Markets," TSE Working Papers 20-1143, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    4. de Bettignies, Jean-Etienne & Ries, John, 2023. "When less is more: Information and the financing of innovation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 346-369.
    5. Christoph Carnehl & Marco Ottaviani & Justus Preusser, 2024. "Designing Scientific Grants," NBER Working Papers 32668, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Rinat Zhanbayev & Saule Sagintayeva & Abildina Ainur & Anton Nazarov, 2020. "The Use of the Foresight Methods in Developing an Algorithm for Conducting Qualitative Examination of the Research Activities Results on the Example of the Republic of Kazakhstan," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Haiwei Jiang & Shiyuan Pan & Xiaomeng Ren, 2020. "Does Administrative Approval Impede Low-Quality Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Mark Vancauteren & Ahmed Boutorat & Oscar Lemmers, 2024. "Import Competition, Destinations, and Firms’ Patent Strategies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 4284-4314, March.
    9. Jay Pil Choi & Doh-Shin Jeon, 2020. "Two-Sided Platforms and Biases in Technology Adoption," CESifo Working Paper Series 8559, CESifo.
    10. Rainer Widmann, 2023. "The Behavioral Additionality of Government Research Grants," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 417, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    11. Kevin A. Bryan & Heidi L. Williams, 2021. "Innovation: Market Failures and Public Policies," NBER Working Papers 29173, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Schmutzler, Armin & Letina, Igor & Seibel, Regina, 2021. "Killer Aquisitions and Beyond: Policy Effects on Innovation Strategies," VfS Annual Conference 2021 (Virtual Conference): Climate Economics 242420, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    13. Brunner, Philipp & Letina, Igor & Schmutzler, Armin, 2022. "Research Joint Ventures: The Role of Financial Constraints," CEPR Discussion Papers 17467, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Joshua Krieger & Ramana Nanda & Ian Hunt & Aimee Reynolds & Peter Tarsa, 2022. "Scoring and Funding Breakthrough Ideas: Evidence from a Global Pharmaceutical Company," Harvard Business School Working Papers 23-014, Harvard Business School, revised Nov 2023.
    15. S. V. Pronichkin & I. B. Mamay & R. N. Bafoev, 2019. "Problems and prospects for evaluating the effectiveness of scientific activity in the chemical-technological field," Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, MISIS, vol. 12(2).
    16. Kaustav Das & Nicolas Klein, 2024. "Do Stronger Patents Lead To Faster Innovation? The Effect Of Clustered Search," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 65(2), pages 915-954, May.
    17. Joshua L. Krieger, 2021. "Trials and Terminations: Learning from Competitors’ R&D Failures," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5525-5548, September.
    18. Bryan, Kevin A. & Lemus, Jorge & Marshall, Guillermo, 2022. "R&D competition and the direction of innovation," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    19. Bhaven Sampat, 2022. "Second World War and the direction of medical innovation," WIPO Economic Research Working Papers 70, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division.
    20. Sergey Novikov & Elmira Amirova & Elena Kosykh & Marina Chudinovskikh & Olga Nikolaevskaya, 2019. "Strategic Planning and Management of High-Tech Developments and Innovative Technical Solutions," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(3), pages 309-314, December.
    21. Chen, Yongmin, 2020. "Improving market performance in the digital economy," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    22. José Luis Moraga-González & Evgenia Motchenkova & Saish Nevrekar, 2019. "Mergers and Innovation Portfolios," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 19-085/VII, Tinbergen Institute.
    23. Kaustav Das & Nicolas Klein, 2020. "Do Stronger Patents Lead to Faster Innovation? The Effect of Duplicative Search," Discussion Papers in Economics 20/03, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.
    24. Daniel P. Gross & Bhaven N. Sampat, 2021. "Crisis Innovation Policy from World War II to COVID-19," NBER Working Papers 28915, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    25. Bräuer, Richard, 2024. "Searching where Ideas Are Harder to Find – The Productivity Slowdown as a Result of Firms Hindering Disruptive Innovation," IWH Discussion Papers 22/2023, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH), revised 2024.
    26. Fabio M. Manenti & Luca Sandrini, 2023. "Patents with Simultaneous Innovations: The Patentability Requirements and the Direction of Innovation," Discussion Papers 2303, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Quantitative Social and Management Sciences, revised Aug 2023.
    27. Kangoh Lee, 2020. "The value and direction of innovation," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 133-156, July.
    28. Esmée Dijk & José Luis Moraga-González & Evgenia Motchenkova, 2023. "Start-up Acquisitions and the Entrant’s and Incumbent’s Innovation Portfolios," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 23-047/VII, Tinbergen Institute.
    29. Kyle Myers & Wei Yang Tham, 2023. "Money, Time, and Grant Design," Papers 2312.06479, arXiv.org.
    30. Widmann, Rainer, 2024. "The behavioral additionality of government research grants," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    31. Steven Callander & Niko Matouschek, 2022. "The Novelty of Innovation: Competition, Disruption, and Antitrust Policy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 37-51, January.

  7. Kevin A. Bryan & András Tilcsik & Brooklynn Zhu, 2017. "Which Entrepreneurs Are Coachable and Why?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(5), pages 312-316, May.

