IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/metjou/v21y2022i1p48-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Higher Education Quality and Student Satisfaction: Meta-Analysis, Subgroup Analysis and Meta-Regression

Author

Listed:
  • Shivangi Dhawan

Abstract

This article reports the findings of a systematic literature review and meta-analysis carried out to identify various quality dimensions in higher education that contributes to student satisfaction. The results of heterogeneity generated from the meta-analysis were further explored via subgroup analysis and meta-regression. To fulfil these objectives, we summarized 122 qualitative studies and 40 quantitative studies that were relevant and important. Most of the included studies for meta-analysis ( N = 40) assessed the relationship between different quality dimensions in higher education institutions and student satisfaction. All six dimensions were found to be positively associated with the dependent variable (student satisfaction). Administrative service quality was found to have the highest correlation with student satisfaction, followed by student support quality, lecturer quality, teaching quality, curriculum quality, and physical evidence quality. The three categorical variables (student, university, and country) were included to test for moderation individually and collectively—these categorical variables, when taken together, moderates all the relationships except lecturer quality–student satisfaction. To our understanding, the current research will be the first one to examine the relationship between six higher education quality dimensions and student satisfaction based on a meta-analysis and meta-regression. The current analysis offers more novel details on the detection of significant moderating variables (type of student, type of university, and country of the study). These consolidated findings help us in identifying the existing state of literature, that is, what we consider and what we do not.

