IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v51y2020i5p632-652.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Across the Board: Board Games as Tools for Dialogue and Simplified Environmental Communication

Author

Listed:
  • Kristoffer S. Fjællingsdal
  • Christian A. Klöckner

Abstract

Background. Board games are a promising, yet rarely used arena for learning about environmental issues . Existing research suggests that they are highly innovative communication tools that make complex sustainability problems more salient and easily understandable. To date, little to no research exists where several environment-themed board games have been compared in a single study. Method. 17 respondents were invited to board game nights where they were tasked to play an environmental board game of their choosing. The respondents were then invited to participate in subsequent focus group interviews about their gameplay experience and learning outcomes. Results. 5 focus group interviews were transcribed and subjected to a qualitative thematic analysis, revealing 2 main themes; the first revolving around board games as simplified environmental simulations and the second revolving around the players’ perceptions of their own impact on the game board. Conclusion. Our results suggest that board games can be highly effective tools in some aspects of environmental communication. Limitations of the study and suggestions for future research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristoffer S. Fjællingsdal & Christian A. Klöckner, 2020. "Green Across the Board: Board Games as Tools for Dialogue and Simplified Environmental Communication," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(5), pages 632-652, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:51:y:2020:i:5:p:632-652
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878120925133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878120925133
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878120925133?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jason S. Wu & Joey J. Lee, 2015. "Climate change games as tools for education and engagement," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(5), pages 413-418, May.
    2. Olivier Barreteau & C. Le Page & P. Perez, 2007. "Contribution of simulation and gaming to natural resource management issues: An introduction," Post-Print hal-00453891, HAL.
    3. David I. Waddington & Thomas Fennewald, 2018. "Grim FATE: Learning About Systems Thinking in an In-Depth Climate Change Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 49(2), pages 168-194, April.
    4. Ping-Han Cheng & Ting-Kuang Yeh & Jen-Che Tsai & Ching-Rong Lin & Chun-Yen Chang, 2019. "Development of an Issue-Situation-Based Board Game: A Systemic Learning Environment for Water Resource Adaptation Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rebecca Yvonne Bayeck, 2020. "Examining Board Gameplay and Learning: A Multidisciplinary Review of Recent Research," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(4), pages 411-431, August.
    2. Ping-Han Cheng & Ting-Kuang Yeh & Yen-Kai Chao & Jing Lin & Chun-Yen Chang, 2020. "Design Ideas for an Issue-Situation-Based Board Game Involving Multirole Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Katherine Ball & Kirk Jalbert & Lisa Test, 2021. "Making the board: participatory game design for environmental action," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 11(1), pages 12-22, March.
    4. Julia Jouan & Mireille De Graeuwe & Matthieu Carof & Rim Baccar & Nathalie Bareille & Suzanne Bastian & Delphine Brogna & Giovanni Burgio & Sébastien Couvreur & Michał Cupiał & Benjamin Dumont & Anne-, 2020. "Learning Interdisciplinarity and Systems Approaches in Agroecology: Experience with the Serious Game SEGAE," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Manh-Toan Ho & Thanh-Huyen T. Nguyen & Minh-Hoang Nguyen & Viet-Phuong La & Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2022. "Virtual tree, real impact: how simulated worlds associate with the perception of limited resources," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Natalie A Jones & Pascal Perez & Thomas G Measham & Gail J Kelly & Patrick D’Aquino & Katherine Daniell & Anne Dray & Nils Ferrand, 2008. "Evaluating Participatory Modeling: Developing a Framework for Cross-case Analysis," Socio-Economics and the Environment in Discussion (SEED) Working Paper Series 2008-11, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems.
    7. Jennifer P. Carman & Marina Psaros & Seth A. Rosenthal & Jennifer Marlon & Marija Verner & Sanguk Lee & Danning Lu & Matthew H. Goldberg & Matthew Ballew & Anthony Leiserowitz, 2024. "Geeks versus climate change: understanding American video gamers’ engagement with global warming," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(6), pages 1-20, June.
    8. María Elena Orduña Alegría & Niels Schütze & Samuel C. Zipper, 2020. "A Serious Board Game to Analyze Socio-Ecological Dynamics towards Collaboration in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-19, June.
    9. Iñigo Capellán-Pérez & David Álvarez-Antelo & Luis J. Miguel, 2019. "Global Sustainability Crossroads : A Participatory Simulation Game to Educate in the Energy and Sustainability Challenges of the 21st Century," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-23, July.
    10. Uyen-Phuong Nguyen & Philip Hallinger, 2020. "Assessing the Distinctive Contributions of Simulation & Gaming to the Literature, 1970-2019: A Bibliometric Review," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(6), pages 744-769, December.
    11. David I. Waddington & Thomas Fennewald, 2018. "Grim FATE: Learning About Systems Thinking in an In-Depth Climate Change Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 49(2), pages 168-194, April.
    12. Robert-Jan Den Haan & Mascha C. Van der Voort, 2018. "On Evaluating Social Learning Outcomes of Serious Games to Collaboratively Address Sustainability Problems: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, December.
    13. Sanga, Udita & Sidibé, Amadou & Olabisi, Laura Schmitt, 2021. "Dynamic pathways of barriers and opportunities for food security and climate adaptation in Southern Mali," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    14. J. Tuomas Harviainen, 2018. "Connections and Correspondences in Simulation/Gaming," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 49(2), pages 95-97, April.
    15. Claire Dormann & Kirsten Duda & Busiku Hamainza & Delenesaw Yewhalaw & Charlotte Hemingway & Marlize Coleman & Michael Coleman & Edward Thomsen, 2020. "Evaluation of a game-based training course to build capacity for insecticide resistance management in vector control programmes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, October.
    16. Roberto Di Paolo & Veronica Pizziol, 2024. "Gamification and Sustainable Water Use: The Case of the BLUTUBE Educational Program," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 55(3), pages 391-417, June.
    17. Tania Ouariachi, 2021. "Facilitating Multi-Stakeholder Dialogue and Collaboration in the Energy Transition of Municipalities through Serious Gaming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, June.
    18. Teen-Hang Meen & Charles Tijus & Jui-Che Tu, 2019. "Selected Papers from the Eurasian Conference on Educational Innovation 2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-12, December.
    19. Victoria Wibeck & Tina‐Simone Neset, 2020. "Focus groups and serious gaming in climate change communication research—A methodological review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(5), September.
    20. Reutemann, Tim & Engel, Stefanie & Pareja, Eliana, 2016. "How (not) to pay — Field experimental evidence on the design of REDD+ payments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 220-229.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:51:y:2020:i:5:p:632-652. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.