    Cited by:

    1. Otis, Nicholas G. & Clarke, Rowan Philip & Delecourt, Solene & Holtz, David & Koning, Rembrand, 2023. "The Uneven Impact of Generative AI on Entrepreneurial Performance," OSF Preprints hdjpk, Center for Open Science.
    2. Kuratko, Donald F. & Neubert, Emily & Marvel, Matthew R., 2021. "Insights on the mentorship and coachability of entrepreneurs," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 199-209.
    3. Mohammed Abdellaoui & Han Bleichrodt & Cédric Gutierrez, 2023. "Unpacking Overconfident Behavior When Betting on Oneself," Post-Print hal-04383402, HAL.
    4. Davidsson, Per & Grégoire, Denis A. & Lex, Maike, 2021. "Venture Idea Assessment (VIA): Development of a needed concept, measure, and research agenda," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(5).
    5. Reddi Kotha & Balagopal (Bala) Vissa & Yimin Lin & Anne‐Valérie Corboz, 2023. "Do ambitious entrepreneurs benefit more from training?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 549-575, February.

  8. Kevin A. Bryan & Pierre-Daniel G. Sarte, 2009. "Semiparametric estimation of land price gradients using large data sets," Economic Quarterly, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, vol. 95(Win), pages 53-74.

    Cited by:

    1. Nichols, Joseph B. & Oliner, Stephen D. & Mulhall, Michael R., 2013. "Swings in commercial and residential land prices in the United States," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 57-76.
    2. Kolbe, Jens & Schulz, Rainer & Wersing, Martin & Werwatz, Axel, 2019. "Land value appraisal using statistical methods," FORLand Working Papers 07 (2019), Humboldt University Berlin, DFG Research Unit 2569 FORLand "Agricultural Land Markets – Efficiency and Regulation".
    3. Raven Molloy & Hui Shan, 2010. "The effect of gasoline prices on household location," Working Papers 2010/28, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    4. Michael R. Mulhall & Joseph B. Nichols & Stephen D. Oliner, 2010. "Commercial and residential land prices across the United States," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2010-16, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    5. Kolbe, Jens & Schulz, Rainer & Wersing, Martin & Werwatz, Axel, 2014. "Identifying Berlin's land value map using adaptive weights smoothing," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2015-003, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    6. Jens Kolbe & Rainer Schulz & Martin Wersing & Axel Werwatz, 2019. "Bodenwertermittlung mit statistischen Methoden [Land value appraisal using statistical methods]," Zeitschrift für Immobilienökonomie (German Journal of Real Estate Research), Springer;Gesellschaft für Immobilienwirtschaftliche Forschung e. V., vol. 5(1), pages 131-154, November.

  9. Kevin A. Bryan & Leonardo Martinez, 2008. "On the evolution of income inequality in the United States," Economic Quarterly, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, vol. 94(Spr), pages 97-120.

    Cited by:

    1. Udo Ebert & Patrick Moyes, 2018. "Talents, preferences and income inequality," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 51(1), pages 13-50, June.
    2. Udo EBERT & Patrick MOYES, 2017. "The Impact of Talents and Preferences on Income Inequality," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2017-15, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    3. Riccardo Fiorentini & Guido Montani, 2012. "The New Global Political Economy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14443.

  10. Kevin A. Bryan & Brian D. Minton & Pierre-Daniel G. Sarte, 2007. "The evolution of city population density in the United States," Economic Quarterly, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, vol. 93(Fall), pages 341-360.

    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Hummel, 2020. "The effects of population and housing density in urban areas on income in the United States," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(1), pages 27-47, February.
    2. Hernán D. Rozenfeld & Diego Rybski & Xavier Gabaix & Hernán A. Makse, 2011. "The Area and Population of Cities: New Insights from a Different Perspective on Cities," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(5), pages 2205-2225, August.
    3. Thomas J. Holmes & Sanghoon Lee, 2010. "Cities as Six-by-Six-Mile Squares: Zipf's Law?," NBER Chapters, in: Agglomeration Economics, pages 105-131, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Brownstone, David & Golob, Thomas F., 2009. "The impact of residential density on vehicle usage and energy consumption," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 91-98, January.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 7 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (3) 2018-08-20 2020-02-10 2020-06-22
  2. NEP-BEC: Business Economics (2) 2019-09-09 2022-10-10
  3. NEP-BIG: Big Data (2) 2020-02-10 2020-06-22
  4. NEP-COM: Industrial Competition (2) 2018-08-20 2021-09-06
  5. NEP-ENT: Entrepreneurship (2) 2019-09-09 2022-10-10
  6. NEP-CMP: Computational Economics (1) 2020-06-22
  7. NEP-GTH: Game Theory (1) 2019-09-09
  8. NEP-HRM: Human Capital and Human Resource Management (1) 2022-10-10
  9. NEP-ICT: Information and Communication Technologies (1) 2019-04-22
  10. NEP-INO: Innovation (1) 2019-04-22
  11. NEP-IPR: Intellectual Property Rights (1) 2019-04-22
  12. NEP-ISF: Islamic Finance (1) 2021-09-06
  13. NEP-LAB: Labour Economics (1) 2022-10-10
  14. NEP-REG: Regulation (1) 2021-09-06

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Kevin A Bryan should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.