IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v55y2024i5p856-885.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Validation of the Psychological Motivations for Playing Video Games scale (PMPVGs)

Author

Listed:
  • Mustafa Can Gursesli
  • Alessia Martucci
  • Alan D.A. Mattiassi
  • Mirko Duradoni
  • Andrea Guazzini

Abstract

Background The gaming industry is experiencing rapid growth, and videogames in various forms have become an integral part of our daily routines. While research has delved into motivations for playing specific types of videogames , such as online multiplayer games, there is still a need for exploration of the broader concept of video game engagement, irrespective of the genre. Aim The primary aim of this study was to develop and validate a gaming motivation scale that focuses on the intrinsic reasons and psychological aspects of video game motivation. Additionally, the goal was to create a scale that does not rely on game genres to assess gamers’ motivational profiles. Research methods The study was conducted in two phases, involving a total of 2641 Italian participants. In the first phase, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed with data from Italian 543 participants ( M = 28.92; sd = 8.26). In the second phase, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted with data collected from 2098 participants ( M = 31.60, sd = 8.81), showing an adequate fit to the theorized model (𠑥 2 (878) =3843.28; CFI = .95, TLI = .95, RMSEA = .040, and SRMR = .042). Key Findings and Discussion In the first part of the study, EFA confirmed 14 dimensions out of the original 18. While CFA demonstrated that the scale had good reliability, with values ranging from .77 to .94. Furthermore, significant correlations were found between the Psychological Motivations for playing Video Games (PMPVGs) scale and dimensions from the Motives for Online Gaming Questionnaire (MOGQ) and Gaming Motivation Scale (GAMS) scales. The final version of the scale comprises 12 dimensions with 45 items in total and it holds potential to explore the players’ psychological needs satisfied through the gaming activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Mustafa Can Gursesli & Alessia Martucci & Alan D.A. Mattiassi & Mirko Duradoni & Andrea Guazzini, 2024. "Development and Validation of the Psychological Motivations for Playing Video Games scale (PMPVGs)," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 55(5), pages 856-885, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:55:y:2024:i:5:p:856-885
    DOI: 10.1177/10468781241260861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10468781241260861
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10468781241260861?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julia Kneer & Sanne Franken & Sabine Reich, 2019. "Not Only for the (Tom) boys: Gender Variables as Predictors for Playing Motivations, Passion, and Addiction for MMORPGs," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 50(1), pages 44-61, February.
    2. Francisco J López-Fernández & Laura Mezquita & Mark D Griffiths & Generós Ortet & Manuel I Ibáñez, 2020. "The development and validation of the Videogaming Motives Questionnaire (VMQ)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Sara Peracchia & Fabio Presaghi & Giuseppe Curcio, 2019. "Pathologic Use of Video Games and Motivation: Can the Gaming Motivation Scale (GAMS) Predict Depression and Trait Anxiety?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Jason S. Wu & Joey J. Lee, 2015. "Climate change games as tools for education and engagement," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(5), pages 413-418, May.
    5. Pantano, Eleonora & Naccarato, Giuseppe, 2010. "Entertainment in retailing: The influences of advanced technologies," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 200-204.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Willems, Kim & Smolders, Annelien & Brengman, Malaika & Luyten, Kris & Schöning, Johannes, 2017. "The path-to-purchase is paved with digital opportunities: An inventory of shopper-oriented retail technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 228-242.
    2. Katherine Ball & Kirk Jalbert & Lisa Test, 2021. "Making the board: participatory game design for environmental action," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 11(1), pages 12-22, March.
    3. Julia Jouan & Mireille De Graeuwe & Matthieu Carof & Rim Baccar & Nathalie Bareille & Suzanne Bastian & Delphine Brogna & Giovanni Burgio & Sébastien Couvreur & Michał Cupiał & Benjamin Dumont & Anne-, 2020. "Learning Interdisciplinarity and Systems Approaches in Agroecology: Experience with the Serious Game SEGAE," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Rebecca Yvonne Bayeck, 2020. "Examining Board Gameplay and Learning: A Multidisciplinary Review of Recent Research," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(4), pages 411-431, August.
    5. Domina, Tanya & Lee, Seung-Eun & MacGillivray, Maureen, 2012. "Understanding factors affecting consumer intention to shop in a virtual world," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 613-620.
    6. Iñigo Capellán-Pérez & David Álvarez-Antelo & Luis J. Miguel, 2019. "Global Sustainability Crossroads : A Participatory Simulation Game to Educate in the Energy and Sustainability Challenges of the 21st Century," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-23, July.
    7. Lee, Wei-Long & Liu, Chih-Hsing & Tseng, Tzu-Wen, 2022. "The multiple effects of service innovation and quality on transitional and electronic word-of-mouth in predicting customer behaviour," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    8. Chattaraman, Veena & Kwon, Wi-Suk & Ross, Kassandra & Sung, Jihyun & Alikhademi, Kiana & Richardson, Brianna & Gilbert, Juan E., 2024. "‘Smart’ Choice? Evaluating AI-Based mobile decision bots for in-store decision-making," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    9. David I. Waddington & Thomas Fennewald, 2018. "Grim FATE: Learning About Systems Thinking in an In-Depth Climate Change Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 49(2), pages 168-194, April.
    10. Le Qin & Jie Lu & Ying Zhou & Tommy Tanu Wijaya & Yongxing Huang & Mohammad Fauziddin, 2022. "Reduction of Academic Burnout in Preservice Teachers: PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-24, October.
    11. Victoria Wibeck & Tina‐Simone Neset, 2020. "Focus groups and serious gaming in climate change communication research—A methodological review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(5), September.
    12. Marie Davidová & Shanu Sharma & Dermott McMeel & Fernando Loizides, 2022. "Co-De|GT: The Gamification and Tokenisation of More-Than-Human Qualities and Values," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Liao, Ziqi & Shi, Xinping & Wong, Wing-Keung, 2014. "Key determinants of sustainable smartcard payment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 306-313.
    14. Krey, Nina & Picot-Coupey, Karine & Cliquet, Gérard, 2022. "Shopping mall retailing: A bibliometric analysis and systematic assessment of Chebat's contributions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    15. Arrigo, Elisa, 2018. "The flagship stores as sustainability communication channels for luxury fashion retailers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 170-177.
    16. Kristoffer S. Fjællingsdal & Christian A. Klöckner, 2020. "Green Across the Board: Board Games as Tools for Dialogue and Simplified Environmental Communication," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(5), pages 632-652, October.
    17. Tina-Simone Neset & Lotta Andersson & Ola Uhrqvist & Carlo Navarra, 2020. "Serious Gaming for Climate Adaptation—Assessing the Potential and Challenges of a Digital Serious Game for Urban Climate Adaptation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Merit Tatar & Mariia Khrapunenko & Richard Karl Henahan & Andra Asser, 2023. "Engaging Citizens in the Bioeconomy: Insights from the Co-Creation and Co-Design in the Development of the Serious Bioeconomy Game “Mission BioHero”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-45, September.
    19. de Lassus, Christel & Anido Freire, N., 2014. "Access to the luxury brand myth in pop-up stores: A netnographic and semiotic analysis," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 61-68.
    20. Tseng-Lung Huang, 2018. "Creating a commercially compelling smart service encounter," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(2), pages 357-377, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:55:y:2024:i:5:p:856-885. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.