IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v25y2014i4p1026-1055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of Organizational Politics: A Need Satisfaction Paradigm

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher C. Rosen

    (Department of Management, Sam M. Walton College of Business, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701)

  • D. Lance Ferris

    (Smeal College of Business, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802)

  • Douglas J. Brown

    (Psychology Department, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada)

  • Yuanyi Chen

    (Department of Management, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong)

  • Ming Yan

    (Lingnan College, Sun Yat-sen University, Guang Zhou 510275, China)

Abstract

Stressor and exchange relationship paradigms have developed in isolation from each other to explain the negative effects of perceived organizational politics. We outline how these different paradigms share a common basis—a focus on psychological need satisfaction—and develop a needs-based paradigm to account for the negative effects of perceived organizational politics. Moreover, we argue that psychological need satisfaction acts as an unmeasured third variable, which, once accounted for, should limit the utility of stressor and exchange relationship paradigms. Across four samples using a combination of multiple sources, operationalizations of constructs, and measurement occasions, we found full support for the needs-based paradigm as a mediator of the effects of politics on contextual performance, creativity, and proactive behavior, whereas strain and exchange relationship constructs by and large had no effect on outcomes once psychological need satisfaction was accounted for. Theoretical implications and future research directions are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher C. Rosen & D. Lance Ferris & Douglas J. Brown & Yuanyi Chen & Ming Yan, 2014. "Perceptions of Organizational Politics: A Need Satisfaction Paradigm," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 1026-1055, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:25:y:2014:i:4:p:1026-1055
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2013.0857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0857
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2013.0857?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John J. Voyer, 1994. "Coercive Organizational Politics and Organizational Outcomes: An Interpretive Study," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 72-85, February.
    2. Rajnanandi Pillai & Terri A Scandura & Ethlyn A Williams, 1999. "Leadership and Organizational Justice: Similarities and Differences across Cultures," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 30(4), pages 763-779, December.
    3. Aryee, Samuel & Chen, Zhen Xiong & Budhwar, Pawan S., 2004. "Exchange fairness and employee performance: An examination of the relationship between organizational politics and procedural justice," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Long‐Zeng Wu & Frederick Hong‐kit Yim & Ho Kwong Kwan & Xiaomeng Zhang, 2012. "Coping with Workplace Ostracism: The Roles of Ingratiation and Political Skill in Employee Psychological Distress," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 178-199, January.
    5. Shiu, Edward & Pervan, Simon J. & Bove, Liliana L. & Beatty, Sharon E., 2011. "Reflections on discriminant validity: Reexamining the Bove et al. (2009) findings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 497-500, May.
    6. Jone L. Pearce & Qiumei Jane Xu, 2012. "Rating Performance or Contesting Status: Evidence Against the Homophily Explanation for Supervisor Demographic Skew in Performance Ratings," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 373-385, April.
    7. Christopher L. Shook & David J. Ketchen & G. Tomas M. Hult & K. Michele Kacmar, 2004. "An assessment of the use of structural equation modeling in strategic management research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 397-404, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jing Zhang & Lynda J. Song & Yue Wang & Guangjian Liu, 2018. "How authentic leadership influences employee proactivity: the sequential mediating effects of psychological empowerment and core self-evaluations and the moderating role of employee political skill," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Salah Gad & Walaa Elsayed, 2023. "Relationship Between Perceived Organizational Politics and Job Satisfaction Among NGO Social Workers," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 793-804, June.
    3. Walumbwa, Fred O. & Hartnell, Chad A. & Misati, Everlyne, 2017. "Does ethical leadership enhance group learning behavior? Examining the mediating influence of group ethical conduct, justice climate, and peer justice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 14-23.
    4. Ramsha Arshad & Javaria Abbas & Muhammad Sajid Tufail & Asia Zulfqar, 2024. "The Dark Facet of Perceived Overqualification: Predictors and their Impact on Proactive Behavior," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(2), pages 53-64.
    5. Ho, Violet T. & Kong, Dejun Tony, 2015. "Exploring the signaling function of idiosyncratic deals and their interaction," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 149-161.
    6. Long W. Lam & Aichia Chuang & Chi-Sum Wong & Julie N. Y. Zhu, 2019. "A typology of three-way interaction models: Applications and suggestions for Asian management research," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Taiwo Temitope Lasisi & Enea Constanţa & Kayode Kolawole Eluwole, 2022. "Workplace Favoritism and Workforce Sustainability: An Analysis of Employees’ Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Liu, Yongmei & Liu, Xiao-Yu, 2018. "Politics under abusive supervision: The role of Machiavellianism and guanxi," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 649-659.
    9. Chen, Liangyong & Liu, Yu & Hu, Sanman & Zhang, Sai, 2022. "Perception of organizational politics and innovative behavior in the workplace: The roles of knowledge-sharing hostility and mindfulness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 268-276.
