IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/pbapdi/v20y2024i3d10.1057_s41254-023-00319-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public diplomacy: a framework-based literature review and decentering research agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Pavón-Guinea

    (University of Navarra)

  • Mónica Codina

    (University of Navarra)

Abstract

Public diplomacy scholarship is multifaceted, eclectic, and accelerating at a tremendous rate. The purpose of this article is to conduct a semi-systematic framework-based literature review of the 200 most cited articles in public diplomacy with the aim of synthetizing and organizing the literature on public diplomacy into a structured and holistic framework and contribute to the advancement of future research. The organizing framework of the literature review is based on a combination of Lasswell’s 5W construct and the TCM (Theory-Context-Methods) framework (Paul et al. 2017). Using Lasswell’s 5W framework, the paper reports on the actors, audiences, strategies, instruments, and effects found in the public diplomacy literature, which enables the paper to explain what we know about public diplomacy. Next, using the TCM framework, the paper reports on the theories, contexts, and methods used by public diplomacy scholars to uncover past findings, thereby answering the question how we know what we know about public diplomacy. Finally, the paper proposes a potentially fruitful agenda for decentering future public diplomacy research.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Pavón-Guinea & Mónica Codina, 2024. "Public diplomacy: a framework-based literature review and decentering research agenda," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(3), pages 255-274, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:pbapdi:v:20:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1057_s41254-023-00319-0
    DOI: 10.1057/s41254-023-00319-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41254-023-00319-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41254-023-00319-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:pbapdi:v:20:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1057_s41254-023-00319-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.