IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0240514.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of a game-based training course to build capacity for insecticide resistance management in vector control programmes

Author

Listed:
  • Claire Dormann
  • Kirsten Duda
  • Busiku Hamainza
  • Delenesaw Yewhalaw
  • Charlotte Hemingway
  • Marlize Coleman
  • Michael Coleman
  • Edward Thomsen

Abstract

Across Africa, malaria control programmes are increasingly challenged with the emergence of insecticide resistance among malaria vector populations. Confronted with this challenge, vector control staff must understand insecticide resistance management, think comprehensively and react positively when confronted with new problems. However, information on the subject is often only available through written guidelines that are difficult to put into practice. Based on the successes and strengths of educational games for health, we developed and evaluated a novel game-based course to fill the gap in training resources for insecticide resistance management. The training was evaluated by analysing results of pre- and post-course knowledge tests and self-efficacy surveys, as well as post-course interviews. At the start of the training, fundamental concepts of insecticide resistance were reviewed through Resistance101, a mobile app game. Subsequently, insecticide resistance management strategies were explored using the simulation game ResistanceSim, which was introduced by mini-lectures and complemented by class discussions and group work. The game-based training was conducted and evaluated in two African countries (Ethiopia and Zambia) using a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative outcome measures included knowledge acquisition and change in self-efficacy. We completed a qualitative inductive thematic analysis of participant interviews to explore the views and experiences of participants with the games and training, and the impact of the training on professional practices and attitudes. The game-based training increased knowledge in the short-term and improved self-efficacy scores. The training increased participants’ knowledge base, stimulated knowledge sharing and changed work practices. The game-based training offers scalable training opportunities that could nurture and capacitate the next generation of professionals in vector control.

Suggested Citation

  • Claire Dormann & Kirsten Duda & Busiku Hamainza & Delenesaw Yewhalaw & Charlotte Hemingway & Marlize Coleman & Michael Coleman & Edward Thomsen, 2020. "Evaluation of a game-based training course to build capacity for insecticide resistance management in vector control programmes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0240514
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0240514
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0240514&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0240514?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Champika Liyanage & Tabarak Ballal & Taha Elhag, 2009. "Assessing the Process of Knowledge Transfer — An Empirical Study," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(03), pages 251-265.
    2. Jason S. Wu & Joey J. Lee, 2015. "Climate change games as tools for education and engagement," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(5), pages 413-418, May.
    3. Darquise Lafrenière & Vincent Menuz & Thierry Hurlimann & Béatrice Godard, 2013. "Knowledge Dissemination Interventions," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(3), pages 21582440134, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katherine Ball & Kirk Jalbert & Lisa Test, 2021. "Making the board: participatory game design for environmental action," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 11(1), pages 12-22, March.
    2. Julia Jouan & Mireille De Graeuwe & Matthieu Carof & Rim Baccar & Nathalie Bareille & Suzanne Bastian & Delphine Brogna & Giovanni Burgio & Sébastien Couvreur & Michał Cupiał & Benjamin Dumont & Anne-, 2020. "Learning Interdisciplinarity and Systems Approaches in Agroecology: Experience with the Serious Game SEGAE," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Rebecca Yvonne Bayeck, 2020. "Examining Board Gameplay and Learning: A Multidisciplinary Review of Recent Research," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(4), pages 411-431, August.
    4. Lafrenière, Darquise & Hurlimann, Thierry & Menuz, Vincent & Godard, Béatrice, 2014. "Evaluation of a cartoon-based knowledge dissemination intervention on scientific and ethical challenges raised by nutrigenomics/nutrigenetics research," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 103-114.
    5. Iñigo Capellán-Pérez & David Álvarez-Antelo & Luis J. Miguel, 2019. "Global Sustainability Crossroads : A Participatory Simulation Game to Educate in the Energy and Sustainability Challenges of the 21st Century," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-23, July.
    6. David I. Waddington & Thomas Fennewald, 2018. "Grim FATE: Learning About Systems Thinking in an In-Depth Climate Change Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 49(2), pages 168-194, April.
    7. Robert-Jan Den Haan & Mascha C. Van der Voort, 2018. "On Evaluating Social Learning Outcomes of Serious Games to Collaboratively Address Sustainability Problems: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, December.
    8. Tania Ouariachi, 2021. "Facilitating Multi-Stakeholder Dialogue and Collaboration in the Energy Transition of Municipalities through Serious Gaming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, June.
    9. Victoria Wibeck & Tina‐Simone Neset, 2020. "Focus groups and serious gaming in climate change communication research—A methodological review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(5), September.
    10. Marie Davidová & Shanu Sharma & Dermott McMeel & Fernando Loizides, 2022. "Co-De|GT: The Gamification and Tokenisation of More-Than-Human Qualities and Values," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Paul Sebo & Sylvain de Lucia, 2021. "Evaluation of the productivity of hospital-based researchers: comparative study between the h-index and the h(fa)-index," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 7087-7096, August.
    12. Kristoffer S. Fjællingsdal & Christian A. Klöckner, 2020. "Green Across the Board: Board Games as Tools for Dialogue and Simplified Environmental Communication," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(5), pages 632-652, October.
    13. Ping-Han Cheng & Ting-Kuang Yeh & Yen-Kai Chao & Jing Lin & Chun-Yen Chang, 2020. "Design Ideas for an Issue-Situation-Based Board Game Involving Multirole Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, March.
    14. Tina-Simone Neset & Lotta Andersson & Ola Uhrqvist & Carlo Navarra, 2020. "Serious Gaming for Climate Adaptation—Assessing the Potential and Challenges of a Digital Serious Game for Urban Climate Adaptation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, February.
    15. Andreas Gerber & Markus Ulrich & Flurin X. Wäger & Marta Roca-Puigròs & João S. V. Gonçalves & Patrick Wäger, 2021. "Games on Climate Change: Identifying Development Potentials through Advanced Classification and Game Characteristics Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    16. Tania Ouariachi & Chih-Yen Li & Wim J. L. Elving, 2020. "Gamification Approaches for Education and Engagement on Pro-Environmental Behaviors: Searching for Best Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, June.
    17. Anna Dziadkiewicz & Wioleta Dryl & Tomasz Dryl & Joanna Nieżurawska & Lech Nieżurawski & Nelson Duarte & Vítor Santos & Carla Sofia Gonçalves Pereira & Tiago Fernandndo Ferreira Lopes, 2017. "Knowledge as a Determinant of the Knowledge Transfer between Poland and Portugal (the Ideation Phase)," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 44, pages 197-210.
    18. Lisette Beek & Manjana Milkoreit & Linda Prokopy & Jason B. Reed & Joost Vervoort & Arjan Wardekker & Roberta Weiner, 2022. "The effects of serious gaming on risk perceptions of climate tipping points," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 170(3), pages 1-23, February.
    19. Paul Sebo & Sylvain de Lucia & Nathalie Vernaz, 2021. "Accuracy of PubMed-based author lists of publications and use of author identifiers to address author name ambiguity: a cross-sectional study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 4121-4135, May.
    20. Jasper N. Meya & Klaus Eisenack, 2018. "Effectiveness of gaming for communicating and teaching climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 319-333, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0240514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.