    10. Sheikh Raheel Manzoor & Atif Ullah & Rezwan Ullah & Afraseyab Khattak & Heesup Han & Sunghoon Yoo, 2023. "Micro CSR intervention towards employee behavioral and attitudinal outcomes: a parallel mediation model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Yuntao Bai & Guohong Helen Han & P. D. Harms, 2016. "Team Conflict Mediates the Effects of Organizational Politics on Employee Performance: A Cross-Level Analysis in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 95-109, November.
    12. Bidhan L. Parmar & Adrian Keevil & Andrew C. Wicks, 2019. "People and Profits: The Impact of Corporate Objectives on Employees’ Need Satisfaction at Work," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 13-33, January.
    13. Wenceslao Unanue & Eduardo Barros & Marcos Gómez, 2021. "The Longitudinal Link between Organizational Citizenship Behaviors and Three Different Models of Happiness," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-20, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Franke, Henrik & Foerstl, Kai, 2018. "Fostering integrated research on organizational politics and conflict in teams: A cross-phenomenal review," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 593-607.
    2. Wu, Chia-Huei & Liu, Jun & Kwong Kwan, Ho & Lee, Cynthia, 2016. "Why and when workplace ostracism inhibits organizational citizenship behaviors: an organizational identification perspective," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64006, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Tahira Rasheed & Arshad Zaheer & Sadaf Manzoor, 2021. "Do Narcissists Tend to Reduce Interpersonal Conflicts in Organizations? The Effects of Abusive Supervision on Ostracism and Interpersonal Conflicts," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 12(6), pages 43-58.
    4. Fang Shuai, 2019. "Homophily Exclusion or Homophily Preference? The Influence of the Executive Identity of Nonexecutive Directors on the Focal Firm Executive Pay and Ordinary Employee Pay," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 7(6), pages 550-567, December.
    5. Takuma Kimura & Mizuki Nishikawa, 2018. "Ethical Leadership and Its Cultural and Institutional Context: An Empirical Study in Japan," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(3), pages 707-724, September.
    6. David Amani & Ismail Juma Ismail, 2022. "Investigating the predicting role of COVID-19 preventive measures on building brand legitimacy in the hospitality industry in Tanzania: mediation effect of perceived brand ethicality," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Lau, Patricia Yin Yin & Tong, Jane L.Y. Terpstra & Lien, Bella Ya-Hui & Hsu, Yen-Chen & Chong, Chooi Ling, 2017. "Ethical work climate, employee commitment and proactive customer service performance: Test of the mediating effects of organizational politics," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 20-26.
    8. Stroe, Silvia & Sirén, Charlotta & Shepherd, Dean & Wincent, Joakim, 2020. "The dualistic regulatory effect of passion on the relationship between fear of failure and negative affect: Insights from facial expression analysis," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(4).
    9. Julian D. Cortes & Diego Tellez & Jesus Godoy, 2021. "Mission Statement Effect on Research and Innovation Performance," Papers 2104.07476, arXiv.org.
    10. Aishwarya Narayan & Sumukh Hungund, 2022. "Enhancing Firm Performance Through Adoption of Innovation: an Empirical Evidence from Indian Biotechnological Firms," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 2431-2456, September.
    11. Zeeshan Ahmed & Shahid Rasool & Qasim Saleem & Mubashir Ali Khan & Shamsa Kanwal, 2022. "Mediating Role of Risk Perception Between Behavioral Biases and Investor’s Investment Decisions," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    12. Anya Johnson & Shanta Dey & Helena Nguyen & Markus Groth & Sadhbh Joyce & Leona Tan & Nicholas Glozier & Samuel B Harvey, 2020. "A review and agenda for examining how technology-driven changes at work will impact workplace mental health and employee well-being," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 45(3), pages 402-424, August.
    13. Lance Ferris, D. & Fatimah, Shereen & Yan, Ming & Liang, Lindie H. & Lian, Huiwen & Brown, Douglas J., 2019. "Being sensitive to positives has its negatives: An approach/avoidance perspective on reactivity to ostracism," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 138-149.
    14. Alkhaser Sappayani & Glein Bustamante & Doreen Agrazamendez & Alvin Cayogyog, 2024. "Emotional Intelligence, Organizational Justice, Character Development and Self-Correct Among School Leaders as Perceived by Teachers," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(4), pages 376-388, April.
    15. Furkan Baser & Soner Gokten & Guray Kucukkocaoglu & Hasan Ture, 2016. "Liquidity-Profitability Tradeoff Existence In Turkey: An Empirical Investigation Under Structural Equation Modeling," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 5(2), pages 27-44.
    16. Bi-Juan Zhong & Yaping Gong & Oded Shenkar & Yadong Luo & Zhixing Xiao & Shuming Zhao, 2023. "Managing the hearts of boundary spanners: CEO organizational identification and international joint venture performance," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 87-119, March.
    17. Long-Zeng Wu & Ho Kwong Kwan & Li-Qun Wei & Jun Liu, 2013. "Ingratiation in the Workplace: The Role of Subordinate and Supervisor Political Skill," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(6), pages 991-1017, September.
    18. Robert Cialdini & Yexin Jessica Li & Adriana Samper & Ned Wellman, 2021. "How Bad Apples Promote Bad Barrels: Unethical Leader Behavior and the Selective Attrition Effect," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(4), pages 861-880, February.
    19. Jie Xin & Shouming Chen & Ho Kwong Kwan & Randy K. Chiu & Frederick Hong-kit Yim, 2018. "Work–Family Spillover and Crossover Effects of Sexual Harassment: The Moderating Role of Work–Home Segmentation Preference," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(3), pages 619-629, February.
    20. Ruyu Xie & Liren An & Nosheena Yasir, 2022. "How Innovative Characteristics Influence Consumers’ Intention to Purchase Electric Vehicle: A Moderating Role of Lifestyle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-24, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:25:y:2014:i:4:p:1026-1055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.