Suggested Citation

  • Shivangi Dhawan, 2022. "Higher Education Quality and Student Satisfaction: Meta-Analysis, Subgroup Analysis and Meta-Regression," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 21(1), pages 48-66, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:metjou:v:21:y:2022:i:1:p:48-66
    DOI: 10.1177/09726225221082376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09726225221082376
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09726225221082376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Voss, Roediger & Gruber, Thorsten & Szmigin, Isabelle, 2007. "Service quality in higher education: The role of student expectations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(9), pages 949-959, September.
    2. Vanessa Apaolaza Ibáñez & Patrick Hartmann & Pilar Zorrilla Calvo, 2006. "Antecedents of customer loyalty in residential energy markets: Service quality, satisfaction, trust and switching costs," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 633-650, September.
    3. Michael D. Clemes & Christopher E.C. Gan & Tzu-Hui Kao, 2008. "University Student Satisfaction: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 292-325, April.
    4. Muhammad Asif & Muhammad Awan & Muhammad Khan & Niaz Ahmad, 2013. "A model for total quality management in higher education," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1883-1904, June.
    5. Amal Said Al-Amri & Priya Mathew & Yong Zulina Zubairi & Rohana Jani, 2020. "Optimal Standards to Measure the Quality of Higher Education Institutions in Oman: Stakeholders’ Perception," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    6. Melodi Guilbault, 2016. "Students as customers in higher education: reframing the debate," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 132-142, July.
    7. Sanjai K. Parahoo & Rana M. Tamim, 2012. "Determinants of student satisfaction in higher education: an empirical study in Dubai," International Journal of Services, Economics and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(4), pages 282-297.
    8. Chonlatis Darawong & Mukdashine Sandmaung, 2019. "Service quality enhancing student satisfaction in international programs of higher education institutions: a local student perspective," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 268-283, July.
    9. Joanne T. Cao & Jamye Foster & Gallayanee Yaoyuneyong & Nina Krey, 2019. "Hedonic and utilitarian value: the role of shared responsibility in higher education services," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 134-152, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adam Malešević & Dušan Barać & Dragan Soleša & Ema Aleksić & Marijana Despotović-Zrakić, 2021. "Adopting xRM in Higher Education: E-Services Outside the Classroom," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Angulo-Ruiz, Fernando & Pergelova, Albena & Cheben, Juraj & Angulo-Altamirano, Eladio, 2016. "A cross-country study of marketing effectiveness in high-credence services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3636-3644.
    3. Chung-Yu Wang, 2007. "Investigating antecedents of consumers' recommend intentions and the moderating effect of switching barriers," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(9), pages 1231-1241, November.
    4. Faiz Muhammad Khuwaja & Waheed Ali Umrani & Sanober Salman Shaikh & Ammar Ahmed & Sanaullah Shar, 2019. "University Markor: A Context-Specific Scale to Measure Market-Orientation in Universities," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, June.
    5. Ofori Debrah & Nasiru Inusah & Joseph Yaw Dwommor, 2021. "Students' Satisfaction with Accounting Teachers' Lesson Delivery, the Role of Perceived Quality of Lesson Delivery in Ghanaian Senior High Schools," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(1), pages 109-124, March.
    6. Fernsebner, Hannah, 2023. "Virtual Reality Transforming the Digital Learning Environment: An Analysis of Students' Acceptance," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 8(4), pages 1081-1099.
    7. Syed Karamatullah Hussainy & Umair Tariq & Eesar Khan, 2017. "A Preliminary Investigation of the Effects of Servicescape on Consumers’ Loyalty Intentions," KASBIT Business Journals (KBJ), Khadim Ali Shah Bukhari Institute of Technology (KASBIT), vol. 10, pages 101-130, December.
    8. Yunbo Wang & Xiuping Duan & Ziyi Chen, 2022. "Pathways to the Sustainable Development of Quality Education for International Students in China: An fsQCA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Marco Taliento, 2022. "The Triple Mission of the Modern University: Component Interplay and Performance Analysis from Italy," World, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-24, July.
    10. Iryna Zadorozhna & Olha Datskiv & Olena Shon, 2020. "Exploring Students’ Expectations of the University Course," Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala - Journal for Multidimensional Education, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 12(1Sup1), pages 293-303, March.
    11. Milenkovska, Violeta & Novkovska, Blagica, 2018. "How To Establish Uniform Higher Education Quality Management System For Macedonia," UTMS Journal of Economics, University of Tourism and Management, Skopje, Macedonia, vol. 9(2), pages 213-220.
    12. Isakin, Maksim & Teplykh, Grigory, 2011. "Research of higher engineering education quality on the base of students Interviewing data by nonlinear principal components analysis (NLPCA)," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 21(1), pages 70-96.
    13. Ebrahim Navid Sadjadi, 2023. "Challenges and Opportunities for Education Systems with the Current Movement toward Digitalization at the Time of COVID-19," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, January.
    14. Mirela Mabic, 2014. "Quality In Higher Education – Which Dimensions Can Be Identified From The Responses Of Students Of Economics," Interdisciplinary Management Research, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 10, pages 721-731.
    15. Chunting Liu & Shanshan Wang & Guozhu Jia, 2020. "Exploring E-Commerce Big Data and Customer-Perceived Value: An Empirical Study on Chinese Online Customers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-22, October.
    16. Bilegjargal Ganbold & Kyungbo Park & Jongyi Hong, 2022. "Study of Educational Service Quality in Mongolian Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-27, December.
    17. Ekrem Toklucu & Fatoş Silman & Selahattin Turan & Ramazan Atasoy & Ümit Kalkan, 2022. "The Effects of the Crisis Management Skills and Distance Education Practices of Universities on Student Satisfaction and Organizational Image," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, May.
    18. Ismail Hussein Amzat & Abdul Hakeem Alade Najimdeen & Lynne M. Walters & Byabazaire Yusuf & Nena Padilla-Valdez, 2023. "Determining Service Quality Indicators to Recruit and Retain International Students in Malaysia Higher Education Institutions: Global Issues and Local Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-25, April.
    19. Philippe Batifoulier & Denis Abecassis & Nicolas da Silva & Victor Duchesne & Léonard Moulin, 2016. "L’utilité sociale de la dépense publique," CEPN Working Papers hal-01421197, HAL.
    20. Abdulrahman Housawi & Amal Al Amoudi & Basim Alsaywid & Miltiadis Lytras & Yara H. bin Μoreba & Wesam Abuznadah & Sami A. Alhaidar, 2020. "Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for Sustainable Postgraduate Medical Training: An Opportunity for Implementing an Innovative Approach to Advance the Quality of Training Programs at the," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-37, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:metjou:v:21:y:2022:i:1:p:48-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.