IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/osi/journl/v10y2014p721-731.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality In Higher Education – Which Dimensions Can Be Identified From The Responses Of Students Of Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Mirela Mabic

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina)

Abstract

Detailed consideration of quality in higher education requires identifying the primary users of service in higher education because the educational process involves many stakeholders - students, parents, teachers, government, enterprise... It is generally accepted that students are the primary customers because they are involved in different roles: they are the product of the process, the internal customer for campus facilities, the labourers of the learning process and the internal customer of the delivery of the course material. So, it becomes necessary to identify the determinants of service quality from the stand point of students being the primary customer. Developing a service quality model to measure the student’s perception on quality is a very complex and tedious task because the service quality dimensions cover many areas. Naturally, defining the dimensions of quality in higher education is based on the dimensions of service quality in other areas. Exploring quality in different areas, authors state different dimensions, i.e. they explore different aspects of users’ satisfaction with some services. Different dimensions of service quality are used for different industries but there are some similarities between them. But, researchers agree that there is no single dimension which can be applicable for all the service sectors. In the literature, one can find different articles that deliver results of identifying dimensions of quality in higher education based on research conducted in different regions of the world, but literature is scarce when analyzing the research conducted in the area of B&H. This prompted the implementation of this research. Furthermore, each state has a specific educational system and it is necessary, to continuously explore and upgrade the models of service quality in higher education and its dimensions of quality. The aim was to offer students as many as possible statements about the quality of the educational process in order to be able to identify the relevant dimesions of service quality in higher education.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirela Mabic, 2014. "Quality In Higher Education – Which Dimensions Can Be Identified From The Responses Of Students Of Economics," Interdisciplinary Management Research, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 10, pages 721-731.
    • Handle: RePEc:osi:journl:v:10:y:2014:p:721-731
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.efos.hr/repec/osi/journl/PDF/InterdisciplinaryManagementResearchX/IMR10a54
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Voss, Roediger & Gruber, Thorsten & Szmigin, Isabelle, 2007. "Service quality in higher education: The role of student expectations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(9), pages 949-959, September.
    2. Martínez, Jose A. & Martínez, Laura, 2010. "Some insights on conceptualizing and measuring service quality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 29-42.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angulo-Ruiz, Fernando & Pergelova, Albena & Cheben, Juraj & Angulo-Altamirano, Eladio, 2016. "A cross-country study of marketing effectiveness in high-credence services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3636-3644.
    2. Shivangi Dhawan, 2022. "Higher Education Quality and Student Satisfaction: Meta-Analysis, Subgroup Analysis and Meta-Regression," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 21(1), pages 48-66, June.
    3. Iryna Zadorozhna & Olha Datskiv & Olena Shon, 2020. "Exploring Students’ Expectations of the University Course," Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala - Journal for Multidimensional Education, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 12(1Sup1), pages 293-303, March.
    4. Isakin, Maksim & Teplykh, Grigory, 2011. "Research of higher engineering education quality on the base of students Interviewing data by nonlinear principal components analysis (NLPCA)," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 21(1), pages 70-96.
    5. repec:hal:cepnwp:hal-01421197 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Silvia Bacci & Michela Gnaldi, 2015. "A classification of university courses based on students’ satisfaction: an application of a two-level mixture item response model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 927-940, May.
    7. Alexandra-Maria Drule & Irimie Emil Popa & Razvan Nistor & Alexandru Chis, 2014. "Quality of the Teaching Process and its Factors of Influence from the Perspective of Future Business Specialists," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(37), pages 827-827, August.
    8. Wilhelms, Mark-Philipp & Henkel, Sven & Falk, Tomas, 2017. "To earn is not enough: A means-end analysis to uncover peer-providers' participation motives in peer-to-peer carsharing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 38-47.
    9. Montserrat Díaz-Méndez & Mario R. Paredes & Michael Saren, 2019. "Improving Society by Improving Education through Service-Dominant Logic: Reframing the Role of Students in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, September.
    10. E. F. ESHUN & A. K. Badu & P. Korwu, 2018. "Impact of Service Quality on Students¡¯ Satisfaction in a Ghanaian Public Tertiary Institution," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(3), pages 97-112, September.
    11. Philippe Batifoulier & Denis Abecassis & Nicolas da Silva & Victor Duchesne & Léonard Moulin, 2016. "L’utilité sociale de la dépense publique," Working Papers hal-01421197, HAL.
    12. MUNTHIU Maria-Cristiana & CETINA Iuliana, 2016. "Understanding Students' Perception, Expectations And The Need Of Innovating Educational Services In The Digital Economy Context," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 68(3), pages 103-113, December.
    13. Lassala, Carlos & Burrus, Robert T. & Graham, J. Edward, 2016. "Business school grading on both sides of the Atlantic," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5106-5110.
    14. David Schüller & Martina Rašticová & Štěpán Konečný, 2013. "Measuring student satisfaction with the quality of services offered by universities - Central European View," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 61(4), pages 1105-1112.
    15. Lee, Wan-I & Chang, Chih-Yuan & Liu, Yu-Lun, 2010. "Exploring customers’ store loyalty using the means-end chain approach," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 395-405.
    16. Chris Vassiliadis & Constantinos-Vasilios Priporas & Victoria Bellou & Andreas Andronikidis, 2013. "Customers' cognitive patterns of assurance: a dual approach," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(13-14), pages 1242-1259, October.
    17. Sandra Brkanlić & Javier Sánchez-García & Edgar Breso Esteve & Ivana Brkić & Maja Ćirić & Jovana Tatarski & Jovana Gardašević & Marko Petrović, 2020. "Marketing Mix Instruments as Factors of Improvement of Students’ Satisfaction in Higher Education Institutions in Republic of Serbia and Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.
    18. Nuri Mohamed M. Otman, 2020. "Quality of higher education and incidence of learning styles: A Review," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(3), pages 141-148, April.
    19. Said, Alison, 2018. "Vocational teaching-learning through the eyes of undergraduate vocational students in Malta: A qualitative exploratory study," International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training (IJRVET), European Research Network in Vocational Education and Training (VETNET), European Educational Research Association, vol. 5(1), pages 42-63.
    20. Khairunnisa & Agus Purwito & Pudji Muljono, 2017. "The Major Minor Curriculum Application in Preparing the Communication Science and Community Development Graduates to the World of Work: Graduates Perception (Case Study in Bogor Agricultural Universit," Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 4(3), pages 100-107.
    21. Milad Kalantari Shahijan & Sajad Rezaei & Vinitha Padmanabhan Guptan, 2018. "Marketing public and private higher education institutions: A total experiential model of international student’s satisfaction, performance and continues intention," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(2), pages 205-234, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    dimension of quality; higher education; quality; students; stakeholders;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osi:journl:v:10:y:2014:p:721-731. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hrvoje Serdarusic, PhD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efosihr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.